0 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY (ICPSR STUDY NUMBER 7379) - PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS - HAROLD CLARKE UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR - JANE JENSON CARLETON UNIVERSITY - LAWRENCE LEDUC UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR - JON PAMMETT CARLETON UNIVERSITY - AUGUST-DECEMBER, 1974 0 ICPSR EDITION FIRST PRINTING, 1976 - INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH P.O. BOX 1248 ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48106 0 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG NUMBER 76-27034 ISBN 0-89138-156-2 1 - ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF ASSISTANCE - 0 ALL MANUSCRIPTS UTILIZING DATA MADE AVAILABLE THROUGH THE CONSORTIUM SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE THAT FACT AS WELL AS IDENTIFY THE ORIGINAL COLLECTOR OF THE DATA. THE ICPSR COUNCIL URGES ALL USERS OF ICPSR DATA FACILITIES TO FOLLOW SOME ADAPTATION OF THIS STATEMENT WITH THE PARENTHESES INDICATING ITEMS TO BE FILLED IN APPROPRIATELY OR DELETED BY THE INDIVIDUAL USER. - THE DATA (AND TABULATIONS) UTILIZED IN THIS (PUBLICATION) WERE MADE AVAILABLE (IN PART) BY THE INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH. THE DATA FOR THE "1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY" WERE ORIGINALLY COLLECTED BY HAROLD CLARKE, JANE JENSON, LAWRENCE LEDUC AND JON PAMMETT. NEITHER THE ORIGINAL COLLECTORS OF THE DATA NOR THE CONSORTIUM BEAR ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ANALYSES OR INTERPRETATIONS PRESENTED HERE. - IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING AGENCIES WITH ESSENTIAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE USE OF ARCHIVAL RESOURCES, AND TO FACILITATE THE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION ABOUT ICPSR PARTICIPANTS' RESEARCH ACTIVITIES, EACH USER OF THE ICPSR DATA FACILITIES IS EXPECTED TO SEND TWO COPIES OF EACH COMPLETED MANUSCRIPT (OR THESIS ABSTRACT) TO THE CONSORTIUM. PLEASE INDICATE IN THE COVER LETTER WHICH DATA WERE USED. - 1 SUMMARY OF CONTENTS - - 0 PAGE NO. INTRODUCTION STUDY DESCRIPTION I SAMPLING INFORMATION II WEIGHTING INFORMATION FREQUENCIES CODEBOOK INFORMATION III FILE STRUCTURES V VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST VI CODEBOOK 1 APPENDIX NOTES FREQUENCIES QUESTIONNAIRES SHOW CARDS 1 - STUDY DESCRIPTION 0 THE 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY WAS CONDUCTED BY HAROLD CLARKE, JANE JENSON, LAWRENCE LEDUC, AND JON PAMMETT. THE STUDY CONSISTS OF INTERVIEWS WITH A NATIONAL SAMPLE OF CANADIANS 18 YEARS AND OLDER. THE 2562 RESPONDENTS WERE INTERVIEWED AUGUST 4, 1974 THROUGH DECEMBER 21, 1974, FOLLOWING THE FEDERAL ELECTION JULY 8, 1974. FUNDING WAS PROVIDED BY THE CANADA COUNCIL. 0 THE STUDY EXPLORED THE POLITICAL ATTITUDES AND BEHAVIOR OF THE RESPONDENTS AT THE FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL LEVELS. GENERAL POLITICAL INTEREST, PARTY IDENTIFICATION, VOTING HISTORY, CAMPAIGN INFORMATION SOURCES AND POLITICAL INVOLVEMENT WERE STUDIED. OTHER ITEMS DEALT MORE SPECIFICALLY WITH THE 1974 CAMPAIGN AND ELECTION. BESIDES ASCERTAINING HOW THE RESPONDENT VOTED, QUERRIES WERE MADE AS TO WHEN THIS VOTING DECISION WAS MADE AND THE REASONS FOR IT. THE RESPONDENTS' VIEWS ON PROVINCIAL AND FEDERAL PARTIES, PARTY LEADERS AND CANDIDATES WERE OBTAINED THROUGH SERIES OF QUESTIONS EACH OF WHICH WAS CODED ON THREE DIMENSIONS. POLITICAL AND SOCIAL ISSUES EXPLORED INCLUDED BILINGUALISM, FOREIGN INVESTMENT, INFLATION, SEPARATISM AND MAJORITY GOVERNMENT. "FEELING THERMOMETERS" WERE USED TO GAUGE THE RESPONDENT'S FEELINGS TOWARDS HIS PROVINCE, CANADA AND OTHER COUNTRIES AND TOWARDS SPECIFIC PARTIES, PARTY LEADERS AND CANDIDATES IN THE 1974 FEDERAL ELECTION. A NUMBER OF ITEMS DEALT WITH CANADIAN FEDERALISM, COMPARING FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT INFLUENCE. A MAP OF CANADA WAS USED TO DETERMINE THE RESPONDENT'S KNOWLEDGE AND ASSESSMENT OF THE POLITICS OF THE REGIONS OF CANADA. 0 THE DEMOGRAPHIC SECTION OF THE INTERVIEW OBTAINED INFORMATION ABOUT THE EDUCATION, OCCUPATION, ORGANIZATIONAL MEMBERSHIP, MARITAL STATUS, AGE AND SEX OF THE RESPONDENT. IN ADDITION, EXTENSIVE INFORMATION ABOUT MALE RESPONDENTS' FATHER'S, GRANDFATHER'S AND SON'S OCCUPATIONAL AND SOCIAL MOBILITY WERE INCLUDED. 0 THE PROCESSING OF THIS STUDY WAS COMPLETED, IN PART, BY SUPPORT FROM THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (GRANT NUMBER SOC 75-17915). 1 II 0 SAMPLING INFORMATION THE SAMPLE DESIGN FOR THE 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY WAS A MULTI-STAGE, STRATIFIED, CLUSTER SAMPLE OF 2562 RESPONDENTS. THERE WAS SYSTEMATIC OVERSAMPLING OF SEVERAL SMALLER PROVINCES, THEREFORE THE WEIGHT VARIABLE (REF. NO.4) SHOULD BE USED TO OBTAIN A NATIONAL SAMPLE. A MORE DETAILED DISCUSSION OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN OF THIS SAMPLE MAY BE FOUND IN LEDUC, CLARKE, JENSON AND PAMMETT, "A NATIONAL SAMPLE DESIGN," CANADIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL. VII, 1974. PP. 701-708. BECAUSE SAMPLING ERROR FOR CLUSTER SAMPLES WILL NORMALLY EXCEED THAT FOR SIMPLE RANDOM SAMPLES OF COMPARABLE SIZE, STANDARD TABLES ARE NOT APPROPRIATE FOR USE WITH THIS SAMPLE. IN FACT, IT MAY BE SHOWN THAT FORMULA FOR SIMPLE RANDOM SAMPLES WILL INCREASINGLY UNDERESTIMATE THE TRUE SAMPLING ERROR AS THE SIZE OF THE SAMPLE INCREASES. SEE NOTE 16 FOR THE TABLES AND FORMULA USED TO ASSIGN LEVELS OF OF SIGNIFICANCE. IN ORDER TO MAXIMIZE THE NUMBER OF QUESTIONS WHICH COULD BE ADMINISTERED, TWO FORMS OF THE INTERVIEW WERE DEVELOPED. ONE-HALF OF THE RESPONDENTS WERE ADMINISTERED FORM 1 AND THE OTHER HALF FORM 2. WHILE MANY ITEMS IN THE FORMS ARE IDENTICAL, THERE ARE ALSO SERIES OF ITEMS WHICH ARE IN ONE FORM ONLY. - WEIGHTING INFORMATION THIS STUDY CONTAINS A WEIGHT VARIABLE (REF. NO. 4) WHICH PRODUCES A REPRESENTATIVE NATIONAL SAMPLE OF THE CANADIAN VOTERS. THIS WEIGHT CORRECTS FOR THE OVERSAMPLING BY PROVINCE. IN ADDITION THERE IS A WEIGHT VARIABLE (REF. NO. 5) WHICH IS TO BE USED WHEN ANALYZING THE MARITIME PROVINCES ALONE. - FREQUENCIES THE FREQUENCIES INSERTED FOR VARIABLES IN THE BODY OF THIS CODEBOOK ARE FOR THE NATIONAL CROSS-SECTION SAMPLE ONLY. FREQUENCIES REFLECT THE USE OF THE DECIMAL WEIGHT (REF. NO. 4) AND HAVE BEEN ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST INTEGER BEFORE INSERTION INTO THE CODEBOOK. CONSEQUENTLY, THE FREQUENCIES SUBJECTED TO ROUNDING DO NOT ALWAYS ADD UP TO THE EXPECTED 'N'. 1 III 0 CODEBOOK INFORMATION THE EXAMPLE BELOW IS A REPRODUCTION OF INFORMATION APPEARING IN THE MACHINE READABLE CODEBOOK FOR A TYPICAL VARIABLE. THE NUMBERS IN CIRCLES DO NOT APPEAR IN THE CODEBOOK, BUT ARE REFERENCES TO THE DESCRIPTIONS WHICH FOLLOW THIS EXAMPLE. ............................................................ 1 VAR 0370 2 MOST IMP-CAND, LDR,PARTY 3 MD=GE 8 REF 0370 4 LOC 575 WIDTH 1 5 DK 9 COL 21 6 ----- 7 ----- 8 Q74A. IN DECIDING HOW YOU WOULD VOTE IN THE LAST PROVINCIAL ELECTION, WHICH WAS THE MOST IMPORTANT TO YOU: THE PARTY LEADERS, THE CANDIDATES HERE IN THIS CONSTITUENCY, OR THE PARTIES TAKEN AS A WHOLE? ............................................... 9 ----------------------------------------------- 10 ----------------------------------------------- 11 12 13 586 1. PARTY LEADERS 537 2. CANDIDATES 970 3. THE PARTIES 143 8. DK 210 9. NA; INAP., CODED 8 IN Q.73A; CODED 8 IN Q.73D ............................................................ 1. INDICATES THE VARIABLE AND REFERENCE NUMBERS. A VARIABLE AND A REFERENCE NUMBER ARE ASSIGNED TO EACH ITEM IN THE STUDY. IN THE PRESENT CODEBOOK, WHICH DOCUMENTS THE ARCHIVED DATASET, THESE NUMBERS ARE IDENTICAL. SHOULD THE DATA BE SUBSETTED OR REARRANGED BY AN OSIRIS PROGRAM (E.G., MMP TO INTERSPERSE DATA FROM ANOTHER SOURCE, OR TCOT TO PRODUCE AN ANALYSIS DECK), THE VARIABLE NUMBERS WOULD CHANGE TO REFLECT THE ORDER OF THE NEW DATASET, WHILE THE REFERENCE NUMBERS WOULD REMAIN UNCHANGED TO REFLECT THE VARIABLE NUMBER IN THE CODEBOOK DESCRIBING THE ARCHIVED DATA SET. 2. INDICATES THE ABBREVIATED (24 CHARACTERS MAXIMUM) VARIABLE NAME USED WITHIN THE OSIRIS SYSTEM TO IDENTIFY THE VARIABLE FOR THE USER. AN EXPANDED VERSION OF THESE NAMES CAN BE FOUND IN THE VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST. 1 IV 3. INDICATES THE DESIGNATION OF MISSING DATA. IN THIS EXAMPLE CODE VALUES GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO EIGHT ARE MISSING DATA (MD=GE 8). ALTERNATIVE STATEMENTS FOR OTHER VARIABLES ARE "MD=0", "MD GE 9", OR "NO MISSING DATA CODES". SOME ANALYSIS SOFTWARE PACKAGES (INCLUDING THE OSIRIS SOFTWARE PACKAGE) REQUIRE THAT CERTAIN TYPES OF DATA WHICH THE USER DESIRES TO BE EXCLUDED FROM ANALYSIS BE DESIGNATED AS "MISSING DATA", E.G., INAPPROPRIATE, NOT ASCERTAINED, OR OTHER AMBIGUOUS DATA CATEGORIES. ALTHOUGH THESE CATEGORIES ARE DEFINED AS MISSING DATA CATEGORIES THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT A USER SHOULD NOT OR CANNOT USE THESE CODES IN A SUB- STANTIVE ROLE IF SO DESIRED. 4. INDICATES THE STARTING LOCATION AND WIDTH OF THIS VARIABLE WHEN THE DATA ARE STORED ON A MAGNETIC TAPE IN THE OSIRIS FORMAT. FOR MULTIPLE RESPONSE VARIABLES THE LOCATION AND WIDTH REFER TO THE FIRST RESPONSE CODED. 5. INDICATES THE LOCATION BY DECK AND COLUMN(S) OF THIS VARIABLE WHEN THE DATA ARE ON CARDS OR IN CARD IMAGE FORM (EITHER 80 OR 84 COLUMN FORMAT). FOR MULTIPLE RESPONSE VARIABLES THE LOCATIONS REFER TO THE ENTIRE VARIABLE FIELD. 6. A MULTIPLE RESPONSE VARIABLE IS DENOTED BY THE MESSAGE, "MULT RESPS X", WHERE X IS THE NUMBER OF RESPONSES. 7. A VARIABLE CONTAINING DATA WITH IMPLIED DECIMALS IS DENOTED BY THE MESSAGE, "XX DEC PLACE(S)", WHERE XX IS THE NUMBER OF DECIMAL PLACES IMPLIED (NOT PUNCHED) IN THE VARIABLE. 8. INDICATES THE FULL TEXT (QUESTION) SUPPLIED BY THE IN- VESTIGATOR TO DESCRIBE THE VARIABLE. 9. INDICATES AN ADDITIONAL COMMENT OR EXPLANATION APPENDED TO THE VARIABLE DESCRIPTION. 10. A VARIABLE WHICH HAS A FOOTNOTE ASSOCIATED WITH IT IS DENOTED BY THE MESSAGE, "SEE NOTE(S) X", WHERE X IS THE NUMBER OF THE FOOTNOTE REFERENCED. 11. INDICATES THE FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF EACH CODE VALUE. FREQUENCIES FOR MULTIPLE RESPONSE VARIABLES ARE CUMULATIVE. 12. INDICATES THE CODE VALUES OCCURRING IN THE DATA FOR THIS VARIABLE. 13. INDICATES THE TEXTUAL DEFINITIONS OF THE CODES. 1 V - FILE STRUCTURES 0 THE DATA ARE AVAILABLE FROM ICPSR IN TWO FORMATS: A CARD IMAGE FILE AND AN OSIRIS DATASET. THE CARD IMAGE FILE CONTAINS 11 DECKS PER RESPONDENT IN A FORMAT BASED ON 80 COLUMN PUNCHED CARDS. THE DATA ARE SORTED BY RESPONDENT WITH ALL DECKS FOR EACH CASE TOGETHER IN ASCENDING ORDER. THERE ARE TWO COMPONENTS TO THE OSIRIS DATASET. THE OSIRIS DICTIONARY GIVES THE FORMAT AND OTHER INFORMATION FOR EACH VARIABLE IN THE OSIRIS DATA FILE. THE DICTIONARY OR DICTIONARY-CODEBOOK FILE IS USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OSIRIS SOFTWARE PACKAGE. THE OSIRIS DATA FILE IS CONSTRUCTED WITH A SINGLE LOGICAL RECORD OF 733 BYTES FOR EACH RESONDENT. THE OSIRIS DATA FILE CAN BE ACCESSED DIRECTLY BY SOFTWARE PACKAGES WHICH DO NOT USE THE OSIRIS DICTIONARY BY SPECIFYING THE TAPE LOCATIONS OF THE DESIRED VARIABLES. THESE TAPE LOCATIONS ARE GIVEN IN THE OSIRIS CODEBOOK. - PROCESSING INFORMATION 0 THE STUDY WAS PROCESSED ACCORDING TO THE STANDARD ICPSR PROCESSING PROCEDURES. THE DATA WERE CHECKED FOR ILLEGAL AND INCONSISTENT CODES, WHICH, WHEN FOUND, WERE CORRECTED BY REFERRING TO THE PROTOCOLS. THROUGHOUT THE TEXT ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, ENCLOSED IN CARET SIGNS "< >", WERE INSERTED BY THE STUDY PROCESSORS IN THE COURSE OF PREPARING THE CODEBOOK TO PROVIDE FURTHER EXPLANATORY INFORMATION. THE CODEBOOK PRESERVES THE ORDER OF THE ORIGINAL QUESTIONNAIRE. STUDY PROCESSING WAS DONE BY MARTHA WRIGHT AND GINGER MAGGIO. 1 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 0 VAR. NO. - STUDY PROCEDURE 0 1 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER (7379) 2 RESPONDENT NUMBER 3 HALF SAMPLE NUMBER 4 NATIONAL SAMPLE WEIGHT 5 MARITIME SUB-SAMPLE WEIGHTS 6 PROVINCE OF INTERVIEW 7 CONSTITUENCY OF INTERVIEW 8 POLL OF INTERVIEW 9 SIZE OF COMMUNITY OF INTERVIEW 10 WEEK OF INTERVIEW - INTEREST IN ELECTION AND POLITICS 0 11 R'S INTEREST IN THE 1974 FEDERAL ELECTION 12 R'S INTEREST IN POLITICS GENERALLY 13 R PAY ATTENTION TO FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL/LOCAL POLITICS 14 LEVEL OF GOVERNMENT R THINKS AFFECTS HIM MOST - LIFE SATISFACTION AND ECONOMIC STATE 0 15 R'S LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH MATERIAL SIDE OF LIFE 16 GOVERNMENT IMPACT ON R'S MATERIAL SATISFACTION 17 R'S MATERIAL STATE IN FOUR YEARS 18 R'S ECONOMIC SITUATION NOW VERSUS WHEN GROWING UP 19 R'S SATISFACTION WITH LIFE AS A WHOLE 20 GOVERNMENT IMPACT ON R'S LIFE SATISFACTION - POLITICAL EFFICACY 0 21 ELECTED MP'S SOON LOSE TOUCH 22 GOVERNMENT DOES NOT CARE WHAT R THINKS 23 POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT ARE TOO COMPLICATED 24 PEOPLE LIKE R DO NOT HAVE ANY SAY 25 DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER R VOTES OR NOT 1 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 0 VAR. NO. 0 RECENT FEDERAL ELECTION PARTICIPATION 26 DID R READ NEWSPAPERS DURING THE ELECTION 27 DID R DISCUSS POLITICS DURING THE ELECTION 28 DID R PERSUADE PEOPLE TO VOTE LIKE HIM DURING ELECTION 29 DID R TRY TO SOLVE COMMUNITY PROBLEMS DURING ELECTION 30 DID R ATTEND POLITICAL MEETINGS DURING THE ELECTION 31 DID R CONTACT OFFICIALS DURING ELECTION 32 DID R WORK FOR PARTY OR CANDIDATE DURING ELECTION 33 DID R DISPLAY SIGNS DURING THE ELECTION 0 GENERAL POLITICAL PARTICIPATION 34 R READ ABOUT FEDERAL POLITICS IN NEWSPAPERS GENERALLY 35 DOES R DISCUSS FEDERAL POLITICS GENERALLY 36 R GENERALLY PERSUADE PEOPLE TO VOTE LIKE HIM FEDERALLY 37 R GENERALLY WORK IN COMMUNITY TO SOLVE LOCAL PROBLEMS 38 R GENERALLY ATTEND FEDERAL POLITICAL MEETINGS/RALLIES 39 R GENERALLY CONTACT FEDERAL PUBLIC OFFICIALS/POLITICIANS 40 R GENERALLY WORK FOR A FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTY/CANDIDATE 41 R GENERALLY DISPLAY STICKER/SIGN ABOUT FEDERAL POLITICS 0 PROVINCIAL POLITICAL PARTICIPATION 42 DOES R READ ABOUT PROVINCIAL POLITICS IN NEWSPAPERS 43 DOES R DISCUSS PROVINCIAL POLITICS 44 DOES R PERSUADE PEOPLE TO VOTE LIKE HIM PROVINCIALLY 45 DOES R TRY TO SOLVE LOCAL PROBLEM PROVINCIALLY 46 DOES R ATTEND PROVINCIAL POLITICAL MEETINGS OR RALLIES 47 DOES R CONTACT PROVINCIAL PUBLIC OFFICIALS/POLITICIANS 48 DOES R WORK FOR PROVINCIAL POLITICAL PARTY/CANDIDATES 49 DOES R DISPLAY STICKER/SIGNS ABOUT PROVINCIAL ISSUES 0 LOCAL OR MUNICIPAL POLITICAL PARTICIPATION 50 DOES R READ ABOUT LOCAL POLITICS IN NEWSPAPERS 51 DOES R DISCUSS LOCAL POLITICS 52 DOES R PERSUADE PEOPLE TO VOTE LIKE HIM LOCALLY 53 DOES R WORK TO SOLVE LOCAL PROBLEM LOCALLY 54 DOES R ATTEND LOCAL POLITICAL MEETINGS OR RALLIES 55 DOES R CONTACT PUBLIC OFFICIALS OR POLITICIANS LOCALLY 56 DOES R WORK FOR LOCAL POLITICAL PARTY OR CANDIDATES 57 DOES R DISPLAY STICKERS OR SIGNS ABOUT LOCAL ISSUES 1 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 0 VAR. NO. 0 REGIONAL ATTITUDES 58 R'S DESCRIPTION POLITICS IN CANADA-MAP RESPONSE 1 59 R'S DESCRIPTION POLITICS IN CANADA-MAP CONTENT 1 60 R'S DESCRIPTION POLITICS IN CANADA-MAP RESPONSE 2 61 R'S DESCRIPTION POLITICS IN CANADA-MAP CONTENT 2 62 R'S DESCRIPTION POLITICS IN CANADA-MAP RESPONSE 3 63 R'S DESCRIPTION POLITICS IN CANADA-MAP CONTENT 3 64 R'S DESCRIPTION POLITICS IN CANADA-MAP RESPONSE 4 65 R'S DESCRIPTION POLITICS IN CANADA-MAP CONTENT 4 66 R'S DESCRIPTION POLITICS IN CANADA-MAP RESPONSE 5 67 R'S DESCRIPTION POLITICS IN CANADA-MAP CONTENT 5 68 REGION R LIVES IN IF R THINKS OF CANADA AS REGIONS 69 R'S DESIGNATION OF OTHER REGIONS OF CANADA 70 R FEEL CLOSER TO FEDERAL OR PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT 71 WHAT PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS ARE MORE POWERFUL 0 FEELINGS ABOUT PROVINCE, REGION, CANADA, UNITED STATES, ENGLAND AND FRANCE 72 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT PROVINCE IN GENERAL 73 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT PROVINCE AS A RESIDENCE 74 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT 75 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT REGION GENERALLY 76 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT REGION AS A RESIDENCE 77 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT CANADA GENERALLY 78 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT CANADA AS A RESIDENCE 79 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT CANADIAN GOVERNMENT 80 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT UNITED STATES 81 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT ENGLAND 82 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT FRANCE 0 PROVINCIAL FAVORITISM 83 SOME PROVINCES BEAR MORE COSTS OF GOVERNING CANADA 84 SOME PROVINCES RECEIVE MORE BENEFITS 0 ROLES OF FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS 85 FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT MORE IMPORTANT IN EDUCATION 86 FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT MORE IMPORTANT IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS 87 FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL MORE IMPORTANT IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT 1 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 0 VAR. NO. 0 ROLES OF FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS (CONTINUED) 88 FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT MORE IMPORTANT IN HOSPITAL INSURANCE 89 FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT MORE IMPORTANT IN UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 90 FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT MORE IMPORTANT IN THE ECONOMY 91 SHOULD SAME PARTY CONTROL FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT 92 STRENGTH OF R'S FEELINGS ABOUT SAME PARTY CONTROL 0 ISSUES: GENERAL 93 MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE IN RECENT ELECTION 94 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE 95 R'S ARTICULATENESS ON MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE 96 PARTY CLOSEST TO R ON MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE 97 IMPORTANCE TO R'S VOTE OF MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE 98 SECOND MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE IN RECENT ELECTION 99 R'S FEELING ABOUT SECOND MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE 100 R'S ARTICULATENESS ON SECOND MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE 101 PARTY CLOSEST TO R ON SECOND MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE 102 IMPORTANCE TO R'S VOTE OF SECOND MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE 0 BILINGUALISM 103 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE REFERENCE 104 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT BILINGUALISM-PRESCRIPTION 105 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT BILINGUALISM-REGIONAL REFERENCE 106 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT BILINGUALISM-COMPULSION REFERENCE 107 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT BILINGUALISM-PERSONAL/IMPERSONAL 108 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT BILINGUALISM-POSITIVE/NEGATIVE 109 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT BILINGUALISM-ARTICULATENESS 110 PARTY CLOSEST TO R ON BILINGUALISM 0 FOREIGN INVESTMENT 111 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT FOREIGN INVESTMENT-INEVITABILITY 112 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT FOREIGN INVESTMENT-CHARACTERISTICS 113 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT FOREIGN INVESTMENT-DOMINATION 114 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT FOREIGN INVESTMENT-ACTION 115 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT FOREIGN INVESTMENT-POSITIVE/NEGATIVE 116 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT FOREIGN INVESTMENT-ARTICULATENESS 117 PARTY CLOSEST TO R ON FOREIGN INVESTMENT 1 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 0 VAR. NO. 0 INFLATION 118 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT INFLATION-CONTENT 119 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT INFLATION-CAUSES 120 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT INFLATION-ACTION 121 AFFECT OF INFLATION ON R 122 WAY INFLATION AFFECTED R THE MOST 123 WAY INFLATION AFFECTED R THE MOST-ARTICULATENESS 124 PARTY CLOSEST TO R ON INFLATION 0 SEPARATISM 125 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT SEPARATISM-FAVOR/OPPOSE 126 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT SEPARATISM-STRENGTH OF FEELINGS 127 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT SEPARATISM-LIKELIHOOD OF SEPARATION 0 MAJORITY GOVERNMENT 128 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT MAJORITY GOVERNMENT-FAVOR/OPPOSE 129 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT MAJORITY GOVERNMENT-SWITCH PARTIES TO FORM ONE 130 R'S FEELINGS ABOUT MAJORITY GOVERNMENT-DID ISSUE INFLUENCE VOTE 0 R'S FEDERAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION 131 R'S FEDERAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION-PREFERENCE 132 R'S FEDERAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION-INTENSITY 133 DOES R FEEL CLOSER TO ONE PARTY THAN ANOTHER 134 WHICH FEDERAL PARTY R FEELS CLOSER TO 135 R EVER FEEL CLOSER TO ANY OTHER FEDERAL PARTY 136 FEDERAL PARTY R WAS ONCE CLOSER TO 137 WHEN R SWITCHED FEDERAL PARTIES 138 WHY R SWITCHED FEDERAL PARTIES-1 139 WHY R SWITCHED FEDERAL PARTIES-2 0 R'S PARENTS' FEDERAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION 140 DID R'S FATHER PREFER A PARTICULAR FEDERAL PARTY 141 FEDERAL PARTY R'S FATHER PREFERRED 142 INTENSITY OF R'S FATHER'S FEDERAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION 143 DID R'S MOTHER PREFER A PARTICULAR FEDERAL PARTY 144 FEDERAL PARTY R'S MOTHER PREFERRED 145 INTENSITY OF R'S MOTHER'S FEDERAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION 146 DEGREE OF INTEREST OF R'S PARENTS IN POLITICS 1 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 0 VAR. NO. - CAMPAIGN INFORMATION SOURCES 0 147 WAS R CONTACTED DURING THE CAMPAIGN 148 WHAT PARTIES OR CANDIDATES CONTACTED R 149 PARTY OF REPRESENTATIVE WHO CONTACTED R 150 R CONTACTED BY TELEPHONE OR MAIL 151 WHICH PARTY OR PARTIES CONTACTED R BY MAIL/TELEPHONE 152 HOW PARTY CONTACTED R 153 HOW MUCH R READ IN NEWSPAPERS ABOUT CAMPAIGN 154 HOW MUCH R FOLLOWED CAMPAIGN ON TELEVISION 155 HOW MUCH R FOLLOWED CAMPAIGN ON RADIO 156 RADIO/TELEVISION/NEWSPAPERS IMPORTANT FOR INFORMATION - FEDERAL VOTING BEHAVIOUR 0 157 R VOTED IN ALL FEDERAL ELECTIONS 158 HAS R ALWAYS VOTED FOR THE SAME PARTY 159 WHICH PARTY R HAS ALWAYS VOTED FOR 160 R VOTED FOR DIFFERENT PARTIES BY CHOICE OR NO ALTERNATIVE 161 DID R VOTE IN JULY 1974 FEDERAL ELECTION 162 WHICH PARTY R VOTED FOR IN JULY 1974 163 WHY R DID NOT VOTE JULY 1974 164 WHOM R WOULD HAVE VOTED FOR JULY 1974 165 PARTY LEADER/CANDIDATE/PARTY IMPORTANT IN VOTE DECISION 166 PARTY LEADER/CANDIDATE/PARTY NEXT MOST IMPORTANT IN VOTE DECISION 167 PARTY LEADER/CANDIDATE/PARTY LEAST IMPORTANT IN VOTE DECISION 168 PARTY LEADER/CANDIDATE IMPORTANT-PERSONAL QUALITIES/ISSUE 169 PARTY LEADER/CANDIDATE IMPORTANT-WHICH ISSUES 1 170 PARTY LEADER/CANDIDATE IMPORTANT-WHICH ISSUES 2 171 PARTY IMPORTANT-GENERAL APPROACH OR POSITION ON ISSUES 172 PARTY IMPORTANT-WHICH ISSUES 1 173 PARTY IMPORTANT-WHICH ISSUES 2 174 DID R VOTE IN OCTOBER 1972 FEDERAL ELECTION 175 PARTY R VOTED FOR IN OCTOBER 1972 176 FIRST REASON R CHANGED PARTY VOTE 1972 TO 1974 177 SECOND REASON R CHANGED PARTY VOTE 1972 TO 1974 178 R VOTE IN JUNE 1968 FEDERAL ELECTION 179 PARTY R VOTED FOR IN JUNE 1968 180 OTHER PARTY R WOULD HAVE VOTED FOR IN JUNE 1974 181 PARTY R WOULD LEAST LIKE TO VOTE FOR 1 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 0 VAR. NO. 0 ELECTORAL DECISION 182 WHEN R DECIDED ON HIS VOTE FOR JULY 1974 183 DID R CONSIDER VOTING FOR ANOTHER PARTY 184 WHICH OTHER PARTY R CONSIDERED VOTING FOR 185 REAL REASON FOR R'S VOTE-1 186 REAL REASON FOR R'S VOTE-2 187 REAL REASON FOR R'S VOTE-3 0 THERMOMETER ITEMS: PARTIES, LEADERS, CANDIDATES 188 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT TRUDEAU 189 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT LOCAL LIBERAL CANDIDATE 190 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT WHOLE LIBERAL PARTY 191 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT STANFIELD 192 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT LOCAL PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE 193 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT WHOLE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE PARTY 194 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT LEWIS 195 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT LOCAL N.D.P. PARTY CANDIDATE 196 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT WHOLE N.D.P. PARTY 197 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT CAOUETTE 198 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT LOCAL SOCIAL CREDIT CANDIDATE 199 THERMOMETER: R'S FEELINGS ABOUT WHOLE SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY 0 FEDERAL PARTY LEADER IMAGES 200 TRUDEAU: WHAT R LIKES 1 201 TRUDEAU: WHAT R LIKES 2 202 TRUDEAU: WHAT R LIKES 3 203 TRUDEAU: WHAT R DISLIKES 1 204 TRUDEAU: WHAT R DISLIKES 2 205 TRUDEAU: WHAT R DISLIKES 3 206 STANFIELD: WHAT R LIKES 1 207 STANFIELD: WHAT R LIKES 2 208 STANFIELD: WHAT R LIKES 3 209 STANFIELD: WHAT R DISLIKES 1 210 STANFIELD: WHAT R DISLIKES 2 211 STANFIELD: WHAT R DISLIKES 3 1 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 0 VAR. NO. - FEDERAL PARTY LEADER IMAGES (CONTINUED) 0 212 LEWIS: WHAT R LIKES 1 213 LEWIS: WHAT R LIKES 2 214 LEWIS: WHAT R LIKES 3 215 LEWIS: WHAT R DISLIKES 1 216 LEWIS: WHAT R DISLIKES 2 217 LEWIS: WHAT R DISLIKES 3 218 CAOUETTE: WHAT R LIKES 1 219 CAOUETTE: WHAT R LIKES 2 220 CAOUETTE: WHAT R LIKES 3 221 CAOUETTE: WHAT R DISLIKES 1 222 CAOUETTE: WHAT R DISLIKES 2 223 CAOUETTE: WHAT R DISLIKES 3 - FEDERAL PARTY IMAGES 0 224 LIBERAL: WHAT R LIKES 1-CONTENT 225 LIBERAL: WHAT R LIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 226 LIBERAL: WHAT R LIKES 1-INTENSITY 227 LIBERAL: WHAT R LIKES 2-CONTENT 228 LIBERAL: WHAT R LIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 229 LIBERAL: WHAT R LIKES 2-INTENSITY 230 LIBERAL: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-CONTENT 231 LIBERAL: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 232 LIBERAL: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-INTENSITY 233 LIBERAL: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-CONTENT 234 LIBERAL: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 235 LIBERAL: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-INTENSITY 236 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R LIKES 1-CONTENT 237 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R LIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 238 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R LIKES 1-INTENSITY 239 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R LIKES 2-CONTENT 240 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R LIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 241 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R LIKES 2-INTENSITY 242 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R DISLIKES 1-CONTENT 243 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R DISLIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 244 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R DISLIKES 1-INTENSITY 245 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R DISLIKES 2-CONTENT 246 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R DISLIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 247 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R DISLIKES 2-INTENSITY 1 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 0 VAR. NO. - FEDERAL PARTY IMAGES (CONTINUED) 0 248 N.D.P.: WHAT R LIKES 1-CONTENT 249 N.D.P.: WHAT R LIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 250 N.D.P.: WHAT R LIKES 1-INTENSITY 251 N.D.P.: WHAT R LIKES 2-CONTENT 252 N.D.P.: WHAT R LIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 253 N.D.P.: WHAT R LIKES 2-INTENSITY 254 N.D.P.: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-CONTENT 255 N.D.P.: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 256 N.D.P.: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-INTENSITY 257 N.D.P.: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-CONTENT 258 N.D.P.: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 259 N.D.P.: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-INTENSITY 260 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R LIKES 1-CONTENT 261 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R LIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 262 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R LIKES 1-INTENSITY 263 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R LIKES 2-CONTENT 264 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R LIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 265 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R LIKES 2-INTENSITY 266 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-CONTENT 267 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 268 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-INTENSITY 269 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-CONTENT 270 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 271 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-INTENSITY 272 ANY DIFFERENCE WHICH PARTY IS IN POWER IN OTTAWA 273 ANY DIFFERENCE WHICH PARTY IS IN POWER IN PROVINCE - R'S PROVINCIAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION 0 274 R'S PROVINCIAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION-PREFERENCE 275 R'S PROVINCIAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION-INTENSITY- AFFILIATION STRENGTH 276 DOES R FEEL CLOSE TO A PROVINCIAL PARTY 277 WHICH PROVINCIAL PARTY R FEELS CLOSE TO 278 R EVER CLOSER TO ANOTHER PROVINCIAL PARTY 279 R EVER CLOSER TO ANOTHER PROVINCIAL PARTY-WHICH ONE 280 R EVER CLOSER TO ANOTHER PROVINCIAL PARTY-WHEN CHANGED 281 R EVER CLOSER TO ANOTHER PROVINCIAL PARTY-WHY CHANGE 1 282 R EVER CLOSER TO ANOTHER PROVINCIAL PARTY-WHY CHANGE 2 1 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 0 VAR. NO. 0 R'S PARENTS' PROVINCIAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION 283 DID R'S FATHER PREFER A PARTICULAR PROVINCIAL PARTY 284 PROVINCIAL PARTY R'S FATHER PREFERRED 285 INTENSITY OF R'S FATHER'S PROVINCIAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION 286 DID R'S MOTHER PREFER A PARTICULAR PROVINCIAL PARTY 287 PROVINCIAL PARTY R'S MOTHER PREFERRED 288 INTENSITY OF R'S MOTHER'S PROVINCIAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION 289 R'S PARENTS' INTEREST IN PROVINCIAL POLITICS 0 R'S PARTY LIKES AND DISLIKES 290 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R LIKES 1-CONTENT 291 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R LIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 292 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R LIKES 1-INTENSITY 293 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R LIKES 2-CONTENT 294 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R LIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 295 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R LIKES 2-INTENSITY 296 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R DISLIKES 1-CONTENT 297 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R DISLIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 298 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R DISLIKES 1-INTENSITY 299 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R DISLIKES 2-CONTENT 300 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: T DISLIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 301 PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE: R DISLIKES 2-INTENSITY 302 LIBERAL: WHAT R LIKES 1-CONTENT 303 LIBERAL: WHAT R LIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 304 LIBERAL: WHAT R LIKES 1-INTENSITY 305 LIBERAL: WHAT R LIKES 2-CONTENT 306 LIBERAL: WHAT R LIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 307 LIBERAL: WHAT R LIKES 2-INTENSITY 308 LIBERAL: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-CONTENT 309 LIBERAL: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 310 LIBERAL: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-INTENSITY 311 LIBERAL: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-CONTENT 312 LIBERAL: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 313 LIBERAL: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-INTENSITY 314 N.D.P.: WHAT R LIKES 1-CONTENT 315 N.D.P.: WHAT R LIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 316 N.D.P.: WHAT R LIKES 1-INTENSITY 317 N.D.P.: WHAT R LIKES 2-CONTENT 318 N.D.P.: WHAT R LIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 319 N.D.P.: WHAT R LIKES 2-INTENSITY 1 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 0 VAR. NO. 0 R'S PARTY LIKES AND DISLIKES (CONTINUED) 320 N.D.P.: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-CONTENT 321 N.D.P.: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 322 N.D.P.: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-INTENSITY 323 N.D.P.: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-CONTENT 324 N.D.P.: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 325 N.D.P.: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-INTENSITY 326 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R LIKES 1-CONTENT 327 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R LIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 328 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R LIKES 1-INTENSITY 329 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R LIKES 2-CONTENT 330 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R LIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 331 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R LIKES 2-INTENSITY 332 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-CONTENT 333 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 334 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-INTENSITY 335 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-CONTENT 336 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 337 SOCIAL CREDIT: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-INTENSITY 338 PARTI QUEBECOIS: WHAT R LIKES 1-CONTENT 339 PARTI QUEBECOIS: WHAT R LIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 340 PARTI QUEBECOIS: WHAT R LIKES 1-INTENSITY 341 PARTI QUEBECOIS: WHAT R LIKES 2-CONTENT 342 PARTI QUEBECOIS: WHAT R LIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 343 PARTI QUEBECOIS: WHAT R LIKES 2-INTENSITY 344 PARTI QUEBECOIS: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-CONTENT 345 PARTI QUEBECOIS: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 346 PARTI QUEBECOIS: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-INTENSITY 347 PARTI QUEBECOIS: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-CONTENT 348 PARTI QUEBECOIS: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 349 PARTI QUEBECOIS: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-INTENSITY 350 QUEBEC UNION NATIONALE: WHAT R LIKES 1-CONTENT 351 QUEBEC UNION NATIONALE: WHAT R LIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 352 QUEBEC UNION NATIONALE: WHAT R LIKES 1-INTENSITY 353 QUEBEC UNION NATIONALE: WHAT R LIKES 2-CONTENT 354 QUEBEC UNION NATIONALE: WHAT R LIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 355 QUEBEC UNION NATIONALE: WHAT R LIKES 2-INTENSITY 356 QUEBEC UNION NATIONALE: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-CONTENT 357 QUEBEC UNION NATIONALE: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-ARTICULATENESS 358 QUEBEC UNION NATIONALE: WHAT R DISLIKES 1-INTENSITY 359 QUEBEC UNION NATIONALE: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-CONTENT 360 QUEBEC UNION NATIONALE: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-ARTICULATENESS 361 QUEBEC UNION NATIONALE: WHAT R DISLIKES 2-INTENSITY 1 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 0 VAR. NO. 0 PROVINCIAL VOTING BEHAVIOUR 362 DID R VOTE IN ALL PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS 363 DID R ALWAYS VOTE FOR SAME PROVINCIAL PARTY 364 R ALWAYS VOTED FOR SAME PROVINCIAL PARTY-WHICH PARTY 365 R VOTE FOR DIFFERENT PARTIES OUT OF CHOICE OR NO ALTERNATIVE 366 DID R VOTE IN LAST PROVINCIAL ELECTION 367 PARTY R VOTED FOR IN LAST PROVINCIAL ELECTION 368 WHY DIDN'T R VOTE IN LAST PROVINCIAL ELECTION 369 WHICH PARTY R WOULD HAVE VOTED FOR PROVINCIAL ELECTION 370 PARTY/LEADER/CANDIDATE IMPORTANT LAST PROVINCIAL VOTE 371 PARTY/LEADER/CANDIDATE NEXT IMPORTANT PROVINCIAL VOTE 372 PARTY/LEADER/CANDIDATE LEAST IMPORTANT PROVINCIAL VOTE 373 LEADER/CANDIDATE IMPORTANT-PERSONAL QUALITIES/ISSUES 374 LEADER/CANDIDATE IMPORTANT PROVINCIALLY-WHICH ISSUES 1 375 LEADER/CANDIDATE IMPORTANT PROVINCIALLY-WHICH ISSUES 2 376 PARTY IMPORTANT PROVINCIALLY-GENERAL APPROACH/ISSUES 377 PARTY IMPORTANT PROVINCIALLY-WHICH ISSUES 1 378 PARTY IMPORTANT PROVINCIALLY-WHICH ISSUES 2 379 REASON R VOTED FOR DIFFERENT FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL PARTY 1 380 REASON R VOTED FOR DIFFERENT FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL PARTY 2 0 R'S OCCUPATION 381 R'S MAIN OCCUPATION: SHORT FORM 382 R'S MAIN OCCUPATION: NON-MANUAL, MANUAL, FARMING 383 R'S MAIN OCCUPATION: EXECUTIVE OR NOT 384 HOW MANY R'S COMPANY EMPLOYS: NON-MANUAL 385 HOW MANY WORKING UNDER R: NON-MANUAL 386 WHAT R'S COMPANY DOES: NON-MANUAL 387 ANY SPECIAL TRAINING NEEDED FOR R'S JOB: MANUAL 388 R CONSIDERED A SKILLED WORKER: MANUAL 389 HOW MANY WORK UNDER R: MANUAL 390 HOW MANY YEARS EXPERIENCE R HAS: MANUAL 391 DOES R OWN HIS FARM 392 HOW LONG R HAS WORKED ON A FARM 393 HOW MANY ACRES IS THE FARM 394 MAIN PRODUCT OF THE FARM 395 R'S OCCUPATION: BLISHEN SCORE 0 R'S MARITAL STATUS 396 RESPONDENT'S MARITAL STATUS 1 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 0 VAR. NO. 0 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD'S OCCUPATION 397 INTERVIEW STREAM CODE-IDENTIFYING HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD 398 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD: MAIN OCCUPATION-BLISHEN SCORE 399 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD: MANUAL, NON-MANUAL, FARMING 400 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD: EXECUTIVE OR NOT 401 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD: HOW MANY COMPANY EMPLOYS 402 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD: HOW MANY UNDER HIM/HER 403 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD: NON-MANUAL-WHAT COMPANY DOES 404 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD: MANUAL-SPECIAL TRAINING? 405 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD: MANUAL-SKILLED WORKER? 406 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD: MANUAL-NUMBER UNDER HIM/HER 407 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD: MANUAL-HOW MUCH EXPERIENCE 408 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD: FARMING-OWN OR MANAGE 409 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD: FARMING-HOW LONG WORKING FARM 410 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD: FARMING-SIZE OF FARM 411 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD: FARMING-MAIN PRODUCT 412 HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD: OCCUPATION-BLISHEN SCORE 0 R'S EDUCATION 413 YEARS OF SCHOOL R HAS HAD 414 HIGHEST GRADE OF SCHOOL R ACHEIVED 415 DID R COMPLETE HIGH SCHOOL 416 DID R ATTEND POST-SECONDARY SCHOOL 417 DID R OBTAIN A DEGREE 0 R'S FATHER'S, GRANDFATHER'S AND SON'S DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 418 R'S FATHER-LIVING OR WHAT YEAR HE DIED 419 R'S FATHER-AGE OR WHEN HE DIED 420 R'S FATHER-MAIN OCCUPATION-BLISHEN SCORE 421 R'S FATHER-LIVE IN CITY OR ON FARM 422 R'S FATHER-OWN FARM 423 R'S FATHER-BORN IN CANADA 424 R'S FATHER-HIGHEST LEVEL OF EDUCATION ACHIEVED 425 R'S GRANDFATHER-LIVING OR WHAT YEAR HE DIED 426 R'S GRANDFATHER-AGE OR WHEN HE DIED 427 R'S GRANDFATHER-MAIN OCCUPATION-BLISHEN SCORE 428 R'S GRANDFATHER-LIVE IN CITY OR ON FARM 429 R'S GRANDFATHER-OWN FARM 430 R'S GRANDFATHER-BORN IN CANADA 431 R'S GRANDFATHER-HIGHEST LEVEL OF SCHOOL ACHIEVED 432 R HAVE CHILDREN-YES/NO 433 R HAVE CHILDREN-SON/DAUGHTER 434 R'S SON-AGE 435 R'S SON-MAIN OCCUPATION-BLISHEN SCORE 1 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 0 VAR. NO. 0 ATTITUDES TOWARDS PARLIAMENT 436 HOW IMPORTANT FOR MP: VIEWS OF HIS RIDING'S VOTERS 437 HOW IMPORTANT FOR MP: VIEWS OF HIS PARTY 438 HOW IMPORTANT FOR MP: VIEWS OF THE CIVIL SERVICE 439 HOW IMPORTANT FOR MP: VIEWS OF ORGANIZED GROUPS MP REPRESENTS 440 HOW IMPORTANT FOR MP: VIEWS OF ADVISERS AND FRIENDS 441 HOW IMPORTANT FOR MP: MP'S OWN BELIEFS 442 R EVER TALKED WITH OR WRITTEN HIS MP 443 MP EVER DONE ANYTHING FOR R PERSONALLY-YES/NO 444 MP EVER DONE ANYTHING FOR R PERSONALLY-WHAT DONE 445 WOULD MP READ A LETTER R WROTE 446 WOULD MP ANSWER A LETTER R WROTE 447 WOULD MP ACT ON PROBLEM R WROTE ABOUT 0 R'S SOCIAL CLASS AND RELIGION 448 R THINK OF HIMSELF AS MEMBER OF SOCIAL CLASS 449 WHAT IS R'S SOCIAL CLASS 450 IF HAD TO CHOOSE-WHAT IS R'S SOCIAL CLASS 451 R FEEL CLOSE TO HIS SOCIAL CLASS 452 CONFLICT BETWEEN CLASSES INEVITABLE 453 RELIGION OF R 454 FREQUENCY OF CHURCH ATTENDANCE 455 R CONSIDER HIMSELF RELIGIOUS 0 R'S BIRTHPLACE, WHERE LIVED AND LANGUAGE 456 R'S COUNTRY OF BIRTH 457 WHEN R CAME TO LIVE IN CANADA 458 HOW LONG R LIVED IN HIS/HER PROVINCE 459 R EVER LIVE IN ANOTHER PROVINCE 460 R EVER LIVE IN NEWFOUNDLAND 461 R EVER LIVE IN PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND 462 R EVER LIVE IN NOVA SCOTIA 463 R EVER LIVE IN NEW BRUNSWICK 464 R EVER LIVE IN QUEBEC 465 R EVER LIVE IN ONTARIO 466 R EVER LIVE IN MANITOBA 467 R EVER LIVE IN SASKATCHEWAN 468 R EVER LIVE IN ALBERTA 469 R EVER LIVE IN BRITISH COLUMBIA 470 RESPONDENT'S ETHNICITY 471 LANGUAGE R FIRST LEARNED AS CHILD AND STILL SPEAKS 472 LANGUAGE R USUALLY SPEAKS AT HOME 473 OTHER LANGUAGES R SPEAKS 474 R GROW UP IN CITY OR ON FARM 475 R GROW UP NEAR A LARGE CITY 1 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST 0 VAR. NO. 0 R'S UNION AFFILIATIONS 476 R BELONG TO TRADE OR LABOUR UNION 477 ANY MEMBERS OF R'S FAMILY BELONG TO TRADE/LABOUR UNION 0 R'S AGE, INCOME AND SEX 478 RESPONDENT'S AGE 479 INCOME OF R AND FAMILY 480 RESPONDENT'S SEX 481 LANGUAGE IN WHICH INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED 0 NOTES 1 CONSTITUENCY AND POLL NUMBERS 2 REGIONAL DIVISIONS OF CANADA 3 FOUR DIGIT REGION CODE 4 PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS 5 FEELING THERMOMETER 6 MAP CODE 7 IMPORTANT ELECTION ISSUES 8 FEELINGS REGARDING ELECTION ISSUES 9 REASONS FOR FEDERAL PARTY CHANGES 10 FEDERAL ISSUES 11 REASONS FOR PARTY CHANGE, 1972/1974 12 PROVINCIAL ISSUES 13 MASTER FEDERAL PARTY IMAGE CODES 14 FOUR DIGIT BLISHEN SCORE AND EXTENDED OCCUPATION CODE 15 TWO DIGIT BLISHEN SCORE 16 LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANCE 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 1 - 0 VAR 0001 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER 7379 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 1 COL 1- 4 0 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER 7379 ----------------------- DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '01' DK 1 COL 5- 6 ---------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0002 RESPONDENT ID NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0002 LOC 5 WIDTH 4 DK 1 COL 7-10 0 RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (UNIQUE FOUR DIGIT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FOR EACH RESPONDENT. FIRST DIGIT INDICATES PROVINCE) ------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 16 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0003 HALF SAMPLE NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0003 LOC 9 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 11 0 HALF SAMPLE NUMBER ------------------ 1241 1. HALF SAMPLE ONE 1203 2. HALF SAMPLE TWO 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0004 NATIONAL SAMPLE WEIGHT NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0004 LOC 10 WIDTH 4 DK 1 COL 12-15 IMP DEC= 3 0 NATIONAL SAMPLE WEIGHTS. THE NATIONAL SAMPLE IS WEIGHTED BY PROVINCE. TO FORM A VALID NATIONAL SAMPLE, THESE WEIGHTS MUST BE USED. THE EFFECTIVE NATIONAL SAMPLE SIZE USING THIS WEIGHT VARIABLE IS 2445. ------------------------------------------------------------ 12 0125. PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND 1 2 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 208 0500. NEWFOUNDLAND, NOVA SCOTIA, NEW BRUNSWICK 1347 1000. QUEBEC, MANITOBA, SASKATCHEWAN, ALBERTA, BRITISH COLUMBIA 878 1250. ONTARIO 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0005 MARITIME SUB-SAMPLE WGT NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0005 LOC 14 WIDTH 3 DK 1 COL 16-18 IMP DEC= 2 0 MARITIME SUB-SAMPLE WEIGHTS. THIS WEIGHT VARIABLE SHOULD BE USED ONLY WHEN THE ATLANTIC PROVINCES ARE ANALYZED AS AN INDEPENDENT SUB-SAMPLE. THESE WEIGHTS PRODUCE AN EFFECTIVE SUB-SAMPLE SIZE OF 440. ----------------------------------------------------------- 2225 000. NON-MARITIME PROVINCE 12 025. PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND 208 100. NEWFOUNDLAND, NOVA SCOTIA, NEW BRUNSWICK 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0006 PROVINCE NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0006 LOC 17 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 19 0 PROVINCE -------- 51 0. NEWFOUNDLAND 12 1. PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND 90 2. NOVA SCOTIA 67 3. NEW BRUNSWICK 702 4. QUEBEC 878 5. ONTARIO 113 6. MANITOBA 101 7. SASKATCHEWAN 179 8. ALBERTA 252 9. BRITISH COLUMBIA 0 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 3 - 0 VAR 0007 CONSTITUENCY NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0007 LOC 18 WIDTH 3 DK 1 COL 20-22 0 CONSTITUENCY NUMBER ------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 1 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0008 POLL NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0008 LOC 21 WIDTH 3 DK 1 COL 23-25 0 POLL NUMBER ----------- SEE NOTE(S) 1 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0009 COMMUNITY SIZE NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0009 LOC 24 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 26 0 COMMUNITY SIZE -------------- 386 1. OVER 500,000 (CITY CORE) 284 2. OVER 500,000 (ADJACENT SUBURB) 242 3. OVER 500,000 (DISTANT SUBURB) 380 4. 100,000 - 500,000 220 5. 30,000 - 100,000 109 6. 10,000 - 30,000 265 7. 1,000 - 10,000 418 8. RURAL NON-FARM 143 9. FARM 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0010 WEEK OF INTERVIEW NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0010 LOC 25 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 27-28 0 WEEK INTERVIEW CONDUCTED ------------------------ 1 4 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 8 01. WEEK OF AUGUST 4, 1974 75 02. WEEK OF AUGUST 11, 1974 165 03. WEEK OF AUGUST 18, 1974 317 04. WEEK OF AUGUST 25, 1974 367 05. WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1974 367 06. WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 8, 1974 365 07. WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 15, 1974 347 08. WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 22, 1974 216 09. WEEK OF SEPTEMBER 29, 1974 91 10. WEEK OF OCTOBER 6, 1974 23 11. WEEK OF OCTOBER 13, 1974 22 12. WEEK OF OCTOBER 20, 1974 30 13. WEEK OF OCTOBER 27, 1974 26 14. WEEK OF NOVEMBER 3, 1974 7 15. WEEK OF NOVEMBER 10, 1974 9 16. WEEK OF NOVEMBER 17, 1974 5 17. WEEK OF NOVEMBER 24, 1974 3 18. WEEK OF DECEMBER 1, 1974 4 19. DECEMBER 8 TO DECEMBER 21, 1974 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0011 INTEREST IN ELECTION MD=GE 8 REF 0011 LOC 27 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 29 0 Q1. WE HAVE FOUND THAT PEOPLE SOMETIMES DON'T PAY TOO MUCH ATTENTION TO ELECTIONS. HOW ABOUT YOURSELF? WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU WERE VERY INTERESTED IN THE RECENT FEDERAL ELECTION, FAIRLY INTERESTED, SLIGHTLY INTERESTED, OR NOT AT ALL INTERESTED IN IT? ------------------------------------------------------------ 745 1. VERY INTERESTED 897 2. FAIRLY INTERESTED 578 3. SLIGHTLY INTERESTED 222 4. NOT AT ALL INTERESTED 2 8. DK 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0012 INTEREST IN POLITICS MD=GE 8 REF 0012 LOC 28 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 30 0 Q2. WE WOULD ALSO LIKE TO KNOW WHETHER YOU PAY MUCH ATTENTION 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 5 - (CONTINUED) - TO POLITICS GENERALLY. I MEAN FROM DAY TO DAY, WHEN THERE ISN'T A BIG ELECTION CAMPAIGN GOING ON. WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU FOLLOW POLITICS VERY CLOSELY, FAIRLY CLOSELY, OR NOT MUCH AT ALL? ------------------------------------------------------------ 346 1. VERY CLOSELY 1064 2. FAIRLY CLOSELY 1032 3. NOT MUCH AT ALL 3 8. DK 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0013 PAY MORE ATTN TO FED-PRV MD=GE 8 REF 0013 LOC 29 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 31 0 --IF 1 OR 2 IN Q.2-- Q3. GENERALLY, WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU PAY MORE ATTENTION TO FEDERAL POLITICS, PROVINCIAL POLITICS, OR LOCAL POLITICS? ----------------------------------------------------------- 461 1. FEDERAL 242 2. PROVINCIAL 104 3. LOCAL 373 4. ALL ABOUT EQUALLY 174 5. FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL EQUALLY 24 6. FEDERAL AND LOCAL EQUALLY 18 7. PROVINCIAL AND LOCAL EQUALLY 14 8. DK 1035 9. INAP., CODED 3 OR 8 IN Q.2 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0014 LEVEL OF GOVT MOST IMP MD=GE 8 REF 0014 LOC 30 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 32 0 Q4. AS FAR AS YOU ARE CONCERNED PERSONALLY, WHICH GOVERNMENT IS MORE IMPORTANT IN AFFECTING HOW YOU AND YOUR FAMILY GET ON, THE ONE IN OTTAWA, THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT HERE IN (PROVINCE) OR THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT HERE IN (CITY, TOWNSHIP, ETC.)? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 6 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 800 1. FEDERAL 732 2. PROVINCIAL 233 3. LOCAL 328 4. ALL ABOUT EQUALLY 150 5. FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL EQUALLY 16 6. FEDERAL AND LOCAL EQUALLY 31 7. PROVINCIAL AND LOCAL EQUALLY 156 8. DK 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0015 MATERIAL SATISFACTION MD=GE 8 REF 0015 LOC 31 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 33 0 Q5A. NOW, I'D LIKE TO ASK YOU HOW YOU AND YOUR FAMILY ARE DOING THESE DAYS. FIRST, LET'S THINK ABOUT THE MATERIAL SIDE OF YOUR LIFE -- THE THINGS YOU CAN BUY AND DO -- ALL THE THINGS THAT MAKE UP YOUR MATERIAL STANDARD OF LIVING. WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU ARE VERY SATISFIED, FAIRLY SATISFIED, A LITTLE DISSATISFIED, OR VERY DISSATISFIED WITH THE MATERIAL SIDE OF YOUR LIFE RIGHT NOW? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 254 1. VERY SATISFIED 578 2. FAIRLY SATISFIED 269 3. LITTLE DISSATISFIED 136 4. VERY DISSATISFIED 4 8. DK 1203 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0016 GOVT IMPACT ON MAT SATIS MD=GE 8 REF 0016 LOC 32 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 34 0 --IF R CODED 1-4 IN Q.5A-- Q5B. DO YOU THINK THAT GOVERNMENT HAS HAD A GREAT DEAL, SOMETHING, OR NOT MUCH AT ALL TO DO WITH THIS? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ---------------------------------------------------- 455 1. GREAT DEAL 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 7 - (CONTINUED) - 379 2. SOMETHING 365 3. NOT MUCH 39 8. DK 1208 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT; CODED 8 IN Q.5A 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0017 MATERIAL STATE IN 4 YRS MD=GE 4 REF 0017 LOC 33 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 35 0 Q6. STILL THINKING ABOUT THE MATERIAL SIDE OF THINGS AND LOOKING AHEAD OVER THE NEXT THREE OR FOUR YEARS, DO YOU THINK THAT YOU WILL BE BETTER OFF, WORSE OFF, OR WILL THINGS STAY ABOUT THE SAME? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 300 1. BETTER OFF 364 2. WORSE OFF 475 3. ABOUT THE SAME 103 4. DK 1203 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0018 ECON COMP WITH GROW UP MD=GE 8 REF 0018 LOC 34 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 36 0 Q7. GENERALLY, IF YOU WERE COMPARING YOUR PRESENT ECONOMIC SITUATION WITH THAT OF YOUR FAMILY WHEN YOU WERE GROWING UP WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU ARE MUCH BETTER OFF NOW, SOMEWHAT BETTER OFF NOW, ABOUT THE SAME NOW, SOMEWHAT WORSE OFF NOW, OR MUCH WORSE NOW? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ----------------------------------------------------------- 469 1. MUCH BETTER OFF NOW 358 2. SOMEWHAT BETTER OFF NOW 233 3. ABOUT THE SAME 117 4. SOMEWHAT WORSE OFF NOW 51 5. MUCH WORSE OFF NOW 14 8. DK 1203 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 1 8 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - 0 VAR 0019 LIFE SATISFACTION MD=GE 8 REF 0019 LOC 35 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 37 0 Q8A. NOW, LET'S THINK ABOUT YOUR LIFE AS A WHOLE. WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU ARE VERY SATISFIED, FAIRLY SATISFIED, A LITTLE DISSATISFIED, OR VERY DISSATISFIED WITH YOUR LIFE AS A WHOLE RIGHT NOW? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ----------------------------------------------------------- 424 1. VERY SATISFIED 616 2. FAIRLY SATISFIED 150 3. LITTLE DISSATISFIED 46 4. VERY DISSATISFIED 7 8. DK 1203 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0020 GOVT IMPACT ON LIFE SAT MD=GE 8 REF 0020 LOC 36 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 38 0 --IF CODED 1-4 IN Q.8A-- Q8B. DO YOU THINK THAT GOVERNMENT HAS HAD A GREAT DEAL, SOMETHING, OR NOT MUCH AT ALL TO DO WITH THIS? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------- 246 1. GREAT DEAL 434 2. SOMETHING 519 3. NOT MUCH 35 8. DK 1210 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT; CODED 8 IN Q.8A 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0021 MP'S LOSE TOUCH MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0021 LOC 37 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 39 0 Q9A. NOW, I WOULD LIKE TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT SOME OPINIONS THAT YOU HEAR DIFFERENT PEOPLE GIVING. AS I READ EACH ONE, I WOULD 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 9 - (CONTINUED) - JUST LIKE YOU TO TELL ME OFFHAND WHETHER YOU STRONGLY AGREE, AGREE, DISAGREE, OR STRONGLY DISAGREE. GENERALLY, THOSE ELECTED TO PARLIAMENT SOON LOSE TOUCH WITH THE PEOPLE. (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 218 1. STRONGLY AGREE 531 2. AGREE 352 3. DISAGREE 45 4. STRONGLY DISAGREE 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 57 0. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0022 GOVT DOESNT CARE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0022 LOC 38 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 40 0 Q9B. I DON'T THINK THAT THE GOVERNMENT CARES MUCH WHAT PEOPLE LIKE ME THINK. (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 186 1. STRONGLY AGREE 475 2. AGREE 431 3. DISAGREE 48 4. STRONGLY DISAGREE 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 63 0. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0023 POLITICS COMPLICATED MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0023 LOC 39 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 41 0 Q9C. SOMETIMES, POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT SEEM SO COMPLICATED THAT A PERSON LIKE ME CAN'T REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT'S GOING ON. (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 10 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 259 1. STRONGLY AGREE 525 2. AGREE 331 3. DISAGREE 66 4. STRONGLY DISAGREE 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 22 0. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0024 DONT HAVE SAY MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0024 LOC 40 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 42 0 Q9D. PEOPLE LIKE ME DON'T HAVE ANY SAY ABOUT WHAT THE GOVERNMENT DOES. (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ----------------------------------------------------- 205 1. STRONGLY AGREE 434 2. AGREE 456 3. DISAGREE 75 4. STRONGLY DISAGREE 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 34 0. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0025 SO MANY VOTERS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0025 LOC 41 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 43 0 Q9E. SO MANY OTHER PEOPLE VOTE IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS THAT IT DOESN'T MATTER VERY MUCH WHETHER I VOTE OR NOT. (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ----------------------------------------------------------- 53 1. STRONGLY AGREE 118 2. AGREE 573 3. DISAGREE 441 4. STRONGLY DISAGREE 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 11 - (CONTINUED) - 18 0. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0026 READ NEWSPAPER-ELECTION MD=GE 8 REF 0026 LOC 42 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 44 0 Q10. SOME PEOPLE DO QUITE A LOT IN POLITICS WHILE OTHERS FIND THEY HAVEN'T THE TIME OR PERHAPS THE INTEREST TO PARTICIPATE IN POLITICAL ACTIVITIES. I'LL READ YOU BRIEFLY SOME OF THE THINGS THAT PEOPLE DO AND I WOULD LIKE YOU TO TELL ME HOW OFTEN YOU DO EACH OF THEM. FIRST, PLEASE TELL ME HOW OFTEN YOU DID EACH OF THESE THINGS IN THE RECENT FEDERAL ELECTION, OFTEN, SOMETIMES, SELDOM OR NEVER. Q10A. READ ABOUT POLITICS IN THE NEWSPAPERS? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 513 1. OFTEN 319 2. SOMETIMES 219 3. SELDOM 149 4. NEVER 3 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0027 DISCUSS POLITICS-ELECT MD=GE 8 REF 0027 LOC 43 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 45 0 Q10B. DISCUSS POLITICS WITH OTHER PEOPLE? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) -------------------------------------------------------- 356 1. OFTEN 429 2. SOMETIMES 252 3. SELDOM 163 4. NEVER 1 12 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 3 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0028 CONVINCE FRIENDS-ELECT MD=GE 8 REF 0028 LOC 44 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 46 0 Q10C. TRY TO CONVINCE FRIENDS TO VOTE THE SAME AS YOU? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ----------------------------------------------------------- 114 1. OFTEN 150 2. SOMETIMES 128 3. SELDOM 810 4. NEVER 1 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0029 WORK IN COMMUNITY-ELECT MD=GE 8 REF 0029 LOC 45 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 47 0 Q10D. WORK WITH OTHER PEOPLE IN THIS COMMUNITY TO TRY TO SOLVE SOME LOCAL PROBLEM? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 80 1. OFTEN 181 2. SOMETIMES 145 3. SELDOM 791 4. NEVER 6 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 13 - 0 VAR 0030 ATTEND MEETING-ELECT MD=GE 8 REF 0030 LOC 46 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 48 0 Q10E. ATTEND A POLITICAL MEETING OR RALLY? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) -------------------------------------------------------- 63 1. OFTEN 162 2. SOMETIMES 152 3. SELDOM 824 4. NEVER 2 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0031 CONTACT OFFICIALS-ELECT MD=GE 8 REF 0031 LOC 47 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 49 0 Q10F. CONTACT PUBLIC OFFICIALS OR POLITICIANS? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) -------------------------------------------------------- 42 1. OFTEN 152 2. SOMETIMES 151 3. SELDOM 857 4. NEVER 2 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0032 CAMPAIGN ACTIVITY-ELECT MD=GE 8 REF 0032 LOC 48 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 50 0 Q10G. SPEND TIME WORKING FOR A POLITICAL PARTY OR A CANDIDATE? 1 14 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) -------------------------------------------------------- 42 1. OFTEN 85 2. SOMETIMES 68 3. SELDOM 1006 4. NEVER 2 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0033 SIGN OR STICKER-ELECTION MD=GE 8 REF 0033 LOC 49 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 51 0 Q10H. PUT A STICKER ON YOUR CAR OR PUT UP A SIGN, OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ----------------------------------------------------------- 67 1. OFTEN 121 2. SOMETIMES 57 3. SELDOM 956 4. NEVER 3 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0034 READ NEWSPAPER-FED MD=GE 8 REF 0034 LOC 50 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 52 0 Q11. NOW, COULD YOU PLEASE TELL ME HOW OFTEN YOU HAVE DONE ANY OF THESE THINGS GENERALLY IN FEDERAL POLITICS, NOT JUST IN THIS RECENT ELECTION. Q11A. READ ABOUT POLITICS IN THE NEWSPAPERS? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ----------------------------------------------------------- 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 15 - (CONTINUED) - 488 1. OFTEN 343 2. SOMETIMES 212 3. SELDOM 155 4. NEVER 6 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0035 DISCUSS POLITICS-FED MD=GE 8 REF 0035 LOC 51 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 53 0 Q11B. DISCUSS POLITICS WITH OTHER PEOPLE? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 283 1. OFTEN 445 2. SOMETIMES 263 3. SELDOM 205 4. NEVER 7 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0036 CONVINCE FRIENDS-FED MD=GE 8 REF 0036 LOC 52 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 54 0 Q11C. TRY TO CONVINCE FRIENDS TO VOTE THE SAME AS YOU? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ----------------------------------------------------------- 100 1. OFTEN 152 2. SOMETIMES 120 3. SELDOM 823 4. NEVER 1 16 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 8 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0037 WORK IN COMMUNITY-FED MD=GE 8 REF 0037 LOC 53 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 55 0 Q11D. WORK WITH OTHER PEOPLE IN THIS COMMUNITY TO TRY TO SOLVE SOME LOCAL PROBLEM? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 61 1. OFTEN 183 2. SOMETIMES 148 3. SELDOM 801 4. NEVER 11 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0038 ATTEND MEETING-FED MD=GE 8 REF 0038 LOC 54 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 56 0 Q11E. ATTEND A POLITICAL MEETING OR RALLY? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ---------------------------------------------------- 59 1. OFTEN 178 2. SOMETIMES 140 3. SELDOM 819 4. NEVER 8 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 17 - 0 VAR 0039 CONTACT OFFICIALS-FED MD=GE 8 REF 0039 LOC 55 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 57 0 Q11F. CONTACT PUBLIC OFFICIALS OR POLITICIANS? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ---------------------------------------------------------- 36 1. OFTEN 133 2. SOMETIMES 165 3. SELDOM 858 4. NEVER 12 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0040 CAMPAIGN ACTIVITY-FED MD=GE 8 REF 0040 LOC 56 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 58 0 Q11G. SPEND TIME WORKING FOR A POLITICAL PARTY OR A CANDIDATE? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------ 44 1. OFTEN 82 2. SOMETIMES 73 3. SELDOM 994 4. NEVER 11 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0041 SIGN OR STICKER-FED MD=GE 8 REF 0041 LOC 57 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 59 0 Q11H. PUT A STICKER ON YOUR CAR OR PUT UP A SIGN, OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? 1 18 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 54 1. OFTEN 108 2. SOMETIMES 52 3. SELDOM 975 4. NEVER 14 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0042 READ NEWSPAPERS-PROV MD=GE 8 REF 0042 LOC 58 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 60 0 Q12. HOW OFTEN HAVE YOU DONE ANY OF THESE THINGS IN PROVINCIAL POLITICS HERE IN (PROVINCE)? Q12A. READ ABOUT POLITICS IN THE NEWSPAPERS? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) --------------------------------------------------------- 499 1. OFTEN 347 2. SOMETIMES 197 3. SELDOM 155 4. NEVER 5 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0043 DISCUSS POLITICS-PROV MD=GE 8 REF 0043 LOC 59 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 61 0 Q12B. DISCUSS POLITICS WITH OTHER PEOPLE? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------ 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 19 - (CONTINUED) - 311 1. OFTEN 436 2. SOMETIMES 241 3. SELDOM 209 4. NEVER 6 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0044 CONVINCE FRIENDS-PROV MD=GE 8 REF 0044 LOC 60 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 62 0 Q12C. TRY TO CONVINCE FRIENDS TO VOTE THE SAME AS YOU? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ----------------------------------------------------- 109 1. OFTEN 161 2. SOMETIMES 112 3. SELDOM 811 4. NEVER 12 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0045 WORK IN COMMUNITY-PROV MD=GE 8 REF 0045 LOC 61 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 63 0 Q12D. WORK WITH OTHER PEOPLE IN THIS COMMUNITY TO TRY TO SOLVE SOME LOCAL PROBLEM? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) --------------------------------------------------------- 68 1. OFTEN 182 2. SOMETIMES 133 3. SELDOM 810 4. NEVER 1 20 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 11 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0046 ATTEND MEETING-PROV MD=GE 8 REF 0046 LOC 62 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 64 0 Q12E. ATTEND A POLITICAL MEETING OR RALLY? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------- 63 1. OFTEN 174 2. SOMETIMES 136 3. SELDOM 820 4. NEVER 10 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0047 CONTACT OFFICIALS-PROV MD=GE 8 REF 0047 LOC 63 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 65 0 Q12F. CONTACT PUBLIC OFFICIALS OR POLITICIANS? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------ 37 1. OFTEN 140 2. SOMETIMES 136 3. SELDOM 880 4. NEVER 11 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 21 - 0 VAR 0048 CAMPAIGN ACTIVITY-PROV MD=GE 8 REF 0048 LOC 64 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 66 0 Q12G. SPEND TIME WORKING FOR A POLITICAL PARTY OR A CANDIDATE? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) --------------------------------------------------------- 43 1. OFTEN 83 2. SOMETIMES 65 3. SELDOM 1002 4. NEVER 10 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0049 SIGN OR STICKER-PROV MD=GE 8 REF 0049 LOC 65 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 67 0 Q12H. PUT A STICKER ON YOUR CAR OR PUT UP A SIGN, OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 58 1. OFTEN 112 2. SOMETIMES 47 3. SELDOM 971 4. NEVER 16 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0050 READ NEWSPAPER-LOCAL MD=GE 8 REF 0050 LOC 66 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 68 0 Q13. NOW, BRIEFLY, COULD YOU TELL ME HOW OFTEN YOU HAVE DONE ANY OF THESE THINGS WITH REGARD TO LOCAL OR MUNICIPAL 1 22 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - POLITICS HERE IN (CITY OR TOWN)? Q13A. READ ABOUT POLITICS IN THE NEWSPAPERS? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 470 1. OFTEN 323 2. SOMETIMES 212 3. SELDOM 192 4. NEVER 7 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0051 DISCUSS POLITICS-LOCAL MD=GE 8 REF 0051 LOC 67 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 69 0 Q13B. DISCUSS POLITICS WITH OTHER PEOPLE? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------- 281 1. OFTEN 390 2. SOMETIMES 261 3. SELDOM 262 4. NEVER 9 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0052 CONVINCE FRIENDS-LOCAL MD=GE 8 REF 0052 LOC 68 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 70 0 Q13C. TRY TO CONVINCE FRIENDS TO VOTE THE SAME AS YOU? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ---------------------------------------------------------- 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 23 - (CONTINUED) - 78 1. OFTEN 147 2. SOMETIMES 112 3. SELDOM 855 4. NEVER 10 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0053 WORK IN COMMUNITY-LOCAL MD=GE 8 REF 0053 LOC 69 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 71 0 Q13D. WORK WITH OTHER PEOPLE IN THIS COMMUNITY TO TRY TO SOLVE SOME LOCAL PROBLEM? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ----------------------------------------------------------- 88 1. OFTEN 211 2. SOMETIMES 134 3. SELDOM 758 4. NEVER 13 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0054 ATTEND MEETING-LOCAL MD=GE 8 REF 0054 LOC 70 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 72 0 Q13E. ATTEND A POLITICAL MEETING OR RALLY? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------- 64 1. OFTEN 141 2. SOMETIMES 138 3. SELDOM 849 4. NEVER 1 24 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 12 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0055 CONTACT OFFICIALS-LOCAL MD=GE 8 REF 0055 LOC 71 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 73 0 Q13F. CONTACT PUBLIC OFFICIALS OR POLITICIANS? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------- 51 1. OFTEN 170 2. SOMETIMES 125 3. SELDOM 846 4. NEVER 11 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0056 CAMPAIGN ACTIVITY-LOCAL MD=GE 8 REF 0056 LOC 72 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 74 0 Q13G. SPEND TIME WORKING FOR A POLITICAL PARTY OR A CANDIDATE? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 32 1. OFTEN 59 2. SOMETIMES 73 3. SELDOM 1026 4. NEVER 13 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 25 - 0 VAR 0057 SIGN OR STICKER-LOCAL MD=GE 8 REF 0057 LOC 73 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 75 0 Q13H. PUT A STICKER ON YOUR CAR OR PUT UP A SIGN, OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 40 1. OFTEN 72 2. SOMETIMES 44 3. SELDOM 1033 4. NEVER 14 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0058 MAP-1ST RESP PLACEMENT MD=0 REF 0058 LOC 74 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 76 0 Q14. HERE IS A BLANK MAP OF CANADA. IT HAS NO WRITING ON IT AT ALL. WE WOULD LIKE YOU TO WRITE IN FIVE WORDS OR PHRASES THAT YOU THINK BEST DESCRIBE POLITICS IN CANADA. YOU CAN PUT DOWN ANYTHING YOU WANT AND WRITE ANYWHERE ON THE MAP, BUT YOU CAN ONLY PUT DOWN FIVE THINGS. TYPE OF RESPONSE (FIRST RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------------ 530 1. PLACED, AND WRITTEN ON PLACE 127 2. PLACED REGIONAL OR PROVINCIAL REFERENCE BUT NOT WRITTEN ON PLACE 1353 3. GENERAL, NON-PLACED 434 0. NO RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0059 MAP-1ST RESPONSE MD=0 REF 0059 LOC 75 WIDTH 4 DK 1 COL 77-80 0 CONTENT OF RESPONSE TO MAP QUESTION (FIRST RESPONSE) ---------------------------------------------------- 1 26 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - SEE NOTE(S) 6 0000. NO RESPONSE, NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0001 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER 7379 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 2 COL 1- 4 0 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER 7379 ----------------------- DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '02' DK 2 COL 5- 6 ---------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0002 RESPONDENT ID NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0002 LOC 5 WIDTH 4 DK 2 COL 7-10 0 RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (UNIQUE FOUR DIGIT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FOR EACH RESPONDENT. FIRST DIGIT INDICATES PROVINCE) ------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 16 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0060 MAP-2ND RESP PLACEMENT MD=0 REF 0060 LOC 79 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 11 0 TYPE OF RESPONSE (SECOND RESPONSE) ---------------------------------- 476 1. PLACED, AND WRITTEN ON PLACE 116 2. PLACED REGIONAL OR PROVINCIAL REFERENCE BUT NOT WRITTEN ON PLACE 1002 3. GENERAL, NON-PLACED 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 27 - (CONTINUED) - 852 0. NO RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0061 MAP-2ND RESPONSE MD=0 REF 0061 LOC 80 WIDTH 4 DK 2 COL 12-15 0 CONTENT OF RESPONSE TO MAP QUESTION (SECOND RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 6 0000. NO RESPONSE, NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0062 MAP-3RD RESP PLACEMENT MD=0 REF 0062 LOC 84 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 16 0 TYPE OF RESPONSE (THIRD RESPONSE) --------------------------------- 413 1. PLACED, AND WRITTEN ON PLACE 79 2. PLACED REGIONAL OR PROVINCIAL REFERENCE BUT NOT WRITTEN ON PLACE 794 3. GENERAL, NON-PLACED 1158 0. NO RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0063 MAP-3RD RESPONSE MD=0 REF 0063 LOC 85 WIDTH 4 DK 2 COL 17-20 0 CONTENT OF RESPONSE TO MAP QUESTION (THIRD RESPONSE) ---------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 6 1 28 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 0000. NO RESPONSE, NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0064 MAP-4TH RESP PLACEMENT MD=0 REF 0064 LOC 89 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 21 0 TYPE OF RESPONSE (FOURTH RESPONSE) ---------------------------------- 359 1. PLACED, AND WRITTEN ON PLACE 61 2. PLACED REGIONAL OR PROVINCIAL REFERENCE BUT NOT WRITTEN ON PLACE 621 3. GENERAL, NON-PLACED 1403 0. NO RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0065 MAP-4TH RESPONSE MD=0 REF 0065 LOC 90 WIDTH 4 DK 2 COL 22-25 0 CONTENT OF RESPONSE TO MAP QUESTION (FOURTH RESPONSE) ----------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 6 0000. NO RESPONSE, NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0066 MAP-5TH RESP PLACEMENT MD=0 REF 0066 LOC 94 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 26 0 TYPE OF RESPONSE (FIFTH RESPONSE) --------------------------------- 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 29 - (CONTINUED) - 304 1. PLACED, AND WRITTEN ON PLACE 50 2. PLACED REGIONAL OR PROVINCIAL REFERENCE BUT NOT WRITTEN ON PLACE 457 3. GENERAL, NON-PLACED 1633 0. NO RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0067 MAP-5TH RESPONSE MD=0 REF 0067 LOC 95 WIDTH 4 DK 2 COL 27-30 0 CONTENT OF RESPONSE TO MAP QUESTION (FIFTH RESPONSE) ---------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 6 0000. NO RESPONSE, NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0068 REGION R LIVES IN MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0068 LOC 99 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 31-32 0 Q15A. PEOPLE OFTEN THINK OF CANADA AS BEING DIVDED INTO REGIONS, BUT THEY DON'T ALWAYS AGREE ON WHAT THE REGIONAL DIVISIONS ARE. WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF YOU THINK OF CANADA AS BEING DIVIDED INTO REGIONS? (IF YES) WHAT REGION DO YOU LIVE IN? ----------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 2 98. DK 99. DON'T KNOW WHICH REGIONS 00. DOES NOT THINK OF CANADA AS BEING DIVIDED INTO REGIONS 0 1 30 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - 0 VAR 0069 OTHER REGIONS OF CANADA MD=0 OR GE 8888 REF 0069 LOC 101 WIDTH 4 DK 2 COL 33-36 0 Q15B. WHAT ARE THE OTHER REGIONS OF CANADA? ------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 3 8888. DK, NOT SURE 9999. NA; INAP., CODED 00 OR 98 IN Q.15A 0000. THERE ARE NO OTHER REGIONS, NONE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0070 FEEL CLOSER TO FED-PROV MD=GE 8 REF 0070 LOC 105 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 37 0 Q16. WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU FEEL CLOSER TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN OTTAWA, OR TO YOUR PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT HERE IN (PROVINCE)? ----------------------------------------------------------- 746 1. FEDERAL 1079 2. PROVINCIAL 369 3. BOTH EQUALLY 210 4. NEITHER 40 8. DK 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0071 PROV GOVTS MORE POWERFUL MD=0 OR GE 8888 REF 0071 LOC 106 WIDTH 4 DK 2 COL 38-41 0 Q17A,17B. ARE ANY PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL THAN OTHERS? (IF YES) WHICH ONES? ----------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 4 8888. DK, NO OPINION 9999. DON'T KNOW WHICH PROVINCES 0000. NO GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 31 - 0 VAR 0072 FEEL ABOUT PROV MD=0 REF 0072 LOC 110 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 42-43 0 Q18. FEELING THERMOMETER SERIES Q18A. (THERMOMETER) FIRST OF ALL, WE WOULD LIKE TO KNOW HOW YOU FEEL IN GENERAL ABOUT THIS PROVINCE OF (PROVINCE)? ------------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0073 PROV AS PLACE TO LIVE MD=0 REF 0073 LOC 112 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 44-45 0 Q18B. (THERMOMETER) NOW, AS A PLACE TO LIVE, COULD YOU TELL ME, AGAIN USING THE THERMOMETER, HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT THIS PROVINCE OF (PROVINCE)? ----------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0074 FEEL ABOUT GOVT OF PROV MD=0 REF 0074 LOC 114 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 46-47 0 Q18C. (THERMOMETER) HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT OF THIS PROVINCE OF (PROVINCE)? ----------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 1 32 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - 0 VAR 0075 FEEL ABOUT REGION MD=0 REF 0075 LOC 116 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 48-49 0 Q18D. (THERMOMETER) HOW DO YOU FEEL, IN GENERAL, ABOUT THIS REGION OF (NAME REGION MENTIONED IN Q.15B, IF SAME AS PROVINCE, GO TO Q.18F)? ----------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION; INAP., REGION SAME AS PROVINCE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0076 REGION AS PLACE TO LIVE MD=0 REF 0076 LOC 118 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 50-51 0 Q18E. (THERMOMETER) NOW SPECIFICALLY, AS A PLACE TO LIVE IN, HOW WOULD YOU SAY YOU FEEL ABOUT THIS REGION OF (NAME REGION MENTIONED IN Q.15B)? ------------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0077 FEEL ABOUT CANADA MD=0 REF 0077 LOC 120 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 52-53 0 Q18F. (THERMOMETER) HOW DO YOU FEEL, IN GENERAL, ABOUT CANADA? ------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 33 - 0 VAR 0078 CANADA AS A PLACE TO LIV MD=0 REF 0078 LOC 122 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 54-55 0 Q18G. (THERMOMETER) NOW SPECIFICALLY, AS A COUNTRY TO LIVE IN, HOW WOULD YOU SAY YOU FEEL ABOUT CANADA? ---------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0079 FEEL ABOUT GOVT OF CAN MD=0 REF 0079 LOC 124 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 56-57 0 Q18H. (THERMOMETER) HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA? ----------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0080 FEEL ABOUT U.S.A. MD=0 REF 0080 LOC 126 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 58-59 0 Q18I. (THERMOMETER) HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THE UNITED STATES? ------------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0081 FEEL ABOUT ENGLAND MD=0 REF 0081 LOC 128 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 60-61 0 Q18J. (THERMOMETER) HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT ENGLAND? -------------------------------------------------- 1 34 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0082 FEEL ABOUT FRANCE MD=0 REF 0082 LOC 130 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 62-63 0 Q18K. (THERMOMETER) HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT FRANCE? ------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0083 PROV BEAR MORE THAN SHR MD=0 OR GE 8888 REF 0083 LOC 132 WIDTH 4 DK 2 COL 64-67 0 Q19A,19B. IN YOUR OPINION, ARE SOME OF THE PROVINCES BEARING MORE THAN THEIR FAIR SHARE OF THE COSTS OF GOVERNING CANADA? (IF YES) WHICH PROVINCES ARE THESE? ------------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 4 8888. DK, NO OPINION 9999. DON'T KNOW WHICH PROVINCES 0000. NO GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0084 PROV BENEFIT MORE TH SHR MD=0 OR GE 8888 REF 0084 LOC 136 WIDTH 4 DK 2 COL 68-71 0 Q20A,20B. WHAT ABOUT BENEFITS? WOULD YOU SAY THAT SOME PROVINCES RECEIVE MORE THAN THEIR FAIR SHARE OF THE BENEFITS OF BEING PART OF CANADA? (IF YES) WHICH PROVINCES ARE THESE? ------------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 4 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 35 - (CONTINUED) - 8888. DK, NO OPINION 9999. DON'T KNOW WHICH PROVINCES 0000. NO GOVERNMENTS MORE POWERFUL 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0085 GOVT RESP FOR EDUCATION MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0085 LOC 140 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 72 0 Q21. THIS IS A LIST OF SOME THINGS FOR WHICH GOVERNMENTS IN CANADA ARE RESPONSIBLE. FOR EACH ONE, I WOULD LIKE YOUR OPINION ABOUT WHETHER THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN OTTAWA OR THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT HERE IN (PROVINCE) IS MORE IMPORTANT IN DEALING WITH THAT PARTICULAR ITEM. Q21A. EDUCATION ----------------------------------------------------------- 345 1. FEDERAL 1591 2. PROVINCIAL 339 3. BOTH EQUALLY 148 8. DK 21 0. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0086 GOVT RESP FOREIGN AFF MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0086 LOC 141 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 73 0 Q21B. FOREIGN AFFAIRS --------------------------------------------------------- 1994 1. FEDERAL 75 2. PROVINCIAL 158 3. BOTH EQUALLY 193 8. DK 25 0. NO OPINION 0 1 36 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - 0 VAR 0087 GOVT RESP FOR LOCAL GOVT MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0087 LOC 142 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 74 0 Q21C. LOCAL GOVERNMENT ---------------------------------------------------------- 182 1. FEDERAL 1755 2. PROVINCIAL 251 3. BOTH EQUALLY 212 8. DK 45 0. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0088 GOVT RESP FOR HOSP INS MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0088 LOC 143 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 75 0 Q21D. HOSPITAL INSURANCE ------------------------------------------------------------ 626 1. FEDERAL 1470 2. PROVINCIAL 216 3. BOTH EQUALLY 120 8. DK 12 0. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0089 GOVT RESP UNEMPL INS MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0089 LOC 144 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 76 0 Q21E. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ------------------------------------------------------ 1439 1. FEDERAL 608 2. PROVINCIAL 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 37 - (CONTINUED) - 219 3. BOTH EQUALLY 152 8. DK 27 0. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0090 GOVT RESP FOR ECONOMY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0090 LOC 145 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 77 0 Q21F. THE ECONOMY ----------------------------------------------------- 1599 1. FEDERAL 170 2. PROVINCIAL 503 3. BOTH EQUALLY 148 8. DK 25 0. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0091 SAME PARTY RUN FED-PROV MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0091 LOC 146 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 78 0 Q22A. SOME PEOPLE FEEL THAT THE SAME POLITICAL PARTY SHOULD NOT CONTROL BOTH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN OTTAWA AND THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT HERE IN (PROVINCE) AT THE SAME TIME, BUT OTHERS SAY THAT IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE. HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THIS? ----------------------------------------------------------- 606 1. SAME PARTY SHOULD NOT CONTROL BOTH LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT 1596 2. MAKES NO DIFFERENCE 25 3. SAME PARTY SHOULD CONTROL BOTH 127 8. DK 91 0. NO OPINION 0 1 38 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - 0 VAR 0092 SAME PARTY RUN-INTENSITY MD=GE 8 REF 0092 LOC 147 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 79 0 --IF R IS CODED 1 IN Q.22A-- Q22B. HOW STRONGLY DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THAT? -------------------------------------------------------- 241 1. VERY STRONGLY 282 2. FAIRLY STRONGLY 76 3. NOT VERY STRONGLY 8 8. DK 1839 9. INAP., CODED 2-8 OR 0 IN Q.22A 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0001 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER 7379 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 3 COL 1- 4 0 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER 7379 ----------------------- DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '03' DK 3 COL 5- 6 ---------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0002 RESPONDENT ID NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0002 LOC 5 WIDTH 4 DK 3 COL 7-10 0 RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (UNIQUE FOUR DIGIT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FOR EACH RESPONDENT. FIRST DIGIT INDICATES PROVINCE) ------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 16 0 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 39 - 0 VAR 0093 MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE MD=0 OR GE 88 REF 0093 LOC 148 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 11-12 0 Q23A. NOW, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU SOME MORE SPECIFIC QUESTIONS ABOUT THE RECENT FEDERAL ELECTION. WHAT, IN YOUR OPINION, WAS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE TO YOU, PERSONALLY, IN THAT ELECTION? ---------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 7 88. DK 00. NO IMPORTANT ISSUES 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0094 FEEL ABOUT IMP ISSUE MD=GE 888 REF 0094 LOC 150 WIDTH 3 DK 3 COL 13-15 0 --IF 01-65 IN Q.23A-- Q23B. HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THISISSUE? ------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 8 888. DK, NOT STATED 999. INAP., CODED 88 OR 00 IN Q.23A 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0095 ARTICULATENESS-1ST ISSUE MD=GE 8 REF 0095 LOC 153 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 16 0 --IF 01-65 IN Q.23A-- ARTICULATENESS --------------------------------------------- 133 1. HIGH 1 40 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 728 2. MEDIUM 870 3. LOW 19 8. DK 696 9. INAP., CODED 88 OR 00 IN Q.23A 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0096 PARTY CLOSEST ON ISSUE MD=GE 8 REF 0096 LOC 154 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 17 0 --IF 01-65 IN Q.23A-- Q23C. WHICH PARTY IS CLOSEST TO YOU ON THIS ISSUE? ----------------------------------------------------------- 184 0. NONE 760 1. LIBERALS 392 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVES 175 3. N.D.P. 52 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 23 5. OTHER 162 8. DK 696 9. INAP., CODED 88 OR 00 IN Q.23A 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0097 ISSUE IMPT IN VOTING MD=GE 8 REF 0097 LOC 155 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 18 0 --IF 01-65 IN Q.23A-- Q23D. HOW IMPORTANT WAS THATISSUE TO YOU IN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE IN THE ELECTION? ----------------------------------------------------------- 986 1. VERY IMPORTANT 489 2. FAIRLY IMPORTANT 215 3. NOT VERY IMPORTANT 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 41 - (CONTINUED) - 59 8. DK 696 9. INAP., CODED 88 OR 00 IN Q.23A 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0098 2ND MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE MD=0 OR GE 88 REF 0098 LOC 156 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 19-20 0 --IF 01-65 IN Q.23A-- Q24A. WAS THERE ANY OTHER ISSUE THAT WAS IMPORTANT TO YOU IN THE ELECTION? --------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 7 88. DK 99. INAP., CODED 88 OR 00 IN Q.23A 00. NO OTHER ISSUE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0099 FEEL ABOUT 2ND ISSUE MD=GE 888 REF 0099 LOC 158 WIDTH 3 DK 3 COL 21-23 0 Q24B. HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THISISSUE? ------------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 8 888. DK, NOT STATED 999. INAP., NO SECOND ISSUE MENTIONED; CODED 88,99 OR 00 IN Q.24A 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0100 ARTICULATENESS-2ND ISSUE MD=GE 8 REF 0100 LOC 161 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 24 0 ARTICULATENESS ----------------------------------------------------------- 1 42 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 62 1. HIGH 395 2. MEDIUM 371 3. LOW 18 8. DK 1599 9. INAP., CODED 88,99 OR 00 IN Q. 24A 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0101 PARTY CLOSEST ON 2ND ISS MD=GE 8 REF 0101 LOC 162 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 25 0 Q24C. WHICH PARTY IS CLOSEST TO YOU ON THISISSUE? ------------------------------------------------------- 96 0. NONE 371 1. LIBERALS 183 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVES 99 3. N.D.P. 21 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 8 5. OTHER 68 8. DK 1599 9. INAP., CODED 88,99 OR 00 IN Q.24A 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0102 2ND ISSUE IMP IN VOTING MD=GE 8 REF 0102 LOC 163 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 26 0 Q24D. HOW IMPORTANT WAS THATISSUE TO YOU IN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE IN THE ELECTION? -------------------------------------------------------- 424 1. VERY IMPORTANT 284 2. FAIRLY IMPORTANT 119 3. NOT VERY IMPORTANT 18 8. DK 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 43 - (CONTINUED) - 1599 9. INAP., CODED 88,99 OR 00 IN Q. 24A 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0103 BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0103 LOC 164 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 27-28 0 Q25A. I WOULD LIKE TO GET YOUR OPINIONS ON AN ISSUE THAT HAS BEEN IMPORTANT FOR SOME TIME NOW IN CANADIAN POLITICS, NOT JUST IN THIS ELECTION. THAT ISSUE IS BILINGUALISM. WHAT DO YOU USUALLY THINK OF WHEN BILINGUALISM IS MENTIONED? ANYTHING ELSE? Q25B. HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT BILINGUALISM? LANGUAGE DIMENSION (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 178 01. RESPONSE OF LANGUAGE GENERALLY, RESPONSE OF BILINGUALISM (NOT SPECIFIC) 135 02. FRENCH SOLE RESPONSE (BILINGUALISM IS 'SPEAKING FRENCH') (ANGLOPHONES ONLY) 19 03. ENGLISH SOLE RESPONSE (BILINGUALISM IS 'SPEAKING ENGLISH') (FRANCOPHONES ONLY) 320 04. FRENCH AND ENGLISH (LES DEUX LANGUES) 14 05. OTHER LANGUAGE, ENGLISH OR FRENCH AND OTHER LANGUAGE 25 06. FRENCH SOLE RESPONSE, 'SPEAKING FRENCH' (FRANCOPHONES ONLY) 96 08. 'SPEAKING TWO LANGUAGES' (DEUX LANGUES) 29 19. GENERAL REFERENCE TO SCHOOLS 22 20. LEARNING FRENCH IN SCHOOL 21. LEARNING ENGLISH IN SCHOOL 13 22. LEARNING FRENCH FOR JOB 11 23. LEARNING ENGLISH FOR JOB 48 25. GENERAL REFERENCE TO JOBS 9 26. LEARNING ENGLISH FOR JOBS AND TRAVEL 11 27. LEARNING ENGLISH FOR TRAVEL 14 30. LANGUAGE LEGISLATION 25 31. BILL 22, WITH REFERENCE TO LANGUAGE 1 32. OFFICIAL LANGUAGES ACT 35 33. SEPARATISM ('INDEPENDENCE'-FRENCH) 193 99. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1247 00. INAP., CODED 35 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL BILINGUALISM DATA AVAILABLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 1 44 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - 0 VAR 0104 BILINGUALISM-PRESCRIP MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0104 LOC 166 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 29-30 0 PRESCRIPTION (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ---------------------------------------------- 50 01. MANY LANGUAGES, 'ANY LANGUAGE SHOULD BE ALLOWED' 67 02. ENGLISH SHOULD BE ONLY LANGUAGE ('IT'S AN ENGLISH COUNTRY') 14 03. ENGLISH PRIMARY LANGUAGE, FRENCH OPTIONAL 25 04. ENGLISH PRIMARY LANGUAGE, ANY OTHER LANGUAGE OPTIONAL 12 05. FRENCH SHOULD BE ONLY LANGUAGE 38 06. FRENCH PRIMARY LANGUAGE, ENGLISH OR OTHER LANGUAGE OPTIONAL 16 07. FRENCH IN QUEBEC, ENGLISH ELSEWHERE 13 08. FRENCH AND ENGLISH IN QUEBEC (BILINGUALISM), ENGLISH ELSEWHERE 15 09. FRENCH WHERE THERE ARE FRENCH PEOPLE 255 10. BILINGUALISM IS A GOOD THING; PEOPLE SHOULD BE BILINGUAL 65 11. FRENCH AND ENGLISH EVERYWHERE 145 12. NO COMPULSORY SECOND LANGUAGE 42 13. PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE FORCED TO SPEAK FRENCH 7 14. PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE FORCED TO SPEAK ENGLISH 21 15. O.K. FOR YOUNG PEOPLE, NOT NECESSARY FOR OLDER PEOPLE 48 16. FRENCH SHOULD BE TAUGHT IN SCHOOLS 2 17. ENGLISH SHOULD BE TAUGHT IN SCHOOLS 5 18. OTHER PRESCRIPTIONS 15 19. FRENCH NOT COMPULSORY, BUT SHOULD BE TAUGHT IN SCHOOL 20. ENGLISH NOT COMPULSORY, BUT SHOULD BE TAUGHT IN SCHOOL 25 21. FRENCH SHOULD BE PRESERVED AS CULTURE AND LANGUAGE 16 22. ANGLOPHONES SHOULD BE AS BILINGUAL AS FRANCOPHONES 304 99. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1247 00. INAP., CODED 35 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL BILINGUALISM DATA AVAILABLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 45 - 0 VAR 0105 BILINGUALISM-REG,PROV MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0105 LOC 168 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 31-32 0 REGIONAL/PROVINCIAL RESPONSES (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------ 5 01. O.K. FOR QUEBEC, NO FURTHER REFERENCE 02. O.K. FOR QUEBEC, NOT MARITIMES 03. O.K. FOR QUEBEC, NOT ONTARIO 2 04. O.K. FOR QUEBEC, NOT WEST 21 05. O.K. FOR QUEBEC, BUT NOWHERE ELSE 3 06. O.K. FOR QUEBEC, BUT NOT HERE (E.G. 'NOT HERE IN SASKATCHEWAN') 07. O.K. FOR QUEBEC AND ONTARIO, BUT NOT ELSEWHERE 9 08. NOT HERE, NOT IN THIS REGION 7 09. O.K. FOR AREAS WITH FRANCOPHONES, BUT NOT ELSEWHERE 10. O.K. FOR AREAS WITH FRANCOPHONES, BUT NOT HERE 8 11. O.K. FOR EAST, BUT NOT HERE, ELSEWHERE 182 15. QUEBEC, BOURASSA 11 19. NEEDED HERE, (REQUIRED, NECESSARY) 76 20. NEEDED IN ALL REGIONS/PROVINCES 875 99. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1247 00. INAP., CODED 35 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL BILINGUALISM DATA AVAILABLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0106 BILINGUALISM-COMPULSION MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0106 LOC 170 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 33-34 0 COMPULSION (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ---------------------------------------------- 20 01. COMPULSION BY GOVERNMENT (GENERAL) 5 02. COMPULSION BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 16 03. COMPULSION BY QUEBEC 9 04. COMPULSION BY THE FRENCH 1 05. COMPULSION BY THE LIBERALS 1 46 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 1 06. COMPULSION BY TRUDEAU 14 07. COMPULSION IN EDUCATION 15 08. COMPULSION IN WORK 2 09. COMBINATIONS 67 10. GENERAL RESPONSE OF COMPULSION 11. COMPULSION, QUEBEC AND LIBERALS 1047 99. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1247 00. INAP., CODED 35 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL BILINGUALISM DATA AVAILABLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0107 BILINGUALISM-PERS,IMPERS MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0107 LOC 172 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 35 0 Q25A,25B. PERSONAL-IMPERSONAL (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ---------------------------------------------------------- 935 1. IMPERSONAL OR SYSTEMIC 169 2. PERSONAL TO INDIVIDUAL (REFERENCE TO PERSONAL FEELINGS, EXPERIENCE, ETC.) 93 9. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1247 0. INAP., CODED 35 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL BILINGUALISM DATA AVAILABLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0108 BILINGUALISM-POS,NEG MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0108 LOC 173 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 36 0 POSITIVE/NEGATIVE (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------- 357 1. COMPLETELY POSITIVE 228 2. QUALIFIED POSITIVE 48 3. NEUTRAL 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 47 - (CONTINUED) - 162 4. QUALIFIED NEGATIVE ('NOT COMPULSORY') 213 5. COMPLETELY NEGATIVE 191 9. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1247 0. INAP., CODED 35 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL BILINGUALISM DATA AVAILABLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0109 BILINGUALISM-ARTICULATE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0109 LOC 174 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 37 0 ARTICULATENESS (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) -------------------------------------------------- 176 1. HIGH 441 2. MEDIUM 496 3. LOW 85 9. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1247 0. INAP., CODED 35 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL BILINGUALISM DATA AVAILABLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0110 BILINGUALISM-PARTY CLOSE MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0110 LOC 175 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 38 0 Q25C. WHICH PARTY IS CLOSEST TO YOU ON THIS ISSUE? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) --------------------------------------------------------- 431 1. LIBERAL 113 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 29 3. N.D.P. 19 4. SOCIAL CREDIT/CREDITISTE 12 5. OTHER 1 48 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 312 8. DK 133 9. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1397 0. NONE; INAP., CODED 35 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL BILINGUALISM DATA AVAILABLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0111 FOR INVEST-INEVITABLE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0111 LOC 176 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 39 0 Q26A. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO GET YOUR OPINIONS ON AN ISSUE THAT HAS BEEN IMPORTANT FOR SOME TIME NOW IN CANADIAN POLITICS, NOT JUST IN THIS ELECTION. THAT ISSUE IS FOREIGN INVESTMENT. WHAT DO YOU USUALLY THINK OF WHEN FOREIGN INVESTMENT IS MENTIONED? Q26B. HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT FOREIGN INVESTMENT? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ INEVITABILITY 200 1. INEVITABLE, 'IT'S INEVITABLE'; 'IT'S NECESSARY' 25 2. CAUSED BY LACK OF CAPITAL IN CANADA 35 3. CAUSED BY CHARACTERISTICS OF CANADIANS E.G., 'WON'T INVEST' 967 9. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1217 0. INAP., CODED 40 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL FOREIGN INVESTMENT DATA AVAILABLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0112 FOR INVEST-CHARACTERIST MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0112 LOC 177 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 40-41 0 CHARACTERISTICS OF FOREIGN INVESTMENT (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) --------------------------------------------------- 44 01. GENERAL REFERENCE, ONE COUNTRY IN ANOTHER 1 02. REFERENCE TO MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 49 - (CONTINUED) - 37 03. GENERAL REFERENCE, TRADE 100 04. GENERAL REFERENCE, INVESTMENT OR ECONOMY 9 05. U.S. AND LAND (INVESTS IN) 29 06. U.S. AND MANUFACTURING 3 07. U.S. AND OIL 9 08. U.S. AND OTHER NATURAL RESOURCES 2 09. U.S. AND OIL AND NATURAL RESOURCES 2 10. LAND 17 11. MANUFACTURING 7 12. OIL 21 13. OTHER NATURAL RESOURCES 1 14. OIL AND NATURAL RESOURCES 17 15. OTHER COMBINATIONS 13 16. U.S. AND OTHER COMBINATIONS 147 19. FOREIGNERS BUYING IN CANADA (OTHER COUNTRIES, NO SPECIFIC COUNTRY); PROFITS GOING OUT OF COUNTRY 111 20. U.S. INVESTMENT IN CANADA 14 21. COUNTRIES OTHER THAN U.S. INVESTING IN CANADA (SPECIFIC COUNTRIES) 36 22. U.S. AND OTHER COUNTRIES INVESTING IN CANADA 11 23. MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS INVESTING IN CANADA 138 30. CANADA INVESTING ABROAD, FOREIGN TRADE OR AID 460 99. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1217 00. INAP., CODED 40 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL FOREIGN INVESTMENT DATA AVAILABLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0113 FOR INVEST-DOMINATION MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0113 LOC 179 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 42 0 DOMINATION (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ---------------------------------------------------- 47 1. DOMINATION (GENERAL) 84 2. DOMINATION BY U.S. 5 3. DOMINATION BY U.S. AND OTHER COUNTRIES 6 4. DOMINATION BY OTHER COUNTRY 6 5. DOMINATION BY MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS 1081 9. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1217 0. INAP., CODED 40 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL FOREIGN INVESTMENT DATA AVAILABLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 1 50 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0114 FOR INVEST-ACTION MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0114 LOC 180 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 43 0 ACTION (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------ 53 1. GENERAL REFERENCE TO ACTION, E.G. 'SOMETHING MUST BE DONE' 167 2. GENERAL REFERENCE, CONTROL NEEDED 28 3. GENERAL GOVERNMENT ACTION 1 4. SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO FOREIGN INVESTMENTS REVIEW ACT (SCREENING MECHANISM - TAKEOVERS) 37 5. SPECIFIC REFERENCES TO OTHER GOVERNMENT POLICIES OR PROPOSED POLICIES (ANYTHING SPECIFIC FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO DO) 21 6. INDIVIDUAL PERSONS ACTION NEEDED 922 9. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1217 0. INAP., CODED 40 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL FOREIGN INVESTMENT DATA AVAILABLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0115 FOR INVEST-POS,NEG MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0115 LOC 181 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 44 0 POSITIVE/NEGATIVE (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ---------------------------------------------------- 232 1. COMPLETELY POSITIVE TOWARDS FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN CANADA 228 2. QUALIFIED POSITIVE (THINK ITS GOOD 'BUT') 19 3. NEUTRAL 119 4. QUALIFIED NEGATIVE 222 5. COMPLETELY NEGATIVE 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 51 - (CONTINUED) - 407 9. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1217 0. INAP., CODED 40 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL FOREIGN INVESTMENT DATA AVAILABLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0116 FOR INVEST-ARTICULATE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0116 LOC 182 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 45 0 ARTICULATENESS (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------- 132 1. HIGH 354 2. MEDIUM 444 3. LOW 299 9. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1217 0. INAP., CODED 40 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL FOREIGN INVESTMENT DATA AVAILABLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0117 FOR INVEST-PARTY CLOSE MD=GE 8 REF 0117 LOC 183 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 46 0 Q26C. WHICH PARTY IS CLOSEST TO YOU ON THISISSUE? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) --------------------------------------------------- 120 0. NONE 296 1. LIBERAL 91 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 114 3. N.D.P. 21 4. SOCIAL CREDIT/CREDITISTE 6 5. OTHER 275 8. DK 1 52 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 1522 9. NA; INAP., CODED 40 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL FOREIGN INVESTMENT DATA AVAILABLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0118 INFLATION-CONTENT MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0118 LOC 184 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 47-48 0 Q27A. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO GET YOUR OPINIONS ON AN ISSUE THAT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED QUITE A BIT IN THIS ELECTION. THAT ISSUE IS INFLATION. WHAT DO YOU USUALLY THINK OF WHEN INFLATION IS MENTIONED? ANYTHING ELSE? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ CONTENT 159 01. GENERAL REFERENCE TO PROBLEM (WHAT A TERRIBLE PROBLEM) 274 02. HIGH PRICES, HIGH COST OF LIVING 18 03. INCOME, WAGES TOO LOW 22 04. PRICES AND WAGES GO TOGETHER TO CREATE A SPIRAL, REFERENCE TO SPIRAL 76 05. PRICES AND WAGES 2 06. WAGES TOO HIGH 4 07. IMPOSSIBLE TO SAVE 75 10. REFERENCE TO FOOD (AND OTHER) 3 11. REFERENCE TO FUEL (AND OTHER) 6 12. REFERENCE TO HOUSING (AND OTHER) 17 13. REFERENCE TO OTHER SPECIFICS 9 14. REFERENCE TO FOOD AND FUEL (AND OTHER) 22 15. REFERENCE TO FOOD AND HOUSING (AND OTHER) 1 16. REFERENCE TO FUEL AND HOUSING (AND OTHER) 2 17. REFERENCE TO FOOD, FUEL AND HOUSING (AND OTHER) 42 20. RESPONSE OF DEPRESSION OR RECESSION (HEADING FOR A COLLAPSE) 9 21. DEPRESSION RESPONSE COMBINED WITH OTHER GENERAL RESPONSES 10 22. DEPRESSION RESPONSE COMBINED WITH FOOD (AND OTHER) 23. DEPRESSION RESPONSE COMBINED WITH FUEL (AND OTHER) 1 24. DEPRESSION RESPONSE COMBINED WITH HOUSING (AND OTHER) 2 25. DEPRESSION RESPONSE COMBINED WITH OTHER SPECIFIC RESPONSES (AND OTHER) 26. DEPRESSION RESPONSE COMBINED WITH FOOD AND FUEL (AND OTHER) 27. DEPRESSION RESPONSE COMBINED WITH FOOD AND HOUSING 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 53 - (CONTINUED) - (AND OTHER) 28. DEPRESSION RESPONSE COMBINED WITH FUEL AND HOUSING (AND OTHER) 29. DEPRESSION RESPONSE COMBINED WITH FOOD, FUEL AND HOUSING (AND OTHER) 6 30. DEPRESSION RESPONSE COMBINED WITH WAGES AND PRICES 38 40. 'IT'S A WORLD-WIDE PHENOMENON' 76 99. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1573 00. INAP., CODED 01 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL INFLATION DATA AVAILBLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0119 INFLATION-CAUSES MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0119 LOC 186 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 49-50 0 CAUSES (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) --------------------------------------- 15 01. UNIONS, HIGH SETTLEMENTS, WAGES, STRIKES 19 02. COMPANIES, BIG BUSINESS 7 03. GOVERNMENT ACTION (I.E., SPENDING) 24 04. GOVERNMENT INACTION 8 05. SHORTAGES 35 06. INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOUR, INDIVIDUAL PEOPLE'S ACTION, E.G., PEOPLE NOT SAVING 11 07. WORLD SITUATION 8 08. SPIRAL 4 10. UNIONS AND COMPANIES 2 11. UNIONS AND GOVERNMENT ACTION 3 12. UNIONS AND GOVERNMENT INACTION 13. UNIONS AND SHORTAGES 3 14. UNIONS AND INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOUR 5 15. COMPANIES AND GOVERNMENT ACTION 6 16. COMPANIES AND GOVERNMENT INACTION 17. COMPANIES AND SHORTAGES 18. COMPANIES AND INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOUR 1 19. GOVERNMENT ACTION AND GOVERNMENT INACTION 20. GOVERNMENT ACTION AND SHORTAGES 1 21. GOVERNMENT ACTION AND INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOUR 22. GOVERNMENT INACTION AND SHORTAGES 23. GOVERNMENT INACTION AND INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOUR 24. SHORTAGES AND INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOUR 25. MULTIPLE COMBINATIONS 1 54 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 720 99. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1573 00. INAP., CODED 01 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL INFLATION DATA AVAILBLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0120 INFLATION-ACTION MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0120 LOC 188 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 51 0 ACTION (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) --------------------------------------- 42 1. GENERAL ACTION, 'ACTION NEEDS TO BE TAKEN' 24 2. GENERAL GOVERNMENT ACTION 24 3. SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO WAGE AND PRICE CONTROL 23 4. SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO OTHER POLICY (GOVERNMENT) 12 5. SPECIFIC CONTROL OR POLICY, NO GOVERNMENT REFERENCE 11 6. INDIVIDUAL ACTION NEEDED, CHANGE IN BEHAVIOUR 736 9. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1573 0. INAP., CODED 01 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL INFLATION DATA AVAILBLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0121 INFLATION-HOW MUCH AFFEC MD=GE 8 REF 0121 LOC 189 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 52 0 Q27B. HOW MUCH WERE YOU PERSONALLY AFFECTED BY INFLATION OVER THE PAST YEAR OR SO, A GREAT DEAL, SOME, OR NOT MUCH AT ALL? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 348 1. A GREAT DEAL 357 2. SOME 133 3. NOT MUCH AT ALL 20 8. DK 1587 9. NA; INAP., CODED 01 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL INFLATION DATA AVAILBLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 55 - 0 VAR 0122 INFLATION-WAY AFFECTED MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0122 LOC 190 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 53-54 0 --IF CODED 1 OR 2 IN Q.27B-- Q27C. IN WHAT WAY WERE YOU MOST AFFECTED? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------- 138 01. GENERAL REFERENCE TO PRICES/EVERYTHING 9 02. LACK OF ABILITY TO SAVE 129 03. FOOD 10 04. CLOTHING 2 05. FUEL 19 06. HOUSING 9 07. MACHINERY 25 08. COSTS OF BUSINESS OPERATION 19 09. OTHER 93 10. FOOD AND CLOTHING 36 11. FOOD AND FUEL 26 12. FOOD AND HOUSING 20 13. FOOD AND OTHER 4 14. CLOTHING AND FUEL 5 15. CLOTHING AND HOUSING 5 16. CLOTHING AND OTHER 3 17. FUEL AND HOUSING 3 18. FUEL AND OTHER 1 19. HOUSING AND OTHER 4 20. OTHER COMBINATIONS 29 40. GENERAL REFERENCE TO INCOME 8 41. WAGES 16 42. PENSIONS 7 43. INVESTMENTS 2 44. BUSINESS INCOME 38 50. INCOME AND PRICES (GENERAL) 3 51. INCOME AND LACK OF ABILITY TO SAVE 6 52. INCOME AND FOOD 1 53. INCOME AND CLOTHING 54. INCOME AND FUEL 2 55. INCOME AND HOUSING 56. INCOME AND MACHINERY 4 57. INCOME AND COST OF BUSINESS OPERATION 2 58. INCOME AND OTHER 7 60. INCOME AND FOOD AND CLOTHING 1 61. INCOME AND FOOD AND FUEL 1 62. INCOME AND FOOD AND HOUSING 1 63. INCOME AND FOOD AND OTHER 1 64. INCOME AND CLOTHING AND FUEL 65. INCOME AND CLOTHING AND HOUSING 1 56 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 66. INCOME AND CLOTHING AND OTHER 1 67. INCOME AND FUEL AND HOUSING 68. INCOME AND FUEL AND OTHER 1 69. INCOME AND HOUSING AND OTHER 70. INCOME AND MULTIPLE COMBINATIONS 17 99. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1739 00. INAP., CODED 3,8 OR 9 IN Q.27B; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0123 INFLATION-ARTICULATE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0123 LOC 192 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 55 0 ARTICULATENESS (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ----------------------------------------------- 134 1. HIGH 273 2. MEDIUM 427 3. LOW 38 9. NA, NO ANSWER ON THIS DIMENSION 1573 0. INAP., CODED 01 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL INFLATION DATA AVAILBLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0124 INFLATION-PARTY CLOSE MD=GE 8 REF 0124 LOC 193 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 56 0 Q27D. WHICH PARTY IS THE CLOSEST TO YOU ON THIS ISSUE? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ---------------------------------------------------------- 2 0. NONE 256 1. LIBERAL 125 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 69 3. N.D.P. 23 4. SOCIAL CREDIT/CREDITISTE 7 5. OTHER 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 57 - (CONTINUED) - 366 8. DK 1598 9. NA; INAP., CODED 01 IN Q.23A OR Q.24A AND NO ADDITIONAL INFLATION DATA AVAILBLE; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0125 FAVOUR SEPARATISM MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0125 LOC 194 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 57 0 Q28A. BEFORE WE LEAVE THE SUBJECT OF ISSUES, THERE IS ONE ADDITIONAL QUESTION THAT I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU ABOUT. THERE HAS BEEN QUITE A BIT OF TALK IN RECENT YEARS ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF QUEBEC SEPARATING FROM THE REST OF CANADA AND BECOMING AN INDEPENDENT COUNTRY. ARE YOU IN FAVOUR OF SEPARATISM OR OPPOSED TO IT? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 138 1. IN FAVOUR 907 2. OPPOSED 94 3. QUALIFIED ANSWERS 36 8. DK 1203 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 66 0. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0126 SEPARATISM-INTENSITY MD=GE 8 REF 0126 LOC 195 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 58 0 --IF 1 OR 2 IN Q.28A-- 28B. HOW STRONGLY DO YOU FEEL ABOUT THAT, VERY STRONGLY, FAIRLY STRONGLY, OR NOT VERY STRONGLY? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ----------------------------------------------------- 644 1. VERY STRONGLY 317 2. FAIRLY STRONGLY 79 3. NOT VERY STRONGLY 6 8. DK 1399 9. INAP., CODED 3-9 OR 0 IN Q.28A; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 1 58 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - 0 VAR 0127 SEPARATISM LIKELY MD=GE 8 REF 0127 LOC 196 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 59 0 Q28C. HOW LIKELY DO YOU THINK IT IS THAT QUEBEC ACTUALLY WILL SEPARATE AT SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE, VERY LIKELY, FAIRLY LIKELY, OR NOT VERY LIKELY? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 77 1. VERY LIKELY 206 2. FAIRLY LIKELY 874 3. NOT VERY LIKELY 85 8. DK 1203 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0128 MAJ GOVT VS MINORITY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0128 LOC 197 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 60 0 Q29A. BEFORE WE LEAVE THE SUBJECT OF ISSUES, THERE IS ONE ADDITIONAL QUESTION THAT I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU ABOUT. IN RECENT YEARS, THE POLITICAL PARTY WHICH HAS FORMED THE GOVERNMENT IN OTTAWA HAS FREQUENTLY NOT HAD A MAJORITY OF THE SEATS IN PARLIAMENT. SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT IT IS BETTER WHEN THE GOVERNMENT HAS A MAJORITY OF SEATS IN PARLIAMENT, WHILE OTHERS FEEL THAT MINORITY GOVERNMENTS CAN ACCOMPLISH MORE, WHICH DO YOU FEEL IS BETTER? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ---------------------------------------------------------- 662 1. MAJORITY 339 2. MINORITY 143 3. IT DEPENDS 29 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 29 0. NO OPINION 0 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 59 - 0 VAR 0129 MAJORITY GOVT-SWITCH MD=GE 8 REF 0129 LOC 198 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 61 0 Q29B. IF YOU BELIEVED THAT ONE PARTY WAS MORE LIKELY TO BE ABLE TO FORM A MAJORITY GOVERNMENT, BUT YOU DID NOT ORDINARILY VOTE FOR THAT PARTY, HOW LIKELY WOULD YOU BE TO VOTE FOR IT IN ORDER TO HAVE A MAJORITY GOVERNMENT, VERY LIKELY, SOMEWHAT LIKELY, OR NOT AT ALL LIKELY? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ---------------------------------------------------------- 218 1. VERY LIKELY 243 2. SOMEWHAT LIKELY 651 3. NOT AT ALL LIKELY 91 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0130 MAJ GOVT ISSUE INFL VOTE MD=GE 8 REF 0130 LOC 199 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 62 0 --IF CODED 1 OR 2 IN Q.29B-- Q29C. DID THIS QUESTION OF MAJORITY GOVERNMENT HAVE A GREAT DEAL, SOMETHING, OR NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH THE WAY YOU VOTED IN THIS LAST ELECTION? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ----------------------------------------------------------- 145 1. A GREAT DEAL 138 2. SOMETHING 172 3. NOTHING AT ALL 6 8. DK 1983 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT; CODED 3, 8, 9 IN Q.29B 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0131 FEDERAL PARTY ID MD=GE 7 REF 0131 LOC 200 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 63 0 Q30A. THINKING OF FEDERAL POLITICS, DO YOU USUALLY THINK OF 1 60 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - YOURSELF AS A LIBERAL, CONSERVATIVE, N.D.P., SOCIAL CREDIT, OR WHAT? ----------------------------------------------------------- 334 0. INDEPENDENT OR NONE 1114 1. LIBERAL 525 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 234 3. N.D.P. 75 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 2 5. OTHER 29 7. REFUSED 132 8. DK 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0132 FED PARTY ID INTENSITY MD=GE 8 REF 0132 LOC 201 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 64 0 --IF CODED 1-5 IN Q.30A-- Q30B. HOW STRONGLY DO YOU FEEL (ABOUT PARTY MENTIONED IN Q.30A), VERY STRONGLY, FAIRLY STRONGLY, OR NOT VERY STRONGLY? ------------------------------------------------------------ 650 1. VERY STRONGLY 964 2. FAIRLY STRONGLY 328 3. NOT VERY STRONGLY 9 8. DK 495 9. INAP., CODED 7,8 OR 0 IN Q.30A 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0133 FEEL CLOSER TO FED PARTY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0133 LOC 202 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 65 0 --IF 7,8 OR 0 IN Q.30A-- Q31A. STILL THINKING OF FEDERAL POLITICS, DO YOU GENERALLY THINK OF YOURSELF AS BEING A LITTLE CLOSER TO ONE OF THE PARTIES THAN TO THE OTHERS? ---------------------------------------------------- 162 1. YES 268 2. NO 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 61 - (CONTINUED) - 53 8. DK 1950 9. INAP., CODED 1-5 IN Q.30A 12 0. REFUSED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0134 FED PARTY CLOSER TO MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0134 LOC 203 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 66 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.31A-- Q31B. WHICH PARTY IS THAT? ------------------------------------------------- 66 1. LIBERAL 45 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 26 3. N.D.P. 4 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 6 8. DK 2283 9. INAP., CODED 2-9 OR 0 IN Q.31A 16 0. REFUSED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0135 ANY PAST FED PARTY ID MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0135 LOC 204 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 67 0 Q32A. STILL THINKING OF FEDERAL POLITICS, WAS THERE EVER A TIME WHEN YOU FELT CLOSER TO ANY OTHER PARTY? ---------------------------------------------------- 800 1. YES 1565 2. NO 73 8. DK 7 0. REFUSED 0 1 62 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - 0 VAR 0136 PAST FED PARTY ID MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0136 LOC 205 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 68 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.32A-- Q32B. WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? -------------------------------------------------- 241 1. LIBERAL 309 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 153 3. N.D.P. 80 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 9 8. DK 1645 9. INAP., CODED 2,8 OR 0 IN Q.32A 7 0. REFUSED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0137 WHEN CHANGED FED PARTY MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0137 LOC 206 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 69 0 --IF CODED 1-4 IN Q.32B-- Q32C. WHEN DID YOU CHANGE FROM THAT PARTY? ----------------------------------------------------- 185 1. LAST ELECTION; JULY 8,1974; 1974 33 2. 1973; LAST YEAR; 1 YEAR AGO 91 3. 1971 - 1972; 2 OR 3 YEARS AGO 23 4. 1969 - 1970; 4 OR 5 YEARS AGO 100 5. 1967 - 1968; 6 OR 7 YEARS AGO 148 6. 1966 OR EARLIER; 8 OR MORE YEARS AGO 26 7. GENERAL - A LONG TIME AGO 147 8. OTHER ANSWERS, TIME NOT SPECIFIED, UNABLE TO DETERMINE FROM RESPONSE, HAVEN'T REALLY CHANGED/NOT PERMANENT CHANGE 1661 9. INAP., CODED 8,9 OR 0 IN Q.32B 30 0. DK, NO ANSWER, NOT SPECIFIED 0 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 63 - 0 VAR 0138 WHY CHG FED PTY-1ST RESP MD=GE 88 REF 0138 LOC 207 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 70-71 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.32A-- Q32D(1). WHAT WAS THE MAIN THING THAT MADE YOU CHANGE? (FIRST RESPONSE) ---------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 9 88. NO ANSWER, CAN'T REMEMBER, REFUSED 99. INAP., CODED 2,8 OR 0 IN Q.32A 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0139 WHY CHG FED PTY-2ND RESP MD=0 OR GE 88 REF 0139 LOC 209 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 72-73 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.32A-- Q32D(2). WHAT WAS THE MAIN THING THAT MADE YOU CHANGE? (SECOND RESPONSE) ---------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 9 88. NO ANSWER, CAN'T REMEMBER, REFUSED 99. INAP., CODED 2,8 OR 0 IN Q.32A 00. NO SECOND RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0140 FATHER FED PARTY? MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0140 LOC 211 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 74 0 Q33A. WHEN YOU WERE GROWING UP, DID YOUR FATHER HAVE ANY PARTICULIAR PREFERENCE FOR ONE OF THE FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTIES HERE IN CANADA? -------------------------------------------------------- 1 64 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 1413 1. YES 622 2. NO 407 8. DK 4 0. REFUSED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0141 FATHER FED PARTY ID MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0141 LOC 212 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 75 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.33A-- Q33B. WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? ----------------------------------------------------- 676 1. LIBERAL 547 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 96 3. N.D.P. 36 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 3 5. OTHER 49 8. DK 1032 9. INAP., CODED 2,8 OR 0 IN Q.33A 8 0. REFUSED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0142 FATHER FED PARTY INTENS MD=GE 8 REF 0142 LOC 213 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 76 0 --IF CODED 1-5 IN Q.33B-- Q33C. HOW STRONGLY (PARTY MENTIONED IN Q.33B) WAS HE THEN? ---------------------------------------------------------- 753 1. VERY STRONG 462 2. FAIRLY STRONG 125 3. NOT VERY STRONG 16 8. DK 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 65 - (CONTINUED) - 1088 9. INAP., CODED 8,9 OR 0 IN Q.33B 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0143 MOTHER FED PARTY? MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0143 LOC 214 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 77 0 Q34A. DID YOUR MOTHER HAVE ANY PARTICULAR PREFERENCE FOR ONE OF THE FEDERAL PARTIES HERE IN CANADA? ---------------------------------------------------- 1050 1. YES 958 2. NO 433 8. DK 4 0. REFUSED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0144 MOTHER FED PARTY ID MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0144 LOC 215 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 78 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.34A-- Q34B. WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? ----------------------------------------------------- 533 1. LIBERAL 383 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 56 3. N.D.P. 31 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 1 5. OTHER 40 8. DK 1395 9. INAP., CODED 2,8 OR 0 IN Q.34A 5 0. REFUSED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0145 MOTHER FED PARTY INTENS MD=GE 8 REF 0145 LOC 216 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 79 0 --IF CODED 1-5 IN Q.34B-- 1 66 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - Q34C. HOW STRONGLY (PARTY MENTIONED IN Q34B) WAS SHE THEN? ---------------------------------------------------------- 443 1. VERY STRONG 408 2. FAIRLY STRONG 138 3. NOT VERY STRONG 16 8. DK 1440 9. INAP., CODED 8,9 OR 0 IN Q.34B 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0146 PARENTS FED POL INTEREST MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0146 LOC 217 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 80 0 Q35. WHEN YOU WERE GROWING UP, HOW INTERESTED WERE YOUR PARENTS IN FEDERAL POLITICS, VERY INTERESTED, SOMEWHAT INTERESTED, OR NOT AT ALL INTERESTED? ------------------------------------------------------- 793 1. VERY INTERESTED 979 2. SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 422 3. NOT AT ALL INTERESTED 7 4. FATHER INTERESTED, MOTHER NOT 1 5. MOTHER INTERESTED, FATHER NOT 239 8. DK 4 0. REFUSED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0001 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER 7379 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 4 COL 1- 4 0 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER 7379 ----------------------- DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '04' DK 4 COL 5- 6 ---------------------------------- 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 67 - 0 VAR 0002 RESPONDENT ID NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0002 LOC 5 WIDTH 4 DK 4 COL 7-10 0 RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (UNIQUE FOUR DIGIT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FOR EACH RESPONDENT. FIRST DIGIT INDICATES PROVINCE) ------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 16 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0147 CAMPAIGN CONTACT MD=GE 8 REF 0147 LOC 218 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 11 0 Q36A. DURING THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN, WERE YOU PERSONALLY CONTACTED BY ANY OF THE LOCAL CANDIDATES OR PARTY WORKERS HERE IN THIS RIDING? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) --------------------------------------------------------- 427 1. YES 759 2. NO 18 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0148 PARTY CONTACT MD=0 OR GE 88 REF 0148 LOC 219 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 12-13 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.36A-- Q36B. WHICH ONES? (PROBE) ANY OTHERS? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ---------------------------------------------------------- 83 01. LIBERAL ONLY 88 02. P.C. ONLY 42 03. N.D.P. ONLY 6 04. SOCIAL CREDIT ONLY 1 68 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 64 05. LIBERAL & P.C. 21 06. LIBERAL & N.D.P. 1 07. LIBERAL & SOCIAL CREDIT 12 08. P.C. & N.D.P. 09. P.C. & SOCIAL CREDIT 1 10. N.D.P. & SOCIAL CREDIT 62 11. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. 1 12. LIB. & P.C. & S.C. 13. LIB. & N.D.P. & S.C. 14. P.C. & N.D.P. & S.C. 10 15. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. & S.C. 1 16. COMMUNIST ONLY 1 17. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. & S.C. & COMMUNIST 1 18. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. & COMMUNIST 19. LIB. & P.C. & COMMUNIST 20. LIB. & COMMUNIST & OTHER 21. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. & OTHER 22. LIB. & P.C. & OTHER 23. LIB.& OTHER 24. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. & S.C. & OTHER 25. LIB. & S.C. & OTHER 1 26. OTHER ONLY 27. P.C. & N.D.P. & OTHER (INCLUDES INDEPENDENT, NEW CANADIAN PARTY, LIBERTARIAN PARTY, PARTI QUEBECOIS AND RHINOCEROS) 6 88. DK 2018 99. INAP., CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.36A; HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 27 00. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0149 CANDIDATE CONTACT MD=0 OR GE 88 REF 0149 LOC 221 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 14-15 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.36A-- Q36C. (IF CANDIDATE(S) MENTIONED IN Q.36B) WHICH PARTY WAS HE (WERE THEY)? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------ 42 01. LIBERAL ONLY 51 02. P.C. ONLY 19 03. N.D.P. ONLY 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 69 - (CONTINUED) - 2 04. SOCIAL CREDIT ONLY 25 05. LIBERAL & P.C. 7 06. LIBERAL & N.D.P. 07. LIBERAL & SOCIAL CREDIT 3 08. P.C. & N.D.P. 1 09. P.C. & SOCIAL CREDIT 1 10. N.D.P. & SOCIAL CREDIT 19 11. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. 1 12. LIB. & P.C. & S.C. 13. LIB. & N.D.P. & S.C. 14. P.C. & N.D.P. & S.C. 2 15. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. & S.C. 2 16. COMMUNIST ONLY 17. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. & S.C. & COMMUNIST 18. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. & COMMUNIST 19. LIB. & P.C. & COMMUNIST 20. LIB. & COMMUNIST & OTHER 21. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. & OTHER 22. LIB. & P.C. & OTHER 23. LIB.& OTHER 1 24. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. & S.C. & OTHER 25. LIB. & S.C. & OTHER 2 26. OTHER ONLY 27. P.C. & N.D.P. & OTHER (INCLUDES INDEPENDENT, NEW CANADIAN PARTY, LIBERTARIAN PARTY, PARTI QUEBECOIS AND RHINOCEROS) 6 88. DK 2018 99. INAP., CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.36A; HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 242 00. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0150 OTHER CAMPAIGN CONTACT MD=GE 8 REF 0150 LOC 223 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 16 0 Q37A. WERE YOU CONTACTED IN ANY OTHER WAYS BY THE PARTIES DURING THE CAMPAIGN, FOR EXAMPLE, BY TELEPHONE OR BY HAVING A PAMPHLET LEFT IN YOUR MAILBOX? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) --------------------------------------------------------- 955 1. YES 230 2. NO 18 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 1 70 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - 0 VAR 0151 OTHER PARTY CONTACT MD=0 OR GE 88 REF 0151 LOC 224 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 17-18 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.37A-- Q37B. WHICH PARTY OR PARTIES? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------ 97 01. LIBERAL ONLY 51 02. P.C. ONLY 16 03. N.D.P. 7 04. SOCIAL CREDIT ONLY 162 05. LIBERAL & P.C. 33 06. LIBERAL & N.D.P. 11 07. LIBERAL & SOCIAL CREDIT 25 08. P.C. & N.D.P. 2 09. P.C. & SOCIAL CREDIT 1 10. N.D.P. & SOCIAL CREDIT 322 11. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. 22 12. LIB. & P.C. & S.C. 2 13. LIB. & N.D.P. & S.C. 3 14. P.C. & N.D.P. & S.C. 137 15. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. & S.C. 2 16. COMMUNIST ONLY 6 17. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. & S.C. & COMMUNIST 5 18. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. & COMMUNIST 2 19. LIB. & P.C. & COMMUNIST 1 20. LIB. & COMMUNIST & OTHER 5 21. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. & OTHER 22. LIB. & P.C. & OTHER 23. LIB.& OTHER 3 24. LIB. & P.C. & N.D.P. & S.C. & OTHER 25. LIB. & S.C. & OTHER 26. OTHER ONLY 1 27. P.C. & N.D.P. & OTHER (INCLUDES INDEPENDENT, NEW CANADIAN PARTY, LIBERTARIAN PARTY, PARTI QUEBECOIS AND RHINOCEROS) 40 88. DK 1490 99. INAP., CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.37A 00. NA 0 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 71 - 0 VAR 0152 HOW CONTACTED MD=GE 8 REF 0152 LOC 226 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 19 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.37A-- Q37C. HOW DID THEYCONTACT YOU? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 838 1. MAIL ONLY (ANY LITERATURE LEFT AT DOOR OR IN MAILBOX = MAIL) 23 2. PHONE ONLY 1 3. OTHER ONLY 93 4. MAIL & PHONE 5. MAIL & OTHER 6. PHONE & OTHER 7. MAIL & PHONE & OTHER 8. DK 1490 9. INAP., CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.37A 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0153 CAMPAIGN-NEWSPAPER MD=GE 8 REF 0153 LOC 227 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 20 0 Q38. DURING THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN, WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU READ QUITE A BIT, SOMETHING, OR NOT MUCH AT ALL ABOUT THE PARTIES, CANDIDATES, OR OTHER ASPECTS OF THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN IN THE NEWSPAPERS? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) --------------------------------------------------------- 467 1. QUITE A BIT 410 2. SOMETHING 320 3. NOT MUCH 7 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 1 72 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - 0 VAR 0154 CAMPAIGN-TELEVISION MD=GE 8 REF 0154 LOC 228 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 21 0 Q39. HOW ABOUT TELEVISION? DURING THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN DID YOU WATCH PROGRAMS OR ADVERTISEMENTS ABOUT THE PARTIES OR CANDIDATES OR OTHER ASPECTS OF THE CAMPAIGN? WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU SAW QUITE A FEW, SOME, OR ALMOST NONE? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ---------------------------------------------------------- 509 1. QUITE A FEW 453 2. SOME 233 3. ALMOST NONE 9 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0155 CAMPAIGN-RADIO MD=GE 8 REF 0155 LOC 229 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 22 0 Q40. HOW ABOUT RADIO? DURING THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN DID YOU HEAR PROGRAMS OR ADVERTISEMENTS ABOUT THE PARTIES OR CANDIDATES OR OTHER ASPECTS OF THE CAMPAIGN? WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU HEARD QUITE A FEW, SOME, OR ALMOST NONE? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ---------------------------------------------------------- 240 1. QUITE A FEW 383 2. SOME 566 3. ALMOST NONE 14 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0156 MOST IMPORTANT MEDIA MD=GE 8 REF 0156 LOC 230 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 23 0 Q41. WHICH WOULD YOU SAY IS MOST IMPORTANT TO YOU IN GETTING INFORMATION ABOUT POLITICS, RADIO, TELEVISION, OR THE NEWSPAPERS? (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------ 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 73 - (CONTINUED) - 71 1. RADIO 480 2. TELEVISION 372 3. NEWSPAPERS 35 4. RADIO & TELEVISION 12 5. RADIO & NEWSPAPERS 140 6. TELEVISION & NEWSPAPERS 64 7. ALL EQUALLY 30 8. DK 1241 9. INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0157 VOTE FREQUENCY-FED ELEC MD=GE 8 REF 0157 LOC 231 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 24 0 Q42A. IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS SINCE YOU HAVE BEEN OLD ENOUGH TO VOTE IN CANADA, INCLUDING THE ONE HELD THIS JULY, WOULD YOU SAY THAT YOU HAVE VOTED IN ALL OF THEM, MOST OF THEM, SOME OF THEM, OR NONE OF THEM? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1456 1. ALL 641 2. MOST 209 3. SOME 97 4. NONE 40 5. NOT ELIGIBLE BEFORE 3 8. DK 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0158 ALWAYS VOTE SAME-FED MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0158 LOC 232 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 25 0 --IF CODED 1,2 OR 3 IN Q.42A-- Q42B. HAVE YOU ALWAYS VOTED FOR THE SAME PARTY IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS, OR HAVE YOU VOTED FOR DIFFERENT PARTIES? --------------------------------------------------------- 1171 1. SAME 1090 2. DIFFERENT 1 74 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 43 8. DK 140 9. INAP., CODED 4,5 OR 8 IN Q.42A 2 0. REFUSED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0159 FED PARTY ALWAYS VOTED MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0159 LOC 233 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 26 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.42B-- Q42C. WHICH PARTY IS THAT? -------------------------------------------------------- 682 1. LIBERAL 293 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 122 3. N.D.P. 39 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 2 5. OTHER 5 6. SPOILED BALLOT 6 8. DK 1274 9. INAP., CODED 2-9 OR 0 IN Q.42B 22 0. REFUSED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0160 CHOICE OR NONCONTEST-FED MD=GE 8 REF 0160 LOC 234 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 27 0 --IF CODED 2 IN Q.42B-- Q42D. DID YOU VOTE FOR DIFFERENT PARTIES OUT OF CHOICE, OR BECAUSE SOME PARTIES DID NOT CONTEST THE ELECTION IN YOUR PROVINCE OR CONSTITUENCY? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1051 1. CHOICE 27 2. DID NOT CONTEST 13 8. DK 1354 9. INAP., CODED 1,8,9 OR 0 IN Q.42B 0 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 75 - 0 VAR 0161 VOTED IN 1974 FED ELEC MD=GE 8 REF 0161 LOC 235 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 28 0 Q43A. NOW, THINKING ABOUT THIS YEAR'S JULY FEDERAL ELECTION, WE FIND THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE WEREN'T ABLE TO VOTE BECAUSE THEY WERE AWAY, OR HAD SOME OTHER REASONS FOR NOT VOTING. HOW ABOUT YOU? DID YOU VOTE THIS TIME, OR DID SOMETHING HAPPEN TO KEEP YOU FROM VOTING? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1992 1. VOTED 353 2. DID NOT VOTE 3 8. DK 97 9. INAP., CODED 4 IN Q.42A 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0162 VOTE IN 1974 FED ELEC MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0162 LOC 236 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 29 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.43A-- Q43B. FOR WHICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE? ------------------------------------------------------------ 986 1. LIBERAL 577 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 228 3. N.D.P. 64 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 8 5. OTHER 28 6. SPOILED BALLOT 21 8. DK 452 9. INAP., CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.43A 81 0. REFUSED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0163 WHY NOT VOTE 1974 F ELEC MD=0 OR GE 16 REF 0163 LOC 237 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 30-31 0 --IF CODED 4 IN Q.42A OR 2 IN Q.43A-- 1 76 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - Q43C. WAS THERE ANY PARTICULAR REASON WHY YOU DIDN'T VOTE IN THE JULY<1974>ELECTION? ------------------------------------------------------------ 71 01. OUT OF TOWN 76 02. ON VACATION, HOLIDAYS 55 03. IN HOSPITAL, SICK, BLIND 7 04. FORGOT ABOUT IT, DIDN'T KNOW WHEN, WHERE VOTING WAS 44 05. BUSY 24 06. COULDN'T DECIDE, DIDN'T KNOW CANDIDATES, PARTIES 53 07. NOT INTERESTED, JUST DIDN'T BOTHER 2 08. RELIGIOUS REASONS 12 09. DID NOT WANT TO VOTE 10. FELT OWN PARTY WOULD WIN WITHOUT MY VOTE 9 11. PROTEST, SPOILED BALLOT 31 12. WOULDN'T MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE 6 13. NEVER VOTE 20 14. OUT OF TOWN ON BUSINESS, AT SCHOOL, AND OTHER SPECIFIC REASONS 9 15. INELIGIBLE, NOT ENUMERATED 2 16. REFUSED, WOULDN'T SAY 4 88. CAN'T REMEMBER 1995 99. INAP., CODED 1 OR 8 IN Q.43A 25 00. DK, NO PARTICULAR REASON 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0164 PARTY WD HAVE VOTED 1974 MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0164 LOC 239 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 32 0 --IF CODED 4 IN Q.42A OR 2 IN Q.43A-- Q43D. IF YOU HAD VOTED, WHO WOULD YOU HAVE VOTED FOR? ------------------------------------------------------------ 181 1. LIBERALS 91 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 61 3. N.D.P. 21 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 5. OTHER 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 77 - (CONTINUED) - 8 6. SPOILED BALLOT 85 8. DK 1995 9. INAP., CODED 1 OR 8 IN Q.43A 3 0. REFUSED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0165 MOST IMP-LDR,CAND,PTY MD=GE 8 REF 0165 LOC 240 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 33 0 Q44A. IN DECIDING HOW YOU WOULD VOTE IN THE RECENT JULY ELECTION, WHICH WAS THE MOST IMPORTANT TO YOU: THE PARTY LEADERS, THE CANDIDATES HERE IN THIS CONSTITUENCY, OR THE PARTIES TAKEN AS A WHOLE? --------------------------------------------------------- 736 1. PARTY LEADERS 595 2. CANDIDATES 931 3. THE PARTIES 92 8. DK 90 9. INAP., CODED 8 IN Q.43A; CODED 8 OR 0 IN Q.43D 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0166 2ND MOST IMP-LDR,CAND,PT MD=GE 8 REF 0166 LOC 241 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 34 0 Q44B. WHICH WOULD SAY WAS THE NEXT MOST IMPORTANT? ------------------------------------------------------------ 837 1. PARTY LEADERS 736 2. CANDIDATES 573 3. THE PARTIES 208 8. DK 90 9. INAP., CODED 8 IN Q.43A; CODED 8 OR 0 IN Q.43D 0 1 78 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - 0 VAR 0167 LEAST IMP-LDR,CAND,PTY MD=GE 8 REF 0167 LOC 242 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 35 0 Q44C. WHICH WOULD YOU SAY WAS LEAST IMPORTANT? --------------------------------------------------------- 608 1. PARTY LEADERS 844 2. CANDIDATES 697 3. THE PARTIES 206 8. DK 90 9. INAP., CODED 8 IN Q.43A; CODED 8 OR 0 IN Q.43D 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0168 ISSUES OR PERSONAL QUAL MD=GE 8 REF 0168 LOC 243 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 36 0 --IF CODED 1 OR 2 IN Q.44A-- Q44D. WHEN YOU SAY THAT (PARTY LEADER OR CANDIDATE) WAS THE MOST IMPORTANT TO YOU, ARE YOU THINKING OF HIS PERSONAL QUALITIES, OR HIS STAND ON CERTAIN ISSUES? ----------------------------------------------------------- 697 1. STAND ON ISSUES 590 2. PERSONAL QUALITIES 45 8. DK 1113 9. INAP., CODED 3-9 IN Q.44A 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0169 WHICH ISSUES-1ST RESP MD=GE 88 REF 0169 LOC 244 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 37-38 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.44D-- Q44E(1). WHICH ISSUES ARE YOU THINKING OF SPECIFICALLY? (FIRST RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------- 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 79 - (CONTINUED) - SEE NOTE(S) 10 88. DK, CAN'T REMEMBER 98. REFUSED 99. INAP., CODED 2-9 IN Q.44D 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0170 WHICH ISSUES-2ND RESP MD=0 OR GE 88 REF 0170 LOC 246 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 39-40 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.44D-- Q44E(2). WHICH ISSUES ARE YOU THINKING OF SPECIFICALLY? (SECOND RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 10 88. DK, CAN'T REMEMBER 98. REFUSED 99. INAP., CODED 2-9 IN Q.44D 00. NO SECOND RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0171 PARTY-APPROACH OR ISSUES MD=GE 8 REF 0171 LOC 248 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 41 0 --IF CODED 3 IN Q.44A-- Q44F. WHEN YOU SAY THAT PARTY WAS THE MOST IMPORTANT TO YOU, ARE YOU THINKING OF THE PARTY'S GENERAL APPROACH TO GOVERNMENT OR ITS POSITION ON CERTAIN ISSUES? ----------------------------------------------------------- 377 1. POSITION ON ISSUES 511 2. GENERAL APPROACH 44 8. DK 1513 9. INAP., CODED 1,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.44A 0 1 80 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - 0 VAR 0172 WHICH ISSUES-1ST RESP MD=GE 88 REF 0172 LOC 249 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 42-43 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.44F-- Q44G(1). WHICH ISSUES ARE YOU THINKING OF SPECIFICALLY? (FIRST RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 10 88. DK, CAN'T REMEMBER 98. REFUSED 99. INAP., CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.44F 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0173 WHICH ISSUES-2ND RESP MD=0 OR GE 88 REF 0173 LOC 251 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 44-45 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.44F-- Q44G(2). WHICH ISSUES ARE YOU THINKING OF SPECIFICALLY? (SECOND RESPONSE) -------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 10 88. DK, CAN'T REMEMBER 98. REFUSED 99. INAP., CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.44F 00. NO SECOND RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0174 VOTED IN 1972 MD=GE 8 REF 0174 LOC 253 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 46 0 Q45A. THE LAST FEDERAL ELECTION BEFORE THE ONE IN JULY WAS IN OCTOBER 1972. DO YOU REMEMBER FOR SURE WHETHER OR NOT YOU VOTED IN THAT ELECTION? ------------------------------------------------------------ 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 81 - (CONTINUED) - 2037 1. VOTED 220 2. DIDN'T VOTE 134 3. NOT ELIGIBLE 55 8. DON'T REMEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0175 VOTE IN 1972 FED ELEC MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0175 LOC 254 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 47 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.45A-- Q45B. WHICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE FOR? ------------------------------------------------------- 1025 1. LIBERAL 521 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 252 3. N.D.P. 82 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 2 5. OTHER 8 6. SPOILED BALLOT 87 8. DK, DON'T REMEMBER 408 9. INAP., CODED 2-8 IN Q.45A 62 0. REFUSED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0176 WHY SWITCH 72-74,1ST RSP MD=GE 88 REF 0176 LOC 255 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 48-49 0 Q45C(1). (IF PARTY VOTED FOR IN 1972, Q.45B, IS DIFFERENT FROM PARTY VOTED FOR IN 1974, Q.43B) I NOTICED THAT YOU CHANGED YOUR VOTE FROM 1972 TO 1974. WAS THERE ANY SPECIAL REASON FOR CHANGING THE PARTY YOU VOTED FOR? ------------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 11 88. DK, CAN'T REMEMBER, NOT STATED 99. INAP., CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.43A OR 2,3 OR 8 IN Q.45A OR 0,6 OR 8 IN Q.43B OR 0,6 OR 8 IN Q.45B OR VOTED FOR SAME PARTY IN 1972 AND 1974 1 82 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 00. NO, NOT REALLY, NO REAL REASON 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0177 WHY SWITCH 72-74,2ND RSP MD=0 OR GE 88 REF 0177 LOC 257 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 50-51 0 Q45C(2). WERE THERE ANY OTHER REASON? (SECOND RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 11 88. DK, CAN'T REMEMBER, NOT STATED 99. INAP., CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.43A OR 2,3 OR 8 IN Q.45A OR 0,6 OR 8 IN Q.43B OR 0,6 OR 8 IN Q.45B OR VOTED FOR SAME PARTY IN 1972 AND 1974 00. NO, NOT REALLY, NO REAL REASON; NO SECOND RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0178 VOTED IN 1968 MD=GE 8 REF 0178 LOC 259 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 52 0 Q46A. THE FEDERAL ELECTION BEFORE THAT WAS IN JUNE 1968. DO YOU REMEMBER FOR SURE WHETHER YOU VOTED IN THAT ELECTION? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1604 1. VOTED 199 2. DIDN'T VOTE 527 3. NOT ELIGIBLE THEN 115 8. DON'T REMEMBER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0179 VOTE IN 1968 FED ELEC MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0179 LOC 260 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 53 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.46A-- 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 83 - (CONTINUED) - Q46B. WHICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE FOR? ---------------------------------------------------- 797 1. LIBERALS 375 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 157 3. N.D.P. 54 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 2 5. OTHER 1 6. SPOILED BALLOT 163 8. DK, DON'T REMEMBER 841 9. INAP., CODED 2-8 IN Q.46A 54 0. REFUSED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0180 2ND CHOICE PARTY-1974 MD=0 OR GE 7 REF 0180 LOC 261 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 54 0 Q47A. IF, FOR SOME REASON, YOU HAD BEEN UNABLE TO VOTE FOR THE FEDERAL PARTY THAT YOU MOST PREFERRED IN THE RECENT<1974> ELECTION, WHICH OTHER FEDERAL PARTY WOULD YOU HAVE VOTED FOR? ------------------------------------------------------------ 435 1. LIBERAL 473 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 316 3. N.D.P. 159 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 17 5. OTHER 10 6. SPOILED BALLOT 26 7. REFUSED 550 8. DK 460 0. WOULD NOT VOTE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0181 PARTY LEAST PREF-1974 MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0181 LOC 262 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 55 0 Q47B. WHICH OF THE FEDERAL PARTIES WOULD YOU LEAST WANT TO VOTE FOR? ---------------------------------------------------------- 246 1. LIBERAL 1 84 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 325 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 670 3. N.D.P. 558 4. SOCIAL CREDIT 177 5. COMMUNIST 67 6. OTHER OR MULTIPLE RESPONSE 385 8. DK 17 0. REFUSED 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0182 TIME OF VOTE DECISION MD=GE 88 REF 0182 LOC 263 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 56-57 0 --IF CODED 1 IN Q.43A-- Q48A. AS YOU KNOW, THE ELECTION WAS HELD ON JULY 8, 1974. CAN YOU REMEMBER EXACTLY WHEN YOU DECIDED HOW YOU WERE GOING TO VOTE? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 147 01. KNEW ALL ALONG, ALWAYS VOTE FOR THE SAME PARTY 84 02. QUITE AWHILE BEFORE THE ELECTION WAS CALLED 281 03. WHEN THE ELECTION WAS CALLED 37 04. 6 WEEKS BEFORE 5 05. 5 WEEKS BEFORE 76 06. 4 WEEKS BEFORE 26 07. 3 WEEKS BEFORE 83 08. 2 WEEKS BEFORE 115 09. 1 WEEK BEFORE 65 10. AT POLL, ELECTION DAY 18 11. REFERENCE TO SPECIFIC EVENT (UNDATED) 7 12. OTHER 13 13. SEVERAL OR A FEW WEEKS BEFORE 43 88. DK 1446 99. NA; INAP.,CODED 2-9 IN Q.43A; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0183 SURE ALL ALONG MD=GE 8 REF 0183 LOC 265 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 58 0 --IF CODED 1 IN 43A-- 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 85 - (CONTINUED) - Q48B. WERE YOU PRETTY SURE ALL ALONG WHICH PARTY YOU WERE GOING TO VOTE FOR, OR WAS THERE ANY POINT WHEN YOU THOUGHT YOU MIGHT VOTE FOR A DIFFERENT PARTY? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ----------------------------------------------------------- 740 1. SURE ALL ALONG 224 2. CONSIDERED OTHER 24 8. DK 1456 9. NA; INAP., CODED 2-9 IN Q.43A; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0184 OTHER PARTY CONSIDERED MD=GE 8 REF 0184 LOC 266 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 59 0 --IF CODED 2 IN Q.48B-- Q48C. WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ---------------------------------------------------------- 72 1. LIBERAL 76 2. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 40 3. N.D.P. 19 4. SOCIAL CREDIT/CREDITISTE 8 5. OTHER 5 8. DK 2225 9. NA; INAP., CODED 1,8 OR 9 IN Q.48B; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0185 REAL REASON VOTED-1ST RP MD=GE 88 REF 0185 LOC 267 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 60-61 0 Q49(1). WE HAVE ASKED A LOT OF QUESTIONS ABOUT REASONS WHY YOU MIGHT HAVE DECIDED TO VOTE. SOMETIMES, HOWEVER, IN ASKING ALL THESE QUESTIONS, RESEARCHERS CAN LOSE TRACK OF WHAT WAS REALLY IMPORTANT TO PEOPLE. SO, COULD YOU TAKE A MOMENT TO THINK OVER ALL THE REASONS WHY YOU DECIDED TO VOTE THE WAY YOU DID, AND JUST BRIEFLY TELL ME THE THINGS THAT WERE MOST 1 86 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - IMPORTANT TO YOU? (FIRST RESPONSE) (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 22 01. TO HAVE GOOD GOVERNMENT, FOR GOOD OF THE PEOPLE 24 02. TRADITIONAL VOTE 97 10. LIBERALS - PRO 27 11. LIBERALS - CON 38 12. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVES - PRO 15 13. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVES - CON 25 14. N.D.P. - PRO 3 15. N.D.P. - CON 3 16. SOCIAL CREDIT - PRO 1 17. SOCIAL CREDIT - CON 27 18. PARTY 34 20. LEADERSHIP (GENERAL REFERENCE), THE LEADERS 63 21. TRUDEAU - PRO 19 22. TRUDEAU - CON 11 23. STANFIELD - PRO 7 24. STANFIELD - CON 4 25. LEWIS - PRO 2 26. LEWIS - CON 27. CAOUETTE - PRO 28. CAOUETTE - CON 72 30. LOCAL CANDIDATE - PRO 5 31. LOCAL CANDIDATE - CON 16 32. LOCAL CANDIDATE (CANNOT DETERMINE DIRECTION) 21 40. ISSUES (GENERAL) 113 41. INFLATION (GENERAL) 16 42. INFLATION (SPECIFIC) 2 43. WAGE AND PRICE CONTROLS - PRO 15 44. WAGE AND PRICE CONTROLS - NEUTRAL 16 45. WAGE AND PRICE CONTROLS - CON 3 46. BUDGET - PRO 4 47. BUDGET - NEUTRAL 3 48. BUDGET - CON 49. BILINGUALISM - PRO 10 50. BILINGUALISM - NEUTRAL 51. BILINGUALISM - CON 2 57. RELATIONS WITH OTHER COUNTRIES, FOREIGN POLICY 3 58. AGRICULTURE 2 59. HEALTH CARE 19 60. THE ECONOMY 5 61. TAXES 3 62. GOVERNMENT SPENDING 5 63. WELFARE 6 64. HOUSING 2 65. FOREIGN INVESTMENT 6 66. ENERGY POLICY 28 67. PENSIONS 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 87 - (CONTINUED) - 4 68. FAMILY ALLOWANCES 8 69. UNEMPLOYMENT/JOBS 9 70. PROTEST VOTE 51 71. MAJORITY GOVERNMENT - PRO 3 72. MINORITY GOVERNMENT - PRO 5 73. PARTY REPRESENTS THE WORKING CLASS 74. PARTY REPRESENTS THE MIDDLE CLASS 12 75. PARTY REPRESENTS REGIONAL INTERESTS 4 80. PERSONAL OR FAMILY JOBS AFFECTED 18 81. CIVIC DUTY 33 85. OTHER 47 88. DK 1459 99. NA; INAP., CODED 2-9 IN Q.43A; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0186 REAL REASON VOTED-2ND RP MD=GE 88 REF 0186 LOC 269 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 62-63 0 Q49(2). (SECOND RESPONSE) (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 14 01. TO HAVE GOOD GOVERNMENT, FOR GOOD OF THE PEOPLE 4 02. TRADITIONAL VOTE 44 10. LIBERALS - PRO 15 11. LIBERALS - CON 16 12. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVES - PRO 13 13. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVES - CON 8 14. N.D.P. - PRO 1 15. N.D.P. - CON 1 16. SOCIAL CREDIT - PRO 17. SOCIAL CREDIT - CON 19 18. PARTY 24 20. LEADERSHIP (GENERAL REFERENCE), THE LEADERS 31 21. TRUDEAU - PRO 9 22. TRUDEAU - CON 7 23. STANFIELD - PRO 16 24. STANFIELD - CON 2 25. LEWIS - PRO 1 26. LEWIS - CON 3 27. CAOUETTE - PRO 28. CAOUETTE - CON 21 30. LOCAL CANDIDATE - PRO 1 88 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 7 31. LOCAL CANDIDATE - CON 4 32. LOCAL CANDIDATE (CANNOT DETERMINE DIRECTION) 36 40. ISSUES (GENERAL) 68 41. INFLATION (GENERAL) 7 42. INFLATION (SPECIFIC) 6 43. WAGE AND PRICE CONTROLS - PRO 3 44. WAGE AND PRICE CONTROLS - NEUTRAL 10 45. WAGE AND PRICE CONTROLS - CON 3 46. BUDGET - PRO 1 47. BUDGET - NEUTRAL 1 48. BUDGET - CON 3 49. BILINGUALISM - PRO 11 50. BILINGUALISM - NEUTRAL 2 51. BILINGUALISM - CON 7 57. RELATIONS WITH OTHER COUNTRIES, FOREIGN POLICY 5 58. AGRICULTURE 2 59. HEALTH CARE 8 60. THE ECONOMY 15 61. TAXES 6 62. GOVERNMENT SPENDING 6 63. WELFARE 11 64. HOUSING 6 65. FOREIGN INVESTMENT 11 66. ENERGY POLICY 21 67. PENSIONS 2 68. FAMILY ALLOWANCES 14 69. UNEMPLOYMENT/JOBS 3 70. PROTEST VOTE 10 71. MAJORITY GOVERNMENT - PRO 72. MINORITY GOVERNMENT - PRO 5 73. PARTY REPRESENTS THE WORKING CLASS 74. PARTY REPRESENTS THE MIDDLE CLASS 11 75. PARTY REPRESENTS REGIONAL INTERESTS 5 80. PERSONAL OR FAMILY JOBS AFFECTED 1 81. CIVIC DUTY 17 85. OTHER 3 88. DK 1868 99. NA; INAP., CODED 2-9 IN Q.43A; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT; NO SECOND RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0187 REAL REASON VOTED-3RD RP MD=GE 88 REF 0187 LOC 271 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 64-65 0 Q49(3). (THIRD RESPONSE) (HALF SAMPLE 1 ONLY) ----------------------------------------------------------- 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 89 - (CONTINUED) - 9 01. TO HAVE GOOD GOVERNMENT, FOR GOOD OF THE PEOPLE 4 02. TRADITIONAL VOTE 15 10. LIBERALS - PRO 5 11. LIBERALS - CON 3 12. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVES - PRO 5 13. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVES - CON 3 14. N.D.P. - PRO 3 15. N.D.P. - CON 16. SOCIAL CREDIT - PRO 1 17. SOCIAL CREDIT - CON 1 18. PARTY 6 20. LEADERSHIP (GENERAL REFERENCE), THE LEADERS 8 21. TRUDEAU - PRO 5 22. TRUDEAU - CON 3 23. STANFIELD - PRO 9 24. STANFIELD - CON 1 25. LEWIS - PRO 26. LEWIS - CON 27. CAOUETTE - PRO 28. CAOUETTE - CON 9 30. LOCAL CANDIDATE - PRO 3 31. LOCAL CANDIDATE - CON 1 32. LOCAL CANDIDATE (CANNOT DETERMINE DIRECTION) 13 40. ISSUES (GENERAL) 18 41. INFLATION (GENERAL) 3 42. INFLATION (SPECIFIC) 4 43. WAGE AND PRICE CONTROLS - PRO 3 44. WAGE AND PRICE CONTROLS - NEUTRAL 9 45. WAGE AND PRICE CONTROLS - CON 46. BUDGET - PRO 1 47. BUDGET - NEUTRAL 48. BUDGET - CON 3 49. BILINGUALISM - PRO 9 50. BILINGUALISM - NEUTRAL 2 51. BILINGUALISM - CON 6 57. RELATIONS WITH OTHER COUNTRIES, FOREIGN POLICY 3 58. AGRICULTURE 2 59. HEALTH CARE 11 60. THE ECONOMY 6 61. TAXES 2 62. GOVERNMENT SPENDING 2 63. WELFARE 4 64. HOUSING 8 65. FOREIGN INVESTMENT 6 66. ENERGY POLICY 7 67. PENSIONS 2 68. FAMILY ALLOWANCES 1 90 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 8 69. UNEMPLOYMENT/JOBS 1 70. PROTEST VOTE 4 71. MAJORITY GOVERNMENT - PRO 2 72. MINORITY GOVERNMENT - PRO 5 73. PARTY REPRESENTS THE WORKING CLASS 1 74. PARTY REPRESENTS THE MIDDLE CLASS 6 75. PARTY REPRESENTS REGIONAL INTERESTS 80. PERSONAL OR FAMILY JOBS AFFECTED 81. CIVIC DUTY 20 85. OTHER 3 88. DK 2181 99. NA; INAP., CODED 2-9 IN Q.43A; HALF SAMPLE 2 RESPONDENT; NO THIRD RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0188 LIKE TRUDEAU-THERM MD=0 REF 0188 LOC 273 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 66-67 0 Q.50. THERE ARE MANY ASPECTS OF POLITICAL PARTIES WHICH STRIKE CANADIANS IN DIFFERENT WAYS. WE WOULD LIKE TO GET YOUR FEELINGS TOWARDS SOME OF THESE ASPECTS OF OUR PARTIES. WE ARE INTERESTED TO SEE HOW YOU LIKED THE LEADERS, THE PARTY'S CANDIDATES IN YOUR RIDING IN THE LAST ELECTION, AND THE PARTY AS A WHOLE. WE WILL USE THE FEELING THERMO- METER AGAIN FOR THESE QUESTIONS. Q50A. LET'S START WITH THE LIBERALS, HOW MUCH DO YOU LIKE THEIR LEADER, MR. TRUDEAU? WHERE WOULD YOU PLACE HIM ON THE THERMOMETER? ----------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0189 LIKE LOCAL LIB CAN-THERM MD=0 REF 0189 LOC 275 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 68-69 0 Q50B. HOW MUCH DID YOU LIKE YOUR LOCAL LIBERAL CANDIDATE IN THE RECENT FEDERAL ELECTION? ----------------------------------------------------------- 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 91 - (CONTINUED) - SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0190 LIKE LIB PARTY-THERM MD=0 REF 0190 LOC 277 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 70-71 0 Q50C. AND, FINALLY, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE LIBERAL PARTY, TAKEN AS A WHOLE? --------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0191 LIKE STANFIELD-THERM MD=0 REF 0191 LOC 279 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 72-73 0 Q50D. NOW, THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVES. HOW MUCH DO YOU LIKE THEIR LEADER, MR. STANFIELD? WHERE WOULD YOU PLACE HIM ON THE THERMOMETER? ----------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0192 LIKE LOCAL PC CAND-THERM MD=0 REF 0192 LOC 281 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 74-75 0 Q50E. HOW MUCH DID YOU LIKE YOUR LOCAL PROGRESSIVE 1 92 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE IN THE RECENT FEDERAL ELECTION? ------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0193 LIKE PC PARTY-THERM MD=0 REF 0193 LOC 283 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 76-77 0 Q50F. AND, FINALLY, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE PARTY, TAKEN AS A WHOLE? ------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0194 LIKE LEWIS-THERM MD=0 REF 0194 LOC 285 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 78-79 0 Q50G. HOW ABOUT THE N.D.P.? HOW MUCH DO YOU LIKE THEIR LEADER, MR. DAVID LEWIS? WHERE WOULD YOU PLACE HIM ON THE THERMOMETER? --------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 93 - 0 VAR 0001 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER 7379 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 4 DK 5 COL 1- 4 0 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER 7379 ----------------------- DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '05' DK 5 COL 5- 6 ---------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0002 RESPONDENT ID NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0002 LOC 5 WIDTH 4 DK 5 COL 7-10 0 RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (UNIQUE FOUR DIGIT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER FOR EACH RESPONDENT. FIRST DIGIT INDICATES PROVINCE) ------------------------------------------------------ SEE NOTE(S) 16 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0195 LIKE LOCAL NDP CAND-THER MD=0 REF 0195 LOC 287 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 11-12 0 Q50H. HOW MUCH DID YOU LIKE YOUR LOCAL N.D.P. CANDIDATE IN THE RECENT FEDERAL ELECTION? ---------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION OR NO CANDIDATE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0196 LIKE NDP-THERM MD=0 REF 0196 LOC 289 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 13-14 0 Q50I. AND, FINALLY, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE N.D.P. PARTY TAKEN AS A WHOLE? ------------------------------------------------------- 1 94 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0197 LIKE CAOUETTE-THERM MD=0 REF 0197 LOC 291 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 15-16 0 Q50J. HOW ABOUTSOCIAL CREDIT? HOW MUCH DO YOU LIKE THEIR LEADER, MR. CAOUETTE? WHERE WOULD YOU PLACE HIM ON THE THERMOMETER? ---------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0198 LIKE LOCAL SC CAND-THERM MD=0 REF 0198 LOC 293 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 17-18 0 Q50K. HOW MUCH DID YOU LIKE YOUR LOCAL SOCIAL CREDIT CANDIDATE IN THE RECENT FEDERAL ELECTION? ---------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION OR NO CANDIDATE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0199 LIKE SC PARTY-THERM MD=0 REF 0199 LOC 295 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 19-20 0 Q50L. AND, FINALLY, HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE SOCIAL CREDIT 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 95 - (CONTINUED) - PARTY, TAKEN AS A WHOLE? -------------------------------------------------------- SEE NOTE(S) 5 00. NO OPINION 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0200 LIKE TRUDEAU-1ST RESP MD=GE 94 REF 0200 LOC 297 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 21-22 0 Q51. NOW WE WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU ABOUT YOUR IMPRESSIONS OF THE VARIOUS LEADERS OF THE FEDERAL POLITICAL PARTIES. Q51A(1). IS THERE ANYTHING IN PARTICULAR THAT YOU LIKE ABOUT MR. TRUDEAU? (FIRST RESPONSE) (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 122 01. INTELLIGENT, SMART, CAPABLE, BRIGHT, CLEVER, KNOWS WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT, BRILLIANT, SHREWD 71 02. HONEST, SINCERE, STRAIGHTFORWARD, FRANK, DIRECT, HAS INTEGRITY 68 03. PERSONALITY, NICE PERSONALITY, NICE PERSON, I LIKE HIM, LIKEABLE 62 04. GOOD SPEAKER, SPEAKING ABILITY OR MANNER 15 05. GOOD MAN, FINE MAN 37 06. WORKS HARD, DOING A GOOD JOB, TRIES HARD, GETS THINGS DONE 59 07. GOOD LEADER, LEADERSHIP QUALITIES, HIS LEADERSHIP, BEST LEADER, IDEAL LEADER, STRONG LEADER, GOOD MAN FOR THE JOB 12 08. CALM, COOL, EASY MANNER, UNRUFFLED 30 09. GOOD FAMILY MAN, HIS FAMILY, HIS WIFE, HAS SETTLED DOWN 5 10. SENSE OF HUMOUR 10 11. GOOD LOOKING, HANDSOME, HIS APPEARANCE 7 12. BILINGUAL 14 13. FRENCH CANADIAN 29 14. DYNAMIC, ENERGETIC, FORCEFUL, VIGOROUS 12 15. HE IS YOUNG, YOUTHFUL, LOOKS YOUNG FOR HIS AGE 16 16. INTELLECTUAL, SCHOLAR, WELL-EDUCATED 27 17. OUTSPOKEN, SAYS WHAT HE THINKS, BLUNT, MIND OF HIS OWN 5 18. CHARMING, A LADIES MAN 1 96 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 8 19. MODERN, UP TO DATE, PROGRESSIVE, MOVES ONWARD, TRYING TO CHANGE THINGS 12 20. COLOURFUL, FLAMBOYANT, FLAIR, HIS STYLE, CLASSY 3 21. BROAD MINDED, OPEN-MINDED, TOLERANT 11 22. A GOOD POLITICIAN 1 23. INTERESTING 5 24. SWINGER, SKIER, ATHLETE 4 25. CHEERFUL, PLEASANT, ALWAYS SMILING 5 26. HIS COURAGE, GUTS, SPUNK, BRAVERY 15 27. DECISIVE, ABLE TO MAKE DECISIONS, DOESN'T EVADE THE ISSUE 6 28. HE IS JUST, FAIR 15 29. AGGRESSIVE, STANDS BEHIND HIS CONVICTIONS 19 30. GOOD INTERNATIONALLY, GOOD IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS 7 31. THE WAY HE HANDLED F.L.Q., LA PORTE AFFAIR 32. THE WAY HE IS HANDLING QUEBEC, AGAINST SEPARATISM, KEEPING QUEBEC IN CONFEDERATION, ANXIOUS FOR QUEBEC AND THE REST OF CANADA TO GET ALONG 33. STANDS UP FOR FRENCH LANGUAGE OR FRENCH PEOPLE, HE REPRESENTS THEM MAGNIFICIENTLY 14 34. HE IS CONCERNED ABOUT CANADA, INTERESTED IN CANADA, HE HAS DONE A LOT FOR CANADA, ANXIOUS TO LEAD CANADA WELL AND TO DO WHAT IS BEST FOR CANADA 6 35. HE IS CONCERNED ABOUT PEOPLE, INTERESTED IN PEOPLE, UNDERSTANDS PEOPLE, INTERESTED IN CANADIANS 2 36. HE HAS HELPED THE PEOPLE 7 37. HE CARES ABOUT OLD PEOPLE, HAS DONE A LOT FOR OLD PEOPLE, FOR THE PENSIONERS, INCREASED OLD AGE PENSIONS 7 38. HE IS FOR YOUNG PEOPLE, DONE A LOT FOR YOUNGER GENERATION, HELPS STUDENTS, LOWERED DRINKING AGE 39. HE IS FOR ALL WALKS OF LIFE, EVERYONE 4 40. SERIOUS, MATURE, CAREFUL, CONTROLS HIMSELF 6 41. A GENTLEMAN, DIGNIFIED, DISTINGUISHED, I RESPECT HIM 13 42. HAS A WAY WITH PEOPLE, HAS CHARISMA, HIS POPULARITY, MAGNETISM 2 43. REFRESHING, DIFFERENT, 'NICEST EGOMANIAC AROUND' 44. NOT PATRONIZING 1 45. GOOD UPBRINGING, COMES FROM A GOOD BACKGROUND, A GOOD LAWYER 2 46. HANDLES PROBLEMS OR CRISES WELL 2 47. CONFIDENT, VERY POSITIVE 10 48. NOT A BAD CHAP, HE IS O.K. 2 49. HE IS OUTSTANDING, PERFECT, THE IDEAL MAN, LIKE EVERYTHING ABOUT HIM 50. HE ACTS QUICKLY 4 51. HE HAS HIS OWN MONEY, IS A RICH MAN, NOT IN IT FOR THE MONEY 4 52. HIS AMBITION 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 97 - (CONTINUED) - 6 53. HE KEEPS HIS PROMISES OR MOST OF HIS PROMISES, MADE A LOT OF GOOD PROMISES 1 54. WILLING TO ADMIT MISTAKES, MAKE COMPROMISES 55. LIKE THE WAY HE IS RUNNING THE COUNTRY 1 56. TRYING TO KEEP PEACE 5 57. WORK HE DID AS MINISTER OF JUSTICE, OVERHAULING OF CRIMINAL CODE, HIS VIEWS ON HOMOSEXUALITY OR ABORTION, PEOPLE FREE TO DO WHAT THEY WANT 2 58. BECOMING MORE SOCIALISTIC 2 59. HE IS CONCERNED ABOUT INFLATION, HIGH PRICES, COST OF LIVING AND IS TRYING TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT 4 60. RAISED FAMILY ALLOWANCE, WIDOWS' ALLOWANCE, ALLOWANCE FOR DISABLED 10 61. HE IS STRONG 8 62. HE IS A DIPLOMAT, STATESMAN 1 63. HE IS REALISTIC 3 64. HE HAS A GOOD TEAM 1 65. RAN A GOOD CAMPAIGN 1 66. DOESN'T MAKE TOO MANY PROMISES 6 67. LIKE HIS IDEAS, MOST OF HIS IDEAS, GOOD IDEAS, YOUNG IDEAS 1 68. HE DID A GOOD JOB IN MINORITY GOVERNMENT OR WHEN HE HAD A LOT OF OPPOSITION 2 69. THE WAY HE HANDLED EMPLOYMENT, JOBS 4 70. LIKE HIS POLICIES (UNSPECIFIED) 4 71. HANDLES PRESS WELL 1 72. GOOD IMAGE 4 73. HIS APPROACH, MANNER, THE WAY HE ACTS, GENERAL LIKE (UNSPECIFIED) 74. HE TRAVELS 4 75. HE KEEPS PEOPLE OR THE COUNTRY INFORMED OF WHAT IS GOING ON 2 76. SYMPATHETIC, UNDERSTANDING (UNSPECIFIED) 1 77. THE WAY HE HANDLES MEETINGS, KNOWS HOW TO DIRECT QUESTIONS 2 78. HIS INDEPENDENCE 1 79. HIS OUTLOOK ON LIFE 80. COMES OVER ON T.V. VERY WELL 81. DONE A FEW THINGS FOR THE FARMERS (ANY RESPONSE OF FARMERS OR AGRICULTURE) 1 82. HIS ATTITUDE TOWARDS BUSINESS 83. MEDICARE, OTHER WELFARE 1 84. ECONOMIC POLICIES (INCLUDING TAXES) 85. THE WAY HE IS HANDLING THE OIL CRISIS 86. I HAVE CONFIDENCE IN HIM 87. HE GIVES HELP TO THE MUNICIPALITIES 1 89. HE WANTS TO BUILD A SEA PORT 0 40 94. NO OPINION, DK, NOT STATED 1 98 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 254 95. NO, NOTHING IN PARTICULAR 37 96. LIKED NOTHING, CAN'T STAND HIM, DISLIKE EVERYTHING ABOUT HIM 1 97. DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT HIM 1244 98. NA; INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0201 LIKE TRUDEAU-2ND RESP MD=0 OR GE 94 REF 0201 LOC 299 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 23-24 0 Q51A(2). ANYTHING ELSE(SECOND RESPONSE) (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 51 01. INTELLIGENT, SMART, CAPABLE, BRIGHT, CLEVER, KNOWS WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT, BRILLIANT, SHREWD 35 02. HONEST, SINCERE, STRAIGHTFORWARD, FRANK, DIRECT, HAS INTEGRITY 28 03. PERSONALITY, NICE PERSONALITY, NICE PERSON, I LIKE HIM, LIKEABLE 43 04. GOOD SPEAKER, SPEAKING ABILITY OR MANNER 5 05. GOOD MAN, FINE MAN 21 06. WORKS HARD, DOING A GOOD JOB, TRIES HARD, GETS THINGS DONE 36 07. GOOD LEADER, LEADERSHIP QUALITIES, HIS LEADERSHIP, BEST LEADER, IDEAL LEADER, STRONG LEADER, GOOD MAN FOR THE JOB 10 08. CALM, COOL, EASY MANNER, UNRUFFLED 13 09. GOOD FAMILY MAN, HIS FAMILY, HIS WIFE, HAS SETTLED DOWN 6 10. SENSE OF HUMOUR 8 11. GOOD LOOKING, HANDSOME, HIS APPEARANCE 14 12. BILINGUAL 2 13. FRENCH CANADIAN 7 14. DYNAMIC, ENERGETIC, FORCEFUL, VIGOROUS 10 15. HE IS YOUNG, YOUTHFUL, LOOKS YOUNG FOR HIS AGE 14 16. INTELLECTUAL, SCHOLAR, WELL-EDUCATED 25 17. OUTSPOKEN, SAYS WHAT HE THINKS, BLUNT, MIND OF HIS OWN 4 18. CHARMING, A LADIES MAN 5 19. MODERN, UP TO DATE, PROGRESSIVE, MOVES ONWARD, TRYING TO CHANGE THINGS 7 20. COLOURFUL, FLAMBOYANT, FLAIR, HIS STYLE, CLASSY 4 21. BROAD MINDED, OPEN-MINDED, TOLERANT 8 22. A GOOD POLITICIAN 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 99 - (CONTINUED) - 23. INTERESTING 4 24. SWINGER, SKIER, ATHLETE 2 25. CHEERFUL, PLEASANT, ALWAYS SMILING 3 26. HIS COURAGE, GUTS, SPUNK, BRAVERY 12 27. DECISIVE, ABLE TO MAKE DECISIONS, DOESN'T EVADE THE ISSUE 4 28. HE IS JUST, FAIR 14 29. AGGRESSIVE, STANDS BEHIND HIS CONVICTIONS 15 30. GOOD INTERNATIONALLY, GOOD IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS 3 31. THE WAY HE HANDLED F.L.Q., LA PORTE AFFAIR 7 32. THE WAY HE IS HANDLING QUEBEC, AGAINST SEPARATISM, KEEPING QUEBEC IN CONFEDERATION, ANXIOUS FOR QUEBEC AND THE REST OF CANADA TO GET ALONG 2 33. STANDS UP FOR FRENCH LANGUAGE OR FRENCH PEOPLE, HE REPRESENTS THEM MAGNIFICIENTLY 17 34. HE IS CONCERNED ABOUT CANADA, INTERESTED IN CANADA, HE HAS DONE A LOT FOR CANADA, ANXIOUS TO LEAD CANADA WELL AND TO DO WHAT IS BEST FOR CANADA 10 35. HE IS CONCERNED ABOUT PEOPLE, INTERESTED IN PEOPLE, UNDERSTANDS PEOPLE, INTERESTED IN CANADIANS 5 36. HE HAS HELPED THE PEOPLE 8 37. HE CARES ABOUT OLD PEOPLE, HAS DONE A LOT FOR OLD PEOPLE, FOR THE PENSIONERS, INCREASED OLD AGE PENSIONS 38. HE IS FOR YOUNG PEOPLE, DONE A LOT FOR YOUNGER GENERATION, HELPS STUDENTS, LOWERED DRINKING AGE 39. HE IS FOR ALL WALKS OF LIFE, EVERYONE 4 40. SERIOUS, MATURE, CAREFUL, CONTROLS HIMSELF 6 41. A GENTLEMAN, DIGNIFIED, DISTINGUISHED, I RESPECT HIM 9 42. HAS A WAY WITH PEOPLE, HAS CHARISMA, HIS POPULARITY, MAGNETISM 1 43. REFRESHING, DIFFERENT, 'NICEST EGOMANIAC AROUND' 1 44. NOT PATRONIZING 2 45. GOOD UPBRINGING, COMES FROM A GOOD BACKGROUND, A GOOD LAWYER 9 46. HANDLES PROBLEMS OR CRISES WELL 7 47. CONFIDENT, VERY POSITIVE 1 48. NOT A BAD CHAP, HE IS O.K. 49. HE IS OUTSTANDING, PERFECT, THE IDEAL MAN, LIKE EVERYTHING ABOUT HIM 3 50. HE ACTS QUICKLY 4 51. HE HAS HIS OWN MONEY, IS A RICH MAN, NOT IN IT FOR THE MONEY 52. HIS AMBITION 1 53. HE KEEPS HIS PROMISES OR MOST OF HIS PROMISES, MADE A LOT OF GOOD PROMISES 1 54. WILLING TO ADMIT MISTAKES, MAKE COMPROMISES 1 55. LIKE THE WAY HE IS RUNNING THE COUNTRY 56. TRYING TO KEEP PEACE 1 100 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 57. WORK HE DID AS MINISTER OF JUSTICE, OVERHAULING OF CRIMINAL CODE, HIS VIEWS ON HOMOSEXUALITY OR ABORTION, PEOPLE FREE TO DO WHAT THEY WANT 58. BECOMING MORE SOCIALISTIC 5 59. HE IS CONCERNED ABOUT INFLATION, HIGH PRICES, COST OF LIVING AND IS TRYING TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT 1 60. RAISED FAMILY ALLOWANCE, WIDOWS' ALLOWANCE, ALLOWANCE FOR DISABLED 4 61. HE IS STRONG 4 62. HE IS A DIPLOMAT, STATESMAN 2 63. HE IS REALISTIC 3 64. HE HAS A GOOD TEAM 1 65. RAN A GOOD CAMPAIGN 1 66. DOESN'T MAKE TOO MANY PROMISES 5 67. LIKE HIS IDEAS, MOST OF HIS IDEAS, GOOD IDEAS, YOUNG IDEAS 1 68. HE DID A GOOD JOB IN MINORITY GOVERNMENT OR WHEN HE HAD A LOT OF OPPOSITION 1 69. THE WAY HE HANDLED EMPLOYMENT, JOBS 2 70. LIKE HIS POLICIES (UNSPECIFIED) 2 71. HANDLES PRESS WELL 72. GOOD IMAGE 2 73. HIS APPROACH, MANNER, THE WAY HE ACTS, GENERAL LIKE (UNSPECIFIED) 1 74. HE TRAVELS 1 75. HE KEEPS PEOPLE OR THE COUNTRY INFORMED OF WHAT IS GOING ON 1 76. SYMPATHETIC, UNDERSTANDING (UNSPECIFIED) 1 77. THE WAY HE HANDLES MEETINGS, KNOWS HOW TO DIRECT QUESTIONS 1 78. HIS INDEPENDENCE 79. HIS OUTLOOK ON LIFE 1 80. COMES OVER ON T.V. VERY WELL 81. DONE A FEW THINGS FOR THE FARMERS (ANY RESPONSE OF FARMERS OR AGRICULTURE) 1 82. HIS ATTITUDE TOWARDS BUSINESS 1 83. MEDICARE, OTHER WELFARE 1 84. ECONOMIC POLICIES (INCLUDING TAXES) 1 85. THE WAY HE IS HANDLING THE OIL CRISIS 1 86. I HAVE CONFIDENCE IN HIM 87. HE GIVES HELP TO THE MUNICIPALITIES 89. HE WANTS TO BUILD A SEA PORT 0 40 94. NO OPINION, DK, NOT STATED 254 95. NO, NOTHING IN PARTICULAR 37 96. LIKED NOTHING, CAN'T STAND HIM, DISLIKE EVERYTHING ABOUT HIM 1 97. DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT HIM 1244 98. NA; INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 101 - (CONTINUED) - 319 00. NO SECOND RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0202 LIKE TRUDEAU-3RD RESP MD=0 OR GE 94 REF 0202 LOC 301 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 25-26 0 Q51A(3).(THIRD RESPONSE) (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 17 01. INTELLIGENT, SMART, CAPABLE, BRIGHT, CLEVER, KNOWS WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT, BRILLIANT, SHREWD 11 02. HONEST, SINCERE, STRAIGHTFORWARD, FRANK, DIRECT, HAS INTEGRITY 10 03. PERSONALITY, NICE PERSONALITY, NICE PERSON, I LIKE HIM, LIKEABLE 19 04. GOOD SPEAKER, SPEAKING ABILITY OR MANNER 7 05. GOOD MAN, FINE MAN 8 06. WORKS HARD, DOING A GOOD JOB, TRIES HARD, GETS THINGS DONE 11 07. GOOD LEADER, LEADERSHIP QUALITIES, HIS LEADERSHIP, BEST LEADER, IDEAL LEADER, STRONG LEADER, GOOD MAN FOR THE JOB 4 08. CALM, COOL, EASY MANNER, UNRUFFLED 9 09. GOOD FAMILY MAN, HIS FAMILY, HIS WIFE, HAS SETTLED DOWN 2 10. SENSE OF HUMOUR 3 11. GOOD LOOKING, HANDSOME, HIS APPEARANCE 5 12. BILINGUAL 1 13. FRENCH CANADIAN 6 14. DYNAMIC, ENERGETIC, FORCEFUL, VIGOROUS 5 15. HE IS YOUNG, YOUTHFUL, LOOKS YOUNG FOR HIS AGE 5 16. INTELLECTUAL, SCHOLAR, WELL-EDUCATED 6 17. OUTSPOKEN, SAYS WHAT HE THINKS, BLUNT, MIND OF HIS OWN 3 18. CHARMING, A LADIES MAN 2 19. MODERN, UP TO DATE, PROGRESSIVE, MOVES ONWARD, TRYING TO CHANGE THINGS 1 20. COLOURFUL, FLAMBOYANT, FLAIR, HIS STYLE, CLASSY 1 21. BROAD MINDED, OPEN-MINDED, TOLERANT 2 22. A GOOD POLITICIAN 23. INTERESTING 24. SWINGER, SKIER, ATHLETE 1 25. CHEERFUL, PLEASANT, ALWAYS SMILING 2 26. HIS COURAGE, GUTS, SPUNK, BRAVERY 1 102 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 11 27. DECISIVE, ABLE TO MAKE DECISIONS, DOESN'T EVADE THE ISSUE 1 28. HE IS JUST, FAIR 5 29. AGGRESSIVE, STANDS BEHIND HIS CONVICTIONS 11 30. GOOD INTERNATIONALLY, GOOD IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS 31. THE WAY HE HANDLED F.L.Q., LA PORTE AFFAIR 2 32. THE WAY HE IS HANDLING QUEBEC, AGAINST SEPARATISM, KEEPING QUEBEC IN CONFEDERATION, ANXIOUS FOR QUEBEC AND THE REST OF CANADA TO GET ALONG 1 33. STANDS UP FOR FRENCH LANGUAGE OR FRENCH PEOPLE, HE REPRESENTS THEM MAGNIFICIENTLY 3 34. HE IS CONCERNED ABOUT CANADA, INTERESTED IN CANADA, HE HAS DONE A LOT FOR CANADA, ANXIOUS TO LEAD CANADA WELL AND TO DO WHAT IS BEST FOR CANADA 1 35. HE IS CONCERNED ABOUT PEOPLE, INTERESTED IN PEOPLE, UNDERSTANDS PEOPLE, INTERESTED IN CANADIANS 2 36. HE HAS HELPED THE PEOPLE 2 37. HE CARES ABOUT OLD PEOPLE, HAS DONE A LOT FOR OLD PEOPLE, FOR THE PENSIONERS, INCREASED OLD AGE PENSIONS 38. HE IS FOR YOUNG PEOPLE, DONE A LOT FOR YOUNGER GENERATION, HELPS STUDENTS, LOWERED DRINKING AGE 1 39. HE IS FOR ALL WALKS OF LIFE, EVERYONE 40. SERIOUS, MATURE, CAREFUL, CONTROLS HIMSELF 41. A GENTLEMAN, DIGNIFIED, DISTINGUISHED, I RESPECT HIM 12 42. HAS A WAY WITH PEOPLE, HAS CHARISMA, HIS POPULARITY, MAGNETISM 1 43. REFRESHING, DIFFERENT, 'NICEST EGOMANIAC AROUND' 44. NOT PATRONIZING 1 45. GOOD UPBRINGING, COMES FROM A GOOD BACKGROUND, A GOOD LAWYER 1 46. HANDLES PROBLEMS OR CRISES WELL 1 47. CONFIDENT, VERY POSITIVE 48. NOT A BAD CHAP, HE IS O.K. 49. HE IS OUTSTANDING, PERFECT, THE IDEAL MAN, LIKE EVERYTHING ABOUT HIM 50. HE ACTS QUICKLY 2 51. HE HAS HIS OWN MONEY, IS A RICH MAN, NOT IN IT FOR THE MONEY 52. HIS AMBITION 1 53. HE KEEPS HIS PROMISES OR MOST OF HIS PROMISES, MADE A LOT OF GOOD PROMISES 1 54. WILLING TO ADMIT MISTAKES, MAKE COMPROMISES 2 55. LIKE THE WAY HE IS RUNNING THE COUNTRY 56. TRYING TO KEEP PEACE 1 57. WORK HE DID AS MINISTER OF JUSTICE, OVERHAULING OF CRIMINAL CODE, HIS VIEWS ON HOMOSEXUALITY OR ABORTION, PEOPLE FREE TO DO WHAT THEY WANT 58. BECOMING MORE SOCIALISTIC 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 103 - (CONTINUED) - 1 59. HE IS CONCERNED ABOUT INFLATION, HIGH PRICES, COST OF LIVING AND IS TRYING TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT 2 60. RAISED FAMILY ALLOWANCE, WIDOWS' ALLOWANCE, ALLOWANCE FOR DISABLED 3 61. HE IS STRONG 2 62. HE IS A DIPLOMAT, STATESMAN 1 63. HE IS REALISTIC 2 64. HE HAS A GOOD TEAM 65. RAN A GOOD CAMPAIGN 1 66. DOESN'T MAKE TOO MANY PROMISES 4 67. LIKE HIS IDEAS, MOST OF HIS IDEAS, GOOD IDEAS, YOUNG IDEAS 68. HE DID A GOOD JOB IN MINORITY GOVERNMENT OR WHEN HE HAD A LOT OF OPPOSITION 1 69. THE WAY HE HANDLED EMPLOYMENT, JOBS 3 70. LIKE HIS POLICIES (UNSPECIFIED) 71. HANDLES PRESS WELL 1 72. GOOD IMAGE 1 73. HIS APPROACH, MANNER, THE WAY HE ACTS, GENERAL LIKE (UNSPECIFIED) 3 74. HE TRAVELS 75. HE KEEPS PEOPLE OR THE COUNTRY INFORMED OF WHAT IS GOING ON 3 76. SYMPATHETIC, UNDERSTANDING (UNSPECIFIED) 77. THE WAY HE HANDLES MEETINGS, KNOWS HOW TO DIRECT QUESTIONS 78. HIS INDEPENDENCE 79. HIS OUTLOOK ON LIFE 80. COMES OVER ON T.V. VERY WELL 81. DONE A FEW THINGS FOR THE FARMERS (ANY RESPONSE OF FARMERS OR AGRICULTURE) 82. HIS ATTITUDE TOWARDS BUSINESS 83. MEDICARE, OTHER WELFARE 1 84. ECONOMIC POLICIES (INCLUDING TAXES) 1 85. THE WAY HE IS HANDLING THE OIL CRISIS 1 86. I HAVE CONFIDENCE IN HIM 1 87. HE GIVES HELP TO THE MUNICIPALITIES 89. HE WANTS TO BUILD A SEA PORT 0 40 94. NO OPINION, DK, NOT STATED 254 95. NO NOTHING IN PARTICULAR 37 96. LIKED NOTHING, CAN'T STAND HIM, DISLIKE EVERYTHING ABOUT HIM 1 97. DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT HIM 1244 98. NA; INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 636 00. NO THIRD RESPONSE 0 1 104 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - 0 VAR 0203 DISLIKE TRUDEAU-1ST RESP MD=GE 94 REF 0203 LOC 303 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 27-28 0 Q51B(1). IS THERE ANYTHING IN PARTICULAR THAT YOU DISLIKE ABOUT MR. TRUDEAU? (FIRST RESPONSE) (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) --------------------------------------------------------- 89 01. TOO ARROGANT, ARROGANT AT TIMES, OVERBEARING 41 02. TRAVELS TOO MUCH, TAKES TOO MANY HOLIDAYS 14 03. PLAYBOY, PLAYBOY IMAGE OR ANTICS 34 04. DOESN'T GET MUCH DONE, HASN'T DONE MUCH, DOESN'T ATTEND TO BUSINESS 19 05. NOT CONCERNED ABOUT PEOPLE, NOT INTERESTED IN PEOPLE, DOESN'T UNDERSTAND PEOPLE (THE NEEDS OR PROBLEMS OF THE PEOPLE), DOESN'T DO ENOUGH FOR PEOPLE 5 06. NOT CONCERNED ABOUT, NOT INTERESTED IN OR DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THE WORKING PEOPLE OR WORKING CLASS 5 07. NOT CONCERNED ABOUT, NOT INTERESTED IN OR DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THE POOR 10 08. LACK OF CONCERN FOR THE COUNTRY OR CANADA, ONLY INTERESTED IN COUNTRY AT ELECTION TIME 7 09. LACK OF CONCERN ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON IN GOVERNMENT, NOT CONCERNED ABOUT HIS JOB 6 10. LACK OF CONCERN, INTEREST, OR UNDERSTANDING (UNSPECIFIED) 19 11. EVERYTHING 2 12. SPENDS TOO MUCH OF OUR MONEY (TAXPAYERS' MONEY) ON HIMSELF 1 13. GIVES OR LOANS TOO MUCH MONEY TO OTHER COUNTRIES, FOREIGN AID 1 14. TOO MUCH MONEY SPENT ON GRANTS (O.F.Y., L.I.P., CANADA COUNCIL) 2 15. SPENDS TOO MUCH MONEY (OTHER SPECIFIC RESPONSES) 9 16. SPENDS, WASTES TOO MUCH MONEY (UNSPECIFIED) 11 17. GIVES TOO MUCH TO QUEBEC OR FRENCH CANADA, FAVOURS FRENCH CANADA OR QUEBEC 9 18. FRENCH LANGUAGE ISSUE, CATERING TO BILINGUALISM, SHOVING FRENCH DOWN OUR THROATS 19. TOO MUCH FOR ONTARIO OR OTTAWA 8 20. TOO MUCH FOR THE EAST, FORGETS THE WEST 2 21. NOT ENOUGH DONE FOR QUEBEC, THINKS OF OTHER PROVINCES BEFORE US IN QUEBEC 6 22. HE IS FRENCH 18 23. HE DOESN'T KEEP HIS PROMISES, TOO MANY PROMISES 10 24. HE IS DISHONEST, NOT SINCERE 15 25. HIS LANGUAGE, USES BAD WORDS, SWEARS, IS RUDE 5 26. HE TALKS TOO MUCH 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 105 - (CONTINUED) - 6 27. SARCASTIC 19 28. CONCEITED, INFLATED EGO, SNOB 18 29. PERSONALITY, NOT A LIKEABLE MAN, JUST DON'T LIKE HIM 26 30. MANNER, ATTITUDE, THE WAY HE ACTS, GENERAL APPROACH (UNSPECIFIED), OUTLOOK ON LIFE 12 31. HIS INFORMALITY, NOT DIGNIFIED, TOO FLAMBOYANT 18 32. DOESN'T ANSWER QUESTIONS DIRECTLY, AVOIDS TAKING A STAND ON ISSUES, SLOW ON DECISIONS, GENERALIZES TOO MUCH, DODGES THE ISSUES 7 33. 'SHRUG OF SHOULDER ATTITUDE', 'SO WHAT ATTITUDE' 6 34. TOO DICTATORIAL, TOO INDEPENDENT, DOESN'T CONSULT HIS MINISTERS ENOUGH 4 35. IMAGE HE PRESENTS AS LEADER OF CANADA, NOT AN ADMIRABLE LEADER 2 36. HE IS JUST A FIGUREHEAD, A FRONT MAN 20 37. HIS APPEARANCE, LOOKS, SPECIFIC MANNERISMS, VOICE 7 38. TOO AMBITIOUS, POWER HUNGRY, DO ANYTHING FOR VOTES 12 39. COOL, ALOOF, NOT FRIENDLY 5 40. TRUDEAUMANIA STYLE, THE WAY HE WON VOTES WITH WOMEN 5 41. THE WAY HE RUNS COUNTRY OR GOVERNMENT 5 42. COULD DO A LOT BETTER, COULD DO MORE 23 43. NOT DO ANYTHING OR MUCH ABOUT INFLATION, COST OF LIVING, HIGH PRICES, MRS. PLUMPTRE, HIS POLICIES ON INFLATION 3 44. NOT A GOOD LEADER 45. HIS MAJORITY 3 46. HIS PARTY, HE IS A LIBERAL, HIS POLITICS 5 47. TOO EXTREME IN HIS THINKING, TOO SOCIALISTIC 6 48. HE IS TOO RICH, NEVER HAD TO SUFFER OR WORK 49. HIS MARRYING SUCH A YOUNG GIRL 1 50. NOT A POLITICIAN 2 51. HIS CABINET SHUFFLE 4 52. RELIES TOO MUCH ON SOME OF HIS MINISTERS OR CAREER CIVIL SERVANTS 8 53. HE IS IMPATIENT 1 54. HE IS UNFAIR 1 55. OIL POLICY, FUEL CRISIS, PIPELINE 5 56. HANDLING OF UNEMPLOYMENT, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 57. HANDLING OF OLD AGE SECURITY, NOT ENOUGH FOR AGED 1 58. HANDLING OF WELFARE, ABUSE OF WELFARE 12 59. HANDLING OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS 60. HANDLING OF IMMIGRATION 2 61. HANDLING OF QUEBEC QUESTION, SEPARATISM 2 62. HANDLING OF LARGE CORPORATIONS, TOO MUCH FOR LARGE CORPORATIONS 1 63. HANDLING OF AMERICAN CONTROL 4 64. HANDLING OF TAXES, TAXES TOO HIGH 2 65. HANDLING OF AGRICULTURE OR FARM PROBLEMS, NOT 1 106 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - ENOUGH FOR FARMERS 8 66. HANDLING OF LEGISLATION ON MORAL ISSUES, VIEWS ON HOMOSEXUALITY OR ABORTION 2 67. HANDLING OF L.I.P., O.F.Y. PROGRAMMES 11 68. DISLIKE HIS POLICIES (UNSPECIFIED) 2 69. HIS BEHAVIOUR WITH THE PRESS, BELITTLES THE PRESS 3 70. TOO INTELLECTUAL, SMART 2 71. HE HAS CHANGED 2 72. TOO OUTSPOKEN 2 73. POOR SPEAKER 1 74. HIS TEMPER 1 75. HIS SPEECHES DURING THE ELECTION, THE TRAIN 76. LACK OF POLICIES, NO SET POLICIES, DON'T HEAR ABOUT HIS POLICIES 1 77. TOO MUCH FOR EAST AND PRAIRIES (IGNORES B.C.) 78. I DON'T TRUST HIM 3 79. HE USES HIS WIFE TO GAIN POPULARITY, WORRIED HIS WIFE INTO THE HOSPITAL, TOO MUCH PUBLICITY ABOUT HIS PRIVATE LIFE 1 80. SPENDS TOO MUCH TIME WITH HIS FAMILY 1 81. HIS ECONOMIC POLICIES 2 82. NOT AGGRESSIVE ENOUGH, TOO CONSERVATIVE 5 83. TOO NARROW 4 84. CHANGES HIS MIND TOO OFTEN 1 85. HIS IDEAS (UNSPECIFIED) 86. DOESN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT UNIONS, DOESN'T PREVENT STRIKES 87. HE IS A NON-VETERAN 1 89. HIS EMOTIONS SHOW THROUGH 90. NOT A TYPICAL WHOLESOME CANADIAN 91. REALLY NOT A MAN 92. HE CRITICIZES OTHERS TOO OFTEN 93. HE DOESN'T USE HIS WIFE TO GAIN POPULARITY 0 59 94. NO OPINION, DK, NOT STATED 465 95. NO, NOTHING IN PARTICULAR 25 96. NOTHING DISLIKE, LIKE HIM 1 97. DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT HIM 1244 98. NA; INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0204 DISLIKE TRUDEAU-2ND RESP MD=0 OR GE 94 REF 0204 LOC 305 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 29-30 0 Q51B(2). ANYTHING ELSE? (SECOND RESPONSE) 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 107 - (CONTINUED) - (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) --------------------------------------------------------- 11 01. TOO ARROGANT, ARROGANT AT TIMES, OVERBEARING 12 02. TRAVELS TOO MUCH, TAKES TOO MANY HOLIDAYS 4 03. PLAYBOY, PLAYBOY IMAGE OR ANTICS 7 04. DOESN'T GET MUCH DONE, HASN'T DONE MUCH, DOESN'T ATTEND TO BUSINESS 5 05. NOT CONCERNED ABOUT PEOPLE, NOT INTERESTED IN PEOPLE, DOESN'T UNDERSTAND PEOPLE (THE NEEDS OR PROBLEMS OF THE PEOPLE), DOESN'T DO ENOUGH FOR PEOPLE 3 06. NOT CONCERNED ABOUT, NOT INTERESTED IN OR DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THE WORKING PEOPLE OR WORKING CLASS 2 07. NOT CONCERNED ABOUT, NOT INTERESTED IN OR DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THE POOR 7 08. LACK OF CONCERN FOR THE COUNTRY OR CANADA, ONLY INTERESTED IN COUNTRY AT ELECTION TIME 7 09. LACK OF CONCERN ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON IN GOVERNMENT, NOT CONCERNED ABOUT HIS JOB 3 10. LACK OF CONCERN, INTEREST, OR UNDERSTANDING (UNSPECIFIED) 2 11. EVERYTHING 4 12. SPENDS TOO MUCH OF OUR MONEY (TAXPAYERS' MONEY) ON HIMSELF 1 13. GIVES OR LOANS TOO MUCH MONEY TO OTHER COUNTRIES, FOREIGN AID 1 14. TOO MUCH MONEY SPENT ON GRANTS (O.F.Y., L.I.P., CANADA COUNCIL) 2 15. SPENDS TOO MUCH MONEY (OTHER SPECIFIC RESPONSES) 1 16. SPENDS, WASTES TOO MUCH MONEY (UNSPECIFIED) 11 17. GIVES TOO MUCH TO QUEBEC OR FRENCH CANADA, FAVOURS FRENCH CANADA OR QUEBEC 5 18. FRENCH LANGUAGE ISSUE, CATERING TO BILINGUALISM, SHOVING FRENCH DOWN OUR THROATS 2 19. TOO MUCH FOR ONTARIO OR OTTAWA 6 20. TOO MUCH FOR THE EAST, FORGETS THE WEST 21. NOT ENOUGH DONE FOR QUEBEC, THINKS OF OTHER PROVINCES BEFORE US IN QUEBEC 1 22. HE IS FRENCH 7 23. HE DOESN'T KEEP HIS PROMISES, TOO MANY PROMISES 7 24. HE IS DISHONEST, NOT SINCERE 3 25. HIS LANGUAGE, USES BAD WORDS, SWEARS, IS RUDE 26. HE TALKS TOO MUCH 1 27. SARCASTIC 8 28. CONCEITED, INFLATED EGO, SNOB 7 29. PERSONALITY, NOT A LIKEABLE MAN, JUST DON'T LIKE HIM 1 108 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 4 30. MANNER, ATTITUDE, THE WAY HE ACTS, GENERAL APPROACH (UNSPECIFIED), OUTLOOK ON LIFE 3 31. HIS INFORMALITY, NOT DIGNIFIED, TOO FLAMBOYANT 10 32. DOESN'T ANSWER QUESTIONS DIRECTLY, AVOIDS TAKING A STAND ON ISSUES, SLOW ON DECISIONS, GENERALIZES TOO MUCH, DODGES THE ISSUES 33. 'SHRUG OF SHOULDER ATTITUDE', 'SO WHAT ATTITUDE' 8 34. TOO DICTATORIAL, TOO INDEPENDENT, DOESN'T CONSULT HIS MINISTERS ENOUGH 2 35. IMAGE HE PRESENTS AS LEADER OF CANADA, NOT AN ADMIRABLE LEADER 2 36. HE IS JUST A FIGUREHEAD, A FRONT MAN 3 37. HIS APPEARANCE, LOOKS, SPECIFIC MANNERISMS, VOICE 2 38. TOO AMBITIOUS, POWER HUNGRY, DO ANYTHING FOR VOTES 5 39. COOL, ALOOF, NOT FRIENDLY 1 40. TRUDEAUMANIA STYLE, THE WAY HE WON VOTES WITH WOMEN 3 41. THE WAY HE RUNS COUNTRY OR GOVERNMENT 3 42. COULD DO A LOT BETTER, COULD DO MORE 10 43. NOT DO ANYTHING OR MUCH ABOUT INFLATION, COST OF LIVING, HIGH PRICES, MRS. PLUMPTRE, HIS POLICIES ON INFLATION 1 44. NOT A GOOD LEADER 3 45. HIS MAJORITY 3 46. HIS PARTY, HE IS A LIBERAL, HIS POLITICS 47. TOO EXTREME IN HIS THINKING, TOO SOCIALISTIC 5 48. HE IS TOO RICH, NEVER HAD TO SUFFER OR WORK 1 49. HIS MARRYING SUCH A YOUNG GIRL 50. NOT A POLITICIAN 1 51. HIS CABINET SHUFFLE 1 52. RELIES TOO MUCH ON SOME OF HIS MINISTERS OR CAREER CIVIL SERVANTS 1 53. HE IS IMPATIENT 54. HE IS UNFAIR 2 55. OIL POLICY, FUEL CRISIS, PIPELINE 3 56. HANDLING OF UNEMPLOYMENT, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 2 57. HANDLING OF OLD AGE SECURITY, NOT ENOUGH FOR AGED 3 58. HANDLING OF WELFARE, ABUSE OF WELFARE 1 59. HANDLING OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS 3 60. HANDLING OF IMMIGRATION 3 61. HANDLING OF QUEBEC QUESTION, SEPARATISM 4 62. HANDLING OF LARGE CORPORATIONS, TOO MUCH FOR LARGE CORPORATIONS 1 63. HANDLING OF AMERICAN CONTROL 64. HANDLING OF TAXES, TAXES TOO HIGH 3 65. HANDLING OF AGRICULTURE OR FARM PROBLEMS, NOT ENOUGH FOR FARMERS 2 66. HANDLING OF LEGISLATION ON MORAL ISSUES, VIEWS ON HOMOSEXUALITY OR ABORTION 2 67. HANDLING OF L.I.P., O.F.Y. PROGRAMMES 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 109 - (CONTINUED) - 3 68. DISLIKE HIS POLICIES (UNSPECIFIED) 3 69. HIS BEHAVIOUR WITH THE PRESS, BELITTLES THE PRESS 2 70. TOO INTELLECTUAL, SMART 71. HE HAS CHANGED 1 72. TOO OUTSPOKEN 73. POOR SPEAKER 2 74. HIS TEMPER 75. HIS SPEECHES DURING THE ELECTION, THE TRAIN 3 76. LACK OF POLICIES, NO SET POLICIES, DON'T HEAR ABOUT HIS POLICIES 77. TOO MUCH FOR EAST AND PRAIRIES (IGNORES B.C.) 1 78. I DON'T TRUST HIM 2 79. HE USES HIS WIFE TO GAIN POPULARITY, WORRIED HIS WIFE INTO THE HOSPITAL, TOO MUCH PUBLICITY ABOUT HIS PRIVATE LIFE 80. SPENDS TOO MUCH TIME WITH HIS FAMILY 1 81. HIS ECONOMIC POLICIES 1 82. NOT AGGRESSIVE ENOUGH, TOO CONSERVATIVE 83. TOO NARROW 1 84. CHANGES HIS MIND TOO OFTEN 85. HIS IDEAS (UNSPECIFIED) 2 86. DOESN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT UNIONS, DOESN'T PREVENT STRIKES 87. HE IS A NON-VETERAN 1 89. HIS EMOTIONS SHOW THROUGH 90. NOT A TYPICAL WHOLESOME CANADIAN 3 91. REALLY NOT A MAN 1 92. HE CRITICIZES OTHERS TOO OFTEN 93. HE DOESN'T USE HIS WIFE TO GAIN POPULARITY 0 59 94. NO OPINION, DK, NOT STATED 465 95. NO, NOTHING IN PARTICULAR 25 96. NOTHING DISLIKE, LIKE HIM 1 97. DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT HIM 1244 98. NA; INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 401 00. NO SECOND RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0205 DISLIKE TRUDEAU-3RD RESP MD=0 OR GE 94 REF 0205 LOC 307 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 31-32 0 Q51B(3).? (THIRD RESPONSE) (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) -------------------------------------------------------- 1 110 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 1 01. TOO ARROGANT, ARROGANT AT TIMES, OVERBEARING 7 02. TRAVELS TOO MUCH, TAKES TOO MANY HOLIDAYS 03. PLAYBOY, PLAYBOY IMAGE OR ANTICS 1 04. DOESN'T GET MUCH DONE, HASN'T DONE MUCH, DOESN'T ATTEND TO BUSINESS 3 05. NOT CONCERNED ABOUT PEOPLE, NOT INTERESTED IN PEOPLE, DOESN'T UNDERSTAND PEOPLE (THE NEEDS OR PROBLEMS OF THE PEOPLE), DOESN'T DO ENOUGH FOR PEOPLE 1 06. NOT CONCERNED ABOUT, NOT INTERESTED IN OR DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THE WORKING PEOPLE OR WORKING CLASS 07. NOT CONCERNED ABOUT, NOT INTERESTED IN OR DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THE POOR 2 08. LACK OF CONCERN FOR THE COUNTRY OR CANADA, ONLY INTERESTED IN COUNTRY AT ELECTION TIME 1 09. LACK OF CONCERN ABOUT WHAT IS GOING ON IN GOVERNMENT, NOT CONCERNED ABOUT HIS JOB 10. LACK OF CONCERN, INTEREST, OR UNDERSTANDING (UNSPECIFIED) 11. EVERYTHING 12. SPENDS TOO MUCH OF OUR MONEY (TAXPAYERS' MONEY) ON HIMSELF 1 13. GIVES OR LOANS TOO MUCH MONEY TO OTHER COUNTRIES, FOREIGN AID 14. TOO MUCH MONEY SPENT ON GRANTS (O.F.Y., L.I.P., CANADA COUNCIL) 3 15. SPENDS TOO MUCH MONEY (OTHER SPECIFIC RESPONSES) 16. SPENDS, WASTES TOO MUCH MONEY (UNSPECIFIED) 4 17. GIVES TOO MUCH TO QUEBEC OR FRENCH CANADA, FAVOURS FRENCH CANADA OR QUEBEC 1 18. FRENCH LANGUAGE ISSUE, CATERING TO BILINGUALISM, SHOVING FRENCH DOWN OUR THROATS 1 19. TOO MUCH FOR ONTARIO OR OTTAWA 1 20. TOO MUCH FOR THE EAST, FORGETS THE WEST 21. NOT ENOUGH DONE FOR QUEBEC, THINKS OF OTHER PROVINCES BEFORE US IN QUEBEC 22. HE IS FRENCH 1 23. HE DOESN'T KEEP HIS PROMISES, TOO MANY PROMISES 1 24. HE IS DISHONEST, NOT SINCERE 1 25. HIS LANGUAGE, USES BAD WORDS, SWEARS, IS RUDE 26. HE TALKS TOO MUCH 1 27. SARCASTIC 28. CONCEITED, INFLATED EGO, SNOB 2 29. PERSONALITY, NOT A LIKEABLE MAN, JUST DON'T LIKE HIM 1 30. MANNER, ATTITUDE, THE WAY HE ACTS, GENERAL APPROACH (UNSPECIFIED), OUTLOOK ON LIFE 2 31. HIS INFORMALITY, NOT DIGNIFIED, TOO FLAMBOYANT 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 111 - (CONTINUED) - 2 32. DOESN'T ANSWER QUESTIONS DIRECTLY, AVOIDS TAKING A STAND ON ISSUES, SLOW ON DECISIONS, GENERALIZES TOO MUCH, DODGES THE ISSUES 1 33. 'SHRUG OF SHOULDER ATTITUDE', 'SO WHAT ATTITUDE' 7 34. TOO DICTATORIAL, TOO INDEPENDENT, DOESN'T CONSULT HIS MINISTERS ENOUGH 1 35. IMAGE HE PRESENTS AS LEADER OF CANADA, NOT AN ADMIRABLE LEADER 1 36. HE IS JUST A FIGUREHEAD, A FRONT MAN 2 37. HIS APPEARANCE, LOOKS, SPECIFIC MANNERISMS, VOICE 38. TOO AMBITIOUS, POWER HUNGRY, DO ANYTHING FOR VOTES 39. COOL, ALOOF, NOT FRIENDLY 1 40. TRUDEAUMANIA STYLE, THE WAY HE WON VOTES WITH WOMEN 1 41. THE WAY HE RUNS COUNTRY OR GOVERNMENT 42. COULD DO A LOT BETTER, COULD DO MORE 6 43. NOT DO ANYTHING OR MUCH ABOUT INFLATION, COST OF LIVING, HIGH PRICES, MRS. PLUMPTRE, HIS POLICIES ON INFLATION 1 44. NOT A GOOD LEADER 45. HIS MAJORITY 1 46. HIS PARTY, HE IS A LIBERAL, HIS POLITICS 1 47. TOO EXTREME IN HIS THINKING, TOO SOCIALISTIC 2 48. HE IS TOO RICH, NEVER HAD TO SUFFER OR WORK 49. HIS MARRYING SUCH A YOUNG GIRL 50. NOT A POLITICIAN 1 51. HIS CABINET SHUFFLE 52. RELIES TOO MUCH ON SOME OF HIS MINISTERS OR CAREER CIVIL SERVANTS 53. HE IS IMPATIENT 54. HE IS UNFAIR 1 55. OIL POLICY, FUEL CRISIS, PIPELINE 56. HANDLING OF UNEMPLOYMENT, UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 57. HANDLING OF OLD AGE SECURITY, NOT ENOUGH FOR AGED 58. HANDLING OF WELFARE, ABUSE OF WELFARE 4 59. HANDLING OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS 60. HANDLING OF IMMIGRATION 61. HANDLING OF QUEBEC QUESTION, SEPARATISM 1 62. HANDLING OF LARGE CORPORATIONS, TOO MUCH FOR LARGE CORPORATIONS 3 63. HANDLING OF AMERICAN CONTROL 64. HANDLING OF TAXES, TAXES TOO HIGH 1 65. HANDLING OF AGRICULTURE OR FARM PROBLEMS, NOT ENOUGH FOR FARMERS 66. HANDLING OF LEGISLATION ON MORAL ISSUES, VIEWS ON HOMOSEXUALITY OR ABORTION 67. HANDLING OF L.I.P., O.F.Y. PROGRAMMES 68. DISLIKE HIS POLICIES (UNSPECIFIED) 1 69. HIS BEHAVIOUR WITH THE PRESS, BELITTLES THE PRESS 70. TOO INTELLECTUAL, SMART 1 112 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 71. HE HAS CHANGED 72. TOO OUTSPOKEN 73. POOR SPEAKER 74. HIS TEMPER 1 75. HIS SPEECHES DURING THE ELECTION, THE TRAIN 76. LACK OF POLICIES, NO SET POLICIES, DON'T HEAR ABOUT HIS POLICIES 77. TOO MUCH FOR EAST AND PRAIRIES (IGNORES B.C.) 1 78. I DON'T TRUST HIM 4 79. HE USES HIS WIFE TO GAIN POPULARITY, WORRIED HIS WIFE INTO THE HOSPITAL, TOO MUCH PUBLICITY ABOUT HIS PRIVATE LIFE 80. SPENDS TOO MUCH TIME WITH HIS FAMILY 1 81. HIS ECONOMIC POLICIES 82. NOT AGGRESSIVE ENOUGH, TOO CONSERVATIVE 83. TOO NARROW 84. CHANGES HIS MIND TOO OFTEN 85. HIS IDEAS (UNSPECIFIED) 86. DOESN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT UNIONS, DOESN'T PREVENT STRIKES 1 87. HE IS A NON-VETERAN 89. HIS EMOTIONS SHOW THROUGH 1 90. NOT A TYPICAL WHOLESOME CANADIAN 91. REALLY NOT A MAN 1 92. HE CRITICIZES OTHERS TOO OFTEN 93. HE DOESN'T USE HIS WIFE TO GAIN POPULARITY 0 59 94. NO OPINION, DK, NOT STATED 465 95. NO, NOTHING IN PARTICULAR 25 96. NOTHING DISLIKE, LIKE HIM 1 97. DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT HIM 1244 98. NA; INAP., HALF SAMPLE 1 RESPONDENT 566 00. NO THIRD RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0206 LIKE STANFIELD-1ST RESP MD=GE 88 REF 0206 LOC 309 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 33-34 0 Q52A(1). IS THERE ANYTHING IN PARTICULAR THAT YOU LIKE ABOUT MR. STANFIELD? (FIRST RESPONSE) (HALF SAMPLE 2 ONLY) ------------------------------------------------------------ 33 01. INTELLIGENT, CAPABLE, CLEVER, BRILLIANT 182 02. HONEST, SINCERE, HAS INTEGRITY, STRAIGHTFORWARD, CONSCIENTIOUS 1 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY 113 - (CONTINUED) - 34 03. NICE PERSON, LIKE HIM, GOOD PERSONALITY 3 04. GOOD SPEAKER, IMPROVED SPEAKER 36 05. GOOD MAN 10 06. WORKS HARD, TRIES HARD, DOES HIS BEST 14 07. GOOD LEADER, WOULD MAKE A GOOD PRIME MINISTER, HAS LEADERSHIP QUALITIES 7 08. CALM 1 09. HE IS A FAMILY MAN, HAS A NICE FAMILY 4 10. SENSE OF HUMOUR 2 11. NICE LOOKING, LOOKS HONEST OR SINCERE, HIS APPEARANCE 22 12. HE TRIES VERY HARD TO LEARN FRENCH, HIS FRENCH ISN'T BAD 5 13. NOVA SCOTIAN, TYPICAL OF EASTERN PROVINCES, FROM THE MARITIMES 14 14. HE IS A GENTLEMAN, DIGNIFIED 15. ANY RESPONSE OF 'OLD MAN' IN A FAVOURABLE CONTEXT ALSO CODED FOR OTHER ATTRIBUTES, FOR EXAMPLE, 'SINCERE OLD MAN', 'PLEASANT OLD FELLOW' 16. TRUSTWORTHY 8 17. HE IS HUMBLE, HOME STYLE, MODEST, NOT A SHOW-OFF, NAIVE 9 18. HE IS O.K., NOT BAD, JUST A MAN 6 19. CONSERVATIVE, MODERATE 10 20. HE IS A GOOD OR SMART BUSINESSMAN 9 21. BETTER THAN TRUDEAU, AS GOOD AS TRUDEAU (ANY RESPONSE) 4 22. A GOOD POLITICIAN, OLD-TIME POLITICIAN, HAS POLITICAL STYLE 4 23. HE IS KIND, GENEROUS, SYMPATHETIC, UNDERSTANDING 4 24. HIGH MORAL STANDARDS, DOESN'T SWEAR, DECENT 6 25. NICE FRIENDLY FELLOW, PLEASANT PERSON, WARM 4 26. HIS COURAGE 9 27. STEADY, RELIABLE 8 28. EARNEST, SERIOUS 11 29. DETERMINATION, KEEPS TRYING, HAS STAMINA, TENACITY, PERSISTENT 5 30. MORE HUMAN, DOWN TO EARTH 4 31. HE IS A STATESMAN, LIKE A STATESMAN, DIPLOMAT 8 32. IS CONCERNED ABOUT INFLATION, HIGH PRICES, COST OF LIVING AND TRYING TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT 4 33. LIKE HIS POLICY ON WAGE AND PRICE CONTROLS, ANY RESPONSE OF CONTROLS 6 34. HE IS CONCERNED ABOUT CANADA 14 35. HE IS CONCERNED ABOUT PEOPLE, CANADIAN PEOPLE, IN TOUCH WITH PEOPLE 36. HE HAS HELPED PEOPLE, DONE A LOT FOR PEOPLE, WOULD HELP PEOPLE 5 37. HE CARES ABOUT OLD PEOPLE, WOULD RAISE PENSIONS 1 38. LIKED HIM ON T.V., GOOD IMPRESSION ON T.V. 1 114 1974 CANADIAN NATIONAL ELECTION SURVEY - (CONTINUED) - 25 39. I DON'T KNOW ENOUGH ABOUT HIM, HARD TO SAY, HASN'T HAD A CHANCE (NO LIKES MENTIONED) 4 40. HAS GOOD INTENTIONS, MEANS WELL, WILLING TO TRY 41. HAS A LOT OF STAMINA 2 42. HE IS RESPECTED, ADMIRED, I RESPECT OR ADMIRE HIM 3 43. HE IS A GO-GETTER, STANDS BEHIND HIS CONVICTIONS, A FIGHTER 9 44. I LIKE HIS IDEAS, GOOD IDEAS 1 45. HE DID A GOOD JOB IN NOVA SCOTIA 5 46. HIS QUALITIES, SOME THINGS (UNSPECIFIED) 47. HE IS DIFFERENT 8 48. LIKE HIS POLICIES, GOOD POLICIES 1 49. HE PERFORMED WELL IN HIS CAMPAIGN, WANTED TO DEAL WITH ISSUES 50. HELPS INDUSTRY 1 51. PLANS CAREFULLY 2 52. HAS NO STRONG POINTS (NO LIKES MENTIONED) 4 53. HAS A GOOD IMAGE 2 54. LOYAL TO PARTY, REPRESENTS THE PARTY 55. AWARE OF HIS BAD IMAGE, KNOWS HIS FAULTS 1 56. HE IS EXPERIENCED, HAS THE POTENTIAL 1 57. WOULD MAKE A GOOD ADMINISTRATOR, IS A GOOD ADMINISTRATOR 58. FOR THE WORKING MAN 3 59. GOOD JOB IN OPPOSITION 60. WOULD SAVE US MONEY 5 61. HE IS OUTSPOKEN, SPEAKS HIS MIND 62. INTERESTED IN THE WEST 4 63. WANTS TO BE FAIR, FAIR MAN 1 64. HIS MANNER, HIS WAY (UNSPECIFIED) 65. HE IS TRYING HARD IN QUEBEC, WITH FRENCH PEOPLE 1 66. TOO BAD HE LOST, I FEEL SORRY FOR HIM 67. HIS ECONOMIC POLICIES 2 68. HIS LONG UNDERWEAR 69. RAISED FAMILY ALLOWANCE 70. PROUD TO BE A CANADIAN 71. HE LIKES TO GARDEN 1 72. HE CARES ABOUT UNEMPLOYMENT 1 73. IF HE WAS FRENCH CANADIAN HE WOULD DO BETTER 1 74. HE HELPS INDIANS 0 77 88. NO OPINION, DK, NOT STATED 455 95. NO, NOTHING IN PARTICULAR 53 96. NOTHING LIKED, CAN'T STAND HIM, DISLIKE EVERYTHING ABOUT HIM 22 97. DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT HIM 1245 98. NA; INAP.