1 1 OSIRIS CODEBOOK LIST PROGRAM, SEPTEMBER 1972. - OPTIONS THAT WILL BE USED ARE: 0 T= 1 MODE= 1 AUTODK= 1 IDWIDTH= IZ= 56 SPACOPT= 1 LOCOPT= 1 UNDOPT= T= 1 DATAID='7225' FREQOPT= 1 INFILE='IN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 1 1 - - 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY - 0 PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS 0 PHILIP CONVERSE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN JOHN MEISEL QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY MAURICE PINARD MCGILL UNIVERSITY PETER REGENSTREIF UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MILDRED SCHWARTZ NORC, UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO 1966 - ICPR EDITION FIRST PRINTING, 1972 - INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL RESEARCH BOX 1248 ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48106 1 - - ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ASSISTANCE - ALL MANUSCRIPTS UTILIZING DATA MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE CONSORTIUM SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT AS WELL AS IDENTIFY THE ORIGINAL COLLECTOR OF THE DATA. THE ICPR COUNCIL URGES ALL USERS OF ICPR DATA FACILITIES TO FOLLOW SOME ADAPTATION OF THIS STATEMENT WITH THE PARENTHESES INDICATING ITEMS TO BE FILLED IN APPROPRIATELY OR DELETED BY THE INDIVIDUAL USER. - THE DATA (AND TABULATIONS) UTILIZED IN THIS (PUBLICATION) WERE MADE AVAILABLE (IN PART) BY THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL RESEARCH. THE DATA WERE ORIGINALLY COLLECTED BY PHILIP CONVERSE, JOHN MEISEL, MAURICE PINARD, PETER REGENSTREIF, AND MILDRED SCHWARTZ. NEITHER THE ORIGINAL COLLECTORS OF THE DATA NOR THE CONSORTIUM BEAR ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ANALYSES OR INTERPRETATIONS PRESENTED HERE. - IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING AGENCIES WITH ESSENTIAL INFOR- MATION ABOUT THE USE OF ARCHIVAL RESOURCES, AND TO FACILITATE THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT ICPR PARTICIPANTS' RESEARCH ACTIVITIES, EACH USER OF THE ICPR DATA FACILITIES IS EXPECTED TO SEND TWO COPIES OF EACH COMPLETED MANUSCRIPT TO THE CONSORTIUM. PLEASE INDICATE IN THE COVER LETTER WHICH DATA WERE USED. 1 STUDY DESCRIPTION THE 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY WAS CONDUCTED BY PHILIP CONVERSE (THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN), JOHN MEISEL (QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY), MAURICE PINARD (MCGILL UNIVERSITY), PETER REGENSTREIF (UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER), AND MILDRED SCHWARTZ (NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER, THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO). THE RESPONDENTS WERE ADMINISTERED A POST-ELECTION SURVEY DURING THE AUTUMN AND EARLY WINTER OF 1965-1966. THE INTERVIEW SCHEDULE, CONSISTING OF BOTH OPEN- AND CLOSED-ENDED QUESTIONS, SPANNED A WIDE AREA OF POLITICAL, SOCIOLOGICAL, AND PERSONAL DATA. THE MAIN THRUST OF THE INVESTIGATION WAS DIRECTED TOWARD THE RESPONDENTS' POLITICAL ATTITUDES AND OPINIONS, AND THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF THE CANADIAN PARTIES, LEADERS, AND CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES. OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS TAPPED THE RESPONDENTS' PERCEPTION OF THE PROBLEMS CONFRONTING CANADA, WHICH OF THESE PROBLEMS RELATED PERSONALLY TO THEM, AND WHAT CAMPAIGN ISSUES WERE RAISED DURING THE ELECTION. THE STUDY CONTAINS CLOSED-ENDED QUESTIONS WHICH PROBE THE RESPONDENTS' REACTIONS TO SPECIFIC ELECTION CONTROVERSIES. THE STANDARD VARIABLES ON POLITICAL EFFICACY AND CYNICISM TOWARDS GOVERNMENT WERE INCLUDED ALONG WITH SOME QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO THE RESPONDENTS' PAST AND PRESENT FINANCIAL STATUS, AND HIS/HER EXPECTED FINANCIAL POSITION IN THE FUTURE AS A RESULT OF THE ELECTION OUTCOME. PROVINCIAL AND REGIONAL CONFLICTS AND AFFINITIES WERE EXPLORED BY SEVERAL QUESTIONS INQUIRING WHICH PROVINCES WERE MORE POWERFUL, BETTER OFF, AND WORSE OFF. PERCEPTIONS OF POLITICAL PARTIES (IN SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL FORM) WERE OBTAINED BY ASKING THE RESPONDENTS TO COMPARE THEIR "IDEAL PARTY" WITH THE ACTUAL CANADIAN PARTIES, AND BY INQUIRING WHICH TWO FEDERAL PARTIES WERE "MOST ALIKE" IN THE RESPOND- ENTS' OPINION AND WHICH TWO WERE "LEAST ALIKE". RESPONDENTS WERE QUERIED ABOUT THE REGIONAL SOURCES OF POWER OF CONTEMPOR- ARY POLITICAL FIGURES IN A LIST, AND THEY WERE ASKED TO MENTION THEIR CHOICE OF PRIME MINISTER. MANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE RESPONDENTS' POLITICAL PARTY ASSOCIATIONS AND ATTACHMENTS ARE INCLUDED IN THE STUDY. IF RESPONDENTS HAD CHANGED THEIR PARTY ATTACHMENT SOMETIME IN THE PAST, OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS PROBED FOR THE CAUSES OF THE SHIFT. DATA CONCERNING THE RESPONDENTS' PREVIOUS VOTING BEHAVIOUR WERE SOLICITED AS WELL AS INFORMATION ON POLITICAL AND VOTING ACTIVITIES FOR 1965. ALSO, DATA WERE COLLECTED REGARDING THE RESPONDENTS' CAMPAIGN ACTIVITES, PARTY INVOLVEMENT, AND TIME OR MONEY CONTRIBUTIONS AS WELL AS THE RESPONDENTS' ATTITUDES ABOUT CAMPAIGN FINANCING. PERSONAL DATA INCLUDE THE STANDARD VARIABLES, SUCH AS EDUCATION, RELIGION, OCCUPATION, AND AGE, IN ADDITION TO VARIABLES SUCH AS MEMBERSHIP IN VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONS AND THE INDIVIDUALS' MOBILITY WITHIN CANADA. 1 THE FOLLOWING VARIABLES WERE ASKED OF QUEBEC RESIDENTS ONLY: (1) THE RESPONDENTS' PRESENT AND FUTURE EVALUATION OF THE CAOUETTE WING OF THE SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY AND (2) FREQUENCY OF EXTRA-FAMILIAL ACQUAINTANCES. 0 SAMPLING INFORMATION INDIVIDUALS INTERVIEWED FOR THE "1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY" FORM A STRATIFIED PROBABILITY CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE OF THE CANADIAN POPULATION ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN 1965. THE SAMPLE POPULATION WAS DRAWN FROM A BASE WHICH EXCLUDED APPROXIMATELY 7% OF THE CANADIAN POPULATION (DUE TO RESIDENCE IN CONSTITUENCIES WITH LOW ACCESSIBILITY), AND INCLUDED FROM THE REMAINING 93%, ONLY THOSE PERSONS ENUMERATED ON THE PRELIMINARY 1965 LIST OF VOTERS. FROM THE RESULTING POPULATION, CONSTITUENCIES WERE STRATIFIED ON THE BASIS OF THESE VARIABLES: (1) PROVINCE, (2) RURAL-URBAN DISTRIBUTION, AND (3) 1963 LIBERAL VOTING PERCENTAGES (EXCEPT IN RURAL QUEBEC WHERE THE CREDITISTE PERCENTAGES WERE SUBSTITUTED FOR LIBERAL). CONSTITUENCIES IN WHICH INTERVIEWS WOULD BE TAKEN WERE SELECTED BY THE FOLLOWING METHOD: 1. AN INTERVAL (I) WAS CREATED BY DIVIDING THE TOTAL BASE POPULATION OF THE SAMPLE BY 121 (THE NUMBER OF SAMPLING CLUSTERS DESIRED AS OPTIMAL). 2. A RANDOM START NUMBER (R) WAS SELECTED WITHIN THAT INTERVAL. 3. THE INTERVAL VALUE AND THE RANDOM START NUMBER WERE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A NAME LIST OF THE TOTAL BASE POPULATION SUCH THAT CONSTITUENCIES IN WHICH THE VOTERS R, R+I, R+2I,..., R+120I RESIDED WERE INCLUDED IN THE SAMPLE. THUS, THE FINAL SAMPLE INCLUDED 121 CLUSTERS; HOWEVER, THE POPULATION OF THREE CLUSTERS (HALIFAX, YORK-SCARBOROUGH, AND EDMONTON-STRATHCONA) WAS LARGE ENOUGH TO BE SAMPLED TWICE, WHICH EXPLAINS WHY ONLY 118 CONSTITUENCIES APPEAR IN THE SAMPLE. 0 THE SELECTION OF POLLING DIVISIONS WITHIN THE CHOSEN CONSTITUENCIES CONSTITUTED THE NEXT SAMPLING STEP. IT WAS CARRIED OUT AS FOLLOWS: 1. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF AVAILABLE POLLING DIVISIONS IN THE CONSTITUENCY WAS DIVIDED BY 28 AND ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST WHOLE NUMBER. THIS WAS THE INTERVAL I. 2. A RANDOM NUMBER BETWEEN 1 AND THIS INTERVAL WAS THEN CHOSEN. THIS WAS THE START NUMBER M. 3. POLLING DIVISIONS NUMBERED M, M+I, M+2I... WERE 1 RECORDED UNTIL THE LIST OF POLLS WAS EXHAUSTED. THIS YIELDED 27, 28, OR 29 POLL NUMBERS PER CONSTITUENCY IN EVERY CASE. THE NUMBER OF VOTERS IN THE POLL WAS ENTERED BESIDE EACH POLL NUMBER AND THESE WERE LISTED IN ORDER AND TOTALLED. 4. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTERS WAS DIVIDED BY 7 (THE NUMBER OF POLLS TO BE FINALLY CHOSEN) TO YIELD A NEW INTERVAL (R). 5. A NEW RANDOM NUMBER (P) EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN THE NEW INTERVAL, R, WAS PICKED. 6. THE 7 POLLS FROM WHICH RESPONDENTS WERE SELECTED WERE OBTAINED BY STARTING AT THE POLLING DIVISION IN THE LIST NUMBERED P, AND INCLUDING THIS POLL AND P+R, P+2R, ..., P+6R. 0 THE SELECTION OF THE INDIVIDUAL RESPONDENTS PROCEEDED AS FOLLOWS: 1. A RANDOM NUMBER BETWEEN 0 AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTERS ON THE LIST WAS SELECTED. 2. THE PERSON WHOSE NAME FELL BESIDE THAT NUMBER WAS SELECTED, AND THEREAFTER, EVERY 8TH PERSON (TO AVOID CHOOSING MORE THAN ONE MEMBER OF THE SAME FAMILY) UNTIL THERE WERE SIX NAMES. THE FIRST FOUR OF THESE WERE THE RESPONDENTS, THE OTHER TWO WERE SPARES TO BE INTERVIEWED ONLY IN THE EVENT THAT THE SAMPLE SIZE WOULD HAVE BEEN INCREASED. THE INVESTIGATORS PROCEEDED FROM THE ASSUMPTION THAT 28 INTERVIEWS PER CLUSTER WOULD BE DESIRABLE. THE RESULT WAS AN ORIGINAL POTENTIAL SAMPLE SIZE OF 3388 NAMES. BEFORE THE ACTUAL INTERVIEW, EACH OF THESE INDIVIDUALS WAS MAILED A LETTER EXPLAINING THE PURPOSE OF THE SURVEY AND THE OBJECT OF THE INTERVIEW. THE INVESTIGATORS HOPED THAT THE LETTER WOULD YIELD A HIGHER RESPONSE RATE. THE ACTUAL FIELD WORK WAS ACCOMPLISHED BY CANADIAN FACTS, A COMMERCIAL MARKETING RESEARCH ORGANIZATION WITH A NATION-WIDE FIELD ORGANIZATION. THE INTERVIEWERS WERE INSTRUCTED TO MAKE THREE ATTEMPTS TO SURVEY EACH POTENTIAL RESPONDENT. IN CERTAIN AREAS (ESPECIAL- LY TORONTO, VANCOUVER, AND WINDSOR), A SECOND LETTER WAS SENT TO THE ORIGINAL POTENTIAL RESPONDENTS IN ORDER TO IMPROVE THE RESPONSE RATE. THE OVERALL RESPONSE RATE WAS APPROXIMATELY 62.5 PERCENT. THE DATA FOR THIS STUDY ARE BASED ON 2118 COMPLETED INTERVIEWS. FIVE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES ORIGINALLY SCREENED FROM INCLUSION WERE RECENTLY REVIEWED, CODED AND ADDED TO THE STUDY. CONSEQUENTLY, THE UNWEIGHTED N OF 2118 DIFFERS BY 5 FROM THE N OF 2113 REPORTED IN PUBLICATIONS BASED ON A DATA SOURCE PRIOR TO THE PRESENT RELEASE. 1 FOR A MORE DETAILED EXPLANATION OF THE SAMPLING METHOD, THE USER SHOULD CONSULT JOHN MEISEL AND RICK VAN LOON, "CANADIAN ATTITUDES TO ELECTION EXPENSES 1965-1966", IN COMMITTEE ON ELECTION EXPENSES, STUDIES IN CANADIAN PARTY FINANCE (OTTAWA: QUEEN'S PRINTER, 1966), PP. 23-146. 0 WEIGHTING INFORMATION TWO FORMS OF THE WEIGHT VARIABLE ARE PRESENT IN THE STUDY--AN INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE AND A DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE. BOTH VERSIONS CORRECT SAMPLING DEFFICIENCIES IN IDENTICAL FASHION, ONLY ONE OF THE VARIABLES USES INTEGER VALUES AND THE OTHER, DECIMAL NUMBERS. THE USER MUST DECIDE WHICH FORM OF THE WEIGHT VARIABLE IS MOST DESIRABLE FOR THE ANALYSIS PROGRAMS AT HIS/HER COMPUTER INSTALLATION. BEAR IN MIND, HOWEVER, THAT A VERSION OF THE WEIGHT VARIABLE MUST BE ALWAYS USED WHEN EXECUTING ANALYSIS PROGRAMS ON THE DATA. - WEIGHT VARIABLE TYPE UNWEIGHTED N WEIGHTED N 0 INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE (V3) 2118 8193 DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE (V4) 2118 2729.04 0 PLEASE NOTE THAT IN SOME PUBLICATIONS THE WEIGHTED N (WEIGHTED BY THE DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE) IS REPORTED AS 2596 INSTEAD OF 2729.04 AS REPORTED HERE. THIS DISCREPANCY STEMS IN PART FROM THE FACT THAT THE BRITISH COLUMBIA RESPONDENTS WERE ORIGINALLY WRONGLY WEIGHTED. THE DATA SET DISTRIBUTED BY THE CONSORTIUM CORRECTS THE WEIGHTS FOR THE BRITISH COLUMBIA RESPONDENTS (ORIGINALLY 1, NOW 2) AS PER THE REQUEST OF PROFESSOR JOHN MEISEL. 0 PUBLICATIONS/PAPERS USING THE 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION DATA JOHN MEISEL & RICK VAN LOON, "CANADIAN ATTITUDES TO ELECTION EXPENSES 1965-1966", IN COMMITTEE ON ELECTION EX- PENSES, STUDIES IN CANADIAN PARTY FINANCE (OTTAWA: QUEEN'S PRINTER, 1966), PP. 23-146. RICK VAN LOON, "POLITICAL PARTICIPATION IN CANADA: THE 1965 ELECTION", CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE (III:3, SEPTEMBER, 1970), PP. 376-399. RICK VAN LOON & MICHAEL WHITTINGTON, THE CANADIAN POLITICAL SYSTEM (SCARBOROUGH: MCGRAW-HILL OF CANADA, 1971), PASSIM. MILDRED A. SCWARTZ, "CANADIAN VOTING BEHAVIOUR", IN RICHARD 1 ROSE (ED.), COMPARATIVE ELECTORAL BEHAVIOUR (NEW YORK: FREE PRESS, FORTHCOMING). MILDRED A. SCWARTZ, THE DIVISIONS OF CANADA (FORTHCOMING). JOHN MEISEL, "PARTY IMAGES IN CANADA: A REPORT ON WORK IN PRO- GRESS", WORKING PAPERS IN CANADIAN POLITICS (MCGILL -QUEEN'S PRESS, 1972). RICK VAN LOON, CANADIAN ELECTORAL PARTICIPATION (UNPUBLISHED PH.D. THESIS, QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY, 1968). PHILIP E. CONVERSE, GEORGES DUPEUX & JOHN MEISEL, "CONTINU- ITIES IN POPULAR POLITICAL CULTURE: FRENCH AND ANGLO-SAXON CONTRASTS IN CANADA". (UNPUBLISHED PAPER PRESENTED AT THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPARATIVE ELECTORAL BEHAVIOUR, HELD AT THE SURVEY RESEARCH CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN IN APRIL, 1967). 0 PROCESSING INFORMATION THE STUDY WAS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO ICPR-SURVEY RESEARCH ARCHIVE PROCESSING PROCEDURES. CODE CATEGORIES WERE RECODED TO ELIMINATE AMPS, DASHES, AND BLANKS PRESENT IN THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENTATION. "MISSING DATA", RELIGION, AND COUNTRY CODES WERE RECODED TO CONFORM TO ICPR STANDARDIZED CODES. A LIMITED NUMBER OF WILD CODES WERE ENCOUNTERED IN OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS AND CORRECTED BY INSPECTING THE QUESTIONNAIRE OF THE RESPOND- ENTS INVOLVED. SOME VARIABLES WERE REFORMATTED TO ACCOMPLISH MORE EFFICIENT ACCESS OF THE DATA FOR THE USER, OR ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION OF THE DATA. V260-V262 AND V294-V295 ARE VARIABLES WHICH WERE REFORMATTED TO FACILITATE THE USER'S ACCESS TO THE DATA. EACH OF THESE VARIABLES CONSISTS OF TWO OR MORE SETS OF QUESTIONS ASKED OF DIFFERENT GROUPS OF RESPONDENTS, WITH EACH SET OF QUESTIONS FOLLOWING A CONSTRUCTION PARALLEL TO THE OTHER ONE(S). RATHER THAN PROVIDE THE USER WITH SEVERAL VARIABLES WHICH MUST BE ACCESSED INDIVIDUALLY IN ORDER TO DETERMINE THE TOTALITY OF THE INFORMATION, THE COMPARABLE QUESTIONS FROM THE VARIOUS SETS HAVE BEEN CONSOLIDATED IN SINGLE VARIABLES WITH A UNIFORM CODING SCHEME. V13-V23, V57-V84, V86-V105, AND V316-V326 ARE VARIABLES REFORMATTED TO ACCOMPLISH ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION OF THE CODING SCHEME. FOR EXAMPLE, SEVERAL CLUSTERS OF VARIABLES SAMPLE THE RESPONDENT'S OPINIONS OF THE VARIOUS PROVINCES. THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT SPECIFICALLY PROBED CONCERNING EACH INDIVIDUAL PROVINCE, BUT RATHER HE RESPONDED WITH THE NAMES OF THE PROVINCES THAT CAME TO HIS MIND, AS THOUGH THE QUESTION WERE OPEN-ENDED. FOR ANY GIVEN PROVINCE, THE ANSWERS OF THE RESPONDENTS WHO DID NOT MENTION THAT PARTICULAR PROVINCE BUT RESPONDED TO THE QUESTION WITH OTHER NAMES WERE SEPARATED IN THE CODING SCHEME FROM THE CATEGORIES OF "NA" OR "INAP" WHERE 1 THEY HAD PREVIOUSLY RESIDED. 0 FREQUENCIES FREQUENCIES FOR ALL VARIABLES IN THIS CODEBOOK HAVE BEEN INSERTED EITHER TO THE LEFT OF THE CODE VALUE (SEE 12 IN THE CODEBOOK INFORMATION SECTION) OR DIRECTLY UNDER THE LAST CODE DESCRIPTION. THE FREQUENCIES PROVIDED IN THIS CODEBOOK ARE WEIGHTED BY THE INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE (VAR- IABLE 3). 1 CODEBOOK INFORMATION THE EXAMPLE BELOW IS A REPRODUCTION (NOT ACTUAL SIZE) OF INFORMATION APPEARING IN THE MACHINE-READABLE CODEBOOK FOR A TYPICAL VARIABLE. THE NUMBERS IN CIRCLES DO NOT APPEAR IN THE CODEBOOK, BUT ARE REFERENCES TO THE DESCRIPTIONS WHICH FOLLOW THIS EXAMPLE. .............................................................. (1) VAR 0014 (1) REF 0014 (2) DATA SET ID='7225' (3) NAME-XNEWFNDLND PWRFL? (4) MD=0 OR GE 8 (5)---------- (6) LOC 32 WIDTH 1 (7) DK 1 COL 33 (8)------- - (9) NEWFOUNDLAND MORE POWERFUL? .......................................................... 1113 100. UNWEIGHTED CASES 588 133. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES #049-#080) 417 200. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES #040-#048, #081-#088, AND #111-#118) 0 '1' DK 1 COL 14 ... 0 VAR 0005 REF 0005 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-PROVINCE OF INTERVIEW NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 14 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 15 0 PROVINCE ........ 72 0. PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND 219 1. NOVA SCOTIA 324 2. NEW BRUNSWICK 72 3. NEWFOUNDLAND 2391 4. QUEBEC 3162 5. ONTARIO 390 6. MANITOBA 282 7. SASKATCHEWAN 513 8. ALBERTA 768 9. BRITISH COLUMBIA 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 3 - 0 VAR 0006 REF 0006 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-R'S CONSTITUENCY NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 15 WIDTH 3 DK 1 COL 16-18 0 RESPONDENT'S CONSTITUENCY CONSTITUENCIES ARE NUMBERED CONSECUTIVELY, BEGINNING WITH 001 (ST. JOHN'S WEST, NEWFOUNDLAND) THROUGH 118 (VICTORIA, BRITISH COLUMBIA). THE CONSTITUENCY IS THE BASIS FOR DETERMINING THE RESPONDENT'S VALUE IN THE WEIGHT VARIABLES. SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 3 AND 4. .......................................................... NEW FOUNDLAND 42 001. ST. JOHN'S WEST 30 002. ST. JOHN'S EAST 0 NOVA SCOTIA 30 003. CAPE BRITON NORTH AND VICTORIA 63 004. COLCHESTER-HANTS 30 005. CUMBERLAND 96 006. HALIFAX 0 PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND 72 007. KINGS 0 NEW BRUNSWICK 63 008. CHARLOTTE 66 009. NORTHUMBERLAND-MIRAMICHI 42 010. RESTIGOUCHE-MADAWASKA 48 011. ROYAL 39 012. SAINT JOHN-ALBERT 66 013. WESTMORLAND 0 QUEBEC 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 4 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 51 014. BEAUCE 48 015. BEAUHARNOIS-SALABERRY 42 016. BELLECHASSE 81 017. CHAMBLY-ROUVILLE 51 018. CHICOUTIMI 87 019. DRUMMOND-ARTHABASKA 48 020. GATINEAU 39 021. HULL 51 022. JOLIETTE-L'ASSUMPTION-MONTCALM 57 023. LEVIS 48 024. LONGUEUIL 51 025. MATAPEDIA-MATANE 66 026. MEGANTIC 60 027. PORTNEUF 60 028. QUEBEC-OUEST 36 029. QUEBEC-SUD 54 030. QUEBEC-MONTMORENCY 75 031. RICHMOND-WOLF 45 032. RIMOUSKI 69 033. SAINT HYACINTHE-BAGOT 39 034. SAINT JEAN-IBERVILLE-NAPIERVILLE 72 035. SAINT-MAURICE-LAFLECHE 39 036. SHEFFORD 66 037. SHERBROOKE 69 038. TERREBONNE 63 039. TROIS-RIVIERES 72 040. CARTIER 114 041. JACQUES-CARTIER-LASALLE 120 042. LAVAL 108 043. MERCIER 120 044. MONT-ROYAL 102 045. NOTRE-DAME-DE-GRACE 102 046. OUTREMONT-SAINT-JEAN 114 047. SAINT-DENIS 72 048. SAINT-JACQUES 0 ONTARIO 52 049. ALGOMA WEST 60 050. BRANTFORD 92 051. BRANT-HALDIMAND 72 052. BRUCE 80 053. CARLETON 76 054. DURHAM 40 055. ESSEX EAST 116 056. ESSEX SOUTH 44 057. ESSEX WEST 48 058. HAMILTON SOUTH 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 5 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 80 059. HAMILTON WEST 76 060. HASTINGS-FRONTENAC 72 061. LAMBTON-KENT 80 062. LONDON 76 063. MIDDLESEX EAST 56 064. NIAGARA FALLS 60 065. NICKEL BELT 84 066. NORFOLK 88 067. ONTARIO 72 068. PEEL 76 069. PERTH 76 070. PETERBOROUGH 88 071. PORT ARTHUR 68 072. PRINCE EDWARD LENNOX 104 073. RENFREW SOUTH 80 074. RUSSELL 76 075. STORMONT 60 076. SUDBURY 88 077. WELLAND 84 078. WELLINGTON-HURON 80 079. WELLINGTON-SOUTH 48 080. WENTWORTH 108 081. YORK CENTRE 96 082. YORK HUMBER 228 083. YORK SCARBOROUGH 150 084. YORK WEST 24 085. BROADVIEW 90 086. EGLINTON 72 087. PARKDALE 42 088. ROSEDALE 0 MANITOBA 54 089. BRANDON-SOURIS 33 090. PORTAGE-NEEPAWA 57 091. ST. BONIFACE 57 092. SPRINGFIELD 42 093. WINNIPEG NORTH 54 094. WINNIPEG NORTH CENTRE 51 095. WINNIPEG SOUTH 42 096. WINNIPEG SOUTH CENTRE 0 SASKATCHEWAN 66 097. MOOSE MOUNTAIN 54 098. QU'APPELLE 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 6 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 48 099. REGINA CITY 6 100. ROSETOWN-BIGGAR 42 101. ROSTHERN 66 102. SASKATOON 0 ALBERTA 69 103. BOW RIVER 63 104. CALGARY NORTH 66 105. CALGARY SOUTH 54 106. EDMONTON EAST 117 107. EDMONTON-STRATHCONA 39 108. EDMONTON-WEST 42 109. MEDICINE HAT 63 110. RED DEER 0 BRITISH COLUMBIA 108 111. BURNABY COQUITLAM 120 112. COAST-CAPILANO 102 113. FRASER VALLEY 90 114. NEW WESTMINSTER 60 115. VANCOUVER CENTRE 78 116. VANCOUVER EAST 114 117. VANCOUVER QUADRA 96 118. VICTORIA 0 0 VAR 0007 REF 0007 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SIZE OF PLACE MD=GE 99 LOC 18 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 19-20 0 SIZE OF PLACE (SUBURBS WERE DEFINED AS PLACES PHYSICALLY COTERMINOUS WITH CITIES OR SO CLOSE AS TO BE PART OF ONE URBAN AREA.) ................................................. 1110 01. CITY 500,000 AND OVER 635 02. SUBURB OF CITY 500,000 AND OVER 866 11. CITY 250,000-499,999 378 12. SUBURB OF CITY 250,000-499,999 540 21. CITY 100,000-249,999 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 7 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 110 22. SUBURB OF CITY 100,000-249,999 598 31. CITY 50,000-99,999 961 40. TOWN 10,000-49,999 764 50. TOWN 2500-9,999 1196 60. VILLAGE UNDER 2500 995 70. RURAL ROUTE ADDRESS; MENTION OF COUNTY ONLY; NO STREET ADDRESS AND FARM OCCUPATION. 40 99. N.A. 0 0 VAR 0008 REF 0008 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-MOST IMP PBMS FOR CANADA MD=GE 90 MULT RESPS 2 LOC 20 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 21-24 0 Q. 1. YOU HEAR A LOT ABOUT THE PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY TODAY AND WE ARE INTERESTED IN GETTING OPINIONS ON THESE FROM YOU. IN YOUR OPINION WHAT PROBLEMS FACING THE COUNTRY ARE MOST IMPORTANT? ........................................................... ECONOMIC PROBLEMS 1898 11. TAXES, INFLATION, PRICES, HIGH COST OF LIVING, LOW SALARIES, POVERTY 623 12. COMMERCE, TRADE, ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, NATURAL RESOURCES, FINANCE, PUBLIC DEBT, MONETARY POLICY. 302 13. OTHERS (GENERAL RUBRICS SUCH AS THE ECONOMY, ECONOMIC SITUATION) 1506 14. UNEMPLOYMENT AND AUTOMATION. 254 15. AGRICULTURAL PROBLEMS. 0 SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 874 16. OLD AGE PENSION AND PENSION PLAN 74 17. FAMILY ALLOWANCES 603 18. HEALTH, WELFARE AND MEDICARE. 194 19. OTHERS (OR GENERALLY) 889 20. EDUCATIONAL PROBLEMS (INCLUDES TECHNICAL TRAINING) 0 RELIGIOUS AND MORAL PROBLEMS 56 21. RELIGIOUS 80 22. MORAL (CHANGING VALUES, ETC.) 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 8 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 FOREIGN RELATIONS 299 23. U.S.A. RELATIONS (INCLUDES SPECIFIC PROBLEM OF U.S. ECONOMIC INFLUENCE) 35 24. COMMUNISM. 751 25. WAR, DEFENCE, NUCLEAR THREAT, VIET NAM 122 26. OTHERS (SUCH AS FOREIGN AID, ETC.) 0 POLITICAL PROBLEMS 959 27. ETHNIC RELATIONS, BILINGUAL & BICULTURAL SEPARATISM 289 28. NATIONAL UNITY AND IDENTITY. 78 29. FEDERAL PROVINCIAL RELATIONS. 261 30. MAJORITY GOVERNMENT. 382 31. LACK OF STABILITY AND/OR LEADERSHIP IN GOVERNMENT. 67 32. PARTY STRUCTURE OR SYSTEM. 19 33. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (WASTE OR TAXES, ETC.) 64 34. CORRUPTION AND SCANDAL. 58 35. SOCIALISM. 516 36. OTHERS (OR GENERALLY). 0 SOCIAL PROBLEMS 203 37. IMMIGRATION, INDIANS, RACE RELATIONS (B AND W) 64 38. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. 136 39. LABOUR-MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS, STRIKES. 203 40. OTHERS. 431 81. ALL OTHER PROBLEMS. 123 90. IRRELEVANT, NO SPECIAL PROBLEM. 3198 92. INAP. (NO SECOND RESPONSE) 775 99. NO ANSWER, DON'T KNOW. 0 0 VAR 0009 REF 0009 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-PBM SPECIAL CONCERN TO R MD=GE 90 MULT RESPS 2 LOC 24 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 25-28 0 Q. 2-A. (IF PROBLEM MENTIONED IN REF. NO. 8) WHICH ONE OF THESE PROBLEMS IS OF SPECIAL CONCERN TO YOU PERSONALLY? .......................................................... 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 9 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 ECONOMIC PROBLEMS 1852 11. TAXES, INFLATION, PRICES, HIGH COST OF LIVING, LOW SALARIES, POVERTY. 311 12. COMMERCE, TRADE, ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, NATURAL RESOURCES, FINANCE, PUBLIC DEBT, MONETARY POLICY. 143 13. OTHERS (GENERAL RUBRICS SUCH AS THE ECONOMY, ECONOMIC SITUATION) 779 14. UNEMPLOYMENT AND AUTOMATION. 181 15. AGRICULTURAL PROBLEMS. 0 SOCIAL SECURITY PROGRAMS 566 16. OLD AGE PENSION AND PENSION PLAN. 33 17. FAMILY ALLOWANCES 340 18. HEALTH, WELFARE AND MEDICARE. 116 19. OTHERS (OR GENERALLY) 615 20. EDUCATIONAL PROBLEMS (INCLUDES TECHNICAL TRAINING) 0 RELIGIOUS AND MORAL PROBLEMS 50 21. RELIGIOUS. 46 22. MORAL (CHANGING VALUES, ETC.) 0 FOREIGN RELATIONS 174 23. U.S.A. RELATIONS (INCLUDES SPECIFIC PROBLEM OF U.S. ECONOMIC INFLUENCE) 16 24. COMMUNISM 279 25. WAR, DEFENCE, NUCLEAR THREAT, VIET NAM. 39 26. OTHERS (SUCH AS FOREIGN AID, ETC.) 0 POLITICAL PROBLEMS 463 27. ETHNIC RELATIONS, BILINGUAL & BICULTURAL SEPARATISM 171 28. NATIONAL UNITY AND IDENTITY. 33 29. FEDERAL PROVINCIAL RELATIONS. 121 30. MAJORITY GOVERNMENT. 215 31. LACK OF STABILITY AND/OR LEADERSHIP IN GOVERNMENT. 23 32. PARTY STRUCTURE OR SYSTEM. 25 33. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (WASTE OF TAXES, ETC.) 45 34. CORRUPTION AND SCANDAL. 51 35. SOCIALISM. 250 36. OTHERS (OR GENERALLY). 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 10 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 SOCIAL PROBLEMS 84 37. IMMIGRATION, INDIANS, RACE RELATIONS (B AND W). 40 38. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. 65 39. LABOUR-MANAGEMENT PROBLEMS, STRIKES. 168 40. OTHERS. 237 81. ALL OTHER PROBLEMS. 45 90. IRRELEVANT, NO SPECIAL PROBLEM. 68 91. INAP.; CODED 90 IN FIRST RESP. REF. NO. 8. 7062 92. NO SECOND MENTION 1680 99. NO ANSWER, DON'T KNOW 0 0 VAR 0010 REF 0010 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-R'S FLGS ABT ELCTN RSLTS MD=0 LOC 28 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 29 0 Q. 3-A. AS YOU KNOW ON NOVEMBER THE 8TH WE HAD A FEDERAL ELECTION. PEOPLE ARE TALKING A LOT ABOUT THIS ELECTION AND HOW IT TURNED OUT. DO YOU HAPPEN TO HAVE ANY FEELINGS ABOUT HOW THE ELECTION TURNED OUT? ......................................................... 3373 1. DISPLEASED BECAUSE ELECTION USELESS OR UNWARRANTED (ANSWERS SUCH AS "WE SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD IT," IT'S A WASTE OF MONEY" OR "IT CHANGES NOTHING"); OR DISPLEASED BECAUSE NO MAJORITY OBTAINED 367 2. DISPLEASED BECAUSE HIS PARTY LOST. 1522 3. DISPLEASED (NO SPECIFIC REASON GIVEN OR REASON OTHER THAN ABOVE) 0 NEUTRAL FEELINGS. 347 4. A. EXPECTED THE RESULTS. 214 5. B. INDIFFERENCE (DOESN'T CARE HOW IT CAME OUT) 424 6. C. FEELINGS UNKNOWN (IRRELEVANT ANSWERS THAT DON'T INDICATE RESPONDENT'S FEELINGS) 96 7. D. OTHERS (ANSWERS THAT DON'T GIVE THE RESPONDENT'S FEELINGS BUT THAT ARE NOT IRRELEVANT.) 0 293 8. PLEASED BECAUSE THIS PARTY WON. 769 9. PLEASED (NO SPECIFIC REASON GIVEN OR REASON OTHER THAN ABOVE) 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 11 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 788 0. DON'T KNOW, NO OPINION, REFUSE, ETC. 0 NOTE: 1. AMBIGUITY IN THE QUESTION CAUSED MOST RESPONDENTS TO GIVE THEIR FEELINGS ABOUT THE "FEDERAL ELECTION," E.G. "WE SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD IT" AND ONLY A MINORITY GAVE THEIR FEELINGS ABOUT THE RESULTS OF THE FEDERAL ELECTION. 0 VAR 0011 REF 0011 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XR'S REASON FR OPINION MD=0 LOC 29 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 30 0 Q. 3-B. CAN YOU TELL ME SOMETHING MORE ABOUT WHY YOU FEEL THAT WAY ? (THE ANSWERS TO 3-A AND 3-B HAVE BEEN COMBINED IN REF. NO. 10 UNLESS THE RESPONDENT GAVE A DISTINCT ANSWER TO 3-B.) ........................................................ 319 1. DISPLEASED BECAUSE ELECTION USELESS OR UNWARRANTED (ANSWERS SUCH AS "WE SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD IT," "IT'S A WASTE OF MONEY" OR "IT CHANGES NOTHING"): OR DISPLEASED BECAUSE NO MAJORITY OBTAINED. 36 2. DISPLEASED BECAUSE HIS PARTY LOST. 797 3. DISPLEASED (NO SPECIFIC REASON GIVEN OR REASON OTHER THAN ABOVE). 0 NEUTRAL FEELINGS. 14 4. A. EXPECTED THE RESULTS. 7 5. B. INDIFFERENCE (DOESN'T CARE HOW IT CAME OUT). 34 6. C. FEELINGS UNKNOWN (IRRELEVANT ANSWERS THAT DON'T INDICATE RESPONDENT'S FEELINGS) 21 7. D. OTHERS (ANSWERS THAT DON'T GIVE THE RESPONDENT'S FEELINGS BUT THAT ARE NOT IRRELEVANT) 47 8. PLEASED BECAUSE HIS PARTY WON 75 9. PLEASED (NO SPECIFIC REASON GIVEN OR REASON OTHER THAN ABOVE). 6843 0. DON'T KNOW, NO OPINION, REFUSE, NO CODABLE OPINION. 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 12 - 0 VAR 0012 REF 0012 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WCH GOVT HANDLES PBMS MD=GE 8 LOC 30 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 31 0 Q. 4-A. THINKING NOW OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PROBLEMS FACING CANADA TODAY, WHICH GOVERNMENT WOULD YOU SAY HANDLES MOST OF THESE, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN OTTAWA OR THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS? ............................................................ 3901 1. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 1449 2. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS 1934 3. BOTH HANDLE THEM 209 4. NEITHER 691 8. DK 9 9. N.A. 0 0 VAR 0013 REF 0013 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-ANY PVNL GOVT MORE PWRFL MD=GE 8 LOC 31 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 32 0 Q. 4-B. ARE ANY PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL THAN OTHERS? .......................................................... 4785 1. YES 1629 2. NO 1779 8. DK, IF ANY ARE MORE POWERFUL 0 0 VAR 0014 REF 0014 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNEWFOUNDLAND POWERFUL? MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 32 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 33 0 NEWFOUNDLAND MORE POWERFUL? .............................................. 154 1. R MENTIONS NEWFOUNDLAND AS MORE POWERFUL 4561 5. R DOES NOT MENTION NEWFOUNDLAND 66 8. YES, SOME PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL, BUT DK WHICH PROVINCES ARE MORE POWERFUL 4 9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N.A. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 13 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 3408 0. INAP.; CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 13 0 0 VAR 0015 REF 0015 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XPRINCE ED ILND POWERFL? MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 33 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 34 0 PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND MORE POWERFUL? ...................................................... 9 1. R MENTIONS PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND AS MORE POWERFUL 4706 5. R DOES NOT MENTION PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND 66 8. YES, SOME PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL, BUT DK WHICH PROVINCES ARE MORE POWERFUL 4 9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N.A. 3408 0. INAP.; CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 13 0 0 VAR 0016 REF 0016 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNOVA SCOTIA POWERFUL? MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 34 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 35 0 NOVA SCOTIA MORE POWERFUL? ............................................. 78 1. R MENTIONS NOVA SCOTIA AS MORE POWERFUL 4637 5. R DOES NOT MENTION NOVA SCOTIA 66 8. YES, SOME PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL, BUT DK WHICH PROVINCES ARE MORE POWERFUL 4 9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N.A. 3408 0. INAP.; CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 13 0 0 VAR 0017 REF 0017 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNEW BRUNSWICK POWERFUL? MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 35 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 36 0 NEW BRUNSWICK MORE POWERFUL? ............................................... 67 1. R MENTIONS NEW BRUNSWICK AS MORE POWERFUL 4648 5. R DOES NOT MENTION NEW BRUNSWICK 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 14 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 66 8. YES, SOME PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL, BUT DK WHICH PROVINCES ARE MORE POWERFUL 4 9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N.A. 3408 0. INAP.; CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 13 0 0 VAR 0018 REF 0018 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XQUEBEC POWERFUL? MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 36 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 37 0 QUEBEC MORE POWERFUL? ........................................ 2911 1. R MENTIONS QUEBEC AS MORE POWERFUL 1804 5. R DOES NOT MENTION QUEBEC 66 8. YES, SOME PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL, BUT DK WHICH PROVINCES ARE MORE POWERFUL 4 9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N.A. 3408 0. INAP.; CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 13 0 0 VAR 0019 REF 0019 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XONTARIO POWERFUL? MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 37 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 38 0 ONTARIO MORE POWERFUL? ......................................... 2679 1. R MENTIONS ONTARIO AS MORE POWERFUL 2036 5. R DOES NOT MENTION ONTARIO 66 8. YES, SOME PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL, BUT DK WHICH PROVINCES ARE MORE POWERFUL 4 9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N.A. 3408 0. INAP.; CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 13 0 0 VAR 0020 REF 0020 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XMANITOBA POWERFUL? MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 38 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 39 0 MANITOBA MORE POWERFUL? .......................................... 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 15 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 149 1. R MENTIONS MANITOBA AS MORE POWERFUL 4566 5. R DOES NOT MENTION MANITOBA 66 8. YES, SOME PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL, BUT DK WHICH PROVINCES ARE MORE POWERFUL 4 9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N.A. 3408 0. INAP.; CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 13 0 0 VAR 0021 REF 0021 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XSASKATCHEWAN POWERFUL? MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 39 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 40 0 SASKATCHEWAN MORE POWERFUL? .............................................. 257 1. R MENTIONS SASKATCHEWAN AS MORE POWERFUL 4458 5. R DOES NOT MENTION SASKATCHEWAN 66 8. YES, SOME PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL, BUT DK WHICH PROVINCES ARE MORE POWERFUL 4 9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N.A. 3408 0. INAP.; CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 13 0 0 VAR 0022 REF 0022 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XALBERTA POWERFUL? MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 40 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 41 0 ALBERTA MORE POWERFUL? ......................................... 606 1. R MENTIONS ALBERTA AS MORE POWERFUL 4109 5. R DOES NOT MENTION ALBERTA 66 8. YES, SOME PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL, BUT DK WHICH PROVINCES ARE MORE POWERFUL 4 9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N.A. 3408 0. INAP.; CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 13 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 16 - 0 VAR 0023 REF 0023 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XBRITISH COLMBIA POWERFL MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 41 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 42 0 BRITISH COLUMBIA MORE POWERFUL? .................................................. 1246 1. R MENTIONS BRITISH COLUMBIA AS MORE POWERFUL 3469 5. R DOES NOT MENTION BRITISH COLUMBIA 66 8. YES, SOME PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL, BUT DK WHICH PROVINCES ARE MORE POWERFUL 4 9. REF. NOS. 14-23 N.A. 3408 0. INAP.; CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 13 0 0 VAR 0024 REF 0024 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LVL GOVT MOST IMP TO R MD=GE 8 LOC 42 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 43 0 Q. 5. AS FAR AS YOU ARE CONCERNED PERSONALLY, WHICH GOVERNMENT IS MORE IMPORTANT IN AFFECTING HOW YOU AND YOUR FAMILY GET ON? THE ONE IN OTTAWA OR THE ONE IN THIS PROVINCE? .......................................................... 2439 1. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 3342 2. PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT 1683 3. BOTH IMPORTANT 360 4. NEITHER 353 8. DK 16 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0025 REF 0025 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IMP ISSUES IN ELECTION MD=GE 90 MULT RESPS 2 LOC 43 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 44-47 0 Q. 6. DURING THIS ELECTION PEOPLE HAD DIFFERENT OPINIONS ABOUT THE ISSUES WHICH WERE IMPORTANT IN THE CAMPAIGN. WE ARE INTERESTED IN HEARING YOUR OPINION ABOUT WHAT YOU THOUGHT WERE THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUES IN THE LAST ELECTION. ......................................................... 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 17 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 SOCIAL SECURITY ISSUES 2664 11. OLD AGE PENSION AND PENSION PLAN. 175 12. FAMILY ALLOWANCE. 1267 13. HEALTH AND WELFARE AND MEDICARE. 199 14. OTHERS (OR GENERALLY). 391 15. CORRUPTION AND SCANDAL IN GOVERNMENT. 149 16. AGRICULTURAL ISSUES. 0 NATIONAL UNITY AND IDENTITY ISSUES 403 17. ETHNIC RELATIONS, SEPARATISM, QUEBEC, BILINGUALISM AND BICULTURALISM. 226 18. FLAG. 128 19. U.S.A. INFLUENCE OR INTERFERENCE, FEDERAL-PROVINCIAL RELATIONS, CANADIAN NATIONALISM. 0 ECONOMIC ISSUES 289 20. TAXES, INFLATION, PRICES, SALARIES, COST OF LIVING, POVERTY. 175 21. COMMERCE, TRADE, ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, ETC. 80 22. OTHERS AND GENERAL RUBRICS SUCH AS, "THE ECONOMY" AND "THE ECONOMIC SITUATION" 438 23. UNEMPLOYMENT AND AUTOMATION. 892 24. MAJORITY GOVERNMENT. 235 25. EDUCATIONAL ISSUES. 62 26. LACK OF LEADERSHIP IN GOVERNMENT. 27 27. LACK OF STABILITY IN GOVERNMENT. 540 28. OTHERS. 487 90. IRRELEVANT OR REFUSES, ETC. 5195 92. NO SECOND RESPONSE 2364 99. NO ANSWER OR "NO IMPORTANT ISSUES" 0 0 VAR 0026 REF 0026 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SCL WLFR ISUS-IMPC ELCN MD=GE 8 LOC 47 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 48 0 NOW I AM GOING TO READ YOU SOME OF THE ISSUES WHICH WERE DISCUSSED IN THE LAST ELECTION CAMPAIGN AND I WOULD LIKE YOU TO TELL ME, FOR EACH ISSUE HOW IMPORTANT IT WAS TO YOU PERSONALLY IN HELPING YOU DECIDE HOW TO VOTE. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 18 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 Q. 7-A. TAKE SOCIAL WELFARE ISSUES, LIKE HEALTH INSURANCE AND PENSIONS. HOW IMPORTANT WAS THAT TO YOU IN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE? VERY IMPORTANT, FAIRLY IMPORTANT, OR NOT TOO IMPORTANT? ........................................................... 3211 1. VERY IMPORTANT 2023 2. FAIRLY IMPORTANT 2740 3. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 182 8. DK 37 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0027 REF 0027 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-ECONOMIC ISUS-IMPC ELCN MD=GE 8 LOC 48 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 49 0 Q. 7-B. HOW ABOUT ISSUES CONCERNING THE ECONOMY, SUCH AS UNEMPLOYMENT, GOVERNMENT PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE, FOREIGN TRADE ? ......................................................... 4120 1. VERY IMPORTANT 2118 2. FAIRLY IMPORTANT 1625 3. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 299 8. DK 31 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0028 REF 0028 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-ENGLH-FN ISUS-IMPC ELCN MD=GE 8 LOC 49 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 50 0 Q. 7-C. NOW THINK OF THE ISSUE OF RELATIONS BETWEEN FRENCH AND ENGLISH-SPEAKING CANADIANS. WAS THIS VERY IMPORTANT, FAIRLY IMPORTANT, OR NOT TOO IMPORTANT TO YOU ? ........................................................... 2513 1. VERY IMPORTANT 1750 2. FAIRLY IMPORTANT 3662 3. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 19 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 208 8. DK 60 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0029 REF 0029 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-FLAG ISSUE-IMPORTNC ELCN MD=GE 8 LOC 50 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 51 0 Q. 7-D. IN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE, DID YOU FEEL THAT THE CANADIAN FLAG ISSUE WAS VERY IMPORTANT, FAIRLY IMPORTANT OR NOT TOO IMPORTANT? ........................................................... 1672 1. VERY IMPORTANT 1288 2. FAIRLY IMPORTANT 5028 3. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 153 8. DK 52 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0030 REF 0030 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CANADIAN UNITY-IMPC ELCN MD=GE 8 LOC 51 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 52 0 Q. 7-E. WHAT ABOUT THE UNITY OF CANADA? WAS THIS AN ISSUE WHICH YOU FOUND VERY IMPORTANT, FAIRLY IMPORTANT, OR NOT TOO IMPORTANT ? ............................................................ 4131 1. VERY IMPORTANT 1958 2. FAIRLY IMPORTANT 1707 3. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 343 8. DK 54 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0031 REF 0031 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-GOVT CORRUPTN-IMPC ELCN MD=GE 8 LOC 52 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 53 0 Q. 7-F. WAS CORRUPTION IN GOVERNMENT AN ISSUE WHICH YOU 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 20 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 FOUND VERY IMPORTANT, FAIRLY IMPORTANT, OR NOT TOO IMPORTANT ? .................................................. 3100 1. VERY IMPORTANT 1660 2. FAIRLY IMPORTANT 2978 3. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 410 8. DK 45 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0032 REF 0032 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-MAJORITY GOVT ISSUE-IMPC MD=GE 8 LOC 53 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 54 0 Q. 7-G. HOW IMPORTANT DID YOU FIND THE ISSUE OF WHETHER CANADA SHOULD HAVE A MAJORITY GOVERNMENT? ........................................................ 4637 1. VERY IMPORTANT 1513 2. FAIRLY IMPORTANT 1641 3. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 311 8. DK 91 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0033 REF 0033 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-STRONG LDR ISU-IMPC ELCN MD=GE 8 LOC 54 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 55 0 Q. 7-H. DID THE ISSUE OF STRONG LEADERSHIP IN OTTAWA STRIKE YOU AS BEING VERY IMPORTANT, FAIRLY IMPORTANT OR NOT TOO IMPORTANT ? ............................................................ 5162 1. VERY IMPORTANT 1639 2. FAIRLY IMPORTANT 1066 3. NOT TOO IMPORTANT 282 8. DK 44 9. NA 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 21 - 0 VAR 0034 REF 0034 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-GOVT FORMN-IMPC MJRY PTY MD=GE 8 LOC 55 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 56 0 Q. 8. NOW I HAVE A DIFFERENT KIND OF QUESTION. IN RECENT ELECTIONS, THE POLITICAL PARTY WHICH HAS FORMED THE GOVERNMENT IN OTTAWA HAS NOT HAD A MAJORITY OF THE SEATS IN PARLIAMENT. DO YOU THINK IT MAKES A GREAT DEAL OF DIFFERENCE, SOME DIFFERENCE, OR NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE WHETHER THE PARTY FORMING THE GOVERNMENT HAS A MAJORITY OF SEATS OR NOT? ............................................................ 4976 1. GREAT DEAL OF DIFFERENCE 1771 2. SOME DIFFERENCE 1206 3. NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE 233 8. DK 7 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0035 REF 0035 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-VT OTR PTY IF MJRY GOVT MD=GE 8 LOC 56 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 57 0 Q. 9. IF YOU BELIEVED THAT A PARTY COULD FORM A MAJORITY GOVERNMENT, BUT YOU DID NOT ORDINARILY VOTE FOR THAT PARTY, HOW LIKELY WOULD YOU BE TO VOTE FOR IT IN ORDER TO HAVE A MAJORITY GOVERNMENT? VERY LIKELY, SOMEWHAT LIKELY, OR NOT AT ALL LIKELY? ........................................................... 1913 1. VERY LIKELY 2010 2. SOMEWHAT LIKELY 3516 3. NOT AT ALL LIKELY 734 8. DK 20 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0036 REF 0036 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DEGREE INTST IN POLITICS MD=GE 8 LOC 57 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 58 0 Q. 10. HOW MUCH INTEREST DO YOU GENERALLY HAVE IN WHAT IS GOING ON IN POLITICS-A GOOD DEAL, SOME, OR NOT MUCH? .......................................................... 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 22 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 2145 1. A GOOD DEAL 3550 2. SOME 2469 3. NOT MUCH 23 8. DK 6 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0037 REF 0037 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CROOKED PEOPLE IN GOVT MD=GE 8 LOC 58 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 59 0 Q. 11. NOW I'D LIKE TO TALK ABOUT SOME OF THE DIFFERENT IDEAS PEOPLE HAVE ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT IN OTTAWA AND SEE HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT THEM. THESE OPINIONS DON'T REFER TO ANY POLITICAL PARTY IN PARTICULAR, BUT JUST TO THE GOVERNMENT IN GENERAL. FOR EXAMPLE: A. DO YOU THINK THAT QUITE A FEW OF THE PEOPLE RUNNING THE GOVERNMENT ARE A LITTLE CROOKED, NOT VERY MANY ARE CROOKED, OR DO YOU THINK HARDLY ANY OF THEM ARE CROOKED? ........................................................... 1970 1. QUITE A FEW 3160 2. NOT VERY MANY 2263 3. HARDLY ANY 780 8. DK 20 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0038 REF 0038 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-TAX MONEY WASTED BY GOVT MD=GE 8 LOC 59 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 60 0 Q. 11-B. DO YOU THINK THAT PEOPLE IN THE GOVERNMENT WASTE A LOT OF THE MONEY WE PAY IN TAXES, WASTE SOME OF IT, OR DON'T WASTE VERY MUCH OF IT? ............................................................ 2921 1. A LOT 3735 2. SOME 1062 3. NOT MUCH 465 8. DK 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 23 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 10 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0039 REF 0039 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-TST GOVT TO DO RGT THING MD=GE 8 LOC 60 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 61 0 Q. 11-C. HOW MUCH OF THE TIME DO YOU THINK YOU CAN TRUST THE GOVERNMENT IN OTTAWA TO DO WHAT IS RIGHT-JUST ABOUT ALWAYS, MOST OF THE TIME, OR ONLY SOME OF THE TIME? ......................................................... 764 1. ALWAYS 3973 2. MOST OF THE TIME 2980 3. SOME OF THE TIME 459 8. DK 17 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0040 REF 0040 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-GOVT TREAT PEOPLE EQUAL MD=GE 8 LOC 61 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 62 0 Q. 11-D. DO YOU THINK THAT ALL PEOPLE WHO ARE HIGH IN GOVERNMENT GIVE EVERYONE A FAIR BREAK, WHETHER THEY ARE BIG SHOTS OR JUST ORDINARY PEOPLE, OR DO YOU THINK SOME OF THEM PAY MORE ATTENTION TO WHAT THE BIG INTERESTS WANT? ........................................................... 1242 1. GIVE EVERYONE A FAIR BREAK 6121 2. PAY ATTENTION TO BIG SHOTS 795 8. DK 35 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0041 REF 0041 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-GOVT PPL KNOW WHAT TO DO MD=GE 8 LOC 62 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 63 0 Q. 11-E. DO YOU FEEL THAT ALMOST ALL OF THE PEOPLE RUNNING THE GOVERNMENT ARE SMART PEOPLE WHO USUALLY KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING, OR DO YOU THINK THAT QUITE A FEW OF THEM DON'T 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 24 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 SEEM TO KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING? ................................. 3221 1. ALL KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING 4287 2. QUITE A FEW DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING 653 8. DK 32 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0042 REF 0042 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-VOTING EFCV POLTL WEAPON MD=GE 8 LOC 63 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 64 0 Q. 12. HERE ARE SOME OTHER KINDS OF OPINIONS THAT YOU HEAR DIFFERENT PEOPLE GIVING. FOR THESE I'D JUST LIKE YOU TO TELL ME OFFHAND WHETHER YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE. A. VOTING IS THE ONLY WAY THAT PEOPLE LIKE ME CAN HAVE ANY SAY ABOUT HOW THE GOVERNMENT RUNS THINGS. DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE? ........................................................... 6188 1. AGREE 1800 2. DISAGREE 193 8. DK 12 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0043 REF 0043 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-PUB OFFICIALS DON'T CARE MD=GE 8 LOC 64 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 65 0 Q. 12-B. I DON'T THINK THAT THE GOVERNMENT CARES MUCH WHAT PEOPLE LIKE ME THINK. ........................................................... 3732 1. AGREE 4009 2. DISAGREE 439 8. DK 13 9. NA 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 25 - 0 VAR 0044 REF 0044 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-POLT COMPLCD FOR PEOPLE MD=GE 8 LOC 65 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 66 0 Q. 12-C. SOMETIMES POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT SEEM SO COMPLICATED THAT A PERSON LIKE ME CAN'T REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT'S GOING ON. ......................................................... 5631 1. AGREE 2293 2. DISAGREE 223 8. DK 46 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0045 REF 0045 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-PPL LK ME NO POLTL PWR MD=GE 8 LOC 66 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 67 0 Q. 12-D. PEOPLE LIKE ME DON'T HAVE ANY SAY ABOUT WHAT THE GOVERNMENT DOES. .......................................................... 4022 1. AGREE 3856 2. DISAGREE 279 8. DK 36 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0046 REF 0046 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-MP'S LOSE TOUCH WITH PPL MD=GE 8 LOC 67 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 68 0 Q. 12-E. GENERALLY THOSE ELECTED TO PARLIAMENT SOON LOSE TOUCH WITH THE PEOPLE. ......................................................... 4546 1. AGREE 3034 2. DISAGREE 583 8. DK 30 9. NA 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 26 - 0 VAR 0047 REF 0047 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-INTLCLS TOO STNG IN GOVT MD=GE 8 LOC 68 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 69 0 Q. 12-F. INTELLECTUALS TAKE UP TOO LARGE A POSITION IN OUR GOVERNMENTS. ........................................................... 2924 1. AGREE 4164 2. DISAGREE 1105 8. DK 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0048 REF 0048 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-PSNT FINANCL SATISFACTN MD=GE 8 LOC 69 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 70 0 Q. 13. WE ARE ALSO INTERESTED IN HOW PEOPLE ARE GETTING ALONG FINANCIALLY THESE DAYS. AS FAR AS YOU AND YOUR FAMILY ARE CONCERNED, WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU ARE PRETTY WELL SATISFIED, MORE OR LESS SATISFIED, OR NOT AT ALL SATISFIED ABOUT THE WAY YOU ARE GETTING ALONG? ............................................................ 3342 1. PRETTY WELL SATISFIED 3362 2. MORE OR LESS SATISFIED 1389 3. NOT AT ALL SATISFIED 58 8. DK 42 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0049 REF 0049 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CHANGE IN FINANCIAL SIT MD=GE 8 LOC 70 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 71 0 Q. 14. DURING THE LAST FEW YEARS, HAS YOUR FINANCIAL SITUATION BEEN GETTING BETTER, BEEN GETTING WORSE, OR HAS IT STAYED THE SAME? ......................................................... 3301 1. GETTING BETTER 1143 2. GETTING WORSE 3663 3. STAYED THE SAME 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 27 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 42 8. DK 44 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0050 REF 0050 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-PSNT EMPLT SITUATION BTR MD=GE 7 LOC 71 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 72 0 Q. 15. IN GENERAL, WOULD YOU SAY THAT THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION OF YOU AND YOUR FAMILY NOW LOOKS MUCH BETTER, SOMEWHAT BETTER, SOMEWHAT WORSE OR MUCH WORSE THAN IT DID TWO OR THREE YEARS AGO? ......................................................... 1534 1. MUCH BETTER 2081 2. SOMEWHAT BETTER 3005 3. ABOUT THE SAME 481 4. SOMEWHAT WORSE 251 5. MUCH WORSE 750 7. NOT APPLICABLE 59 8. DK 32 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0051 REF 0051 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-FUTURE FINANCL SIT BTR? MD=GE 8 LOC 72 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 73 0 Q. 16. NOW LOOKING AHEAD, AND THINKING ABOUT THE NEXT FEW YEARS, DO YOU EXPECT YOUR FINANCIAL SITUATION WILL STAY ABOUT THE WAY IT IS NOW, GET BETTER, OR GET WORSE? .......................................................... 3200 1. STAY ABOUT THE SAME 3325 2. GET BETTER 872 3. GET WORSE 753 8. DK 43 9. NA 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 28 - 0 VAR 0052 REF 0052 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-ELCTN RSLT AFCT FIN SIT MD=GE 8 LOC 73 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 74 0 Q. 17-A. DO YOU THINK THAT THE WAY THE ELECTION TURNED OUT WILL MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE IN HOW WELL OFF YOU ARE? ........................................................... 1497 1. YES 5877 2. NO 799 8. DK 20 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0053 REF 0053 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XELCTN MK FIN SIT BTR/WS MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 74 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 75 0 Q. 17-B. (IF "YES"): WILL IT MAKE THINGS BETTER OR WORSE? ........................................................... 825 1. BETTER 431 2. WORSE 233 8. DK 8 9. NA 6696 0. INAP.; CODED 2, 8 OR 9 IN REF. NO. 52. 0 0 VAR 0054 REF 0054 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-R UNEMPLOYED IN LAST YR? MD=GE 8 LOC 75 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 76 0 Q. 18. HAVE YOU BEEN PERSONALLY UNEMPLOYED AND LOOKING FOR WORK DURING THE PAST YEAR? ........................................................... 645 1. YES 7491 2. NO 18 8. DK 39 9. NA 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 29 - 0 VAR 0055 REF 0055 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-FAMILY MBR UEMPLD LST YR MD=GE 8 LOC 76 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 77 0 Q. 19. HAS ANYONE IN YOUR FAMILY BEEN UNEMPLOYED AND LOOKING FOR WORK DURING THE PAST YEAR? ..................................................... 1058 1. YES 7080 2. NO 47 8. DK 8 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0056 REF 0056 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-FAM MBR UEMPLD LST 3 YR MD=GE 8 LOC 77 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 78 0 Q. 20. WHAT ABOUT THE LAST THREE YEARS? DURING THAT TIME HAVE YOU OR ANY MEMBER OF YOUR FAMILY BEEN UNEMPLOYED AND LOOKING FOR WORK? .......................................................... 1708 1. YES 6406 2. NO 58 8. DK 21 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0001 REF 0001 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-ICPR STUDY NUMBER-7225 NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 2 COL 1- 4 0 STUDY NUMBER (7225) ................... 0 VAR 0002 REF 0002 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-INTERVIEW NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 5 WIDTH 5 DK 2 COL 5- 9 0 RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 30 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 THE FIRST DIGIT IDENTIFIES THE PROVINCE AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT FOUR DIGITS ARE THE RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUMBER WITHIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY A RESPONDENT. ............................................................ 0 VAR 0003 REF 0003 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 10 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 10 0 INTEGER WEIGHT VALUES RESPONDENTS WERE WEIGHTED ACCORDING TO THEIR CONSTITUENCY OF RESIDENCE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVING IN CONSTITUENCY #049 (ALGOMA WEST, ONTARIO) THROUGH #080 (WENTWORTH, ONTARIO) WERE WEIGHTED BY A FACTOR OF ONE AND ONE-THIRD. RESIDENTS OF #040 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) THRU #048 (SAINT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (INCLUSIVE), #081 (YORK CENTRE, ONTARIO) THRU #088 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDENTS FROM BRITISH COLUMBIA WERE DOUBLE WEIGHTED. THE REST OF THE CONSTITUENCIES ARE UNWEIGHTED. SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 4 AND 6. THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNWEIGHTED (RAW) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA CASES. ............................................................ 1113 3. UNWEIGHTED CASES 588 4. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES #049-#080) 417 6. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES #040-#048, #081- #088, AND #111-#118) 0 0 VAR 0004 REF 0004 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 11 WIDTH 3 DK 2 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S) 0 DECIMAL WEIGHT VALUES PLEASE SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 3 AND 6. THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNWEIGHTED (RAW) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA CASES. .......................................................... 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 31 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 1113 100. UNWEIGHTED CASES 588 133. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES #049-#080) 417 200. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES #040-#048, #081-#088, AND #111-#118) 0 '2' DK 2 COL 14 ... 0 VAR 0057 REF 0057 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-ANY PRVC/RGN BETTER OFF MD=GE 8 LOC 78 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 15 0 Q. 21-A. DO YOU THINK THERE ARE ANY PROVINCES OR REGIONS OF CANADA WHICH ARE BETTER OFF THAN THE OTHERS? ............................................................ 6123 1. YES 732 2. NO 1338 8. DK, IF ANY ARE BETTER OFF 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0058 REF 0058 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNEWFOUNDLAND BETTER OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 79 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 16 0 Q. 21-B. (IF "YES"): WHICH ONES ? Q. 21-B. NEWFOUNDLAND BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. .......................................................... 33 1. YES, NEWFOUNDLAND BETTER OFF 5978 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION NEWFOUNDLAND 112 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57. 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 32 - 0 VAR 0059 REF 0059 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XPRNC ED ILND BETTER OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 80 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 17 0 Q. 21-B. PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. .................................................... 19 1. YES, PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND BETTER OFF 5992 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND 112 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57. 0 0 VAR 0060 REF 0060 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNOVA SCOTIA BETTER OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 81 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 18 0 Q. 21-B. NOVA SCOTIA BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ........................................... 30 1. YES, NOVA SCOTIA BETTER OFF 5981 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION NOVA SCOTIA 112 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57. 0 0 VAR 0061 REF 0061 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNEWBRUNSWICK BETTER OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 82 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 19 0 Q. 21-B. NEW BRUNSWICK BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ............................................. 45 1. YES, NEW BRUNSWICK BETTER OFF 5966 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION NEW BRUNSWICK 112 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 33 - 0 VAR 0062 REF 0062 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XQUEBEC BETTER OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 83 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 20 0 Q. 21-B. QUEBEC BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ........................................ 1473 1. YES, QUEBEC BETTER OFF 4538 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION QUEBEC 112 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57. 0 0 VAR 0063 REF 0063 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XONTARIO BETTER OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 84 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 21 0 Q. 21-B. ONTARIO BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ........................................ 4319 1. YES, ONTARIO BETTER OFF 1692 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION ONTARIO 112 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57. 0 0 VAR 0064 REF 0064 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XMANITOBA BETTER OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 85 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 22 0 Q. 21-B. MANITOBA BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ........................................ 154 1. YES, MANITOBA BETTER OFF 5857 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION MANITOBA 112 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 34 - 0 VAR 0065 REF 0065 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XSASKATCHEWAN BETTER OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 86 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 23 0 Q. 21-B. SASKATCHEWAN BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ............................................ 380 1. YES, SASKATCHEWAN BETTER OFF 5631 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION SASKATCHEWAN 112 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57. 0 0 VAR 0066 REF 0066 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XALBERTA BETTER OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 87 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 24 0 Q. 21-B. ALBERTA BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ........................................ 1388 1. YES, ALBERTA BETTER OFF 4623 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION ALBERTA 112 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57. 0 0 VAR 0067 REF 0067 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XBRIT COLMBIA BETTER OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 88 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 25 0 Q. 21-B. BRITISH COLUMBIA BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ................................................ 2317 1. YES, BRITISH COLUMBIA BETTER OFF 3694 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION BRITISH COLUMBIA 112 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 35 - 0 VAR 0068 REF 0068 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XMARITIMES BETTER OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 89 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 26 0 Q. 21-B. MARITIMES BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ......................................... 41 1. YES, MARITIMES BETTER OFF 5970 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION MARITIMES 112 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57. 0 0 VAR 0069 REF 0069 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XPRAIRIES BETTER OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 90 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 27 0 Q. 21-B. PRAIRIES BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ........................................ 323 1. YES, PRAIRIES BETTER OFF 5688 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION PRAIRIES 112 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57. 0 0 VAR 0070 REF 0070 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XSPECIFC AREA BETTER OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 91 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 28 0 Q. 21-B. SPECIFIC REGIONS OR AREAS BETTER OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ......................................................... 732 1. YES, SPECIFIC REGIONS OR AREAS BETTER OFF 5279 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION SPECIFIC REGIONS OR AREAS 112 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS BETTER, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2070 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 57. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 36 - 0 VAR 0071 REF 0071 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-ANY PRVC/RGN WORSE OFF MD=GE 8 LOC 92 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 29 0 Q. 22-A. DO YOU THINK THERE ARE ANY PROVINCES OR REGIONS OF CANADA WHICH ARE WORSE OFF THAN THE OTHERS? ............................................................ 5925 1. YES 553 2. NO 1715 8. DK, IF ANY ARE WORSE OFF 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0072 REF 0072 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNEWFOUNDLAND WORSE OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 93 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 30 0 Q. 22-B. (IF "YES"): WHICH ONES ? Q. 22-B. NEWFOUNDLAND WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ........................................................... 1291 1. YES, NEWFOUNDLAND WORSE OFF 4461 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION NEWFOUNDLAND 173 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2268 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71. 0 0 VAR 0073 REF 0073 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XPRINC ED ILND WORSE OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 94 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 31 0 Q. 22-B. PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ................................................... 602 1. YES, PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WORSE OFF 5150 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 37 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 173 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2268 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71. 0 0 VAR 0074 REF 0074 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNOVA SCOTIA WORSE OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 95 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 32 0 Q. 22-B. NOVA SCOTIA WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. .......................................... 929 1. YES, NOVA SCOTIA WORSE OFF 4823 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION NOVA SCOTIA 173 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2268 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71. 0 0 VAR 0075 REF 0075 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNEW BRUNSWICK WORSE OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 96 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 33 0 Q. 22-B. NEW BRUNSWICK WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ............................................ 886 1. YES, NEW BRUNSWICK WORSE OFF 4866 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION NEW BRUNSWICK 173 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2268 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71. 0 0 VAR 0076 REF 0076 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XQUEBEC WORSE OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 97 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 34 0 Q. 22-B. QUEBEC WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ........................................ 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 38 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 802 1. YES, QUEBEC WORSE OFF 4950 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION QUEBEC 173 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2268 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71. 0 0 VAR 0077 REF 0077 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XONTARIO WORSE OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 98 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 35 0 Q. 22-B. ONTARIO WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ........................................ 65 1. YES, ONTARIO WORSE OFF 5687 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION ONTARIO 173 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2268 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71. 0 0 VAR 0078 REF 0078 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XMANITOBA WORSE OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 99 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 36 0 Q. 22-B. MANITOBA WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ........................................ 245 1. YES, MANITOBA WORSE OFF 5507 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION MANITOBA 173 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2268 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71. 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 39 - 0 VAR 0079 REF 0079 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XSASKATCHEWAN WORSE OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 100 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 37 0 Q. 22-B. SASKATCHEWAN WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ........................................... 335 1. YES, SASKATCHEWAN WORSE OFF 5417 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION SASKATCHEWAN 173 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2268 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71. 0 0 VAR 0080 REF 0080 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XALBERTA WORSE OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 101 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 38 0 Q. 22-B. ALBERTA WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ........................................ 82 1. YES, ALBERTA WORSE OFF 5670 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION ALBERTA 173 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2268 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71. 0 0 VAR 0081 REF 0081 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XBRIT COLMBIA WORSE OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 102 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 39 0 Q. 22-B. BRITISH COLUMBIA WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ............................................... 56 1. YES, BRITISH COLUMBIA WORSE OFF 5696 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION BRITISH COLUMBIA 173 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2268 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 40 - 0 VAR 0082 REF 0082 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XMARITIMES WORSE OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 103 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 40 0 Q. 22-B. MARITIMES WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ........................................ 2892 1. YES, MARITIMES WORSE OFF 2860 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION MARITIMES 173 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2268 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71. 0 0 VAR 0083 REF 0083 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XPRAIRIES WORSE OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 104 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 41 0 Q. 22-B. PRAIRIES WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ........................................ 138 1. YES, PRAIRIES WORSE OFF 5614 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION PRAIRIES 173 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2268 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71. 0 0 VAR 0084 REF 0084 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XSPECIFIC AREA WORSE OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 105 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 42 0 Q. 22-B. SPECIFIC REGIONS OR AREAS WORSE OFF THAN OTHER PROVINCES OR REGIONS. ........................................................ 1014 1. YES, SPECIFIC REGIONS OR AREAS WORSE OFF 4738 5. NO, R DOES NOT MENTION SPECIFIC REGIONS OR AREAS 173 8. YES, SOME PROVINCES OR REGIONS ARE WORSE OFF, BUT DK WHICH ONES 2268 0. INAP. CODED 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 71. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 41 - 0 VAR 0085 REF 0085 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-R'S OWN PVNC BTR/WRS OFF MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 106 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 43 0 Q. 23. HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THIS PROVINCE? DO YOU THINK IT IS BETTER OFF THAN MOST, WORSE OFF, OR ABOUT AVERAGE? ...................................................... 974 1. BETTER OFF 148 2. WORSE OFF 2456 3. ABOUT AVERAGE 164 8. DK 403 9. NA 4048 0. INAP, R'S PROVINCE WAS MENTIONED IN REF. NOS. 58-70 OR REF. NOS. 72-84. 0 0 VAR 0086 REF 0086 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD LIKE LIVE-NWFNDLD MD=GE 8 LOC 107 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 44 0 Q. 24-A. IN WHICH CANADIAN PROVINCES DO YOU THINK YOU MIGHT LIKE TO LIVE? Q. 24-A. ...................................................... 124 1. YES, R MENTIONED NEWFOUNDLAND 7657 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION NEWFOUNDLAND 412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 0 0 VAR 0087 REF 0087 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD LIKE LIVE-P.E ILND MD=GE 8 LOC 108 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 45 0 .............................................. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 42 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 207 1. YES, R MENTIONED PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND 7574 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND 412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 0 0 VAR 0088 REF 0088 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD LIKE LIVE-NOVASCOT MD=GE 8 LOC 109 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 46 0 ..................................... 284 1. YES, R MENTIONED NOVA SCOTIA 7497 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION NOVA SCOTIA 412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 0 0 VAR 0089 REF 0089 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD LIKE LIVE-NEWBNSWK MD=GE 8 LOC 110 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 47 0 ....................................... 319 1. YES, R MENTIONED NEW BRUNSWICK 7462 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION NEW BRUNSWICK 412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 0 0 VAR 0090 REF 0090 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD LIKE LIVE-QUEBEC MD=GE 8 LOC 111 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 48 0 ................................ 2074 1. YES, R MENTIONED QUEBEC 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 43 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 5707 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION QUEBEC 412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 0 0 VAR 0091 REF 0091 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD LIKE LIVE-ONTARIO MD=GE 8 LOC 112 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 49 0 ................................. 3234 1. YES, R MENTIONED ONTARIO 4547 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION ONTARIO 412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 0 0 VAR 0092 REF 0092 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD LIKE LIVE-MANITOBA MD=GE 8 LOC 113 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 50 0 .................................. 383 1. YES, R MENTIONED MANITOBA 7398 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION MANITOBA 412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 0 0 VAR 0093 REF 0093 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD LIKE LIVE-SASKTWN MD=GE 8 LOC 114 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 51 0 ...................................... 380 1. YES, R MENTIONED SASKATCHEWAN 7401 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION SASKATCHEWAN 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 44 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 0 0 VAR 0094 REF 0094 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD LIKE LIVE-ALBERTA MD=GE 8 LOC 115 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 52 0 ................................. 1032 1. YES, R MENTIONED ALBERTA 6749 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION ALBERTA 412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 0 0 VAR 0095 REF 0095 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD LIKE LIVE-BRTCOLMB MD=GE 8 LOC 116 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 53 0 .......................................... 3056 1. YES, R MENTIONED BRITISH COLUMBIA 4725 5. NO, R DID NOT MENTION BRITISH COLUMBIA 412 8. DK WHICH PROVINCE R WOULD LIKE TO LIVE IN 0 0 VAR 0096 REF 0096 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD NOT LIVE-NWFNDLD MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 117 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 54 0 Q. 24-B. IN WHICH CANADIAN PROVINCES WOULD YOU DEFINITELY NEVER WANT TO LIVE? Q. 24-B. ........................................................... 2477 1. YES, R DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN NEWFOUNDLAND 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 45 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 3194 5. NO MENTION OF NEWFOUNDLAND TO Q. 24-B 1249 8. DK WHICH PROVINCES R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES 0 0 VAR 0097 REF 0097 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD NOT LIVE-P.E ISLND MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 118 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 55 0 .................................................. 1813 1. YES, R DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND 3858 5. NO MENTION OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND TO Q. 24-B 1249 8. DK WHICH PROVINCES R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES 0 0 VAR 0098 REF 0098 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD NOT LIVE-NOVA SCOT MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 119 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 56 0 ......................................... 1951 1. YES, R DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN NOVA SCOTIA 3720 5. NO MENTION OF NOVA SCOTIA TO Q. 24-B 1249 8. DK WHICH PROVINCES R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES 0 0 VAR 0099 REF 0099 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD NOT LIVE-NEW BNSWK MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 120 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 57 0 ........................................... 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 46 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 1844 1. YES, R DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN NEW BRUNSWICK 3827 5. NO MENTION OF NEW BRUNSWICK TO Q. 24-B 1249 8. DK WHICH PROVINCES R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES 0 0 VAR 0100 REF 0100 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD NOT LIVE-QUEBEC MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 121 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 58 0 .................................... 2363 1. YES, R DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN QUEBEC 3308 5. NO MENTION OF QUEBEC TO Q. 24-B 1249 8. DK WHICH PROVINCES R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES 0 0 VAR 0101 REF 0101 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD NOT LIVE-ONTARIO MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 122 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 59 0 ..................................... 857 1. YES, R DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN ONTARIO 4814 5. NO MENTION OF ONTARIO TO Q. 24-B 1249 8. DK WHICH PROVINCES R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES 0 0 VAR 0102 REF 0102 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD NOT LIVE-MANITOBA MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 123 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 60 0 ...................................... 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 47 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 1223 1. YES, R DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN MANITOBA 4448 5. NO MENTION OF MANITOBA TO Q. 24-B 1249 8. DK WHICH PROVINCES R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES 0 0 VAR 0103 REF 0103 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD NOT LIVE-SASKTWN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 124 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 61 0 .......................................... 1613 1. YES, R DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN SASKATCHEWAN 4058 5. NO MENTION OF SASKATCHEWAN TO Q. 24-B 1249 8. DK WHICH PROVINCES R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES 0 0 VAR 0104 REF 0104 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD NOT LIVE-ALBERTA MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 125 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 62 0 ..................................... 1030 1. YES, R DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN ALBERTA 4641 5. NO MENTION OF ALBERTA TO Q. 24-B 1249 8. DK WHICH PROVINCES R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES 0 0 VAR 0105 REF 0105 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WOULD NOT LIVE-BRT COLMB MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 126 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 63 0 .............................................. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 48 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 555 1. YES, R DOES NOT WANT TO LIVE IN BRITISH COLUMBIA 5116 5. NO MENTION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA TO Q. 24-B 1249 8. DK WHICH PROVINCES R WOULD NOT WANT TO LIVE IN 1273 0. R WOULD LIVE IN ALL THE PROVINCES 0 0 VAR 0106 REF 0106 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DIEFENBAKR-MARTIME CNCTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 127 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 64 0 Q. 25. THINKING NOW OF THE NATIONAL LEADERS OF THE FOUR MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES, WHICH PART OF THE COUNTRY DO YOU THINK THESE MEN ARE CLOSEST TO: THE MARITIMES, QUEBEC, ONTARIO, THE PRAIRIES OR BRITISH COLUMBIA? TAKE MR. DIEFENBAKER. DOES HE HAVE MORE CONNECTION WITH THE MARITIMES, QUEBEC, ONTARIO, THE PRAIRIES, OR BRITISH COLUMBIA? ........................................................ 639 1. YES 5821 5. NO 1243 8. DK 4 9. NA 486 0. DIEFENBAKER HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 0 VAR 0107 REF 0107 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DIEFENBAKER-QUEBEC CNCTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 128 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 65 0 ....................................... 145 1. YES 6315 5. NO 1243 8. DK 4 9. NA 486 0. DIEFENBAKER HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 49 - 0 VAR 0108 REF 0108 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DIEFENBAKR-ONTARIO CNCTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 129 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 66 0 ........................................................... 639 1. YES 5821 5. NO 1243 8. DK 4 9. NA 486 0. DIEFENBAKER HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 0 VAR 0109 REF 0109 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DIEFENBAKR-PRAIRIE CNCTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 130 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 67 0 ........................................................... 5210 1. YES 1250 5. NO 1243 8. DK 4 9. NA 486 0. DIEFENBAKER HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 0 VAR 0110 REF 0110 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DIEFENBAKR-BRTCOLM CNCTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 131 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 68 0 ........................................................... 410 1. YES 6050 5. NO 1243 8. DK 4 9. NA 486 0. DIEFENBAKER HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 50 - 0 VAR 0111 REF 0111 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-PEARSON-MARITIMES CNCTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 132 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 69 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. PEARSON? .................................................. 310 1. YES 5440 5. NO 1499 8. DK 4 9. NA 940 0. PEARSON HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 0 VAR 0112 REF 0112 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-PEARSON-QUEBEC CONNECTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 133 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 70 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. PEARSON? ....................................................... 2198 1. YES 3552 5. NO 1499 8. DK 4 9. NA 940 0. PEARSON HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 0 VAR 0113 REF 0113 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-PEARSON-ONTARIO CONNECTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 134 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 71 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. PEARSON? ........................................................ 4238 1. YES 1512 5. NO 1499 8. DK 4 9. NA 940 0. PEARSON HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 51 - 0 VAR 0114 REF 0114 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-PEARSON-PRAIRIE CONNECTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 135 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 72 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. PEARSON? ............................................................ 217 1. YES 5533 5. NO 1499 8. DK 4 9. NA 940 0. PEARSON HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 0 VAR 0115 REF 0115 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-PEARSON-BRTCOLUMB CNCTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 136 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 73 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. PEARSON? ...................................................... 163 1. YES 5587 5. NO 1499 8. DK 4 9. NA 940 0. PEARSON HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 0 VAR 0116 REF 0116 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DOUGLAS-MARITIMES CNCTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 137 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 74 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. DOUGLAS? .................................................. 186 1. YES 4495 5. NO 2739 8. DK 7 9. NA 766 0. DOUGLAS HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 52 - 0 VAR 0117 REF 0117 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DOUGLAS-QUEBEC CONNECTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 138 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 75 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. DOUGLAS? ....................................................... 182 1. YES 4499 5. NO 2739 8. DK 7 9. NA 766 0. DOUGLAS HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 0 VAR 0118 REF 0118 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DOUGLAS-ONTARIO CONNECTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 139 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 76 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. DOUGLAS? ........................................................ 597 1. YES 4084 5. NO 2739 8. DK 7 9. NA 766 0. DOUGLAS HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 0 VAR 0119 REF 0119 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DOUGLAS-PRAIRIE CONNECTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 140 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 77 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. DOUGLAS? ............................................................ 2778 1. YES 1903 5. NO 2739 8. DK 7 9. NA 766 0. DOUGLAS HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 53 - 0 VAR 0120 REF 0120 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DOUGLAS-BRTCOLUMB CNCTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 141 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 78 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. DOUGLAS? ...................................................... 1618 1. YES 3063 5. NO 2739 8. DK 7 9. NA 766 0. DOUGLAS HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 0 VAR 0001 REF 0001 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-ICPR STUDY NUMBER-7225 NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 3 COL 1- 4 0 STUDY NUMBER (7225) ................... 0 VAR 0002 REF 0002 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-INTERVIEW NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 5 WIDTH 5 DK 3 COL 5- 9 0 RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUMBER THE FIRST DIGIT IDENTIFIES THE PROVINCE AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT FOUR DIGITS ARE THE RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUMBER WITHIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY A RESPONDENT. ............................................................ 0 VAR 0003 REF 0003 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 10 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 10 0 INTEGER WEIGHT VALUES RESPONDENTS WERE WEIGHTED ACCORDING TO THEIR CONSTITUENCY OF RESIDENCE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVING IN CONSTITUENCY #049 (ALGOMA WEST, ONTARIO) THROUGH #080 (WENTWORTH, ONTARIO) WERE 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 54 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 WEIGHTED BY A FACTOR OF ONE AND ONE-THIRD. RESIDENTS OF #040 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) THRU #048 (SAINT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (INCLUSIVE), #081 (YORK CENTRE, ONTARIO) THRU #088 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDENTS FROM BRITISH COLUMBIA WERE DOUBLE WEIGHTED. THE REST OF THE CONSTITUENCIES ARE UNWEIGHTED. SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 4 AND 6. THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNWEIGHTED (RAW) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA CASES. ............................................................ 1113 3. UNWEIGHTED CASES 588 4. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES #049-#080) 417 6. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES #040-#048, #081- #088, AND #111-#118) 0 0 VAR 0004 REF 0004 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 11 WIDTH 3 DK 3 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S) 0 DECIMAL WEIGHT VALUES PLEASE SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 3 AND 6. THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNWEIGHTED (RAW) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA CASES. .......................................................... 1113 100. UNWEIGHTED CASES 588 133. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES #049-#080) 417 200. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES #040-#048, #081-#088, AND #111-#118) 0 '3' DK 3 COL 14 ... 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 55 - 0 VAR 0121 REF 0121 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-THOMPSON-MARITIMES CNCTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 142 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 15 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. THOMPSON? ................................................... 128 1. YES 3910 5. NO 3728 8. DK 7 9. NA 420 0. THOMPSON HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 0 VAR 0122 REF 0122 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-THOMPSON-QUEBEC CONNECTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 143 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 16 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. THOMPSON? ........................................................ 291 1. YES 3747 5. NO 3728 8. DK 7 9. NA 420 0. THOMPSON HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 0 VAR 0123 REF 0123 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-THOMPSON-ONTARIO CNCTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 144 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 17 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. THOMPSON? ......................................................... 471 1. YES 3567 5. NO 3728 8. DK 7 9. NA 420 0. THOMPSON HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 56 - 0 VAR 0124 REF 0124 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-THOMPSON-PRAIRIES CNCTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 145 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 18 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. THOMPSON? ................................................... 2669 1. YES 1369 5. NO 3728 8. DK 7 9. NA 420 0. THOMPSON HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 0 VAR 0125 REF 0125 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-THOMPSON-BRTCOLMBA CNCTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 146 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 19 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. THOMPSON? ....................................................... 766 1. YES 3272 5. NO 3728 8. DK 7 9. NA 420 0. THOMPSON HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS 0 0 VAR 0126 REF 0126 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CAOUETTE-MARITIMES CNCTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 147 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 20 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. CAOUETTE? ................................................... 96 1. YES 6230 5. NO 1744 8. DK 19 9. NA 104 0. CAOUETTE HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 57 - 0 VAR 0127 REF 0127 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CAOUETTE-QUEBEC CONNECTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 148 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 21 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. CAOUETTE? ........................................................ 6190 1. YES 136 5. NO 1744 8. DK 19 9. NA 104 0. CAOUETTE HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS. 0 0 VAR 0128 REF 0128 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CAOUETTE-ONTARIO CNCTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 149 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 22 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. CAOUETTE? ......................................................... 52 1. YES 6274 5. NO 1744 8. DK 19 9. NA 104 0. CAOUETTE HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS. 0 0 VAR 0129 REF 0129 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CAOUETTE-PRAIRIES CNCTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 150 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 23 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. CAOUETTE? ................................................... 25 1. YES 6301 5. NO 1744 8. DK 19 9. NA 104 0. CAOUETTE HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS. 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 58 - 0 VAR 0130 REF 0130 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CAOUETTE-BRTCOLMBA CNCTN MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 151 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 24 0 WHAT ABOUT MR. CAOUETTE? ....................................................... 25 1. YES 6301 5. NO 1744 8. DK 19 9. NA 104 0. CAOUETTE HAS THE SAME CONNECTIONS TO ALL REGIONS. 0 0 VAR 0131 REF 0131 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-BEST PRIME MINISTER MD=GE 80 MULT RESPS 2 LOC 152 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 25-28 0 Q. 26. WHICH POLITICAL FIGURE TODAY DO YOU THINK WOULD MAKE THE BEST PRIME MINISTER FOR CANADA? ............................................................ 675 01. JOHN DIEFENBAKER 1230 02. LESTER PEARSON 888 03. TOMMY DOUGLAS 201 04. TOMMY THOMPSON 138 05. REAL CAOUETTE 507 06. GEORGE HEES 428 07. PAUL MARTIN 155 08. ROBERT WINTERS 199 09. JOHN ROBART 120 10. DAVID FULTON 67 11. MITCHELL SHARPE 453 12. JEAN LESAGE 168 13. RENE LEVESQUE 964 80. MISCELLANEOUS MENTIONS 4 90. MORE THAN TWO MENTIONS 7984 92. NO SECOND MENTION 417 96. CAN'T ANSWER; NO IDEA 1591 98. DK 197 99. NA 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 59 - 0 VAR 0132 REF 0132 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DFRNC BTWN FEDERAL PTYS MD=GE 8 LOC 156 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 29 0 Q. 27. ONE OF THE THINGS WE ARE INTERESTED IN IS THE DIFFERENCES WHICH EXIST BETWEEN OUR FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTIES. CONSIDERING EVERYTHING THE PARTIES STAND FOR, WOULD YOU SAY THAT THERE IS A GOOD DEAL OF DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE PARTIES, SOME DIFFERENCE, OR NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE? ....................................................... 1970 1. GOOD DEAL OF DIFFERENCE 2937 2. SOME DIFFERENCE 2893 3. NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE 385 8. DK 8 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0133 REF 0133 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-FEDERAL PTYS MOST ALIKE MD=GE 83 LOC 157 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 30-31 0 Q. 28-A. WHICH OF OUR FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTIES DO YOU FEEL ARE MOST ALIKE? ............................................................ 4498 12. LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE 539 13. LIBERAL-NDP 224 14. LIBERAL-SOCIAL CREDIT 55 15. LIBERAL-CREDITISTE 13 16. LIBERAL-CCF 57 18. LIBERAL-OTHER 152 23. CONSERVATIVE-NDP 219 24. CONSERVATIVE-SOCIAL CREDIT 19 25. CONSERVATIVE-CREDITISTE 3 26. CONSERVATIVE-CCF 9 28. CONSERVATIVE-OTHER 239 34. NDP-SOCIAL CREDIT 44 35. NDP-CREDITISTE 4 36. NDP-CCF 6 38. NDP-OTHER 103 45. SOCIAL CREDIT-CREDITISTE 6 46. SOCIAL CREDIT-CCF 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 60 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 48. SOCIAL CREDIT-OTHER 56. CREDITISTE-CCF 58. CREDITISTE-OTHER 68. CCF-OTHER 120 81. ALL THE SAME 109 82. ALL DIFFERENT 26 83. ONLY ONE PARTY MENTIONED 101 84. MORE THAN TWO PARTIES MENTIONED 1639 98. DK 8 99. N.A. 0 0 VAR 0134 REF 0134 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-FEDERAL PTYS LEAST ALIKE MD=GE 83 LOC 159 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 32-33 0 Q. 28-B. WHICH OF OUR FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTIES ARE LEAST ALIKE? .......................................................... 625 12. LIBERAL-CONSERVATIVE 562 13. LIBERAL-NDP 470 14. LIBERAL-SOCIAL CREDIT 436 15. LIBERAL-CREDITISTE 26 16. LIBERAL-CCF 31 18. LIBERAL-OTHER 688 23. CONSERVATIVE-NDP 415 24. CONSERVATIVE-SOCIAL CREDIT 373 25. CONSERVATIVE-CREDITISTE 19 26. CONSERVATIVE-CCF 62 28. CONSERVATIVE-OTHER 785 34. NDP-SOCIAL CREDIT 460 35. NDP-CREDITISTE 36. NDP-CCF 20 38. NDP-OTHER 114 45. SOCIAL CREDIT-CREDITISTE 29 46. SOCIAL CREDIT-CCF 39 48. SOCIAL CREDIT-OTHER 6 56. CREDITISTE-CCF 29 58. CREDITISTE-OTHER 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 61 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 68. CCF-OTHER 54 81. ALL THE SAME 56 82. ALL DIFFERENT 354 83. ONLY ONE PARTY MENTIONED 487 84. MORE THAN TWO PARTIES MENTIONED 2045 98. DK 8 99. NA 0 0 VAR 0135 REF 0135 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WCH PTY GOVERNS MATTERS MD=GE 8 LOC 161 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 34 0 Q. 29. IN YOUR OPINION, DO YOU THINK IT MAKES A GREAT DEAL OF DIFFERENCE, SOME DIFFERENCE, OR NO DIFFERENCE, WHICH POLITICAL PARTY RUNS THIS COUNTRY? ........................................................... 3628 1. GREAT DEAL 2769 2. SOME DIFFERENCE 1449 3. NO DIFFERENCE 276 8. DK 71 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0136 REF 0136 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IDEAL PTY-OLD/MODERN MD=GE 8 LOC 162 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 35 0 Q. 30. (SHOW CARD), NOW I HAVE A DIFFERENT KIND OF QUESTION FOR YOU. I'M GOING TO SHOW YOU SOME WORD PAIRS. EACH PAIR IS SEPARATED BY SEVEN BOXES LIKE THIS. IF YOU THINK THAT THE PARTICULAR POLITICAL PARTY IS VERY WELL KNOWN, YOU WOULD PUT A CHECK MARK IN THE BOX ON THE LEFT END OF THE SCALE. IF YOU FEEL IT IS NOT KNOWN AT ALL, YOU WOULD CHECK THE BOX ON THE RIGHT END OF THE SCALE. OR YOU MIGHT RATE IT SOMEWHERE BETWEEN THESE TWO EXTREMES. A. FIRST, WE'LL START WITH AN IMAGINARY POLITICAL PARTY-THE ONE YOU WOULD CONSIDER IDEAL FOR CANADA. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 62 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 THE IDEAL PARTY ............... 109 1. OUT OF DATE 109 2. 122 3. 966 4. 1082 5. 1500 6. 3967 7. MODERN 338 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0137 REF 0137 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IDEAL PTY-CMPTNT/INCMPTN MD=GE 8 LOC 163 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 36 0 <30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136> ............................................................ 6354 1. COMPETENT 742 2. 287 3. 262 4. 53 5. 61 6. 91 7. INCOMPETENT 343 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0138 REF 0138 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IDEAL PTY-POWERFUL/WEAK MD=GE 8 LOC 164 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 37 0 <30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136> ............................................................ 3811 1. POWERFUL 1445 2. 1530 3. 870 4. 97 5. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 63 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 38 6. 53 7. WEAK 349 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0139 REF 0139 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IDEAL PTY-FOOLISH/WISE MD=GE 8 LOC 165 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 38 0 <30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136> ............................................................ 129 1. FOOLISH 58 2. 62 3. 258 4. 369 5. 876 6. 6087 7. WISE 354 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0140 REF 0140 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IDEAL PTY-MID/WRKG CLS MD=GE 8 LOC 166 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 39 0 <30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136> ............................................................ 509 1. FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS 231 2. 377 3. 3922 4. 505 5. 383 6. 1881 7. FOR THE WORKING CLASS 385 8. DK 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 64 - 0 VAR 0141 REF 0141 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IDEAL PTY-UNITED/SPLIT MD=GE 8 LOC 167 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 40 0 <30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136> ............................................................ 5413 1. UNITED 942 2. 590 3. 601 4. 132 5. 62 6. 108 7. SPLIT 345 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0142 REF 0142 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IDEAL PTY-BAD/GOOD MD=GE 8 LOC 168 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 41 0 <30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136> ............................................................ 103 1. BAD 36 2. 49 3. 252 4. 321 5. 725 6. 6357 7. GOOD 350 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0143 REF 0143 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IDEAL PTY-LEFT/RIGHT MD=GE 8 LOC 169 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 42 0 <30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136> ............................................................ 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 65 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 321 1. LEFT WING 174 2. 432 3. 3849 4. 675 5. 558 6. 1581 7. RIGHT WING 603 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0144 REF 0144 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IDEAL PTY-STG/WEAK MIND MD=GE 8 LOC 170 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 43 0 <30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136> ............................................................ 4849 1. STRONG-MINDED 1531 2. 748 3. 522 4. 69 5. 48 6. 68 7. WEAK-MINDED 358 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0145 REF 0145 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IDEAL PTY-HONEST/DHONEST MD=GE 8 LOC 171 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 44 0 <30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136> ............................................................ 6846 1. HONEST 526 2. 230 3. 196 4. 18 5. 16 6. 48 7. DISHONEST 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 66 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 313 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0146 REF 0146 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IDEAL PTY-DULL/EXCITING MD=GE 8 LOC 172 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 45 0 <30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136> ............................................................ 92 1. DULL 43 2. 133 3. 1785 4. 1520 5. 1476 6. 2757 7. EXCITING 387 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0147 REF 0147 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IDEAL PTY-YOUNG/OLD MD=GE 8 LOC 173 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 46 0 <30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136> ............................................................ 1847 1. YOUNG 894 2. 1222 3. 3144 4. 464 5. 149 6. 118 7. OLD 355 8. DK 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 67 - 0 VAR 0148 REF 0148 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-IDEAL PTY-SLOW/FAST MD=GE 8 LOC 174 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 47 0 <30. A. R'S RATING OF IDEAL PARTY FOR CANADA. SEE REF. NO. 136> ............................................................ 129 1. SLOW 100 2. 177 3. 2550 4. 1491 5. 1512 6. 1900 7. FAST 334 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0149 REF 0149 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LBRL PTY-OLD/MODERN MD=GE 8 LOC 175 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 48 0 30. B. NOW YOU CAN GO ON TO EACH OF CANADA'S FEDERAL PARTIES. ..................................................... 695 1. OUT OF DATE 549 2. 975 3. 2046 4. 1445 5. 977 6. 1068 7. MODERN 438 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0150 REF 0150 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LBRL PTY-CMPTNT/INCMPTNT MD=GE 8 LOC 176 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 49 0 ................................................ 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 68 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 1301 1. COMPETENT 1106 2. 1560 3. 1725 4. 859 5. 583 6. 614 7. INCOMPETENT 445 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0151 REF 0151 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LBRL PTY-POWERFUL/WEAK MD=GE 8 LOC 177 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 50 0 ................................................ 878 1. POWERFUL 783 2. 1230 3. 1926 4. 1178 5. 763 6. 1007 7. WEAK 428 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0152 REF 0152 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LBRL PTY-FOOLISH/WISE MD=GE 8 LOC 178 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 51 0 ................................................ 369 1. FOOLISH 255 2. 760 3. 2368 4. 1636 5. 1157 6. 1179 7. WISE 469 8. DK 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 69 - 0 VAR 0153 REF 0153 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LBRL PTY-MIDDLE/WRKG CLS MD=GE 8 LOC 179 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 52 0 ................................................ 1086 1. FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS 724 2. 1296 3. 3021 4. 642 5. 350 6. 549 7. FOR THE WORKING CLASS 525 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0154 REF 0154 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LBRL PTY-UNITED/SPLIT MD=GE 8 LOC 180 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 53 0 ................................................ 1413 1. UNITED 1152 2. 1285 3. 1519 4. 1025 5. 549 6. 787 7. SPLIT 463 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0155 REF 0155 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LBRL PTY-BAD/GOOD MD=GE 8 LOC 181 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 54 0 ................................................ 434 1. BAD 302 2. 699 3. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 70 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 2145 4. 1573 5. 1233 6. 1343 7. GOOD 464 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0156 REF 0156 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LBRL PTY-LEFT/RIGHT MD=GE 8 LOC 182 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 55 0 ................................................ 330 1. LEFT WING 274 2. 702 3. 3335 4. 1088 5. 761 6. 932 7. RIGHT WING 771 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0157 REF 0157 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LBRL PTY-STNG/WEAK MIND MD=GE 8 LOC 183 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 56 0 ................................................ 1217 1. STRONG-MINDED 1104 2. 1396 3. 1823 4. 957 5. 576 6. 644 7. WEAK-MINDED 476 8. DK 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 71 - 0 VAR 0158 REF 0158 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LBRL PTY-HONEST/DHONEST MD=GE 8 LOC 184 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 57 0 ................................................ 1400 1. HONEST 1268 2. 1414 3. 1935 4. 955 5. 421 6. 337 7. DISHONEST 463 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0159 REF 0159 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LBRL PTY-DULL/EXCITING MD=GE 8 LOC 185 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 58 0 ................................................ 747 1. DULL 743 2. 1320 3. 2574 4. 1069 5. 657 6. 583 7. EXCITING 500 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0160 REF 0160 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LBRL PTY-YOUNG/OLD MD=GE 8 LOC 186 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 59 0 ................................................ 393 1. YOUNG 283 2. 630 3. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 72 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 2485 4. 1544 5. 1091 6. 1299 7. OLD 468 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0161 REF 0161 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LBRL PTY-SLOW/FAST MD=GE 8 LOC 187 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 60 0 ................................................ 1045 1. SLOW 843 2. 1397 3. 2412 4. 1085 5. 522 6. 445 7. FAST 444 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0162 REF 0162 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV PTY-OLD/MODERN MD=GE 8 LOC 188 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 61 0 ..................................................... 1133 1. OUT OF DATE 883 2. 1370 3. 1978 4. 953 5. 593 6. 714 7. MODERN 569 8. DK 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 73 - 0 VAR 0163 REF 0163 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV PTY-CMPTN/INCMPTN MD=GE 8 LOC 189 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 62 0 ..................................................... 1068 1. COMPETENT 906 2. 1269 3. 1714 4. 1223 5. 672 6. 761 7. INCOMPETENT 580 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0164 REF 0164 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV PTY-POWERFUL/WEAK MD=GE 8 LOC 190 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 63 0 ..................................................... 652 1. POWERFUL 644 2. 1078 3. 1702 4. 1758 5. 873 6. 926 7. WEAK 560 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0165 REF 0165 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV PTY-FOOLISH/WISE MD=GE 8 LOC 191 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 64 0 ..................................................... 492 1. FOOLISH 432 2. 1084 3. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 74 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 2375 4. 1404 5. 885 6. 944 7. WISE 577 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0166 REF 0166 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV PTY-MID/WRKG CLS MD=GE 8 LOC 192 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 65 0 ..................................................... 995 1. FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS 864 2. 1154 3. 2998 4. 663 5. 418 6. 493 7. FOR THE WORKING CLASS 608 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0167 REF 0167 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV PTY-UNITED/SPLIT MD=GE 8 LOC 193 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 66 0 ..................................................... 874 1. UNITED 723 2. 900 3. 1524 4. 1410 5. 1092 6. 1097 7. SPLIT 573 8. DK 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 75 - 0 VAR 0168 REF 0168 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV PTY-BAD/GOOD MD=GE 8 LOC 194 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 67 0 ..................................................... 427 1. BAD 485 2. 880 3. 2479 4. 1373 5. 985 6. 998 7. GOOD 566 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0169 REF 0169 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV PTY-LEFT/RIGHT MD=GE 8 LOC 195 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 68 0 ..................................................... 250 1. LEFT WING 267 2. 529 3. 3121 4. 1160 5. 927 6. 1065 7. RIGHT WING 874 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0170 REF 0170 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV PTY-STG/WEAK MIND MD=GE 8 LOC 196 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 69 0 ..................................................... 1220 1. STRONG-MINDED 1189 2. 1333 3. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 76 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 1685 4. 1122 5. 531 6. 538 7. WEAK-MINDED 575 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0171 REF 0171 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV PTY-HONEST/DHONST MD=GE 8 LOC 197 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 70 0 ..................................................... 1688 1. HONEST 1514 2. 1443 3. 2108 4. 550 5. 155 6. 173 7. DISHONEST 562 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0172 REF 0172 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV PTY-DULL/EXCITING MD=GE 8 LOC 198 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 71 0 ..................................................... 906 1. DULL 860 2. 1256 3. 2351 4. 1056 5. 638 6. 550 7. EXCITING 576 8. DK 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 77 - 0 VAR 0173 REF 0173 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV PTY-YOUNG/OLD MD=GE 8 LOC 199 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 72 0 ..................................................... 302 1. YOUNG 260 2. 517 3. 2152 4. 1543 5. 1262 6. 1582 7. OLD 575 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0174 REF 0174 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV PTY-SLOW/FAST MD=GE 8 LOC 200 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 73 0 ..................................................... 993 1. SLOW 944 2. 1318 3. 2680 4. 940 5. 433 6. 327 7. FAST 558 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0001 REF 0001 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-ICPR STUDY NUMBER-7225 NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 4 COL 1- 4 0 STUDY NUMBER (7225) ................... 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 78 - 0 VAR 0002 REF 0002 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-INTERVIEW NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 5 WIDTH 5 DK 4 COL 5- 9 0 RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUMBER THE FIRST DIGIT IDENTIFIES THE PROVINCE AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT FOUR DIGITS ARE THE RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUMBER WITHIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY A RESPONDENT. ............................................................ 0 VAR 0003 REF 0003 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 10 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 10 0 INTEGER WEIGHT VALUES RESPONDENTS WERE WEIGHTED ACCORDING TO THEIR CONSTITUENCY OF RESIDENCE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVING IN CONSTITUENCY #049 (ALGOMA WEST, ONTARIO) THROUGH #080 (WENTWORTH, ONTARIO) WERE WEIGHTED BY A FACTOR OF ONE AND ONE-THIRD. RESIDENTS OF #040 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) THRU #048 (SAINT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (INCLUSIVE), #081 (YORK CENTRE, ONTARIO) THRU #088 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDENTS FROM BRITISH COLUMBIA WERE DOUBLE WEIGHTED. THE REST OF THE CONSTITUENCIES ARE UNWEIGHTED. SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 4 AND 6. THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNWEIGHTED (RAW) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA CASES. ............................................................ 1113 3. UNWEIGHTED CASES 588 4. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES #049-#080) 417 6. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES #040-#048, #081- #088, AND #111-#118) 0 0 VAR 0004 REF 0004 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 11 WIDTH 3 DK 4 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S) 0 DECIMAL WEIGHT VALUES PLEASE SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 3 AND 6. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 79 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNWEIGHTED (RAW) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA CASES. .......................................................... 1113 100. UNWEIGHTED CASES 588 133. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES #049-#080) 417 200. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES #040-#048, #081-#088, AND #111-#118) 0 '4' DK 4 COL 14 ... 0 VAR 0175 REF 0175 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-NDP PTY-OLD/MODERN MD=GE 8 LOC 201 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 15 0 ........................................................ 332 1. OUT OF DATE 180 2. 251 3. 1242 4. 1278 5. 1588 6. 1999 7. MODERN 1323 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0176 REF 0176 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-NDP PTY-CMPTNT/INCMPTNT MD=GE 8 LOC 202 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 16 0 ...................................... 1171 1. COMPETENT 929 2. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 80 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 1099 3. 1996 4. 746 5. 493 6. 442 7. INCOMPETENT 1317 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0177 REF 0177 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-NDP PTY-POWERFUL/WEAK MD=GE 8 LOC 203 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 17 0 ...................................... 403 1. POWERFUL 434 2. 720 3. 1794 4. 1139 5. 1193 6. 1196 7. WEAK 1314 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0178 REF 0178 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-NDP PTY-FOOLISH/WISE MD=GE 8 LOC 204 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 18 0 ...................................... 346 1. FOOLISH 294 2. 601 3. 2303 4. 1374 5. 869 6. 1062 7. WISE 1344 8. DK 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 81 - 0 VAR 0179 REF 0179 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-NDP PTY-MIDDLE/WORKG CLS MD=GE 8 LOC 205 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 19 0 ...................................... 204 1. FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS 188 2. 212 3. 1885 4. 1014 5. 1203 6. 2143 7. FOR THE WORKING CLASS 1344 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0180 REF 0180 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-NDP PTY-UNITED/SPLIT MD=GE 8 LOC 206 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 20 0 ...................................... 1723 1. UNITED 1339 2. 960 3. 1647 4. 499 5. 282 6. 381 7. SPLIT 1362 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0181 REF 0181 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-NDP PTY-BAD/GOOD MD=GE 8 LOC 207 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 21 0 ...................................... 311 1. BAD 287 2. 504 3. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 82 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 2294 4. 1220 5. 991 6. 1257 7. GOOD 1329 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0182 REF 0182 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-NDP PTY-LEFT/RIGHT MD=GE 8 LOC 208 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 22 0 ...................................... 936 1. LEFT WING 716 2. 935 3. 2730 4. 536 5. 349 6. 428 7. RIGHT WING 1563 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0183 REF 0183 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-NDP PTY-STRONG/WEAK MIND MD=GE 8 LOC 209 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 23 0 ...................................... 1495 1. STRONG-MINDED 1384 2. 1369 3. 1680 4. 485 5. 193 6. 244 7. WEAK-MINDED 1343 8. DK 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 83 - 0 VAR 0184 REF 0184 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-NDP PTY-HONEST/DISHONEST MD=GE 8 LOC 210 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 24 0 ...................................... 2011 1. HONEST 1485 2. 1068 3. 1921 4. 188 5. 63 6. 127 7. DISHONEST 1330 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0185 REF 0185 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-NDP PTY-DULL/EXCITING MD=GE 8 LOC 211 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 25 0 ...................................... 292 1. DULL 298 2. 560 3. 2390 4. 1430 5. 1107 6. 783 7. EXCITING 1333 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0186 REF 0186 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-NDP PTY-YOUNG/OLD MD=GE 8 LOC 212 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 26 0 ...................................... 1337 1. YOUNG 1473 2. 1462 3. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 84 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 1943 4. 335 5. 140 6. 172 7. OLD 1331 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0187 REF 0187 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-NDP PTY-SLOW/FAST MD=GE 8 LOC 213 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 27 0 ...................................... 250 1. SLOW 301 2. 566 3. 2879 4. 1226 5. 981 6. 652 7. FAST 1338 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0188 REF 0188 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SOCRDT PTY-OLD/MODERN MD=GE 8 LOC 214 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 28 0 ...................................................... 739 1. OUT OF DATE 434 2. 609 3. 1586 4. 1055 5. 929 6. 986 7. MODERN 1855 8. DK 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 85 - 0 VAR 0189 REF 0189 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SOCRDT PTY-CMPTN/INCMPTN MD=GE 8 LOC 215 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 29 0 ...................................................... 684 1. COMPETENT 639 2. 917 3. 1707 4. 877 5. 724 6. 775 7. INCOMPETENT 1870 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0190 REF 0190 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SOCRDT PTY-POWERFUL/WEAK MD=GE 8 LOC 216 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 30 0 ...................................................... 388 1. POWERFUL 284 2. 622 3. 1476 4. 856 5. 1133 6. 1585 7. WEAK 1849 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0191 REF 0191 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SOCRDT PTY-FOOLISH/WISE MD=GE 8 LOC 217 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 31 0 ...................................................... 597 1. FOOLISH 566 2. 909 3. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 86 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 2067 4. 996 5. 644 6. 548 7. WISE 1866 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0192 REF 0192 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SOCRDT PTY-MID/WRKG CLS MD=GE 8 LOC 218 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 32 0 ...................................................... 390 1. FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS 246 2. 424 3. 2560 4. 763 5. 822 6. 1108 7. FOR THE WORKING CLASS 1880 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0193 REF 0193 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SOCRDT PTY-UNITED/SPLIT MD=GE 8 LOC 219 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 33 0 ...................................................... 695 1. UNITED 623 2. 738 3. 1636 4. 665 5. 805 6. 1159 7. SPLIT 1872 8. DK 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 87 - 0 VAR 0194 REF 0194 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SOCRDT PTY-BAD/GOOD MD=GE 8 LOC 220 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 34 0 ...................................................... 525 1. BAD 539 2. 795 3. 2241 4. 910 5. 642 6. 700 7. GOOD 1841 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0195 REF 0195 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SOCRDT PTY-LEFT/RIGHT MD=GE 8 LOC 221 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 35 0 ...................................................... 407 1. LEFT WING 456 2. 691 3. 2784 4. 667 5. 461 6. 665 7. RIGHT WING 2062 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0196 REF 0196 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SOCRDT PTY-STG/WEAK MIND MD=GE 8 LOC 222 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 36 0 ...................................................... 769 1. STRONG-MINDED 876 2. 1047 3. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 88 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 1850 4. 789 5. 542 6. 440 7. WEAK-MINDED 1880 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0197 REF 0197 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SOCRDT PTY-HONST/DHONEST MD=GE 8 LOC 223 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 37 0 ...................................................... 1394 1. HONEST 1279 2. 1065 3. 2080 4. 276 5. 142 6. 93 7. DISHONEST 1864 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0198 REF 0198 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SOCRDT PTY-DULL/EXCITING MD=GE 8 LOC 224 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 38 0 ...................................................... 679 1. DULL 710 2. 740 3. 2368 4. 898 5. 537 6. 399 7. EXCITING 1862 8. DK 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 89 - 0 VAR 0199 REF 0199 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SOCRDT PTY-YOUNG/OLD MD=GE 8 LOC 225 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 39 0 ...................................................... 684 1. YOUNG 950 2. 1308 3. 2411 4. 549 5. 192 6. 235 7. OLD 1864 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0200 REF 0200 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SOCRDT PTY-SLOW/FAST MD=GE 8 LOC 226 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 40 0 ...................................................... 441 1. SLOW 513 2. 888 3. 2863 4. 854 5. 429 6. 339 7. FAST 1866 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0201 REF 0201 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CRDTST PTY-OLD/MODERN MD=GE 8 LOC 227 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 41 0 ................................................... 911 1. OUT OF DATE 452 2. 485 3. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 90 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 1476 4. 806 5. 743 6. 1182 7. MODERN 2138 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0202 REF 0202 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CRDTST PTY-CMPTN/INCMPTN MD=GE 8 LOC 228 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 42 0 ................................................... 532 1. COMPETENT 377 2. 504 3. 1357 4. 752 5. 955 6. 1589 7. INCOMPETENT 2127 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0203 REF 0203 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CRDTST PTY-POWERFUL/WEAK MD=GE 8 LOC 229 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 43 0 ................................................... 413 1. POWERFUL 294 2. 489 3. 1215 4. 755 5. 1155 6. 1725 7. WEAK 2147 8. DK 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 91 - 0 VAR 0204 REF 0204 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CRDTST PTY-FOOLISH/WISE MD=GE 8 LOC 230 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 44 0 ................................................... 1424 1. FOOLISH 1120 2. 847 3. 1462 4. 413 5. 370 6. 423 7. WISE 2134 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0205 REF 0205 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CRDTST PTY-MID/WRKG CLS MD=GE 8 LOC 231 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 45 0 ................................................... 285 1. FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS 247 2. 294 3. 2435 4. 470 5. 732 6. 1539 7. FOR THE WORKING CLASS 2191 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0206 REF 0206 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CRDTST PTY-UNITED/SPLIT MD=GE 8 LOC 232 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 46 0 ................................................... 643 1. UNITED 443 2. 397 3. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 92 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 1425 4. 713 5. 931 6. 1443 7. SPLIT 2198 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0207 REF 0207 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CRDTST PTY-BAD/GOOD MD=GE 8 LOC 233 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 47 0 ................................................... 1218 1. BAD 881 2. 829 3. 1773 4. 521 5. 362 6. 475 7. GOOD 2134 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0208 REF 0208 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CRDTST PTY-LEFT/RIGHT MD=GE 8 LOC 234 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 48 0 ................................................... 822 1. LEFT WING 569 2. 573 3. 2485 4. 425 5. 455 6. 513 7. RIGHT WING 2351 8. DK 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 93 - 0 VAR 0209 REF 0209 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CRDTST PTY-STG/WEAK MIND MD=GE 8 LOC 235 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 49 0 ................................................... 1427 1. STRONG-MINDED 935 2. 802 3. 1280 4. 423 5. 531 6. 660 7. WEAK-MINDED 2135 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0210 REF 0210 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CRDTST PTY-HONST/DHONEST MD=GE 8 LOC 236 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 50 0 ................................................... 1014 1. HONEST 892 2. 771 3. 2242 4. 556 5. 305 6. 245 7. DISHONEST 2168 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0211 REF 0211 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CRDTST PTY-DULL/EXCITING MD=GE 8 LOC 237 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 51 0 ................................................... 762 1. DULL 481 2. 529 3. 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 94 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 1714 4. 862 5. 686 6. 991 7. EXCITING 2168 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0212 REF 0212 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CRDTST PTY-YOUNG/OLD MD=GE 8 LOC 238 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 52 0 ................................................... 1076 1. YOUNG 963 2. 1117 3. 2211 4. 321 5. 161 6. 165 7. OLD 2179 8. DK 0 0 VAR 0213 REF 0213 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CRDTST PTY-SLOW/FAST MD=GE 8 LOC 239 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 53 0 ................................................... 456 1. SLOW 467 2. 438 3. 2304 4. 881 5. 740 6. 742 7. FAST 2165 8. DK 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 95 - 0 VAR 0214 REF 0214 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LIBERAL MP-JOB PERFRMNCE MD=GE 8 LOC 240 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 54 0 Q. 31. WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THE PARTIES. I'D ALSO LIKE YOUR OPINIONS OF THE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHICH EACH OF THE PARTIES HAVE SENT TO OTTAWA IN THE LAST FEW YEARS. YOU MAY NOT KNOW TOO MUCH ABOUT THEM, BUT JUST GIVE ME YOUR GENERAL IMPRESSION OF THE JOB THEY HAVE BEEN DOING. A. LET'S START WITH THE LIBERAL MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT. HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE JOB THEY HAVE BEEN DOING-PRETTY GOOD, JUST SO-SO, OR NOT GOOD AT ALL? ............................................................ 2848 1. PRETTY GOOD 4208 2. SO-SO 776 3. NOT GOOD 330 8. DK 31 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0215 REF 0215 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CNSVTV MP-JOB PERFRMANCE MD=GE 8 LOC 241 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 55 0 Q. 31-B. HOW ABOUT THE CONSERVATIVE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT? HOW HAVE THEY BEEN PRETTY GOOD, SO-SO, OR NOT GOOD AT ALL? ........................................................... 2277 1. PRETTY GOOD 4154 2. SO-SO 1253 3. NOT GOOD 465 8. DK 44 9. NA 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 96 - 0 VAR 0216 REF 0216 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-NDP MP-JOB PERFORMANCE MD=GE 8 LOC 242 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 56 0 Q. 31-C. WHAT ABOUT THE NDP MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT? HOW WOULD YOU RATE THEM? ......................................................... 2373 1. PRETTY GOOD 2687 2. SO-SO 1165 3. NOT GOOD 1923 8. DK 45 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0217 REF 0217 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SOCRDT MP-JOB PERFRMANCE MD=GE 8 LOC 243 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 57 0 Q. 31-D. AND HOW ABOUT THE SOCIAL CREDIT MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOLLOWING MR. THOMPSON? ......................................................... 1228 1. PRETTY GOOD 2563 2. SO-SO 1947 3. NOT GOOD 2421 8. DK 34 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0218 REF 0218 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-CRDTST MP-JOB PERFRMANCE MD=GE 8 LOC 244 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 58 0 Q. 31-E. AND FINALLY, WHAT ABOUT THE CAOUETTE GROUP OF SOCIAL CREDIT MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT? ....................................................... 732 1. PRETTY GOOD 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 97 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 1764 2. SO-SO 2936 3. NOT GOOD 2721 8. DK 40 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0219 REF 0219 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XCMPR CRDTST PTY TO OTRS MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 245 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 59 0 ASK QUESTIONS 32 AND 33 IN QUEBEC. FOR ALL OTHERS GO TO Q. 34 Q. 32. (QUEBEC ONLY) NOW I'M GOING TO ASK YOU TWO QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY LED BY MR. CAOUETTE. DO YOU PERSONALLY FEEL THAT, IN THE LAST FEW YEARS, ON THE WHOLE, THE SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY IN OTTAWA HAS DONE A MUCH BETTER JOB, A SOMEWHAT BETTER JOB, ABOUT THE SAME, A SOMEWHAT WORSE JOB, OR A MUCH WORSE JOB THAN THE OTHER PARTIES? ............................................................ 246 1. MUCH BETTER 384 2. SOMEWHAT BETTER 807 3. ABOUT THE SAME 414 4. SOMEWHAT WORSE 258 5. MUCH WORSE 282 8. DK 9. NA 5802 0. INAP (R IS NOT A QUEBEC RESIDENT) 0 0 VAR 0220 REF 0220 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XCRDTST COME PWR-10 YRS MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 246 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 60 0 Q. 33. (QUEBEC ONLY) WHAT CHANCES DO YOU THINK THE SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY HAS TO BECOME THE PARTY IN POWER IN OTTAWA IN THE NEXT TEN YEARS: A VERY GOOD CHANCE, FAIRLY GOOD CHANCE, NOT TOO MUCH OF A CHANCE OR NO CHANCE AT ALL? ............................................................ 69 1. VERY GOOD 330 2. FAIRLY GOOD 717 3. NOT TOO MUCH CHANCE 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 98 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 1119 4. NO CHANCE 156 8. DK 9. NA 5802 0. INAP (R IS NOT A QUEBEC RESIDENT) 0 0 VAR 0221 REF 0221 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-R'S PARTY IDENTIFICATION MD=GE 98 LOC 247 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 61-62 0 Q. 34. (EVERYONE) GENERALLY SPEAKING, DO YOU USUALLY THINK OF YOURSELF AS CONSERVATIVE, LIBERAL, SOCIAL CREDIT, CREDITISTE, NDP, UNION NATIONALE OR WHAT? ........................................................... 2045 10. CONSERVATIVE 3043 20. LIBERAL 883 30. NDP 344 40. SOCIAL CREDIT 144 50. CREDITISTE 42 60. UNION NATIONALE 16 70. OTHER PARTY 1381 80. NO PARTY 238 98. DK 57 99. NA 0 IF SOME PARTY IDENTIFICATION CHOSEN, ASK QUESTIONS 35, 36, 37 . IF NO PARTY IDENTIFICATION, ASK QUESTION 38 . 0 VAR 0222 REF 0222 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XSTRENGTH-R'S PARTY ID MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 249 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 63 0 Q. 35. (FOR IDENTIFIERS) HOW STRONGLY (NAME OF CHOSEN PARTY) DO YOU GENERALLY FEEL-VERY STRONGLY, FAIRLY STRONGLY, OR NOT VERY STRONGLY? ............................................................ 1887 1. VERY STRONGLY 3386 2. FAIRLY STRONGLY 1211 3. NOT VERY STRONGLY 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 99 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 31 8. DK 59 9. NA 1619 0. INAP (R CODED 80 OR 98 IN REF. NO. 221) 0 0 VAR 0223 REF 0223 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XR'S PAST PARTY ID MD=GE 91 LOC 250 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 64-65 0 Q. 36-A. (FOR IDENTIFIERS) WAS THERE EVER A TIME WHEN YOU THOUGHT OF YOURSELF AS CLOSEST TO ANY OTHER PARTY IN CANADA? 36-B. (IF "YES") WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? ............................................................ 3977 00. NO, NEVER FELT CLOSER 955 10. YES, CONSERVATIVE 850 20. YES, LIBERAL 354 30. YES, NDP 108 40. YES, SOCIAL CREDIT 21 50. YES, CREDITISTE 111 80. YES, OTHER 1619 91. INAP (R CODED 0 IN REF. NO. 222) 125 98. DK 73 99. NA 0 0 VAR 0224 REF 0224 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XLEVEL PTY ID-NATL/PVNCL MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 252 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 66 0 Q. 37-A. (FOR IDENTIFIERS) WHEN YOU SAY YOU ARE A (NAME OF CHOSEN PARTY) ARE YOU THINKING OF NATIONAL POLITICS, POLITICS HERE IN THIS PROVINCE, OR BOTH? ........................................................... 1371 1. NATIONAL ONLY 380 2. PROVINCIAL ONLY 4707 3. BOTH 63 8. DK 53 9. NA 1619 0. INAP (R CODED 0 IN REF. NO. 222) 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 100 - 0 VAR 0225 REF 0225 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XPVNCL PTY ID-NATL LVL 1 MD=GE 91 LOC 253 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 67-68 0 --FOR IDENTIFIERS-- Q. 37-B. (IF NATIONAL ONLY) WELL, HOW ABOUT POLITICS HERE IN (NAME OF PROVINCE)? HOW DO YOU THINK OF YOURSELF? .......................................................... 325 10. CONSERVATIVE 401 20. LIBERAL 78 30. NDP 259 40. SOCIAL CREDIT 6 50. CREDITISTE 54 60. UNION NATIONALE 6 70. OTHER 117 80. NONE 6769 91. INAP (R CODED 2, 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 224) 70 98. DK 108 99. NA 0 0 VAR 0226 REF 0226 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNATL PTY ID-PVNCL LVL 1 MD=GE 91 LOC 255 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 69-70 0 --FOR IDENTIFIERS-- Q. 37-C. (IF PROVINCIAL ONLY) WELL, HOW ABOUT NATIONAL POLITICS? HOW DO YOU THINK OF YOURSELF? ....................................................... 107 10. CONSERVATIVE 145 20. LIBERAL 36 30. NDP 15 40. SOCIAL CREDIT 50. CREDITISTE 60. UNION NATIONALE 21 80. NONE 7760 91. INAP (R CODED 1, 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 224) 46 98. DK 63 99. NA 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 101 - 0 VAR 0227 REF 0227 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-NN.ID-CLOSER TO WCH PTY MD=GE 91 LOC 257 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 71-72 0 Q. 38-A. (FOR NON-IDENTIFIERS) WELL, DO YOU GENERALLY THINK OF YOURSELF AS A LITTLE CLOSER TO ONE OF THE PARTIES THAN THE OTHERS? Q. 38-B. (IF "YES") WHICH PARTY IS THAT? ............................................................ 865 00. NO, DO NOT FEEL CLOSER 201 10. YES, CONSERVATIVE 293 20. YES, LIBERAL 103 30. YES, NDP 18 40. YES, SOCIAL CREDIT 27 80. YES, OTHER 6517 91. INAP, (R CODED 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, OR 70 IN REF. NO. 221) 6 97. REFUSED 119 98. DK 44 99. NA 0 0 VAR 0228 REF 0228 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNN.ID-PTY CHOICE NAT/PV MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 259 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 73 0 --FOR NON-IDENTIFIERS WHO LEAN-- Q. 38-C. WHEN YOU SAY YOU FEEL CLOSER TO (PARTY MENTIONED), ARE YOU THINKING OF NATIONAL POLITICS, POLITICS HERE IN THE PROVINCES OR BOTH? ............................................................ 208 1. NATIONAL ONLY 65 2. PROVINCIAL ONLY 362 3. BOTH 13 8. DK 38 9. NA 7507 0. INAP (R CODED 00, 91, 97, OR 98 IN REF.NO. 227) 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 102 - 0 VAR 0229 REF 0229 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNN.ID,PV LVL-NATL LVL 1 MD=GE 91 LOC 260 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 74-75 0 --FOR NON-IDENTIFIERS WHO LEAN-- Q. 38-D. (IF NATIONAL ONLY) WELL HOW ABOUT POLITICS HERE IN (PROVINCE) TO WHICH PARTY DO YOU GENERALLY FEEL CLOSER? ............................................................ 35 10. CONSERVATIVE 73 20. LIBERAL 16 30. NDP 27 40. SOCIAL CREDIT 50. CREDITISTE 3 60. UNION NATIONALE 70. OTHER 7947 91. INAP (R CODED 2, 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 228) 16 98. DK 76 99. NA 0 0 VAR 0230 REF 0230 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNN.ID,NATL LVL-PV LVL 1 MD=GE 91 LOC 262 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 76-77 0 --FOR NON-IDENTIFIERS WHO LEAN-- Q. 38-E. (IF PROVINCIAL ONLY) HOW ABOUT NATIONAL POLITICS? TO WHICH PARTY DO YOU GENERALLY FEEL CLOSER? ........................................................... 3 10. CONSERVATIVE 23 20. LIBERAL 3 30. NDP 40. SOCIAL CREDIT 50. CREDITISTE 70. OTHER 8090 91. INAP (R CODED 1, 3, 8, OR 0 IN REF. NO. 228.) 26 98. DK 48 99. NA 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 103 - 0 VAR 0231 REF 0231 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XNN.ID-PST PTY CHOICE/ID MD=GE 91 LOC 264 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 78-79 0 --FOR NON-IDENTIFIERS WHO LEAN-- Q. 38-F. WAS THERE EVER A TIME WHEN YOU FELT CLOSER TO ANY OTHER PARTY? Q. 38-G. (IF "YES") WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? .................................................... 331 00. NO, NEVER FELT CLOSER 143 10. CONSERVATIVE 75 20. LIBERAL 30 30. NDP 19 40. SOCIAL CREDIT 12 70. OTHER 7507 91. INAP (R CODED 00, 91, 97, OR 98 IN REF.NO.227) 29 98. DK 47 99. NA 0 0 VAR 0001 REF 0001 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-ICPR STUDY NUMBER-7225 NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 5 COL 1- 4 0 STUDY NUMBER (7225) ................... 0 VAR 0002 REF 0002 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-INTERVIEW NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 5 WIDTH 5 DK 5 COL 5- 9 0 RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUMBER THE FIRST DIGIT IDENTIFIES THE PROVINCE AS CODED IN VARIABLE FIVE; THE NEXT FOUR DIGITS ARE THE RESPONDENT'S IDENTIFICATION NUMBER WITHIN THE PROVINCE. ALL FIVE DIGITS ARE NEEDED TO UNIQUELY IDENTIFY A RESPONDENT. ............................................................ 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 104 - 0 VAR 0003 REF 0003 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-INTEGER WEIGHT VARIABLE NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 10 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 10 0 INTEGER WEIGHT VALUES RESPONDENTS WERE WEIGHTED ACCORDING TO THEIR CONSTITUENCY OF RESIDENCE. ALL SUBJECTS LIVING IN CONSTITUENCY #049 (ALGOMA WEST, ONTARIO) THROUGH #080 (WENTWORTH, ONTARIO) WERE WEIGHTED BY A FACTOR OF ONE AND ONE-THIRD. RESIDENTS OF #040 (CARTIER, QUEBEC) THRU #048 (SAINT-JACQUES, QUEBEC) (INCLUSIVE), #081 (YORK CENTRE, ONTARIO) THRU #088 (ROSEDALE, ONTARIO), AND ALL RESPONDENTS FROM BRITISH COLUMBIA WERE DOUBLE WEIGHTED. THE REST OF THE CONSTITUENCIES ARE UNWEIGHTED. SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 4 AND 6. THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNWEIGHTED (RAW) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA CASES. ............................................................ 1113 3. UNWEIGHTED CASES 588 4. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES #049-#080) 417 6. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES #040-#048, #081- #088, AND #111-#118) 0 0 VAR 0004 REF 0004 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-DECIMAL WEIGHT VARIABLE NO MISSING DATA CODES LOC 11 WIDTH 3 DK 5 COL 11-13 2 DEC PLACE(S) 0 DECIMAL WEIGHT VALUES PLEASE SEE ALSO REF. NOS. 3 AND 6. THE FREQUENCIES REPORTED FOR THIS VARIABLE REPRESENT UNWEIGHTED (RAW) FREQUENCIES FOR THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF DATA CASES. .......................................................... 1113 100. UNWEIGHTED CASES 588 133. WEIGHTED ONE AND ONE-THIRD (CONSTITUENCIES #049-#080) 417 200. DOUBLE WEIGHTED (CONSTITUENCIES #040-#048, #081-#088, AND #111-#118) 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 105 - '5' DK 5 COL 14 ... 0 VAR 0232 REF 0232 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XTRUE NN.ID-EVER CLS PTY MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 266 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 15 0 Q. 38-J. (IF DOESN'T FEEL CLOSE IN Q. 38-A ) (FOR NON LEANERS) WAS THERE EVER A TIME WHEN YOU DID THINK OF YOURSELF AS CLOSER TO ONE OF THE PARTIES? ........................................................... 263 1. YES 657 2. NO 79 8. DK 35 9. NA 7159 0. INAP (R CODED 10-80 OR 91 IN REF.NO. 227) 0 0 VAR 0233 REF 0233 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XWHEN R'S PTY ID CHANGED MD=GE 91 LOC 267 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 16-17 0 QNS. 36-C, 38-H, AND 38-K (EACH RESPONDENT ANSWERED ONLY ONE OF THESE) Q. 36-C. (IF "YES" IN REF. NO. 223) WHEN DID YOU CHANGE FROM THAT PARTY TO YOUR PRESENT ONE? Q. 38-H. (IF "YES" IN REF. NO. 231) WHEN DID YOU CHANGE FROM FEELING CLOSER TO THAT PARTY? Q. 38-K. (IF "YES" IN REF. NO. 232) WHEN DID YOU MOVE AWAY FROM THAT PARTY? ......................................................... 359 01. DURING THE LAST FEDERAL CAMPAIGN 90 02. LESS THAN 1 YEAR BEFORE (INTERVIEW) BUT BEFORE LAST CAMPAIGN. 361 03. 1 OR 2 YRS. BEFORE (12 MONTHS-35 MONTHS) 508 04. 3-5 YRS. BEFORE (36 MONTHS-71 MONTHS) 301 05. 6-9 YRS BEFORE (72 MONTHS-119 MONTHS) 227 06. 10-14 YRS. 71 07. 15-20 YRS. 238 08. 20 YRS. PLUS 5198 91. INAP (R DID NOT SWITCH PARTIES, I.E. CODED 00 OR 98 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 106 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 IN REF. NO. 223, OR 00 OR 98 IN REF. NO. 231, OR 2 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 232) 840 99. NO ANSWER, CAN'T REMEMBER, UNCLEAR 0 0 VAR 0234 REF 0234 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XREASON R CHANGD PTY ID MD=GE 91 LOC 269 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 18-19 0 QNS. 36-D, 38-I, AND 38-L. (EACH RESPONDENT ANSWERED ONLY ONE OF THESE QUESTIONS.) Q. 36-D. (IF "YES" IN REF. NO. 223) WHAT WAS THE MAIN THING THAT MADE YOU CHANGE? Q. 38-I. (IF "YES" IN REF. NO. 231) WHAT WAS THE MAIN THING THAT MADE YOU CHANGE? Q. 38-L. (IF "YES" IN REF. NO. 232) WHAT WAS THE MAIN THING THAT MADE YOU MOVE AWAY FROM THE PARTY? ....................................................... 394 11. PARTY LEADER OR LEADERS. 322 12. CANDIDATE. 445 13. PARTY (DISSATISFIED WITH FORMERLY FAVOURED PARTY OR ATTRACTED BY OTHER PARTY) NEW OR OLD. 337 14. GENERAL PLATFORM AND PROGRAM OF PARTY OR CANDIDATE. 0 SPECIFIC ISSUES 42 15. MAJORITY. 19 16. LACK OF LEADERSHIP. 445 17. OTHERS. 9 18. LACK OF STABILITY. 165 19. NEEDED CHANGE IN GOVERNMENT. 70 20. SWITCHED ALLEGIANCE BECAUSE HE FELT HIS PARTY HAD NO CHANCE. 155 21. OTHER NON-POLITICAL REASONS, E.G. INFLUENCE OF ANOTHER PERSON OR GEOGRAPHICAL AREA. 63 22. UNKEPT PROMISES. 33 23. UNEMPLOYMENT. 5198 91. INAP. (CODED 91 IN REF. NO. 233) 98. IRRELEVANT ANSWERS, DON'T KNOW, REFUSE. 496 99. NO ANSWER OR NOT APPLICABLE. 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 107 - 0 VAR 0235 REF 0235 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-SECOND CHOICE FDRL PTY MD=GE 8 LOC 271 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 20 0 Q. 39. (EVERYBODY) IF AT THIS TIME YOU HAD TO VOTE FOR ONE OF THE OTHER FEDERAL PARTIES, WHICH ONE WOULD BE YOUR SECOND CHOICE? ............................................................ 1074 0. NO SECOND CHOICE 1730 1. CONSERVATIVE 1666 2. LIBERAL 1721 3. NDP 616 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 151 5. CREDITISTE 34 6. OTHER 1152 8. DK 49 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0236 REF 0236 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-LAST CHOICE FEDERAL PTY MD=GE 7 LOC 272 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 21 0 Q. 40. WHICH OF THE FEDERAL PARTIES TODAY WOULD YOU LEAST WANT TO VOTE FOR? .......................................................... 792 1. CONSERVATIVE 565 2. LIBERAL 952 3. NDP 1229 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 2948 5. CREDITISTE 160 6. OTHER 6 7. REFUSED 1504 8. DK 37 9. NA 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 108 - 0 VAR 0237 REF 0237 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WCH MOST IMP VT:LDR,PTY MD=GE 80 LOC 273 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 22-23 0 Q. 41. ON THE WHOLE, WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS MOST IMPORTANT TO YOU WHEN YOU VOTE? THE CANDIDATE RUNNING IN YOUR RIDING, THE PARTY ITSELF, OR THE PARTY'S LEADER? ......................................................... 2349 01. PARTY 1652 02. LEADER 422 03. PARTY AND LEADER EQUALLY 2458 04. CANDIDATE 267 05. PARTY AND CANDIDATE 204 06. LEADER AND CANDIDATE 196 08. PROGRAM 130 09. PARTY AND PROGRAM EQUALLY 194 10. LEADER AND PROGRAM EQUALLY 156 12. CANDIDATE AND PROGRAM 4 80. OTHER COMBINATIONS 161 98. DK 0 0 VAR 0238 REF 0238 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-VOTE WN BAD CAND,GD PTY MD=GE 8 LOC 275 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 24 0 Q. 42. SUPPOSE THERE WAS AN ELECTION IN WHICH THE PARTY YOU FAVOUR RAN A CANDIDATE IN YOUR RIDING WHOM YOU DID NOT LIKE OR DID NOT AGREE WITH WHAT WOULD YOU BE MOST LIKELY TO DO? VOTE FOR THE CANDIDATE ANYWAY? OR WOULD YOU PROBABLY NOT VOTE AT ALL? ............................................................ 3243 1. CANDIDATE 2726 2. OTHER PARTY 1527 3. WON'T VOTE 667 8. DK 30 9. NA 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 109 - 0 VAR 0239 REF 0239 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-VOTE WN BAD PLCY,GD PTY MD=GE 8 LOC 276 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 25 0 Q. 43. SUPPOSE THERE WAS AN ELECTION IN WHICH THE PARTY YOU PREFER WAS IN FAVOUR OF SOME POLICY YOU DID NOT LIKE OR DID NOT AGREE WITH. WHAT WOULD YOU BE MOST LIKELY TO DO? VOTE FOR THE PARTY'S CANDIDATE ANYWAY? CONSIDER ANOTHER PARTY'S CANDIDATE? OR WOULD YOU PROBABLY NOT VOTE? ............................................................ 2111 1. CANDIDATE 3015 2. OTHER PARTY 1343 3. WON'T VOTE 1041 4. IT DEPENDS, QUALIFIED 654 8. DK 29 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0240 REF 0240 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-FATHER'S INTST IN POLT MD=GE 8 LOC 277 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 26 0 Q. 44. DO YOU REMEMBER, WHEN YOU WERE GROWING, UP, WHETHER YOUR FATHER WAS VERY MUCH INTERESTED IN POLITICS, SOMEWHAT INTERESTED, OR DIDN'T HE PAY MUCH ATTENTION TO IT? ........................................................... 3176 1. VERY INTERESTED 2849 2. SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 1558 3. DID NOT PAY MUCH ATTENTION 213 4. DID NOT LIVE WITH FATHER 390 8. DK 7 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0241 REF 0241 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-FATHER'S PTY PREFERENCE MD=GE 60 LOC 278 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 27-28 0 Q. 45-A. DID YOUR FATHER HAVE ANY PARTICULAR PREFERENCE FOR ONE OF THE FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTIES WHEN YOU WERE YOUNG? Q. 45-B. (IF "YES") WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? ............................................................ 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 110 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 2093 00. NO PREFERENCE 2120 10. CONSERVATIVE 2497 20. LIBERAL 267 30. CCF 88 40. SOCIAL CREDIT 43 60. OTHER 405 80. NOT CANADIAN PARTY 213 91. INAP (R CODED 4 IN REF. NO. 240) 320 98. DK 147 99. NA 0 0 VAR 0242 REF 0242 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-MOTHER'S INTST IN POLT MD=GE 8 LOC 280 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 29 0 Q. 46. WHEN YOU WERE GROWING UP, WAS YOUR MOTHER VERY MUCH INTERESTED IN POLITICS, SOMEWHAT INTERESTED, OR DIDN'T SHE PAY MUCH ATTENTION TO IT? ........................................................... 1161 1. VERY INTERESTED 2447 2. SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 3872 3. DID NOT PAY MUCH ATTENTION 267 4. DID NOT LIVE WITH MOTHER 446 8. DK 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0243 REF 0243 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-MOTHER'S PTY PREFERENCE MD=GE 60 LOC 281 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 30-31 0 Q. 47-A. WHEN YOU WERE YOUNG, DID YOUR MOTHER HAVE ANY PREFERENCE FOR ONE OF THE FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTIES? Q. 47-B. (IF "YES") WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? ....................................................... 3525 00. NO PREFERENCE 1539 10. CONSERVATIVE 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 111 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 1956 20. LIBERAL 198 30. CCF 67 40. SOCIAL CREDIT 9 60. OTHER 262 80. NOT CANADIAN PARTY 267 91. INAP (R CODED 4 IN REF. NO. 242) 189 98. DK 181 99. NA 0 0 VAR 0244 REF 0244 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-RMBR NAME ELECTED CAND MD=9 LOC 283 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 32 0 Q. 48. DO YOU HAPPEN TO REMEMBER THE NAME OF THE CANDIDATE WHO WAS ELECTED TO PARLIAMENT FOR THIS RIDING IN THE NOVEMBER 8TH, ELECTION? ........................................................... 6153 1. YES, CORRECT 194 2. YES, INCORRECT 1443 3. NO, DO NOT REMEMBER 394 4. NOT SURE 9 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0245 REF 0245 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-RMBR PARTY ELECTED CAND MD=9 LOC 284 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 33 0 Q. 49. DO YOU HAPPEN TO KNOW HIS (HER) PARTY? ........................................................... 6947 1. YES, CORRECT 188 2. YES, INCORRECT 802 3. NO, DO NOT KNOW 248 4. NOT SURE 8 9. NA 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 112 - 0 VAR 0246 REF 0246 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-READ/HEARD ABOUT CAND MD=GE 8 LOC 285 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 34 0 Q. 50-A. (IF R GAVE INCORRECT ANSWERS OR DID NOT KNOW, NAME AND PARTY READ BY INTERVIEWER) HAVE YOU EVER READ OR HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT HIM (HER) ? ......................................................... 4793 1. YES 2689 2. NOT HEARD ANYTHING 694 3. NOT SURE 8. DK 17 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0247 REF 0247 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XTYPE OF INFO R/H ABT MP MD=0 OR GE 9 LOC 286 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 35 0 Q. 50-B. WHAT WAS THAT ? ........................................................... (ANSWERS TO THIS QUESTION ARE CODED ACCORDING TO WHETHER OR NOT THE RESPONDENT IS ABLE TO BACK UP HIS CLAIM IN 50-A. ANSWERS WERE AIMED AT THE SOURCE OF INFORMATION OR THE CONTENT. ALL SOURCE ORIENTED RESPONSES WERE CODED 1 (PAMPHLETS, NEWSPAPER ARTICLES, T.V., ETC.). ALL CONTENT ANSWERS WERE EVALUATED ACCORDING TO THE CODING SCHEME. IN CASES OF DOUBT THE RESPONDENT WAS ALWAYS GIVEN THE BENEFIT OF A 1 CODE.) 3838 1. MENTIONS SOMETHING SPECIFIC. 427 2. GIVES VAGUE GENERAL ANSWER. 518 8. CAN NOT REMEMBER, REFUSES 10 9. NA 3400 0. QUESTION IS NOT APPLICABLE (R CODED 2, 3, 8, OR 9 IN REF. NO. 246) 0 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 113 - 0 VAR 0248 REF 0248 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-WAS CANDIDATE INCUMBENT MD=9 LOC 287 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 36 0 Q. 51-A. DO YOU HAPPEN TO KNOW WHETHER HE (SHE) WAS ALREADY IN PARLIAMENT JUST BEFORE THIS ELECTION? ............................................................ 4998 1. IN PARLIAMENT, CORRECT 271 2. IN PARLIAMENT, INCORRECT 1468 3. NOT IN PARLIAMENT, CORRECT 197 4. NOT IN PARLIAMENT, INCORRECT 6 5. OTHER 1253 8. DK 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0249 REF 0249 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XCAND AIDED CONSTITUENCY MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 288 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 37 0 Q. 51-B. (IF IN PARLIAMENT, CORRECT) DO YOU REMEMBER ANYTHING THAT (NAME OF MEMBER) HAS DONE FOR THE PEOPLE OF THIS CONSTITUENCY? ......................................................... 1272 1. YES 966 2. DID NOTHING 2746 8. DK 14 9. NA 3195 0. INAP. (R CODED 2-8 IN REF. NO. 248) 0 0 VAR 0250 REF 0250 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XCAND AIDED R/R'S FAMILY MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 289 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 38 0 Q. 51-D. HAS HE (SHE) EVER DONE ANYTHING FOR YOU OR YOUR FAMILY PERSONALLY? ......................................................... 193 1. YES 4758 2. DONE NOTHING 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 114 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 8. DK 47 9. NA 3195 0. INAP (R CODED 2-8 IN REF. NO. 248) 0 0 VAR 0251 REF 0251 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-OTHER DIST CANDS--NAME MD=0 OR GE 9 MULT RESPS 4 LOC 290 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 39-42 0 FOR EACH NAME ELICITED BY Q. 52-A (REF.NO. 251), THE RESPOND- ENT WAS ASKED QS. 52-B AND 52-C (REF.NOS. 252-253). COMMENTS ABOUT THE FIRST INDIVIDUAL MENTIONED ARE ALWAYS CODED AS THE FIRST RESPONSE IN EACH OF THESE THREE VARIABLES (REF. NOS. 251-253). COMMENTS ABOUT THE SECOND INDIVIDUAL ARE CODED IN THE SECOND RESPONSE, ETC. Q. 52-A. DO YOU REMEMBER THE NAMES OF ANY OTHER CANDIDATES RUNNING FOR ELECTION ON NOVEMBER 8TH FROM THIS RIDING? ............................................................ 1. CORRECT 2. INCORRECT 4. DK NAME BUT KNOWS THE PARTY 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP (NO FURTHER RESPONSE) 0 THE FREQUENCIES FOR REF. NO. 251 FOLLOW BY RESPONSE: RESP # CODES--> (1) (2) (4) (8) (9) (0) 1 4738 439 203 2813 2 2296 173 231 3 5490 3 442 70 88 7593 4 91 11 9 8082 0 VAR 0252 REF 0252 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-OTHER DIST CANDS--PARTY MD=0 OR GE 9 MULT RESPS 4 LOC 294 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 43-46 0 Q. 52-B. WHAT IS HIS (HER) PARTY ? ........................................................ 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 115 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 1. CORRECT 2. INCORRECT 4. DK PARTY BUT KNOWS NAME 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP (NO FURTHER RESPONSE) 0 THE FREQUENCIES FOR REF. NO. 252 FOLLOW BY RESPONSE: RESP # CODES--> (1) (2) (4) (8) (9) (0) 1 4869 414 100 2810 2 2403 222 75 3 5490 3 474 114 12 7593 4 91 20 8082 0 VAR 0253 REF 0253 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-OTHER DIST CANDS--RD/HRD MD=0 OR GE 8 MULT RESPS 4 LOC 298 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 47-50 0 Q. 52-C. HAVE YOU READ OR HEARD ANYTHING ABOUT HIM (HER) ? ......................................................... 1. YES 2. NO 3. NOT SURE 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP (NO FURTHER RESPONSE) 0 THE FREQUENCIES FOR REF. NO. 253 FOLLOW BY RESPONSE: RESP # CODES--> (1) (2) (3) (8) (9) (0) 1 3737 1283 370 2797 6 2 1585 794 324 5490 3 313 210 77 7593 4 53 43 15 8082 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 116 - 0 VAR 0254 REF 0254 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-RGLR VTR IN FDRL ELCTN MD=GE 8 LOC 302 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 51 0 Q. 53. IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS SINCE YOU HAVE BEEN OLD ENOUGH TO VOTE IN CANADA, WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU HAVE VOTED IN ALL OF THEM, MOST OF THEM, SOME OF THEM, OR NONE OF THEM? ........................................................... 4550 1. VOTED IN ALL 2292 2. VOTED IN MOST 1072 3. VOTED IN SOME 251 4. VOTED IN NONE 21 8. DK 7 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0255 REF 0255 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XFDRL ELCTN-VT SAME PTY? MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 303 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 52 0 IF RESPONDENT HAS EVER VOTED IN A FEDERAL ELECTION-ASK Q. 54-A . FOR ALL OTHERS, GO TO Q. 55 . Q. 54-A. (FOR THOSE WHO HAVE VOTED IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS) HAVE YOU ALWAYS VOTED FOR THE SAME PARTY, OR HAVE YOU VOTED FOR DIFFERENT PARTIES? ........................................................... 3626 1. VOTED FOR SAME PARTY 4262 2. VOTED FOR DIFFERENT PARTIES 8. DK 33 9. NA 272 0. INAP, (R CODED 4 OR 8 IN REF. NO. 254) 0 0 VAR 0256 REF 0256 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XFDRL ELCN-VT WCH SM PTY MD=0 OR GE 7 LOC 304 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 53 0 Q. 54-B. (IF SAME PARTY) WHICH PARTY IS THAT ? ........................................................... 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 117 - (CONTINUED) ........... 0 1169 1. CONSERVATIVE 1915 2. LIBERAL 279 3. NDP 105 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 29 5. OTHER 16 7. REFUSED 8. DK 113 9. NA 4567 0. INAP.; (R CODED 2, 9 OR 0 IN REF. NO. 255) 0 0 VAR 0257 REF 0257 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-RGLR VTR IN PVNCL ELCTN MD=GE 8 LOC 305 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 54 0 Q. 55. IN PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS SINCE YOU HAVE BEEN OLD ENOUGH TO VOTE, WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU HAVE VOTED IN ALL OF THEM, MOST OF THEM, SOME OF THEM, OR NONE OF THEM? ........................................................... 3830 1. VOTED IN ALL 2344 2. VOTED IN MOST 1142 3. VOTED IN SOME 788 4. VOTED IN NONE 79 8. DK 10 9. NA 0 0 VAR 0258 REF 0258 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XPVNL ELCTN-VT SAME PTY? MD=0 OR GE 8 LOC 306 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 55 0 Q. 56-A. (FOR THOSE WHO HAVE VOTED IN PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS) IN PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS, HAVE YOU ALWAYS VOTED FOR THE SAME PARTY, OR HAVE YOU VOTED FOR DIFFERENT PARTIES? ............................................................ 3938 1. VOTED FOR SAME PARTY 3368 2. VOTED FOR DIFFERENT PARTIES 8. DK 10 9. NA 877 0. INAP (R CODED 4, 8 OR 9 IN REF. NO. 257) 1 1965 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY PAGE 118 - 0 VAR 0259 REF 0259 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-XPVNL ELCN-VT WCH SM PTY MD=0 OR GE 7 LOC 307 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 56 0 Q. 56-B. (IF SAME PARTY) WHICH PARTY IS THAT ? ........................................................... 1234 1. CONSERVATIVE 1710 2. LIBERAL 293 3. NDP 273 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 120 5. UNION NATIONALE 13 6. OTHER 22 7. REFUSED 8. DK 273 9. NA 4255 0. INAP (R CODED 2, 9 OR 0 IN REF. NO. 258) 0 0 VAR 0260 REF 0260 DATA SET ID-'7225' NAME-QUEBEC VT '62 FDRL ELCTN