1 B.C. ELECTION STUDY:1979-1980 - PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS DAVID J. ELKINS DONALD E. BLAKE RICHARD JOHNSTON - DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA VANCOUVER, B.C. 1 1 1 INTRODUCTION THIS DATA SET CONTAINS THREE TYPES OF INFORMATION. THE SURVEY DATA CONSIST OF 1051 PERSONAL INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED IN THE SUMMER AND FALL OF 1979 FOLLOWING THE MAY 10 (PROVINCIAL) AND MAY 22 (FEDERAL) ELECTIONS; AND 808 TELEPHONE INTERVIEWS IN FEB. 1980 IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE FEDERAL ELECTION OF FEB. 18, 1980. A SECOND TYPE OF DATA INVOLVES ELECTORAL INFORMATION ON THE POLLING DIVISIONS AND CONSTITUENCIES IN WHICH RESPONDENTS WERE INTERVIEWED. A THIRD SET OF DATA ON SOCIAL COMPOSITION OF NEIGHBOURHOODS WAS DERIVED FROM THE 1976 CENSUS. EACH TYPE OF DATA IS DESCRIBED MORE FULLY BELOW. FUTHERMORE, AT THE END OF THIS CODEBOOK, THERE ARE A SERIES OF NOTES WHICH DESCRIBE SOME ASPECTS OF THE DATA IN GREATER DETAIL. THE DATA ARE UNUSUAL IN AT LEAST TWO IMPORTANT RESPECTS, ASIDE FROM THEIR USEFULNESS AS ELECTION STUDIES. FOR ONE, THE SURVEY CONTAINS INFORMATION ON THREE ELECTIONS IN A TWO-WAVE PANEL. THIS MEANS THAT THERE IS NO DIFFERENTIAL TIME LAPSE BETWEEN RECALL OF FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS, WHEREAS THE USUAL CASE INVOLVES A STUDY OF ONE RECENT ELECTION AND ANOTHER TWO OR THREE YEARS IN THE PAST. EVEN THE SECOND WAVE WAS RELATIVELY SOON AFTER THE FIRST WAVE, AND INTERVIEWING FOR IT OCCURRED IN A TWO-WEEK PERIOD, THEREBY LESSENING THE CHANCES OF RECALL ERROR. SECOND, THE SURVEY DATA CAN BE ANALYSED WITHIN A RICH AND VARIED SET OF CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION, SOME RELEVANT TO PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS, SOME TO FEDERAL ELECTIONS, AND SOME TO BOTH OR TO GENERAL SOCIAL FACTORS. THE UNITS OF ANALYSIS ARE VERY SMALL AND HOMOGENEOUS, CONSISTING OF A FEW HUNDRED PEOPLE EACH. IN THE CASE OF ELECTORAL DATA, POLLING STATION REPORTS ARE UTILIZED; AND IN THE CASE OF CENSUS REPORTS, ENUMERATION AREAS ARE UTILIZED. EACH OF THESE SMALL UNITS CAN BE AGGREGATED TO FORM LARGER CONTEXTS-- SUCH AS TOWNS, CONSTITUENCIES, OR SUB-PROVINCIAL REGIONS. RESEARCH IS EXPENSIVE, AND WE WISH TO THANK THE SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA FOR GENEROUS SUPPORT IN THE FORM OF RESEARCH GRANTS NO. 410-78-0578 AND 410-81-0090 AND LEAVE FELLOWSHIPS. THE FIELD WORK FOR THE SURVEYS WAS CONDUCTED BY CANADIAN FACTS, LTD., UNDER THE DIRECTION OF SHERRILL SELANDER. ALTHOUGH WE WOULD LIKE TO BLAME THEM FOR ANY DEFIENCIES USERS MAY FIND, WE MUST CONFESS THAT ALL MAJOR DECISIONS WERE MADE BY US; WE THEREFORE ABSOLVE CANADIAN FACTS, MS. SELANDER, AND THE SSHRC OF ALL RESPONSIBILITY FOR WHAT WE HAVE DISSEMINATED. THE SAMPLE DESIGN WAS A MULTI-STAGE, STRATIFIED CLUSTER SAMPLE. TEN PROVINCIAL RIDINGS WERE PRE-SELECTED ON THE BASIS OF POLITICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL CHARACTERISTICS TO GIVE REPRESENTATION TO INTERIOR, VANCOUVER ISLAND, AND METROPOLITAN RIDINGS, NDP AND SOCIAL CREDIT STRONGHOLDS AS WELL AS COMPETITIVE 1 RIDINGS, AND RIDINGS DIVIDED BY OR CONTAINED WITHIN FEDERAL CONSTITUENCIES. THE TEN RIDINGS MIRROR ALMOST EXACTLY THE AGE, RELIGIOUS AND ETHNIC COMPOSITION OF THE PROVINCE AS A WHOLE. SAMPLING LOCATIONS WITHIN RIDINGS WERE CHOSEN AS FOLLOWS: CENSUS ENUMERATION AREAS WITHIN PROVINCIAL RIDINGS WERE CHOSEN WITH PROBABILITY OF SELECTION BASED ON THE EA POPULATION AGE 15 OR OVER ACCORDING TO THE 1976 CENSUS. WITHIN THESE CLUSTERS DWELLING UNITS WERE SELECTED USING A RANDOMLY CHOSEN STARTING POINT AND A RANDOM INTERVAL BETWEEN DWELLING UNITS. HOUSEHOLDS CONTACTED WERE INVENTORIED FOR RESIDENTS AGE 16 OR OVER AND AN INDIVIDUAL SELECTED FOR INTERVIEW ON THE BASIS OF A SELECTION PATTERN WHICH ALSO VARIED RANDOMLY. NO SUBSTITUTIONS WERE PERMITTED. APPROXIMATELY THREE INTERVIEWS WERE COMPLETED PER CLUSTER. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT OUR SAMPLE IS BASED ON THE POPULATION AGE 16 AND OVER AND NOT ELIGIBLE VOTERS. THUS, A CERTAIN PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS WERE INELIGIBLE BECAUSE OF AGE OR BECAUSE OF NOT BEING CANADIAN CITIZENS. SOME WERE ELIGIBLE FOR THE PROVINCIAL ELECTION BY VIRTUE OF BEING "BRITISH SUBJECTS" WHO WERE INELIGIBLE FEDERALLY; AND SOME WERE ELIGIBLE FEDERALLY BUT NOT PROVINCIALLY BECAUSE OF DIFFERENT AGE REQUIREMENTS. THESE GROUPS MAY BE IDENTIFIED CONVENIENTLY BY REFERENCE TO VARIABLES NO. V7-V13 IN THE DATA SET. LIKEWISE THE PANEL AND NON-PANEL RESPONDENTS ARE IDENTIFIED WITH THE SAME VARIABLES. A TARGET OF 150 INTERVIEWS PER RIDING WAS SET BUT COULD NOT BE MET IN ALL CASES BECAUSE OF THE UNEXPECTED CALLING OF THE 1980 FEDERAL ELECTION. NEVETHELESS, THE RESULTING SAMPLE PROVED REMARKABLY REPRESENTATIVE OF THE B.C. POPULATION AND OF THE 1979 ELECTION RESULTS. WHEN OUR SAMPLE IS WEIGHTED BY PROBABILITY OF SELECTION ACCORDING TO HOUSEHOLD SIZE AND TO COMPENSATE FOR OVER- OR UNDER-SAMPLING CERTAIN RIDINGS, THE VOTE DISTRIBUTION CORRESPONDS CLOSELY TO THE ACTUAL RESULT: 0 WEIGHTED VOTE OFFICIAL RESULTS DISTRIBUTION IN SAMPLE IN 1979 PROVINCIAL ELECTION LIBERAL 2.1% 0.5% CONSERVATIVE 4.6 5.1 NDP 43.7 45.6 SOCIAL CREDIT 49.6 48.2 OTHER 0.1 0.3 0 THE WEIGHTED (AND UNWEIGHTED) DISTRIBUTION OF AGE AND MOTHER TONGUE IN THE SAMPLE CORRESPOND CLOSELY TO 1 THE DISTRIBUTIONS IN THE 1976 CENSUS. WEIGHTING, IN FACT, MAKES LITTLE DIFFERENCE TO THE RESULTS, AT LEAST FOR THE VARIABLES WHICH WE CAN CHECK AGAINST CENSUS OR ELECTORAL DATA. WEIGHTING FOR THE SAMPLE AS A WHOLE REQUIRES THE USE OF REFERENCE NO.006. WEIGHTING WITHIN RIDINGS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED USING REFERENCE NO.511. THE PERSONAL INTERVIEWS AVERAGED ONE HOUR AND FIFTY-ONE MINUTES IN LENGTH. TELEPHONE INTERVIEWS IN THE SECOND WAVE (IN 1980) AVERAGED APPROXIMATELY TEN MINUTES IN LENGTH. GIVEN THE SAMPLING PROCEDURES, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO GIVE A PRECISE FIGURE FOR THE COMPLETION RATES. IN THE PERSONAL INTERVIEWS, THE IMPRECISION RESULTS FROM THE COMBINATION OF STAGES: (A) AFTER HOUSEHOLD ENUMERATION, RELATIVELY FEW DESIGNATED RESPONDENTS REFUSED TO BE INTERVIEWED, BUT OTHERS WERE TOO ILL, WERE OUT TOWN FOR TOO LONG, SPOKE A LANGUAGE WHICH NONE OF OUR INTERVIEWERS KNEW, OR HAD OTHER REASONS FOR NON-COMPLETION; (B) DURING ENUMERATION, SOME HOUSEHOLDS COULD NOT BE ENUMERATED BECAUSE OF REFUSAL BY THE PERSON ANSWERING THE DOOR, BECAUSE OF EXTENDED HOLIDAYS, AND SO ON; FAILURE TO ENUMERATE A HOUSEHOLD RESULTED IN INTERVIEWERS GOING TO THE NEXT DESIGNATED HOUSEHOLD. IF ONE INCLUDES ALL HOUSEHOLDS APPROACHED, THE COMPLETION RATE WAS IN THE 50%-60% RANGE; BUT IF ONE COUNTS ONLY ENUMERATED HOUSEHOLDS, COMPLETION RATES WERE APPROXIMATELY 75%. FOR THE TELEPHONE INTERVIEWS, WE CONTACTED 77% OF THE ORIGINAL (1979) SAMPLE. THE COMPLETION RATE WAS OVER 80%, HOWEVER, IF ONE IGNORES THE RESPONDENTS KNOWN IN ADVANCE TO BE INELIGIBLE DUE TO AGE OR CITIZENSHIP, WITH WHOM NO CONTACTS WERE ATTEMPTED. THE AGGREGATE CONTEXTUAL DATA (REFERENCE NUMBERS 601-82) CONSIST OF OFFICIAL RIDING LEVEL ELECTION RESULTS FOR THE 1979 AND 1980 FEDERAL ELECTIONS AND THE 1979 PROVINCIAL ELECTION. IN ADDITION, ESTIMATES OF RIDING LEVEL RESULTS FOR THE PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS OF 1966, 1969, 1972 AND 1975 ARE PROVIDED. THESE ESTIMATES WERE PRODUCED BY AGGREGATING POLL LEVEL RESULTS TO THE BOUNDARIES PRODUCED BY REDISTRIBUTION PRIOR TO THE 1979 ELECTION. ALSO SUPPLIED ARE DISTRIBUTIONS OF MOTHER TONGUE, EDUCATION, MOBILITY STATUS, AGE, AND LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION AGGREGATED TO THE LEVEL OF PROVINCIAL RIDING FROM ENUMERATION AREA LEVEL DATA FROM THE 1976 CENSUS. ADDITIONAL SMALL AREA DATA ARE OFFICIAL POLL LEVEL RESULTS FOR THE 1979 AND 1980 FEDERAL ELECTIONS AND THE 1979 PROVINCIAL ELECTION FOR EACH RESPONDENT AS WELL AS THE 1976 CENSUS DATA ALREADY REFERRED TO BUT AT THE ENUMERATION LEVEL. WHILE THESE DATA ARE BASED ON AGGREGATES OF DIFFERENT SIZES, THEIR USE WITH THE SURVEY DATA IS QUITE STRAIGHTFORWARD SINCE EACH INDIVIDUAL RESPONDENT'S RECORD CONTAINS INFORMATION ON THE RELEVANT ENUMERATION AREA, PROVINCIAL POLL, PROVINCIAL RIDING AND FEDERAL 1 RIDING. WITHIN THE PERSONAL INTERVIEWS THEMSELVES, WE ASCERTAINED SOME CONTEXTUAL DATA. FOR EXAMPLE, THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS IN THE HOUSEHOLD AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO THE RESPONDENTS CAN BE USED TO CREATE STRUCTURAL VARIABLES SUCH AS "MULTI-GENERATIONAL HOUSEHOLDS". ALSO WE ASKED ABOUT WHETHER EACH MEMBER OF HOUSEHOLD WAS EMPLOYED, ON STRIKE, ETC. IN REGARD TO WORK PLACE, THERE ARE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE NUMBER OF OTHER WORKERS, WHETHER POLITICS IS DISCUSSED AT WORK OR AFTER WORK, AND SO ON. THE TITLE OF OUR STUDY, "POLITICAL CULTURE, STRUCTURE OF OPPORTUNITY, AND ELECTORAL CHOICE," INDICATES MANY OF THE THEORETICAL FOCAL POINTS. IN ASSESSING POLITICAL CULTURE, WE HAVE INCLUDED QUESTIONS USED TO CREATE SEVERAL ATTITUDE SCALES MEASURING TRUST IN GOVERNMENT, POLITICAL EFFICACY, POPULISM, AND ALIENATION, AMONG OTHERS. BY STRUCTURE OF OPPORTUNITY, WE MEAN THE RANGE OF POLITICAL OBJECTS AND SITUATIONS CONFRONTING AN INDIVIDUAL. WITHOUT A KNOWLEDGE OF RESPONDENTS' OPPORTUNITIES TO EXPRESS THEIR ATTITUDES IN ACTION, ONE MAY MISTAKENLY BELIEVE THAT THE ATTITUDES HAVE NO EXPLANATORY POWER. LIKEWISE, BY KNOWING SOMETHING ABOUT BOTH ATTITUDES AND SITUATIONS, WE CAN BETTER EXPLORE CONFLICTING ATTITUDES AND CONFLICTING SITUATIONAL CUES, AS WELL AS ATTITUDES AND SITUATIONS WHICH REINFORCE EACH OTHER. THESE CONSIDERATIONS WERE ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT IN THE 1979 PERIOD BECAUSE TWO ELECTION CAMPAIGNS UNFOLDED SIMULTANEOUSLY, ONE FEDERAL AND ONE PROVINCIAL. THIS COMPLICATED RESPONDENTS' DECISION-MAKING BUT ALSO OPENED OPPORTUNUTIES FOR CROSS-LEVEL INFLUENCES WHOSE ANALYSIS SHOULD PROVE FRUITFUL. POLITICAL CULTURE AND STRUCTURE OF OPPORTUNITY DO NOT EXHAUST THE DOMAIN OF VARIABLES RELEVANT TO THE EXPLANATION OF THE OUTCOMES OF THE THREE ELECTIONS WE HAVE STUDIED. WE ALSO HAVE INFORMATION ON PARTY IDENTIFICATION, INCLUDING WHEN AND WHY IT HAS CHANGED IN THE PAST, ON EVALUATIONS OF PARTIES, LEADERS, AND CANDIDATES, ON POLITICAL ISSUES, ON MEDIA CONSUMPTION, ON ORGANIZATIONAL AFFILIATIONS, AND A HOST OF OTHER VARIABLES OF A SOCIAL OR POLITICAL SORT. SOME SUBSTANTIVE AND METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS DESERVE NOTE. IN THE RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THE CODEBOOK AND IN THE FOOTNOTES, WE HAVE PROVIDED SOME DETAILS, BUT IT MAY BE HELPFUL TO COMMENT BRIEFLY ON THESE AT THIS POINT. WE HAVE ALREADY MENTIONED THE INFORMATION ON HOUSEHOLD STRUCTURE AND WORKPLACE CONTEXTS. POLITICAL ISSUES WERE EXPLORED IN CONSIDERABLE DETAIL BY ASKING RESPONDENTS TO MENTION THE THREE ISSUES MOST IMPORTANT TO THEM, TO DEFINE THE MEANING OF THESE ISSUES, TO SUGGEST SOLUTIONS TO EACH, AND TO SPECIFY THE PARTY CLOSEST TO THEIR OWN POSITION AND FURTHEST FROM THEIR OWN POSITION ON EACH ISSUE. TRUST IN GOVERNMENT WAS EXPLORED SEPARATELY FOR FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL LEVELS AND FOR DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACTORS (POLITICIANS AND CIVIL 1 SERVANTS) IN DIFFERENT SITUATIONS. IN EVALUATING A SERIES OF POLITICAL OBJECTS (COUNTRIES, PARTIES, LEADERS, AND CANDIDATES) WE ASCERTAINED BOTH DEGREE OF LIKING AND DEGREE OF DISLIKING, SO THAT ONE CAN DISTINGUISH BETWEEN INDIFFERENCE AND AMBIVALENCE AS WELL AS BETWEEN UNALLOYED LIKING AND DISLIKING. SOME OF THE ATTITUDE ITEMS WERE IN AGREE-DISAGREE FORMAT, BUT OTHERS WERE IN FORCED-CHOICE FORMAT, THUS ALLOWING ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL RESPONSE BIAS. 0 CODEBOOK INFORMATION THIS CODEBOOK HAS BEEN PREPARED FOLLOWING THE MODEL PROVIDED BY THE INTERUNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH USING OSIRIS FORMAT. VARIABLES IN THE CODEBOOK HAVE BEEN ORDERED ACCORDING TO THEIR SUBJECT MATTER RATHER THAN IN THE ORDER GIVEN BY THE QUESTIONNAIRE, ALTHOUGH, WHERE RELEVANT, SECTION AND QUESTION NUMBERS FROM THE ORIGINAL QUESTIONNAIRE APPEAR AS PART OF THE VARIABLE DESCRIPTION. REF. NOS.80-107 CONTAIN DATA OBTAINED DURING THE L980 WAVE. SEVERAL NEW VARIABLES HAVE BEEN GENERATED THROUGH RECODING, HOWEVER, THE ORIGINAL VARIABLES HAVE BEEN RETAINED IN THE DATASET AS WELL. VARIABLES 601 TO 812 REPRESENT AGGREGATE DATA BASED ON OFFICIAL SOURCES. USERS ARE REMINDED TO EXAMINE THE SET OF FILTER VARIABLES (REF. NO.S 7-13) TO ASCERTAIN WHICH SUBSET OF THE SAMPLE CORRESPONDS TO THEIR NEEDS. FILTERING IS ALSO REQUIRED FOR THE ANALYSIS OF ISSUES (REF. NO.S 271 TO 345) SINCE THE MEANING CORRESPONDING TO THE CODES FOR THOSE VARIABLES DEPENDS ON THE ISSUE BEING ANALYZED. DETAILED CODES BY ISSUE CAN BE FOUND IN THE APPENDIX. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 0 WEIGHTING AND FILTERING INFORMATION............. 9 PROVINCIAL VOTING.............................. 12 PROVINCIAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION................ 25 FEDERAL VOTING:FIRST WAVE...................... 37 FEDERAL VOTING:SECOND WAVE..................... 43 FEDERAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION................... 58 LIKES AND DISLIKES............................. 67 HYPOTHETICAL VOTING............................ 99 CAMPAIGN INTEREST,PERCEPTIONS,PARTICIPATION... 117 ISSUES, POLICIES, PARTY DISTANCES............. 141 PERCEPTIONS OF GOV'T,POLITICIANS,BUREAUCRATS.. 172 SELF-ADMINISTERED ITEMS....................... 176 VOLUNTARY ORGANIZATIONAL MEMBERSHIPS.......... 199 SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION................. 209 INTERVIEWER OBSERVATIONS...................... 279 AGGREGATE CENSUS AND ELECTION DATA............ 290 APPENDIX:DETAILED ISSUE CODES,CANDIDATE LISTS. 338 1 2 - DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '01' DK 1 COL 1- 2 ---------------------------------- 0 VAR 0813 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0813 LOC 1672 WIDTH 4 DK 1 COL 3- 6 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0814 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0814 LOC 1676 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 7 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0815 ICPSR PART NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0815 LOC 1677 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 8 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0001 RESPONDENT ID NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 6 DK 1 COL 9-14 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0002 CARD NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0002 LOC 7 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 15-16 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0003 CENSUS TRACT OR DIVISION NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0003 LOC 9 WIDTH 3 DK 1 COL 17-19 0 1976 CENSUS TRACT FOR RESPONDENT LOCATION ----------------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0004 CENSUS TRACT SUBDIVISION NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0004 LOC 12 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 20 0 1976 CENSUS TRACT SUBDIVISION FOR RESPONDENT LOCATION ----------------------------------------------------- 1 3 - 0 VAR 0005 ENUMERATION AREA NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0005 LOC 13 WIDTH 3 DK 1 COL 21-23 0 1976 ENUMERATION AREA NUMBER FOR RESPONDENT LOCATION ---------------------------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0006 WEIGHT NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0006 LOC 16 WIDTH 3 DK 1 COL 24-26 IMP DEC= 1 0 USE OF THIS VARIABLE AS A WEIGHT WILL COMPENSATE FOR DIFFERENCES IN HOUSEHOLD SIZES AND THE FACT THAT CERTAIN RIDINGS WERE OVERSAMPLED OR UNDERSAMPLED GIVEN THEIR POPULATIONS RELATIVE TO THE TOTAL POPULATION. COMPENSATION FOR DIFFERENCES IN HOUSEHOLD SIZE IS NECESSARY TO PRODUCE A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE WITHIN RIDINGS BECAUSE THE PROBALITY OF A GIVEN INDIVIDUAL OVER AGE 16 BEING SELECTED FOR INTERVIEWS ONCE A HOUSEHOLD WAS SELECTED WAS INVERSELY PROPORTIONAL TO THE SIZE OF THE HOUSEHOLD. IN PRACTICE, DISTRIBUTIONS OF DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND PARTY SUPPORT FOR THE SAMPLE AS A WHOLE ARE LITTLE AFFECTED BY WEIGHTING. REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES WITHIN RIDINGS MAY BE PRODUCED BY USING ELIGIBLE (OVER AGE 16) HOUSEHOLD SIZE (REF.511) AS A WEIGHT. -------------------------------------------------------- - 0 FILTER VARIABLES ---------------- FILTERING IS NECESSARY TO PRODUCE ACCURATE MARGINAL DISTRIBUTIONS DEPENDING ON THE TYPE OF RESPONDENT BEING STUDIED. USE OF THE DATA WITHOUT FILTERING PRODUCES A SAMPLE OF THE BRITISH COLUMBIA POPULATION OVER AGE 16 INCLUDING NON-CITIZENS AND/OR THOSE NOT ELIGIBLE TO VOTE. BECAUSE ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR VOTING IN PROVINCIAL AND FEDERAL ELECTIONS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA DIFFER, USE OF THE APPROPRIATE FILTER IS REQUIRED TO PRODUCE A VALID SAMPLE FOR A GIVEN LEVEL OF ELECTION. OTHER FILTERS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO COVER A VARIETY OF ANALYTICAL POSSIBILITIES. 1 4 - 0 VAR 0007 FILTER1 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0007 LOC 19 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 27 0 PROVINCIAL ELECTORATE (1979) FILTER TO RESTRICT ANALYSIS TO THOSE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN THE 1979 PROVINCIAL ELECTION USE THIS VARIABLE AS A FILTER. CANADIAN CITIZENS OR BRITISH SUBJECTS OVER AGE 19 WERE ENTITLED TO BECOME REGISTERED TO VOTE. ------------------------------------------------------- 1. MEMBER OF 1979 PROVINCIAL ELECTORATE 0. NOT ELIGIBLE FOR 1979 PROVINCIAL ELECTORATE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0008 FILTER2 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0008 LOC 20 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 28 0 FEDERAL ELECTORATE (1979) FILTER TO RESTRICT ANALYSIS TO THOSE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN THE 1979 FEDERAL ELECTION USE THIS VARIABLE AS A FILTER. CANADIAN CITIZENS OVER AGE 18 WERE ENTITLED TO BECOME REGISTERED TO VOTE. ----------------------------------------------------- 1. MEMBER OF 1979 FEDERAL ELECTORATE 0. NOT ELIGIBLE FOR 1979 FEDERAL ELECTORATE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0009 FILTER3 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0009 LOC 21 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 29 0 FEDERAL ELECTORATE (1980) FILTER TO RESTRICT ANALYSIS TO THOSE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN THE 1980 FEDERAL ELECTION AND WHO WERE INTERVIEWED IN THE SECOND WAVE OF THE STUDY, USE THIS VARIABLE AS A FILTER. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT USE OF THIS FILTER WILL NOT PRODUCE A VALID SAMPLE OF THE 1980 ELECTORATE BECAUSE CONTACT WAS NOT MADE WITH ALL THOSE INTERVIEWED IN 1979 KNOWN TO BE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN 1980; NOR WAS THE SAMPLE SUPPLEMENTED TO INCLUDE THOSE IN THE POPULATION WHO BECAME ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN 1980 BUT WERE NOT ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN 1979. -------------------------------------------------------- 1 5 - (CONTINUED) - 1. MEMBER OF THE 1980 FEDERAL ELECTORATE AND REINTERVIEWED IN 1980. 0. NOT ELIGIBLE FOR 1980 ELECTORATE OR NOT REINTERVIEWED IN 1980. 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0010 FILTER4 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0010 LOC 22 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 30 0 COMBINED ELECTORATES (1979) FILTER TO RESTRICT ANALYSIS TO THOSE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN BOTH THE 1979 PROVINCIAL AND FEDERAL ELECTIONS USE THIS VARIABLE AS A FILTER. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE USE OF THIS VARIABLE TO PRODUCE VOTER DISTRIBUTIONS FOR THE 1979 PROVINCIAL ELECTION WILL GIVE DIFFERENT RESULTS THAN THE USE OF REF.007 BECAUSE ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS DIFFERED FOR THE FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS. -------------------------------------------------------- 1. ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN THE FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS IN 1979. 0. NOT ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN BOTH FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS IN 1979. 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0011 FILTER5 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0011 LOC 23 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 31 0 COMBINED FEDERAL ELECTORATES (1979-1980) FILTER TO RESTRICT ANALYSIS TO THOSE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN BOTH 1979 AND 1980 FEDERAL ELECTIONS AND WHO WERE INTERVIEWED IN BOTH WAVES, USE THIS VARIABLE AS A FILTER. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT USE OF THIS VARIABLE WILL NOT YIELD A VALID SAMPLE OF EITHER THE 1979 OR 1980 FEDERAL ELECTORATE. -------------------------------------------------------- 1. ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN THE FEDERAL ELECTIONS IN 1979 AND 1980 AND INTERVIEWED IN BOTH WAVES. 0. NOT ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN BOTH THE 1979 AND 1980 FEDERAL ELECTIONS OR NOT INTERVIEWED IN SECOND WAVES. 0 1 6 - 0 VAR 0012 FILTER6 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0012 LOC 24 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 32 0 THREE-ELECTION ELECTORATE FILTER TO RESTRICT ANALYSIS TO THOSE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN THE 1979 PROVINCIAL ELECTION AND THE 1979 AND 1980 FEDERAL ELECTIONS, USE THIS VARIABLE AS A FILTER. BECAUSE CONTACT WAS NOT ESTABLISHED WITH ALL THOSE INTERVIEWED IN 1979 WHO WERE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN 1980, USE OF THIS FILTER WILL PRODUCE DIFFERENT VOTE DISTRIBUTIONS FOR THE 1979 ELECTIONS THAN THOSE PRODUCED USING REFS.007 AND 008. -------------------------------------------------------- 1. MEMBER OF THE 1979 PROVINCIAL AND FEDERAL ELECTORATES AND ELIGIBLE AND INTERVIEWED IN 1980 0. NOT ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN 1979 PROVINCIAL ELECTION, 1979 FEDERAL ELECTION,OR NOT INTERVIEWED IN 1980. 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0013 FILTER7 NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0013 LOC 25 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 33 0 1979-1980 PANEL FILTER TO RESTRICT ANALYSIS TO THOSE INTERVIEWED IN 1979 AND IN 1980 USE THIS VARIABLE AS A FILTER. THIS FILTER WILL RARELY BE USED EXCEPT BY THOSE WISHING AS MUCH INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE ON THE PERCEPTIONS OF MEMBERS OF THE B.C. POPULATION WHO WERE NOT ELIGIBLE TO VOTE AT THE TIME OF THE STUDY. -------------------------------------------------------- 1. INTERVIEWED IN BOTH 1979 AND 1980 0. INTERVIEWED IN 1979 BUT NOT IN 1980 0 - 0 SECTION III. PROVINCIAL VOTE DECISION ------------------------------------- 1 7 - 0 VAR 0014 CANADIAN CITIZEN? MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0014 LOC 26 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 34 0 Q.III.A.2 ARE YOU A CANADIAN CITIZEN? ------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0015 BRITISH SUBJECT? MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0015 LOC 27 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 35 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.III.A.2 WAS NO,DK OR NA ... Q.III.A.3 ARE YOU A BRITISH SUBJECT? ----------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP., CODED 1 IN Q.III.A.2 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0016 BC RESIDENT? MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0016 LOC 28 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 36 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.III.A.2 OR Q.III.A.3 WAS YES... Q.III.A.4 AND ON MAY 10, THE DATE OF THE MOST RECENT PROVINCIAL ELECTION, HAD YOU BEEN A RESIDENT OF B.C. FOR AT LEAST 12 MONTHS? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP., CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.III.A.3 0 0 1 8 - (CONTINUED) - SECTION III.B REGISTRATION -------------------------- QUESTIONS IN SECTION III.B WERE ASKED ONLY OF THOSE AGE 19 OR OVER ON PROVINCIAL ELECTION DAY. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0017 ON PROVINCIAL LIST 1979 MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0017 LOC 29 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 37 0 0 Q.III.B.1 WERE YOU ON THE VOTERS' LIST IN THIS RIDING FOR THE MAY 10 PROVINCIAL ELECTION? ----------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP., CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.III.A.2 OR IN Q.III.A. 3,OR AGE 18 OR YOUNGER ON PROVINCIAL ELECTION DAY 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0018 ON LIST IN OTHER RIDING MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0018 LOC 30 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 38 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.III.B.1 WAS NO,DK OR NA... Q.III.B.2 (A) WERE YOU ON THE VOTERS' LIST IN SOME OTHER RIDING? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP., CODED 1 IN Q.III.B.1;CODED 0,8 OR 9 IN Q. III.A.4 0 1 9 - 0 VAR 0019 NAME OF OTHER RIDING MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0019 LOC 31 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 39-40 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.III.B.2(A) WAS YES... Q.III.B.2 (B) WHICH RIDING WAS THAT? ----------------------------------------- 01. VICTORIA 02. VANCOUVER CENTRE 03. VANCOUVER EAST 04. SOUTH OKANAGAN 05. BURNABY-EDMONDS 08. NEW WESTMINSTER 09. SAANICH AND THE ISLANDS 10. BURNABY NORTH 12. DELTA 13. NORTH VANCOUVER-SEYMOUR 14. CARIBOO 15. NORTH ISLAND 16. VANCOUVER-POINT GREY 17. SURREY 18. PRINCE GEORGE SOUTH 20. BOUNDARY-SIMILKAMEEN 21. SKEENA 22. VANCOUVER SOUTH 26. NANAIMO 28. COQUITLAM-MOODY 31. BURNABY-WILLINGDON 32. COWICHAN MALAHAT 33. KAMLOOPS 34. VANCOUVER-LITTLE MOUNTAIN 35. LANGLEY 36. YALE-LILLOOET 38. DEWDNEY 40. RICHMOND 41. ATLIN 45. WEST VANCOUVER-HOWE SOUND 48. KOOTENAY 00. INAP., CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.III.B.2;CODED 0 IN Q. III.B.1 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0020 ON PROV LIST IN 1975 MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0020 LOC 33 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 41 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.III.B.2(A) WAS YES... 1 10 - (CONTINUED) - Q.III.B.3 WERE YOU ON THE VOTERS' LIST THIS YEAR BECAUSE YOU VOTED IN 1975? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP., CODED 0 IN QIII.B.1 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0021 DECLARATION AT POLL-PROV MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0021 LOC 34 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 42 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.III.B.2(A) WAS NO,DK OR NA... Q.III.B.4 DID YOU TRY TO GET ON THE VOTERS' LIST BY MAKING A DECLARATION AT THE POLLING STATION ON ELECTION DAY? ------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP., CODED 1 OR 0 IN Q.III.B.1;CODED 1 OR 0 IN Q.III.B.2 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0022 AS A RESULT VOTED 1979 MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0022 LOC 35 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 43 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.III.B.4 WAS YES... Q.III.B.5 AS A RESULT DID YOU CAST A BALLOT? -------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP., CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.III.B.4 0 - 1 11 - (CONTINUED) - SECTION III.C CURRENT PROVINCIAL ELECTION ----------------------------------------- 0 QUESTIONS IN SECTION III.C WERE ASKED ONLY OF THOSE AGE 19 OR OVER ON PROVINCIAL ELECTION DAY. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0023 VOTED PROV 1979? MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0023 LOC 36 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 44 0 ...IF ANSWER TO Q.III.B.1 WAS YES... Q.III.C.1 IN THE MAY 10TH PROVINCIAL ELECTION HERE IN B.C., WE FIND THAT LOTS OF PEOPLE WERE UNABLE TO VOTE FOR VARIOUS REASONS. DID YOU VOTE THIS TIME, OR DID SOMETHING HAPPEN TO KEEP YOU FROM VOTING? ----------------------------------------------------- 1. VOTED 2. DID NOT VOTE 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP., CODED 0 IN Q.III.B.1;CODED 2.8 OR 9 ON Q. III.B.4;OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 ON Q.III.B.5(NOT REGISTERED OR INELIGIBLE GIVEN AGE OR CITIZENSHIP) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0024 PROVINCIAL VOTE 1979 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0024 LOC 37 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 45-46 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.III.B.1 OR Q.III.B.5 WAS YES... Q.III.C.2 (IF VOTED) FOR WHICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE? (FIRST RESPONSE) --------------------------------------------------- 01. LIBERALS 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 06. COMMUNIST 07. MARXIST-LENINIST 08. RHINOCEROS 1 12 - (CONTINUED) - 10. SPOILED BALLOT 20. INDEPENDENT 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP., CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.III.C.1 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0025 SECOND PROV VOTE 1979 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0025 LOC 39 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 47-48 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.III.C.2 ---------------------------- 00. INAP., DID NOT VOTE,VOTED IN SINGLE MEMBER RIDING, OR VOTED FOR CANDIDATE(S) OF ONLY ONE PARTY IN DUAL RIDING. 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0026 WHY NOT VOTE PROV-ONE MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0026 LOC 41 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 49-50 0 Q.III.C.3 (IF DID NOT VOTE) WAS THERE ANY PARTICULAR REASON WHY YOU DID NOT VOTE IN THE MAY 10TH PROVINCIAL ELECTION? (FIRST RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------ 01. ILL 02. OUT OF TOWN 03. TOO BUSY 04. NO INTEREST 05. NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION, DID NOT KNOW ENGLISH 06. RELIGIOUS REASONS 07. DON'T LIKE PARTIES OR CANDIDATES 08. DISORGANIZED VOTERS LIST PREPARATION 09. NOT ON LIST IN CURRENT RIDING 11. TOO MUCH CONFLICT BETWEEN PARTIES 12. NO REASON 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,VOTED IN 1979 OR SCREENED OUT AS NOT ELIGIBLE TO VOTE GIVEN AGE,CITIZENSHIP OR FAILURE TO REGISTER 0 1 13 - 0 VAR 0027 WHY NOT VOTE PROV-TWO MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0027 LOC 43 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 51-52 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.III.C.3 ---------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0,98,99 IN Q.III.C.3,OR GAVE ONLY ONE REASON FOR FAILURE TO VOTE. 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0028 PROV PREF 1979 NON-VOTER MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0028 LOC 45 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 53-54 0 IDENTICAL VERSIONS OF QUESTIONS Q.III.C.4,QIII.C.5,AND Q .III.C.6 WERE ALSO ASKED OF THOSE WHO COULD NOT VOTE BECAUSE OF AGE,CITIZENSHIP OR FAILURE TO BE REGISTERED. (SEE QUESTIONNAIRE SECTION III.D) 0 Q.III.C.4 (IF DID NOT VOTE) IF YOU HAD BEEN ABLE TO VOTE, WHICH PARTY WOULD YOU HAVE VOTED FOR? -------------------------------------------------------- 01. LIBERALS 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,VOTED IN 1979 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0029 DISCUSS ELECTION-HSHLD MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0029 LOC 47 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 55-56 0 Q.III.C.5 DID YOU AND YOUR (WIFE/HUSBAND/PARENTS/ ROOMATES) DISCUSS THE ELECTION AND HOW TO VOTE? ------------------------------------------------- 01. YES, DISCUSSED IT 02. NO, DID NOT 1 14 - (CONTINUED) - 03. YES, DISCUSSED IT BUT NOT HOW TO VOTE 05. NO, LIVED ALONE 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 1 ON REF.511,ONLY ONE PERSON AGE 16 OR OVER IN HOUSEHOLD 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0030 VOTE 79-1ST HSHLD MEMBER MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0030 LOC 49 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 57-58 0 Q.III.C.6 HOW DID YOUR (WIFE/HUSBAND/PARENTS/ROOMMATES) VOTE? (FIRST RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------- 01. LIBERAL 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 07. MARXIST-LENINIST 81. DID NOT VOTE 82. NOT ON VOTERS' LIST 83. NOT ELIGIBLE 98. DK 99. NA OO. INAP.,CODED 1 ON REF.511 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0031 VOTE 79-2ND HSHLD MEMBER MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0031 LOC 51 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 59-60 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.III.C.6 ---------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 1 ON REF.511 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.III.C.6 0 - 0 SECTION III.E PREVIOUS PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS 1 15 - (CONTINUED) - -------------------------------------------- QUESTIONS IN SECTION III.E WERE NOT ASKED OF THOSE TOO YOUNG OR WHOSE CURRENT CITIZENSHIP WOULD HAVE MADE THEM INELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN THE 1975 PROVINCIAL ELECTION. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0032 ELIGIBLE TO VOTE 1972? MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0032 LOC 53 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 61 0 WE ARE ALSO INTERESTED IN PREVIOUS PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS. I WOULD LIKE YOU TO THINK BACK TO THE LAST TWO PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS, THE ONE IN 1972 WHEN THE NDP UNDER DAVE BARRETT DEFEATED THE SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY AND THE ONE IN 1975 WHEN THE SOCIAL CREDIT UNDER BILL BENNETT DEFEATED THE NDP. Q.III.E.1 (A) LET'S THINK ABOUT THE 1972 ELECTION FIRST. WERE YOU ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN THAT ELECTION, THAT IS, WERE YOU AT LEAST 19 YEARS OF AGE AT THAT TIME, A RESIDENT OF B.C., AND A CITIZEN OF CANADA OR BRITISH SUBJECT? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. ELIGIBLE 2. NOT ELIGIBLE 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,RESPONDENT INELIGIBLE BECAUSE OF AGE OR CITIZENSHIP FOR 1972 ELECTION. 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0033 VOTED PROV 1972? MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0033 LOC 54 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 62 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.III.E.1(A) WAS ELIGIBLE... Q.III.E.1 (B) DID YOU VOTE IN THAT ELECTION? ---------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.III.E.1(A) 0 1 16 - 0 VAR 0034 PROV VOTE 1972-ONE MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0034 LOC 55 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 63-64 0 Q.III.E.1 (C) WHICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE FOR THEN? (FIRST RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------- 01. LIBERAL 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.III.E.1(B) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0035 PROV VOTE 1972-TWO MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0035 LOC 57 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 65-66 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.III.E.1 (C) -------------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN Q.III.E.1(C) OR NO SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.III.E.1(C) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0036 ELIGIBLE PROV 1975 MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0036 LOC 59 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 67 0 Q.III.E.2 (A) NOW LET'S THINK OF THE 1975 PROVINCIAL ELECTION. WERE YOU ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN THAT ELECTION, THAT IS, WERE YOU AT LEAST 19 YEARS OF AGE AT THAT TIME, A RESIDENT OF B.C., AND A CITIZEN OF CANADA OR A BRITISH SUBJECT? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. ELIGIBLE 2. NOT ELIGIBLE 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,RESPONDENT INELIGIBLE BECAUSE OF AGE OR CITIZENSHIP FOR 1975 ELECTION . 0 1 17 - 0 VAR 0037 VOTED PROV 1975? MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0037 LOC 60 WIDTH 1 DK 1 COL 68 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.III.E.2(A) WAS ELIGIBLE... Q.III.E.2 (B) DID YOU VOTE IN THAT ELECTION? ---------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.III.E.2(A) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0038 PROV VOTE 1975-ONE MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0038 LOC 61 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 69-70 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.III.E.2(B) WAS YES... Q.III.E.2 (C) WHICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE FOR THEN? FIRST RESPONSE ------------------------------------------------------ 01. LIBERAL 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.III.E.2(B) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0039 PROV VOTE 1975-TWO MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0039 LOC 63 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 71-72 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.III.E.2 (C) -------------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN Q.III.E.2(C) OR NO SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.III.E.2(C) 0 1 18 - 0 VAR 0040 WHY CHANGED 72-75 ONE MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0040 LOC 65 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 73-74 0 Q.III.E.3 (IF VOTE CHANGED FROM 1972 TO 1975) I NOTICE THAT YOU CHANGED YOUR VOTE BETWEEN 1972 AND 1975. WAS THERE ANY SPECIAL REASON FOR CHANGING THE PARTY YOU VOTED FOR? (ANY OTHER REASONS?) (FIRST RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------ 01. POOR PERFORMANCE OF NDP GOVERNMENT 02. LIKED LEADER 03. DISLIKED LEADER 04. LIKED CANDIDATE 05. DISLIKED CANDIDATE 06. LIKED PARTY - GENERAL REFERENCE 07. DISLIKED PARTY - GENERAL REFERENCE 08. LIKED PARTY - POLICY REASONS 09. DISLIKED PARTY - POLICY REASONS 10. PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CANDIDATE, DID NOT RUN 11. TIME FOR A CHANGE 12. LIKED ONE OR MORE CABINET MINISTERS 13. DISLIKED ONE OR MORE CABINET MINISTERS 14. VOTE FOR THE MAN 18. PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE, VOTED FOR SECOND CHOICE OR VOTED FOR OTHER THAN PREFERRED PARTY TO KEEP ANOTHER PARTY OUT 19. PROTEST AGAINST MAJOR PARTIES 20. REFERENCE TO FAMILY 21. RESPONDENT'S OWN ATTITUDES,FEELINGS CHANGED 22. POOR PERFORMANCE OF SOCIAL CREDIT GOVERNMENT 23. SOCIAL INFLUENCE (OTHER THAN FAMILY) 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,DID NOT CHANGE VOTE BETWEEN 1972-1975 OR CODED 0 IN Q.III.E.1(C) OR Q.III.E.2(C) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0041 WHY CHANGED 72-75 TWO MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0041 LOC 67 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 75-76 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.III.E.3 ---------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN REF.040 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE IN REF.040 0 1 19 - 0 VAR 0042 WHY CHANGED 75-79 ONE MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0042 LOC 69 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 77-78 0 Q.III.E.4 (IF VOTE CHANGED FROM 1975 TO 1979) YOU HAVE SAID THAT YOU CHANGED YOUR VOTE FROM 1975 TO THIS YEAR. WAS THERE ANY SPECIAL REASON FOR CHANGING THE PARTY YOU VOTED FOR? (ANY OTHER REASONS?) (FIRST RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------- 00. INAP.,DID NOT CHANGE VOTE BETWEEN 1975-79 OR CODED 0 IN Q.III.C.2 OR Q.III.E.2(C) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0043 WHY CHANGED 75-79 TWO MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0043 LOC 71 WIDTH 2 DK 1 COL 79-80 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.III.E.4 ---------------------------- OO. INAP.,CODED IN IN REF.042 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE IN REF.042 0 - SECTION VII. PROVINCIAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION SPECIAL ROUTING INSTRUCTIONS WERE EMPLOYED IN SECTION VII. THE QUESTION TEXTS PRESENTED HERE AS Q.VII.4(C) TO Q.VII.4(G) WERE USED AS NOTED BELOW ALTHOUGH QUESTION NUMBERS MAY NOT CORRESPOND TO THOSE USED FOR ANY GIVEN RESPONDENT. EQUIVALENT QUESTION NUMBERS ARE GIVEN WHERE APPROPRIATE. DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '02' DK 2 COL 1- 2 ---------------------------------- 1 20 - 0 VAR 0813 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0813 LOC 1672 WIDTH 4 DK 2 COL 3- 6 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0814 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0814 LOC 1676 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 7 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0815 ICPSR PART NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0815 LOC 1677 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 8 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0001 RESPONDENT ID NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 6 DK 2 COL 9-14 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0044 PROV PARTY ID MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0044 LOC 73 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 15-16 0 Q.VII.1 THINKING OF PROVINCIAL POLITICS HERE IN B.C., DO YOU USUALLY THINK OF YOURSELF AS A LIBERAL, PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, NDP, SOCIAL CREDIT OR WHAT? ----------------------------------------------------- 00. NONE 01. LIBERAL 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 05. INDEPENDENT 06. CHRISTIAN 07. VOTE FOR MAN 08. FASCIST, RIGHT WING IDEOLOGY 09. PROGRESSIVE, LEFT WING IDEOLOGY 10. RHINOCEROS 11. COMMUNIST 12. COMMUNIST (MARXIST-LENINIST) 13. WESTERN SEPARATIST 20. SOMETIMES ONE PARTY, SOMETIMES ANOTHER 30. LIBERAL & PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 31. NDP & SOCIAL CREDIT 1 21 - (CONTINUED) - 32. P.C.& NDP 97. OTHER UNSPECIFIED 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0045 STRENGTH PROV PTY ID MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0045 LOC 75 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 17-18 0 ...IF PARTY RESPONSE GIVEN IN Q.VI.2... Q.VII.2 HOW STRONGLY (PARTY MENTIONED IN Q.VII.1) DO YOU FEEL: VERY STRONGLY, FAIRLY STRONGLY, OR NOT VERY STRONGLY? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY STRONGLY 2. FAIRLY STRONGLY 3. NOT VERY STRONGLY 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0,5,6,7,98 OR 99 IN Q.VII.1 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0046 STR PROV NON-PTY STAND MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0046 LOC 77 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 19 0 ...IF CODED 0,5,6,7,8,9 OR 20 IN Q.VII.1... Q.VII.4 (A) HOW STRONGLY DO YOU FEEL ABOUT (OTHER NON-PARTY ANSWER IN Q.VII.1) VERY STRONGLY, FAIRLY STRONGLY, OR NOT VERY STRONGLY? -------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY STRONGLY 2. FAIRLY STRONGLY 3. NOT VERY STRONGLY 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0,98 OR 99 OR GAVE NAME OF PARTY IN REF.044 0 1 22 - 0 VAR 0047 CLOSER TO PROV PTY NOW MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0047 LOC 78 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 20 0 ...IF CODED 0,5,6,7,8,9,20,98 OR 99 IN Q.VII.1... Q.VII.4 (B) STILL THINKING OF PROVINCIAL POLITICS, DO YOU GENERALLY THINK OF YOURSELF AS BEING A LITTLE CLOSER TO ONE OF THE PARTIES THAN TO THE OTHERS? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,GAVE PARTY RESPONSE IN Q.VII.1 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0048 PROV PTY CLOSER TO NOW MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0048 LOC 79 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 21-22 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.VII.4(B) OR ITS EQUIVALENT WAS YES.. Q.VII.4 (C) WHICH PARTY IS THAT? -------------------------------------------------------- 01. LIBERAL 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 50. FREE ENTERPRISE 98. DK 99. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN REF.047 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0049 EVER CHANGED PROV ID ? MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0049 LOC 81 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 23 0 ...THIS QUESTION OR ITS EQUIVALENT ASKED OF ALL RESPONDENTS... Q.VII.4 (D) EVEN THOUGH THEY MAY VOTE FOR DIFFERENT PARTIES FROM TIME TO TIME, SOME PEOPLE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN CLOSER TO ONE PARTY THAN TO OTHERS. SOME PEOPLE'S 1 23 - (CONTINUED) - FEELINGS HAVE CHANGED. STILL THINKING OF PROVINCIAL POLITICS, WAS THERE EVER A TIME WHEN YOU THOUGHT OF YOURSELF AS (SOMETHING OTHER THAN RESPONSE GIVEN IN Q.VII.1) ------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0050 PAST PROV PTY ID-ONE MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0050 LOC 82 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 24-25 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.VII.4(D) OR ITS EQUIVALENT WAS YES.. Q.VII.4 (E) WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? (ANY OTHERS?) FIRST RESPONSE -------------------------------------------------------- 01. LIBERAL 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP OR CCF 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 05. INDEPENDENT 30. LIBERAL AND PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 97. OTHER.UNSPECIFIED 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN REF.049 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0051 PAST PROV PTY ID-TWO MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0051 LOC 84 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 26-27 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO REF 050 -------------------------- 1 24 - (CONTINUED) - 00. INAP.,CODED 0,98 OR 99 IN REF.050 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0052 EVER CLOSER PROV PTY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0052 LOC 86 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 28 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.VII.4(D) OR ITS EQUIVALENT WAS NO, DK, OR NA... Q.VII.4 (F) WELL, WAS THERE EVER A TIME WHEN YOU FELT CLOSER TO ANY OTHER PARTY? ------------------------------------------------------ 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 1 IN REF.049 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0053 PTY CLOSER TO IN PAST-1 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0053 LOC 87 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 29-30 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.VII.4(F) OR ITS EQUIVALENT WAS YES.. Q.VII.4 (G) WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? (ANY OTHERS?) FIRST RESPONSE -------------------------------------------------------- 01. LIBERAL 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP OR CCF 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 08. FASCIST,RIGHT WING IDEOLOGY 13. WESTERN SEPARATIST 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN REF.052 0 1 25 - 0 VAR 0054 PTY CLOSER TO IN PAST-2 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0054 LOC 89 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 31-32 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO REF 053 -------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN REF.053 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE IN REF.053 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0055 WHEN CHANGED PROV PTY-1 MD=0 OR GE 97 REF 0055 LOC 91 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 33-34 0 ...IF PARTY RESPONSE GIVEN IN Q.VII.1 OR IN Q.V11.4(C) OR ITS EQUIVALENT... Q.VII.7 (A) WHEN DID YOU BEGIN TO THINK OF YOURSELF AS (PARTY MENTIONED IN Q.VII.1)? FIRST RESPONSE ------------------------------------------------------ 05. 1905 . . . . 79. 1979 80. ALL MY LIFE,AS LONG AS I CAN REMEMBER 81. CHILDHOOD,BEFORE ADOLESCENCE 82. TEENAGE,ADOLESCENCE 83. EARLY ADULTHOOD,WHEN FIRST ELIGIBLE TO VOTE 84. MOST OF MY LIFE 97. UNCLASSIFIABLE 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,RESPONDENT HAS NEVER DEVELOPED A PARTY IDENTIFICATION OR EVER FELT CLOSE TO A PARTY 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0056 WHEN CHANGED PROV PTY-2 MD=0 OR GE 97 REF 0056 LOC 93 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 35-36 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO REF 055 -------------------------- 1 26 - (CONTINUED) - 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN REF.055 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE IN REF.055 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0057 WHY CHANGED PROV PTY-1 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0057 LOC 95 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 37-38 0 ...IF PARTY RESPONSE GIVEN IN Q.VII.1 OR IN Q.VII.4(C) OR ITS EQUIVALENT... Q.VII.7 (B) WHAT WAS THE MAIN THING THAT MADE YOU BECOME A (PARTY MENTIONED IN Q.VII.1)? FIRST RESPONSE -------------------------------------------------------- 01. IMMIGRATION 02. LABOUR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS 03. NATIONAL UNITY 04. BILINGUALISM 05. PROVINCIAL RIGHTS FEDERAL-PROVINCIAL RELATIONS 06. AMERICAN CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC INFLUENCE 07. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT 08. WELFARE 09. HOUSING, MORTGAGES 10. MEDICAL CARE, HOSPITALS 11. DRUGS, ALCOHOL 12. TRANSPORTATION 13. COMMUNICATION, BROADCASTING 14. FISHERIES 15. AGRICULTURE 16. CLIMATE FOR INVESTMENT IN B.C., CANADA 17. GUN CONTROL 18. RCMP, POLICE POWERS 19. FREE BCRIC SHARES 20. ABORTION 21. INFLATION, COST OF LIVING 22. UNEMPLOYMENT 23. ENERGY 24. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES 25. TAXES, SIZE OF GOVERNMENT 26. FOREIGN TRADE, TARIFFS 27. EDUCATION 28. OLD AGE, PENSIONS 29. NATIVE RIGHTS, LAND CLAIMS 1 27 - (CONTINUED) - 30. CIVIL LIBERTIES 31. RELIGION 32. COURTS, PRISONS, PUNISHMENT 33. WOMEN'S RIGHTS 34. CONSUMER ISSUES 35. GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP 36. MILITARY CONSCRIPTION 37. FOREIGN POLICY 38. FAMILY ALLOWANCE 39. SPECIFIC ISSUE MENTIONS OTHER THAN 1-38 40. FREE ENTERPRISE 41. CONSERVATISM, RIGHT WING, RIGHT 42. LIBERALISM 43. SOCIALISM, LEFT WING, LEFT 44. ANARCHISM 45. RELIGIOUS PRINCIPLES 49. OTHER IDEOLOGICAL 50. GOVERNMENT MANAGEMENT 51. GOVERNMENT MISMANAGEMENT 52. HONESTY, CLEAN GOVERNMENT 53. DISHONESTY, CORRUPTION, BRIBES, INFLUENCE PEDDLING. 54. DEPRESSION, BAD ECONOMIC CONDITIONS 60. CONSISTENCY OVER TIME, KEEPS PROMISES 61. INCONSISTENCY OVER TIME, DOESN'T KEEP PROMISES 62. CREDIBILITY POSITIVE, TELLS THE TRUTH 63. CREDIBILITY NEGATIVE, DOES NOT TELL THE TRUTH 70. LEADER REFERENCE, POSITIVE 71. LEADER REFERENCE, NEGATIVE 72. LEADER REFERENCE, BOTH POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE 73. CANDIDATE REFERENCE, POSITIVE 74. CANDIDATE REFERENCE, NEGATIVE 75. CANDIDATE REFERENCE, BOTH POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE 76. PARTY REFERENCE, POSITIVE 77. PARTY REFERENCE, NEGATIVE 78. PARTY REFERENCE, BOTH POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE 79. REFERENCE TO ABSENCE OR WEAKNESS OF PREFERRED PARTY 80. PARENTS, SIBLINGS, OTHERS IN ORIGIN FAMILY POSITIVE 81. PARENTS, SIBLINGS, OTHERS IN ORIGIN FAMILY NEGATIVE 82. ACQUAINTANCES AND FRIENDS POSITIVE 83. ACQUAINTANCES AND FRIENDS NEGATIVE 84. CO-WORKERS POSITIVE 85. CO-WORKERS NEGATIVE 86. SPOUSE, IN-LAWS POSITIVE 87. SPOUSE, IN-LAWS NEGATIVE 88. OTHER SOCIAL INFLUENCES -- POSITIVE 89. OTHER SOCIAL INFLUENCES -- NEGATIVE 1 28 - (CONTINUED) - 90. POSITIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS AT OTHER LEVEL IN FEDERAL SYSTEM 91. NEGATIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS AT OTHER LEVEL 92. POSITIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS IN OTHER PROVINCE 93. NEGATIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS IN OTHER PROVINCE 94. POSITIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS IN OTHER COUNTRY 95. NEGATIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS IN OTHER COUNTRY 97. OTHER, UNSPECIFIED 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN REF.055 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0058 WHY CHANGED PROV PTY-2 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0058 LOC 97 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 39-40 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO REF 057 -------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN REF.057 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE IN REF.057 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0059 WHY CHANGED PROV PTY-3 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0059 LOC 99 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 41-42 0 THIRD RESPONSE TO REF 057 ------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN REF.057 OR NO THIRD RESPONSE IN REF.057 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0060 GREW UP IN CANADA? MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0060 LOC 101 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 43 0 Q.VII.9 (A) ASK EVERYONE WHILE YOU WERE GROWING UP DID YOUR PARENTS LIVE IN CANADA? -------------------------------------------------- 1 29 - (CONTINUED) - 1. YES 2. NO 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0061 FATHER HAD PROV ID? MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0061 LOC 102 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 44 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.VII.9(A) WAS YES... Q.VII.9 (B) WHEN YOU WERE GROWING UP, DID YOUR FATHER HAVE ANY PARTICULAR PREFERENCE FOR ONE OF THE PROVINCIAL POLITICAL PARTIES HERE IN CANADA? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.VII.9(A) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0062 FATHERS PROV ID MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0062 LOC 103 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 45-46 0 Q.VII.9 (C) (IF YES TO Q.VII.9 (B)) WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? --------------------------------------------------- 01. LIBERAL 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP OR CCF 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 30. LIBERAL AND PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 33. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE AND SOCIAL CREDIT 50. FREE ENTERPRISE 90. CHANGED A LOT; SOMETIMES ONE, SOMETIMES ANOTHER 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.VII.9(B) 0 1 30 - 0 VAR 0063 MOTHER HAD PROV ID? MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0063 LOC 105 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 47 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.VII.9(A) WAS YES... Q.VII.10 (A) WHEN YOU WERE GROWING UP, DID YOUR MOTHER HAVE ANY PARTICULAR PREFERENCE FOR ONE OF THE PROVINCIAL POLITICAL PARTIES HERE IN CANADA? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.VIII.9(A) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0064 MOTHERS PROV ID MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0064 LOC 106 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 48-49 0 Q.VII.10 (B) (IF YES TO Q.VII.10 (A)) WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? ----------------------------------------------------- 01. LIBERAL 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP OR CCF 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 30. LIBERAL AND PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 33. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE AND SOCIAL CREDIT 50. FREE ENTERPRISE 90. CHANGED A LOT; SOMETIMES ONE, SOMETIMES ANOTHER 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.VIII.10(A) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0065 PARENTS DISCUSS POLITICS MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0065 LOC 108 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 50 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.VII.9(A) WAS YES... Q.VII.11 (A) WHEN YOU WERE GROWING UP, WERE PROVINCIAL POLITICS DISCUSSED IN YOUR HOME? (READ LIST) ------------------------------------------------------ 1 31 - (CONTINUED) - 1. A LOT 2. SOMEWHAT 3. NOT AT ALL 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.VIII.9(A) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0066 PARENT TRY CONVINCE R MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0066 LOC 109 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 51 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.VII.11(A) CODED 1 OR 2... Q.VII.11 (B) IN THESE DISCUSSIONS, DID YOUR PARENTS TRY TO PERSUADE YOU TO SUPPORT A PARTY? ------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0,3,8 OR 9 IN Q.VIII.11(A) 0 - 0 SECTION IX.A CURRENT FEDERAL ELECTION ------------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0067 ELIGIBLE FEDERAL 1979 MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0067 LOC 110 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 52 0 0 NOW I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU A FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT FEDERAL ELECTIONS. Q.IX.A.1 COULD YOU TELL ME WHETHER YOU WERE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN THE FEDERAL ELECTION IN MAY, THAT IS, WHETHER YOU WERE A CANADIAN CITIZEN AND 18 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER? ------------------------------------------------------- 1 32 - (CONTINUED) - 1. YES, ELIGIBLE 2. NO, NOT ELIGIBLE 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0068 VOTED FEDERAL 1979 MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0068 LOC 111 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 53 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.IX.A.1 WAS YES... Q.IX.A.2 IN THE FEDERAL ELECTION WHICH WAS HELD ON MAY 22 OF THIS YEAR, QUITE A FEW PEOPLE WERE UNABLE TO VOTE FOR VARIOUS REASONS. DID YOU VOTE THIS TIME, OR DID SOMETHING HAPPEN TO KEEP YOU FROM VOTING? ------------------------------------------------------- 1. VOTED 2. DID NOT VOTE 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.IX.A.1 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0069 FEDERAL VOTE 1979 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0069 LOC 112 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 54-55 0 Q.IX.A.3 (IF VOTED) FOR WHICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE? ------------------------------------------------- 01. LIBERAL 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 06. COMMUNIST 07. MARXIST-LENINIST 08. RHINOCEROS 10. SPOILED BALLOT 20. INDEPENDENT 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.IX.A.2 0 1 33 - 0 VAR 0070 WHY NOT VOTE FEDERAL MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0070 LOC 114 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 56-57 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.IX.A.2 WAS CODED 2... Q.IX.A.4 (IF DID NOT VOTE) WAS THERE ANY PARTICULAR REASON WHY YOU DID NOT VOTE IN THE MAY 22 FEDERAL ELECTION? --------------------------------------------------- 01. NOT REGISTERED 02. ILL 03. OUT OF TOWN 04. TOO BUSY 05. NO INTEREST 06. NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION, DID NOT KNOW ENOUGH 07. RELIGIOUS REASONS 08. DON'T LIKE PARTIES OR CANDIDATES 09. TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM; UNABLE TO GET THERE 10. NOT ON LIST IN CURRENT RIDING 11. UNAWARE OF, UNABLE TO FIND WHERE TO VOTE 12. TOO MUCH CONFLICT BETWEEN PARTIES 13. RESPONDENT FELT CONFLICTING FEELINGS 14. WASTED VOTE, LOPSIDED CONTEST 50. UNAWARE OF ELIGIBILITY 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.IX.A.1 OR 0,1,8 OR 9 IN Q.IX.A.2 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0071 FED PREF 79 NON-VOTERS MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0071 LOC 116 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 58-59 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.IX.A.2 WAS CODED 2 OR Q.IX.A.1 CODED 2,8 OR 9 Q.IX.A.5 (IF DID NOT VOTE) IF YOU HAD BEEN ABLE TO VOTE, WHO WOULD YOU HAVE VOTED FOR? -------------------------------------------------------- 01. LIBERALS 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 07. MARXIST-LENINIST 98. DK 99. NA 1 34 - (CONTINUED) - 00. INAP.,CODED 0,1,8 OR 9 IN Q.IX.A.2 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0072 DISCUSS FED ELECT HSHLD MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0072 LOC 118 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 60-61 0 Q.IX.A.6 DID YOU AND YOUR (WIFE/HUSBAND/PARENTS/ ROOMMATES) DISCUSS THE ELECTION AND HOW TO VOTE? ------------------------------------------------ 01. YES, DISCUSSED IT 02. NO, DID NOT 03. YES,DISCUSSED IT BUT NOT HOW TO VOTE 05. NO, LIVED ALONE 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 1 IN REF.511;ONLY ONE PERSON 16 OR OVER IN HOUSEHOLD;OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.IX.A.1. 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0073 FED VOTE HSHLD-ONE MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0073 LOC 120 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 62-63 0 Q.IX.A.7 HOW DID YOUR (WIFE/HUSBAND/PARENTS/ROOMMATES) VOTE? (FIRST RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------ 01. LIBERAL 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 20. INDEPENDENT 81. DID NOT VOTE 82. NOT ON VOTERS' LIST 83. NOT ELIGIBLE 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODE 1 IN REF.511,ONLY ONE PERSON 16 OR OVER IN HOUSEHOLD;OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.IX.A.1. 0 1 35 - 0 VAR 0074 FED VOTE HSHLD-TWO MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0074 LOC 122 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 64-65 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.IX.A.7 --------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN REF.073 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.IX.A.7 0 - 0 SECTION IX.B.PREVIOUS FEDERAL ELECTION -------------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0075 ELIGIBLE FEDERAL 1974 MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0075 LOC 124 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 66 0 Q.IX.B.1 THE PREVIOUS FEDERAL ELECTION WAS IN JULY 1974. WERE YOU ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN THAT ELECTION, THAT IS, WERE YOU A CANADIAN CITIZEN AND 18 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES, ELIGIBLE 2. NO, NOT ELIGIBLE 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.IXA.1. 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0076 VOTED FEDERAL 1974 MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0076 LOC 125 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 67 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.IX.B.1 WAS YES... Q.IX.B.2 DO YOU REMEMBER FOR SURE WHETHER OR NOT YOU VOTED IN THAT ELECTION? ---------------------------------------------------- 1 36 - (CONTINUED) - 1. VOTED 2. DID NOT VOTE 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.IX.B.1 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0077 FEDERAL VOTE 1974 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0077 LOC 126 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 68-69 0 Q.IX.B.3 (IF VOTED) WHICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE FOR THEN? ------------------------------------------------------ 01. LIBERAL 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 07. MARXIST-LENINIST 10. SPOILED BALLOT 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.IX.B.2 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0078 WHY CHANGED 74-79 ONE MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0078 LOC 128 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 70-71 0 Q.IX.B.4 (IF VOTE CHANGED FROM 1974 TO 1979) I NOTICE THAT YOU CHANGED YOUR VOTE FROM THAT ELECTION TO THIS ONE. WAS THERE ANY SPECIAL REASON FOR CHANGING THE PARTY YOU VOTED FOR? (ANY OTHER REASONS?) (FIRST RESPONSE) ----------------------------------------------------- 01. POOR PERFORMANCE OF LIBERAL GOVERNMENT 02. LIKED LEADER 03. DISLIKED LEADER 04. LIKED CANDIDATE 05. DISLIKED CANDIDATE 06. LIKED PARTY - GENERAL REFERENCE 07. DISLIKED PARTY - GENERAL REFERENCE 08. LIKED PARTY - POLICY REASONS 09. DISLIKED PARTY - POLICY REASONS 10. PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CANDIDATE, DID NOT RUN 1 37 - (CONTINUED) - 11. TIME FOR A CHANGE 12. LIKED ONE OR MORE CABINET MINISTERS 13. DISLIKED ONE OR MORE CABINET MINISTERS 14. VOTE FOR THE MAN 18. PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE, VOTED FOR SECOND CHOICE OR VOTED FOR OTHER THAN PREFERRED PARTY TO KEEP ANOTHER PARTY OUT 19. PROTEST AGAINST MAJOR PARTIES 20. REFERENCE TO FAMILY 21. RESPONDENTS' OWN ATTITUDES, FEELINGS CHANGED 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0,98 OR 99 IN Q.IX.B.3 OR 0,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.IX.B.2 OR DID NOT CHANGE VOTE BETWEEN 1974-1979 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0079 WHY CHANGED 74-79 TWO MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0079 LOC 130 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 72-73 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.IX.B.4 --------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0,98 OR 99 IN REF.078 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE IN REF.078 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0080 WHY CHANGED 74-79 THREE MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0080 LOC 132 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 74-75 0 THIRD RESPONSE TO Q.IX.B.4 -------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0,98 OR 99 IN REF.078 OR NO THIRD RESPONSE IN REF.078 0 - 0 SECOND WAVE SECTION 0 1 38 - (CONTINUED) - REFERENCE NO'S 080 TO 107 ARE BASED ON TELEPHONE INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED FOLLOWING THE FEBRUARY 1980 FEDERAL ELECTION. SEE REF.007 TO 013 FOR FILTERING INFORMATION. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0081 VOTED FED 1980? MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0081 LOC 134 WIDTH 1 DK 2 COL 76 0 Q.1 IN THE FEBRUARY 18TH ELECTION,WE HAVE FOUND THAT A NUMBER OF PEOPLE WERE UNABLE TO VOTE FOR VARIOUS REASONS. DID YOU VOTE THIS TIME,OR DID SOMETHING HAPPEN TO KEEP YOU FROM VOTING? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. VOTED 2. DID NOT VOTE 8. DK 9. NA/REFUSED 0. INAP.,NO SECOND WAVE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0082 WHY NOT VOTE 1980-1 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0082 LOC 135 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 77-78 0 Q.2 (IF DID NOT VOTE) WAS THERE ANY PARTICULAR REASON WHY YOU DID NOT VOTE IN THE FEBRUARY 18TH ELECTION? (FIRST RESPONSE) ----------------------------------------------------- 01. NOT ELIGIBLE TO VOTE 02. NOT ON VOTERS' LIST 03. CONFUSED BY ENUMERATION PROCEDURES 04. ILL 05. OUT OF TOWN 06. TOO BUSY 07. NO INTEREST 08. DID NOT LIKE PARTIES OR CANDIDATES 09. NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION,DID NOT KNOW ENOUGH 10. RELIGIOUS REASONS 11. "JUST DID NOT GET THERE" 12. CAMPAIGN TURNED ME OFF 13. MY VOTE WOULD NOT HAVE COUNTED ANYWAY 14. COULD NOT DECIDE WHO TO VOTE FOR;COULD NOT MAKE UP MIND 1 39 - (CONTINUED) - 15. NOT A TAXPAYER 16. ABSENCE OR WEAKNESS OF PREFERRED PARTY OR CANDIDATE 98. DK 99. NA/REFUSED 00. INAP.,CODED 0,1,8 OR 9 IN Q.1 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0083 WHY NOT VOTE 1980-2 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0083 LOC 137 WIDTH 2 DK 2 COL 79-80 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.2 ---------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN REF.082 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE 0 DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '03' DK 3 COL 1- 2 ---------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0813 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0813 LOC 1672 WIDTH 4 DK 3 COL 3- 6 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0814 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0814 LOC 1676 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 7 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0815 ICPSR PART NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0815 LOC 1677 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 8 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0001 RESPONDENT ID NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 6 DK 3 COL 9-14 0 1 40 - 0 VAR 0084 WHY NOT VOTE 1980-3 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0084 LOC 139 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 15-16 0 THIRD RESPONSE TO Q.2 --------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN REF.082 OR NO THIRD RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0085 FEDERAL VOTE 1980 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0085 LOC 141 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 17-18 0 Q.3 (IF VOTED) FOR WHICH PARTY DID YOU VOTE? -------------------------------------------- 01. LIBERALS 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 06. COMMUNIST(GENERAL) 07. COMMUNIST(MARXIST-LENINIST) 08. RHINOCEROS 10. SPOILED BALLOT 20. INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE 98. DK 99. NA/REFUSED 00. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.1 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0086 RTE TO RESIDUAL MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0086 LOC 143 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 19 0 ROUTE TO RESIDUAL RESPONSES --------------------------- 1. BASIC Q.4 2. PROBE Q.4 4. BOTH BASIC Q.4 AND PROBE Q.4 5. TRANSFER FROM Q.7 1 41 - (CONTINUED) - 6. ONLY APPLICABLE FROM 4(A) TRANSFER FROM SPECIFIC PROBE ABOUT LEADERS OR ISSUES 0. INAP.,CODED 0 IN Q.1;OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.1 OR 98 OR 99 IN Q.3 AND NO TRANSFERS FROM Q.7;OR NO MENTIONS OTHER THAN LEADERS OR ISSUES. 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0087 REASON FOR VOTE-1 MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0087 LOC 144 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 20-21 0 Q.4(A) WHY DID YOU VOTE FOR (PARTY GIVEN IN Q.3)? WERE THERE ANY OTHER REASONS? (RESPONSES NOT RELATING TO PARTY LEADERS OR POLITICAL ISSUES) FIRST RESPONSE ------------------------------------------------------ 01. VOTED FOR PARTY NOT CANDIDATE (OR LEADER) 02. STRATEGIC-VOTED FOR CANDIDATE MOST LIKELY TO DEFEAT GOVT/DEFEAT TRUDEAU 03. TO COUNTERBALANCE LIBERAL POWER IN EAST 04. GIVE CHANGE A CHANCE 05. LIKED LIBERAL CANDIDATE 06. LIKED PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE 07. LIKED NDP CANDIDATE 08. DISLIKED LIBERAL CANDIDATE 09. DISLIKED PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE 10. DISLIKED NDP CANDIDATE 11. LIKED LIBERAL PARTY/PREFERRED LIBERALS 12. LIKED PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE PARTY/PREFERRED CONSERVATIVES 13. LIKED NDP/PREFERRED NDP 14. DISLIKED LIBERAL PARTY 15. DISLIKED CONSERVATIVE PARTY 16. DISLIKED NDP PARTY 17. DISLIKED LOCAL CANDIDATE(NO PARTY MENTIONED) 18. LIKED LOCAL CANDIDATE (NO PARTY MENTIONED) 19. GAVE US GOOD GOVERNMENT IN PAST 20. WANTED TO GET PCS OUT 21. THOUGHT IT WOULD BE MINORITY GOVT AND WANTED NDP AS OPPOSITION 23. UNNECESSARY TO HAVE THIS ELECTION 24. GOOD IDEA TO HAVE THIS ELECTION 25. LACK OF ISSUES/UNCLEAR POLICY POSITIONS 1 42 - (CONTINUED) - 26. ALWAYS VOTED THIS WAY/SAW NO REASON TO CHANGE 27. FOR THE LITTLE MAN/THE COMMON PEOPLE 28. FOR BIG BUSINESS 29. AGAINST BIG BUSINESS 30. FOR UNIONS,LABOUR,WORKING PEOPLE 31. AGAINST UNIONS,LABOUR,WORKING PEOPLE 32. FOR MINORITIES 33. AGAINST MINORITIES 34. FOR THE WEST/B.C. 35. NOT FOR (OR AGAINST) THE WEST/B.C. 36. FOR FRENCH CANADIANS 37. AGAINST FRENCH CANADIANS 38. FOR ONTARIO 39. AGAINST ONTARIO 40. FREE ENTERPRISE 41. CONSERVATISM,RIGHT WING,RIGHT 42. LIBERALISM 43. SOCIALISM,LEFT WING,LEFT 44. ANARCHISM 45. RELIGIOUS PRINCIPLES 46. WANTS MAJORITY GOVERNMENT 47. WANTS MINORITY GOVERNMENT(NOT CODE 21) 49. OTHER IDEOLOGICAL 50. GOVERNMENT MANAGEMENT 51. GOVERNMENT MISMANAGEMENT 52. HONESTY,CLEAN GOVERNMENT 53. DISHONESTY,CORRUPTION,BRIBES,INFLUENCE PEDDLING 54. DEPRESSION,BAD ECONOMIC CONDITIONS 55. LIBERALS LACK OF CREDIBILITY 56. PC'S LACK OF CREDIBILITY 57. NDP'S LACK OF CREDIBILITY 58. LIKED/PREFERRED A MINOR PARTY(NOT NDP) 59. DISLIKED A MINOR PARTY(NOT NDP) 60. FOR THE WHOLE COUNTRY,NOT JUST A PART 61. GOOD FOR LOCAL AREA 62. BAD FOR LOCAL AREA 63. GOOD FOR ME 64. BAD FOR ME 68. MISC. GROUP REF.-POSITIVE 69. MISC. GROUP REF.-NEGATIVE 79. REFERENCE TO ABSENCE OR WEAKNESS OF PREFERRED PARTY OR ACCEPTABLE PARTY 80. PARENTS,SIBLINGS,OTHERS IN ORIGIN FAMILY- POSITIVE 81. PARENTS,SIBLINGS,OTHERS IN ORIGIN FAMILY- NEGATIVE 82. ACQUAINTANCES AND FRIENDS-POSITIVE 83. ACQUAINTANCES AND FRIENDS-NEGATIVE 84. C0-WORKERS POSITIVE 85. C0-WORKERS NEGATIVE 1 43 - (CONTINUED) - 86. SPOUSE,IN-LAWS POSITIVE 87. SPOUSE,IN-LAWS NEGATIVE 88. OTHER SOCIAL INFLUENCES-POSITIVE 89. OTHER SOCIAL INFLUENCES-NEGATIVE 90. POSITIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS AT OTHER LEVEL IN FEDERAL SYSTEM 91. NEGATIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS AT OTHER LEVEL 92. POSITIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS IN OTHER PROVINCE 93. NEGATIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS IN OTHER PROVINCE 94. POSITIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS IN OTHER COUNTRY 95. NEGATIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS IN OTHER COUNTRY 96. NO RESIDUAL REASONS 97. OTHER,UNSPECIFIED 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0 OR 9 IN REF.086 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0088 REASON FOR VOTE-2 MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0088 LOC 146 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 22-23 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO REF.087 -------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN REF.087 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0089 REASON FOR VOTE-3 MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0089 LOC 148 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 24-25 0 THIRD RESPONSE TO REF.087 ------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN REF.087 OR NO THIRD RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0090 REASON FOR VOTE-4 MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0090 LOC 150 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 26-27 0 FOURTH RESPONSE TO REF.087 -------------------------- 1 44 - (CONTINUED) - 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN REF.087 OR NO FOURTH RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0091 REASON FOR VOTE-5 MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0091 LOC 152 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 28-29 0 FIFTH RESPONSE TO REF.087 ------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN REF.087 OR NO FIFTH RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0092 RTE TO PTY LEADER MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0092 LOC 154 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 30 0 ROUTE TO PARTY LEADER RESPONSES ------------------------------- 1. BASIC Q.4 2. PROBE Q.4 3. SPECIFIC PROBE 4. BOTH BASIC Q.4 AND PROBE Q.4 5. TRANSFER FROM Q.7 O. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.1 OR 98 OR 99 IN Q.3 AND NO TRANSFERS FROM Q.7;OR NO LEADER MENTIONS 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0093 REASON PTY LEADER-1 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0093 LOC 155 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 31-32 0 RESPONSES TO Q.4(A) RELATING TO MAJOR PARTY LEADERS- CLARK,TRUDEAU OR BROADBENT. IF LEADERS NOT MENTIONED ASK: DID YOUR FEELINGS ABOUT SPECIFIC PARTY LEADERS HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH YOUR DECISION ABOUT HOW TO VOTE?(IF YES) HOW WAS YOUR VOTE AFFECTED? -------------------------------------------------------- 1 45 - (CONTINUED) - 01. CLARK-COMPETENCE 02. CLARK-LACK OF COMPETENCE/INEXPERIENCE 03. TRUDEAU-COMPETENCE 04. TRUDEAU-LACK OF COMPETENCE 05. BROADBENT-COMPETENCE 06. BROADBENT-LACK OF COMPETENCE 07. CLARK-CREDIBLE 08. CLARK-LACK OF CREDIBILITY 09. TRUDEAU-CREDIBLE 10. TRUDEAU-LACK OF CREDIBILITY 11. BROADBENT-CREDIBLE 12. BROADBENT-LACK OF CREDIBILITY 13. CLARK-GENERAL POSITIVE COMMENTS 14. CLARK-GENERAL NEGATIVE COMMENTS 15. TRUDEAU-GENERAL POSITIVE 16. TRUDEAU-GENERAL NEGATIVE 17. BROADBENT-GENERAL POSITIVE 18. BROADBENT-GENERAL NEGATIVE 19. CLARK-ATTRACTIVE,PLEASANT,DECENT 20. CLARK-UNATTRACTIVE,AWKWARD,SILLY 21. TRUDEAU-ATTRACTIVE,PLEASANT,DECENT 22. TRUDEAU-UNATTRACTIVE,ARROGANT,SLIPPERY,IMMORAL 23. BROADBENT-ATTRACTIVE,PLEASANT,DECENT 24. BROADBENT-UNATTRACTIVE,ETC. 25. CLARK-GROUP REFERENCE POSITIVE 26. CLARK-GROUP REFERENCE NEGATIVE 27. TRUDEAU-GROUP REFERENCE POSITIVE 28. TRUDEAU-GROUP REFERENCE NEGATIVE 29. BROADBENT-GROUP REFERENCE POSITIVE 30. BROADBENT-GROUP REFERENCE NEGATIVE 31. CLARK-GOOD LEADER 32. CLARK-BAD LEADER 33. TRUDEAU-GOOD LEADER 34. TRUDEAU-BAD LEADER 35. BROADBENT-GOOD LEADER 36. BROADBENT-BAD LEADER 37. CLARK-INTELLIGENT 38. CLARK-DUMB 39. TRUDEAU-INTELLIGENT 40. TRUDEAU-DUMB 41. BROADBENT-INTELLIGENT 42. BROADBENT-DUMB 95. NON-LEADER RELATED RESPONSES 96. OTHER/UNSPECIFIED 97. NO,DEFINITELY NOT 1 46 - (CONTINUED) - 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 9 IN REF.092 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0094 REASON PTY LEADER-2 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0094 LOC 157 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 33-34 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.4(B) ------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN REF.093 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0095 REASON PTY LEADER-3 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0095 LOC 159 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 35-36 0 THIRD RESPONSE TO Q.4(B) ------------------------ 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN REF.093 OR NO THIRD RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0096 RTE TO ISSUE VOTE MD=0 OR GE 9 REF 0096 LOC 161 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 37 0 ROUTE TO ISSUE VOTE RESPONSE ---------------------------- 1. BASIC Q.4 2. PROBE Q.4 3. SPECIFIC PROBE 4. BOTH BASIC Q.4 AND PROBE Q.4 5. TRANSFER FROM Q.7 0. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.1 OR 98 OR 99 ON Q.3 AND NO TRANSFERS FROM Q.7;OR NO ISSUE RESPONSE 0 1 47 - 0 VAR 0097 ISSUE RSNS VOTE-1 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0097 LOC 162 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 38-39 0 RESPONSES TO Q.4(A) RELATING TO POLITICAL ISSUES.(IF NO ISSUE MENTIONS ASK:)WERE ANY OF THE POLITICAL ISSUES ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT TO YOU IN DECIDING HOW TO VOTE? (IF YES) WHICH ONES?) -------------------------------------------------------- 01. IMMIGRATION 02. LABOUR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS 03. NATIONAL UNITY 04. BILINGUALISM 05. PROVINCIAL RIGHTS,FEDERAL-PROVINCIAL RELATIONS 06. AMERICAN CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC INFLUENCE 07. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT 08. WELFARE 09. HOUSING,MORTAGES 10. MEDICAL CARE,HOSPITALS 11. DRUGS,ALCOHOL 12. TRANSPORTATION 13. COMMUNICATION,BROADCASTING 14. FISHERIES 15. AGRICULTURE 16. CLIMATE FOR INVESTMENT IN B.C.,CANADA 17. GUN CONTROL 18. RCMP,POLICE POWERS 19. FREE BCRIC SHARES 20. ABORTION 21. INFLATION,COST OF LIVING 22. UNEMPLOYMENT 23. ENERGY 24. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES 25. TAXES,SIZE OF GOVERNMENT 26. FOREIGN TRADE 27. EDUCATION 28. OLD AGE,PENSIONS 29. NATIVE RIGHTS,LAND CLAIMS 30. CIVIL LIBERTIES 31. RELIGION 32. COURTS,PRISON,PUNISHMENT 33. WOMEN'S RIGHTS 34. CONSUMER ISSUES 35. GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP 1 48 - (CONTINUED) - 36. MILITARY CONSCRIPTION 37. FOREIGN POLICY(OVERSEAS,DOES NOT INCLUDE AMERICA 38. FAMILY ALLOWANCE 39. DEFICIT FINANCING 40. INSURANCE,ICBC 41. FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN CANADA(OWNED BY OTHER COUNTRIES) 42. MORALITY,MORAL ISSUES 43. HUMAN RIGHTS,EQUAL RIGHTS,GAY RIGHTS,ETC. 44. CULTURAL POLICY,ARTS POLICY,CANADIAN CONTENT 45. POWER OF LARGE CORPORATIONS,BIG BUSINESS 46. MILITARY OR DEFENCE ISSUES,ARMS RACE 47. REFERENCE TO FUNDAMENTAL SOCIAL,ECONOMIC CHANGE 49. METRIC SYSTEM 50. NUCLEAR ENERGY,NUCLEAR POLICY 51. INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY,KEEPING JOBS IN CANADA 52. INTEREST RATES 53. TAX LOOPHOLES,TAX CONCESSIONS,DEDUCTIONS:FOR BUSINESS 54. REFORM OF ELECTORAL PROCEDURES,ELECTORAL SYSTEM 60. BUDGET-POSITIVE OR FAVOURABLE REFERENCES 61. BUDGET-NEGATIVE REFERENCES(E.G. DID NOT LIKE,BAD FOR COUNTRY) 62. BUDGET-QUALIFIED RESPONSES(E.G. OK IN PRINCIPLE, BUT INTRODUCED TOO MUCH TOO FAST) 63. SOUND ECONOMIC POLICIES/FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY 64. PRICE OF GASOLINE/EXCISE TAX ON GAS,ETC. 65. GENERAL ECONOMIC CONCERNS,CRISIS 66. GENERAL SOCIAL POLICY,CONCERNS 70. PETRO CANADA-POSITIVE REFERENCES 71. PETRO CANADA-NEGATIVE REFERENCES 72. OLYMPIC BOYCOTT-AGREE/POSITIVE 73. OLYMPIC BOYCOTT-DISAGREE/NEGATIVE 74. JERUSALEM/MOVE EMBASSY IN ISRAEL 75. PUBLIC OPINION POLLS-POSITIVE 76. PUBLIC OPINION POLLS-NEGATIVE/SHOULD BE BANNED 77. GENERAL ATTITUDE TO THE WEST 78. GIVE CHANGE A FAIR CHANCE 79. IRAN 80. AFGHANISTAN 81. ESCAPE OF SIX AMERICANS FROM IRAN 82. LACK OF ISSUES IN CAMPAIGN/UNCLEAR POLICIES 90. MISCELLANEOUS LOCAL ISSUES 95. NON ISSUE RELATED RESPONSES 96. OTHER SPECIFIC ISSUES 97. NO/NOTHING 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 9 IN REF.096 0 1 49 - 0 VAR 0098 ISSUE RSNS VOTE-2 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0098 LOC 164 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 40-41 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.4(C) ------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 00 IN REF.097 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE IN Q.4(C) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0099 ISSUE RSNS VOTE-3 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0099 LOC 166 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 42-43 0 THIRD RESPONSE TO Q.4(C) ------------------------ 00. INAP.,CODED 00 IN REF.097 OR NO THIRD RESPONSE IN Q.4(C) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0100 PARTY PREFERENCE MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0100 LOC 168 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 44 0 Q.5. BEFORE THE CAMPAIGN IN DECEMBER,DID YOU HAVE A DEFINITE PREFERENCE FOR ONE OF THE POLITICAL PARTIES? ----------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA/REFUSED 0. INAP.,CODED 0 IN Q.1 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0101 PARTY PREFERRED MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0101 LOC 169 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 45-46 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.5 WAS YES... Q.6. WHICH PARTY? -------------------------------- 1 50 - (CONTINUED) - 01. LIBERALS 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVES 03. NDP 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 06. COMMUNIST(GENERAL) 07. COMMUNIST(MARXIST-LENINIST) 08. RHINOCEROS 20. INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN Q.5 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0102 CAMPAIGN EFFECTS-1 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0102 LOC 171 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 47-48 0 Q.7. HOW DID THE CAMPAIGN AFFECT YOUR DECISION? ----------------------------------------------- 01. NOT AT ALL/NONE/NO EFFECT 02. VERY LITTLE EFFECT/NEGLIGIBLE/NOT MUCH 03. SOME EFFECT 04. IMPORTANT/DECISIVE/CRUCIAL 05. STRENGTHENED EXISTING PREFERENCE/"SOLIDIFIED" FEELINGS/REINFORCED MY POINT OF VIEW 06. WEAKENED EXISTING PREFERENCES BUT NOT ENOUGH TO CHANGE MY VOTE 07. VASCILLATED/CHANGED BACK AND FORTH 08. CHANGED MY MIND/VOTE;CONVINCED ME TO CHANGE 09. CAMPAIGN (ALMOST) KEPT ME FROM VOTING AT ALL 10. FROM CAMPAIGN I COULD TELL MY VOTE WOULD NOT MATTER 11. I NEVER TRUST CAMPAIGN PROMISES;WARY OF CAMPAIGN 12. CAMPAIGNS ARE A WASTE OF MONEY/TIME;TOO LONG 13. THIS CAMPAIGN WAS UNNECESSARY 14. PROVIDED SOME INFORMATION 15. DID NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH INFORMATION 16. RADIO/TV/NEWSPAPER ADS WERE DISGUSTING(GENERAL) 17. LIBERAL ADS-POSITIVE 18. LIBERAL ADS-NEGATIVE 19. CONSERVATIVE ADS-POSITIVE 20. CONSERVATIVE ADS-NEGATIVE 21. NDP ADS-POSITIVE 22. NDP ADS-NEGATIVE 23. GENERAL REFERENCES TO ISSUES/POLICIES 24. REFERENCES TO ANY SPECIFIC ISSUES (CODED UNDER 1 51 - (CONTINUED) - Q.4(C),REF.097) 25. LIKED LIBERAL CAMPAIGN 26. DISLIKED LIBERAL CAMPAIGN 27. LIKED CONSERVATIVE CAMPAIGN 28. DISLIKED CONSERVATIVE CAMPAIGN 29. LIKED NDP CAMPAIGN 30. DISLIKED NDP CAMPAIGN 31. LIKED CAMPAIGN(NO PARTY REFERENCE) 32. DISLIKED CAMPAIGN(NO PARTY REFERENCE) 33. SPECIFIC LEADER REFERENCE(CODED UNDER Q.4(B), REF.093) 34. SPECIFIC CANDIDATE REFERENCE(CODED UNDER Q.4(A), REF.087) 35. WANTED MAJORITY GOVERNMENT;BANDWAGON EFFECT 36. WANTED MINORITY GOVERNMENT;UNDERDOG EFFECT 40. WOULD HAVE VOTED CONSERVATIVE IF ELIGIBLE 41. WOULD HAVE VOTED LIBERAL IF ELIGIBLE 42. WOULD HAVE VOTED NDP IF ELIGIBLE 43. SPECIFIC PARTY REFERENCE(CODED UNDER Q.4(A)) 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0 IN Q.1 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0103 CAMPAIGN EFFECTS-2 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0103 LOC 173 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 49-50 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.7 ---------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 00 IN REF.102 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.7 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0104 CAMPAIGN EFFECTS-3 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0104 LOC 175 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 51-52 0 THIRD RESPONSE TO Q.7 --------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 00 IN REF.104 OR NO THIRD RESPONSE TO Q.7 0 1 52 - 0 VAR 0105 CAMPAIGN EFFECTS-4 MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0105 LOC 177 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 53-54 0 FOURTH RESPONSE TO Q.7 ---------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 00 IN REF.102 OR NO FOURTH RESPONSE TO Q.7 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0106 MOVING-RES CHANGE MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0106 LOC 179 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 55 0 Q.8 I HAVE JUST ONE MORE QUESTION. WE HAVE FOUND THAT QUITE A FEW PEOPLE MOVE EVERY YEAR. DID YOU BY ANY CHANCE MOVE TO A DIFFERENT CONSTITUENCY SINCE LAST MAY, OR DID YOU LIVE IN THE SAME CONSTITUENCY BOTH TIMES? ------------------------------------------------------- 1. MOVED 2. LIVED IN SAME CONSTITUENCY 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 IN Q.1 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0107 FED CONSTITUENCY MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0107 LOC 180 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 56-57 0 ...ASKED ONLY IF RESPONSE TO Q.8 WAS MOVED... Q.9 WHICH CONSTITUENCY DID YOU VOTE IN ON FEBRUARY 18TH? -------------------------------------------------------- 01. BURNABY 02. CAPILANO 03. CARIBOO-CHILCOTIN 04. COMOX-POWELL RIVER 05. COWICHAN-MALAHAT-ISLANDS 06. ESQUIMALT-SAANICH 07. FRASER VALLEY EAST 08. FRASER VALLEY WEST 09. KAMLOOPS-SHUSWAP 10. KOOTENAY EAST-REVELSTOKE 1 53 - (CONTINUED) - 11. KOOTENAY WEST 12. MISSION-PORT MOODY 13. NANAIMO-ALBERNI 14. NEW WESTMINSTER 15. NORTH VANCOUVER-BURNABY 16. OKANAGAN NORTH 17. OKANAGAN-SIMILKAMEEN 18. PRINCE GEORGE-BULKLEY VALLEY 19. PRINCE GEORGE-PEACE RIVER 20. RICHMOND-SOUTH DELTA 21. SKEENA 22. SURREY-WHITE ROCK 23. VANCOUVER CENTRE 24. VANCOUVER EAST 25. VANCOUVER KINGSWAY 26. VANCOUVER QUADRA 27. VANCOUVER SOUTH 28. VICTORIA 90. A CONSTITUENCY OUTSIDE OF THE PROVINCE 98. DK 99. NA/REFUSED 00. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8,9 IN Q.8 0 - 0 SECTION XII. FEDERAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION ----------------------------------------- 0 SPECIAL ROUTING INSTRUCTIONS WERE EMPLOYED IN SECTION XII. THE QUESTION TEXTS PRESENTED HERE AS Q.XII.4(B) TO XII.4(G) WERE USED AS NOTED BELOW ALTHOUGH QUESTION NUMBERS MAY NOT CORRESPOND TO THOSE USED FOR ANY GIVEN RESPONDENT. ONLY ONE VERSION OF A GIVEN QUESTION WAS ASKED OF A PARTICULAR RESPONDENT. EQUIVALENT QUESTION NUMBERS ARE GIVEN WHERE APPROPRIATE. ............................................................... 0 VAR 0108 FEDERAL PARTY ID MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0108 LOC 182 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 58-59 0 Q.XII.1 THINKING OF FEDERAL POLITICS, THEN, DO YOU USUALLY THINK OF YOURSELF AS A LIBERAL, PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE, NDP, SOCIAL CREDIT OR WHAT? --------------------------------------------------- 1 54 - (CONTINUED) - 00. NONE 01. LIBERAL 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 05. INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE 06. CHRISTIAN 07. VOTE FOR MAN 08. FASCIST, RIGHT WING IDEOLOGY 09. PROGRESSIVE, LEFT WING IDEOLOGY 10. RHINOCEROS 11. COMMUNIST 12. COMMUNIST (MARXIST-LENINIST) 20. SOMETIMES ONE, SOMETIMES ANOTHER 30. LIBERAL AND PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 31. NDP AND SOCIAL CREDIT 32. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE AND NDP 97. OTHER UNSPECIFIED 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0109 STRENGTH FED PTY ID MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0109 LOC 184 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 60 0 ...IF PARTY RESPONSE GIVEN IN Q.XII.1... Q.XII.2 HOW STRONGLY (PARTY MENTIONED IN Q.XII.1) DO YOU FEEL: VERY STRONGLY, FAIRLY STRONGLY, OR NOT VERY STRONGLY? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY STRONGLY 2. FAIRLY STRONGLY 3. NOT VERY STRONGLY 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0,5,6,7,8,9,20,98 OR 99 IN Q.XII.1 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0110 STR FED ID-NO PTY STAND MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0110 LOC 185 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 61 0 ...IF CODED 0,5,6,7,8,9 OR 20 IN Q.XII.1... 1 55 - (CONTINUED) - Q.XII.4 (A) HOW STRONGLY DO YOU FEEL ABOUT (OTHER NON-PARTY ANSWER IN Q.XII.1) VERY STRONGLY, FAIRLY STRONGLY, OR NOT VERY STRONGLY? -------------------------------------------------- 1. VERY STRONGLY 2. FAIRLY STRONGLY 3. NOT VERY STRONGLY 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP., CODED 0,98 OR 99 IN Q.XII.1 OR GAVE PARTY RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0111 CLOSER TO FED PTY NOW MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0111 LOC 186 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 62 0 ...IF CODED 0,5,6,7,8,9,20,98 OR 99 IN Q.XII.1... Q.XII.4 (B) STILL THINKING OF FEDERAL POLITICS, DO YOU GENERALLY THINK OF YOURSELF AS BEING A LITTLE CLOSER TO ONE OF THE PARTIES THAN TO THE OTHERS? ------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP., GAVE PARTY RESPONSE IN Q.XII.1 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0112 FED PTY CLOSER TO NOW MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0112 LOC 187 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 63-64 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.XII.4(B) OR ITS EQUIVALENT WAS YES.. Q.XII.4 (C) WHICH PARTY IS THAT? -------------------------------------------------------- 01. LIBERAL 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 07. MARXIST-LENINIST 1 56 - (CONTINUED) - 20. INDEPENDENT 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN REF.111 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0113 EVER CHANGED FED ID MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0113 LOC 189 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 65 0 ...THIS QUESTION OR ITS EQUIVALENT ASKED OF ALL RESPONDENTS... Q.XII.4 (D) EVEN THOUGH THEY MAY VOTE FOR DIFFERENT PARTIES FROM TIME TO TIME, SOME PEOPLE HAVE ALWAYS BEEN CLOSER TO ONE PARTY THAN TO OTHERS. SOME PEOPLE'S FEELINGS HAVE CHANGED. STILL THINKING OF FEDERAL POLITICS, WAS THERE EVER A TIME WHEN YOU THOUGHT OF YOURSELF AS (SOMETHING OTHER THAN RESPONSE GIVEN IN Q.XII.1)? ------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0114 PAST FED PTY ID-ONE MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0114 LOC 190 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 66-67 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.XII.4(D) OR ITS EQUIVALENT WAS YES.. Q.XII.4 (E) WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? (ANY OTHERS)? (FIRST RESPONSE) -------------------------------------------------------- 01. LIBERAL 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP OR CCF 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 1 57 - (CONTINUED) - 05. INDEPENDENT 32. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE AND NDP 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN REF.113 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0115 PAST FED PTY ID-TWO MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0115 LOC 192 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 68-69 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO REF 114 -------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 00,98 OR 99 IN REF.114 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0116 EVER CLOSER FED PTY MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0116 LOC 194 WIDTH 1 DK 3 COL 70 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.XII.4(D) OR ITS EQUIVALENT WAS NO,DK OR NA... Q.XII.4 (F) WELL, WAS THERE EVER A TIME WHEN YOU FELT CLOSER TO ANY OTHER PARTY? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 1 IN REF.113 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0117 PAST PTY CLOSER TO-ONE MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0117 LOC 195 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 71-72 0 ...IF RESPONSE TO Q.XII.4(F) OR ITS EQUIVALENT WAS YES.. Q.XII.4 (G) WHICH PARTY WAS THAT? (ANY OTHERS)? (FIRST 1 58 - (CONTINUED) - RESPONSE) -------------------------------------------------------- 01. LIBERAL 02. PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 03. NDP OR CCF 04. SOCIAL CREDIT 07. VOTE FOR MAN 11. COMMUNIST 30. LIBERAL AND PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE 31. NDP AND SOCIAL CREDIT 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0,2,8 OR 9 IN REF.116 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0118 PAST PTY CLOSER TO-TWO MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0118 LOC 197 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 73-74 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO REF 117 -------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 00 IN REF.117 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE TO REF.117 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0119 WHEN CHNGD FED ID-ONE MD=0 OR GE 97 REF 0119 LOC 199 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 75-76 0 ...IF PARTY RESPONSE GIVEN IN Q.XII.1 OR Q.XII.4(C) OR ITS EQUIVALENT... Q.XII.7 (A) WHEN DID YOU BEGIN TO THINK OF YOURSELF AS (PARTY MENTIONED IN Q.XII.1) (FIRST RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------ 01. 1901 . . 1 59 - (CONTINUED) - . . 79. 1979 80. ALL MY LIFE,AS LONG AS I CAN REMEMBER 81. CHILDHOOD,BEFORE ADOLESCENCE 82. TEENAGE,ADOLESCENCE 83. EARLY ADULTHOOD,WHEN FIRST ELIGIBLE TO VOTE 84. MOST OF MY LIFE 85. ADULT YEARS UNSPECIFIED 97. UNCLASSIFIABLE 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,RESPONDENT HAS NEVER DEVELOPED A PARTY IDENTIFICATION OR FELT CLOSER TO A PARTY 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0120 WHEN CHNGD FED ID-TWO MD=0 OR GE 97 REF 0120 LOC 201 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 77-78 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO REF 119 -------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 00 IN REF.119 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE TO REF.119 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0121 WHY CHNGD FED ID-ONE MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0121 LOC 203 WIDTH 2 DK 3 COL 79-80 0 ...IF PARTY RESPONSE GIVEN IN Q.XII.1 OR Q.XII.4(C) OR ITS EQUIVALENT... Q.XII.7 (B) WHAT WAS THE MAIN THING THAT MADE YOU BECOME A (PARTY MENTIONED IN Q.XII.1)? (FIRST RESPONSE) -------------------------------------------------------- 01. IMMIGRATION 02. LABOUR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS 03. NATIONAL UNITY 04. BILINGUALISM 05. PROVINCIAL RIGHTS FEDERAL-PROVINCIAL RELATIONS 06. AMERICAN CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC INFLUENCE 1 60 - (CONTINUED) - 07. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT 08. WELFARE 09. HOUSING, MORTGAGES 10. MEDICAL CARE, HOSPITALS 11. DRUGS, ALCOHOL 12. TRANSPORTATION 13. COMMUNICATION, BROADCASTING 14. FISHERIES 15. AGRICULTURE 16. CLIMATE FOR INVESTMENT IN B.C., CANADA 17. GUN CONTROL 18. RCMP, POLICE POWERS 19. FREE BCRIC SHARES 20. ABORTION 21. INFLATION, COST OF LIVING 22. UNEMPLOYMENT 23. ENERGY 24. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES 25. TAXES, SIZE OF GOVERNMENT 26. FOREIGN TRADE, TARIFFS 27. EDUCATION 28. OLD AGE, PENSIONS 29. NATIVE RIGHTS, LAND CLAIMS 30. CIVIL LIBERTIES 31. RELIGION 32. COURTS, PRISONS, PUNISHMENT 33. WOMEN'S RIGHTS 34. CONSUMER ISSUES 35. GOVERNMENT OWNERSHIP 36. MILITARY CONSCRIPTION 37. FOREIGN POLICY 38. FAMILY ALLOWANCE 39. SPECIFIC ISSUE MENTIONS OTHER THAN 1-38 40. FREE ENTERPRISE 41. CONSERVATISM, RIGHT WING, RIGHT 42. LIBERALISM 43. SOCIALISM, LEFT WING, LEFT 44. ANARCHISM 45. RELIGIOUS PRINCIPLES 49. OTHER IDEOLOGICAL 50. GOVERNMENT MANAGEMENT 51. GOVERNMENT MISMANAGEMENT 52. HONESTY, CLEAN GOVERNMENT 53. DISHONESTY, CORRUPTION, BRIBES, INFLUENCE PEDDLING 54. DEPRESSION, BAD ECONOMIC CONDITIONS 60. CONSISTENCY OVER TIME, KEEPS PROMISES 61. INCONSISTENCY OVER TIME, DOESN'T KEEP PROMISES 62. CREDIBILITY POSITIVE, TELLS THE TRUTH 63. CREDIBILITY NEGATIVE, DOES NOT TELL THE TRUTH 1 61 - (CONTINUED) - 70. LEADER REFERENCE, POSITIVE 71. LEADER REFERENCE, NEGATIVE 72. LEADER REFERENCE, BOTH POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE 73. CANDIDATE REFERENCE, POSITIVE 74. CANDIDATE REFERENCE, NEGATIVE 75. CANDIDATE REFERENCE, BOTH POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE 76. PARTY REFERENCE, POSITIVE 77. PARTY REFERENCE, NEGATIVE 78. PARTY REFERENCE, BOTH POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE 79. REFERENCE TO ABSENCE OR WEAKNESS OF PREFERRED PARTY 80. PARENTS, SIBLINGS, OTHERS IN ORIGIN FAMILY POSITIVE 81. PARENTS, SIBLINGS, OTHERS IN ORIGIN FAMILY NEGATIVE 82. ACQUAINTANCES AND FRIENDS POSITIVE 83. ACQUAINTANCES AND FRIENDS NEGATIVE 84. CO-WORKERS POSITIVE 85. CO-WORKERS NEGATIVE 86. SPOUSE, IN-LAWS POSITIVE 87. SPOUSE, IN-LAWS NEGATIVE 88. OTHER SOCIAL INFLUENCES -- POSITIVE 89. OTHER SOCIAL INFLUENCES -- NEGATIVE 90. POSITIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS AT OTHER LEVEL IN FEDERAL SYSTEM 91. NEGATIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS AT OTHER LEVEL 92. POSITIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS IN OTHER PROVINCE 93. NEGATIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS IN OTHER PROVINCE 94. POSITIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS IN OTHER COUNTRY 95. NEGATIVE REFERENCE TO POLITICS IN OTHER COUNTRY 97. OTHER, UNSPECIFIED 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 00 IN REF.119 0 DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '04' DK 4 COL 1- 2 ---------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0813 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0813 LOC 1672 WIDTH 4 DK 4 COL 3- 6 0 1 62 - 0 VAR 0814 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0814 LOC 1676 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 7 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0815 ICPSR PART NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0815 LOC 1677 WIDTH 1 DK 4 COL 8 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0001 RESPONDENT ID NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 6 DK 4 COL 9-14 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0122 WHY CHNGD FED ID-TWO MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0122 LOC 205 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 15-16 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO REF 121 -------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 00 IN REF.121 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE IN REF.121 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0123 WHY CHNGD FED ID-THREE MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0123 LOC 207 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 17-18 0 THIRD RESPONSE TO REF 121 ------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 00 IN REF.122 OR NO THIRD RESPONSE IN REF.121 0 - 0 SECTION XIV. LIKES AND DISLIKES ------------------------------- 1 63 - 0 VAR 0124 LIKE US MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0124 LOC 209 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 19-20 0 NOW, I'D LIKE TO ASK YOU ABOUT HOW MUCH YOU LIKE AND DISLIKE VARIOUS THINGS. EVEN IF WE LIKE SOMETHING A LOT, WE CAN STILL USUALLY THINK OF THINGS WE DON'T REALLY LIKE ABOUT IT. SIMILARLY, WE CAN USUALLY FIND SOMETHING TO LIKE EVEN IN PEOPLE OR THINGS THAT WE BASICALLY DISLIKE. I AM GOING TO ASK YOU ABOUT SOME COUNTRIES, POLITICAL PARTIES, LEADERS AND CANDIDATES. WHEN I GIVE YOU A NAME, FIRST THINK ABOUT THOSE THINGS YOU LIKE ABOUT IT THEN TELL ME HOW MUCH YOU LIKE THOSE THINGS. WE WILL USE A SCALE OF ZERO TO TEN. ZERO MEANS YOU REALLY DON'T LIKE ANYTHING ABOUT THE OBJECT, AND TEN MEANS YOU REALLY LIKE SOME THINGS ABOUT IT A LOT. OF COURSE YOU MAY USE ANY NUMBER IN BETWEEN. LATER I WILL ASK YOU ABOUT THOSE OBJECTS AGAIN TO FIND OUT ABOUT YOUR DISLIKES. A.PLACES Q.XIV.A.1 LET'S START WITH THE THINGS YOU LIKE ABOUT SOME COUNTRIES AND ABOUT B.C. ON A SCALE OF ZERO TO TEN, HOW MUCH DO YOU LIKE THE UNITED STATES? REMEMBER THAT "TEN" MEANS "A LOT" AND "ZERO" MEANS "NOT AT ALL". -------------------------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 64 - 0 VAR 0125 LIKE BRITAIN MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0125 LOC 211 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 21-22 0 Q.XIV.A.2 NOW, HOW MUCH DO YOU LIKE BRITAIN? -------------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0126 LIKE FRANCE MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0126 LOC 213 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 23-24 0 Q.XIV.A.3 WHAT ABOUT FRANCE? OUT OF TEN, HOW MUCH DO YOU LIKE THAT COUNTRY? -------------------------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 65 - 0 VAR 0127 LIKE CANADA MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0127 LOC 215 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 25-26 0 Q.XIV.A.4 THINKING NOW ABOUT CANADA, HOW MUCH DO YOU LIKE THIS COUNTRY? ---------------------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0128 LIKE BRITISH COLUMBIA MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0128 LOC 217 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 27-28 0 Q.XIV.A.5 AND WHAT ABOUT B.C.? ------------------------------ 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 66 - 0 VAR 0129 DISLIKE US MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0129 LOC 219 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 29-30 0 NOW I WOULD LIKE YOU TO THINK ABOUT THE THINGS YOU DISLIKE ABOUT THESE PLACES AND TELL ME HOW MUCH YOU DISLIKE. AGAIN WE WILL USE A SCALE OF ZERO TO TEN. ZERO MEANS THAT YOU REALLY DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING, AND TEN MEANS YOU DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT. Q.XIV.A.6 FIRST, HOW MUCH DO YOU DISLIKE THE UNITED STATES? ------------------------------------------------------ 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0130 DISLIKE BRITAIN MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0130 LOC 221 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 31-32 0 Q.XIV.A.7 HOW MUCH DO YOU DISLIKE BRITAIN? ------------------------------------------ 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 1 67 - (CONTINUED) - 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0131 DISLIKE FRANCE MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0131 LOC 223 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 33-34 0 Q.XIV.A.8 FRANCE? ----------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0132 DISLIKE CANADA MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0132 LOC 225 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 35-36 0 Q.XIV.A.9 AND HOW MUCH DO YOU DISLIKE CANADA? --------------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 68 - 0 VAR 0133 DISLIKE BRITISH COLUMBIA MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0133 LOC 227 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 37-38 0 Q.XIV.A.10 WHAT ABOUT B.C.? --------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0134 LIKE BC LIB PTY MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0134 LOC 229 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 39-40 0 B. POLITICAL PARTIES LET ME ASK YOU NOW ABOUT THE POLITICAL PARTIES--THOSE WHICH CONTEST THE PROVINCIAL ELECTIONS AND THE FEDERAL PARTIES WHICH HAVE NOMINATED CANDIDATES HERE IN YOUR CONSTITUENCY. WE WILL USE THE SAME SCALE OF ZERO TO TEN, WHERE TEN INDICATES "A LOT" AND ZERO INDICATES "NOT AT ALL". FIRST THINK ABOUT THINGS YOU LIKE ABOUT EACH PARTY. WE WILL START WITH THE PROVINCIAL PARTIES HERE IN B.C. Q.XIV.B.1 COULD YOU TELL ME ON A SCALE OF ZERO TO TEN, HOW MUCH YOU LIKE THE PROVINCIAL LIBERAL PARTY HERE IN B.C.? -------------------------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 1 69 - (CONTINUED) - 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0135 LIKE BC PC PTY MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0135 LOC 231 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 41-42 0 Q.XIV.B.2 HOW ABOUT THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVES? HOW MUCH DO YOU LIKE THEM? ------------------------------------------------------ 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0136 LIKE BC NDP PTY MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0136 LOC 233 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 43-44 0 Q.XIV.B.3 NOW THE NDP? ---------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 1 70 - (CONTINUED) - 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0137 LIKE BC SOCRED PTY MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0137 LOC 235 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 45-46 0 Q.XIV.B.4 AND THE SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY? -------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0138 LIKE FED LIBERAL PTY MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0138 LOC 237 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 47-48 0 Q.XIV.B.5 NOW THINK ABOUT THE THINGS YOU LIKE ABOUT THE FEDERAL PARTIES. HOW MUCH DO YOU LIKE THE FEDERAL LIBERAL PARTY OUT OF ZERO TO TEN? ------------------------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 1 71 - (CONTINUED) - 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0139 LIKE FED PC PTY MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0139 LOC 239 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 49-50 0 Q.XIV.B.6 AND THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVES? -------------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0140 LIKE BC NDP PTY MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0140 LOC 241 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 51-52 0 Q.XIV.B.7 AND THE FEDERAL NDP? ------------------------------ 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 1 72 - (CONTINUED) - 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0141 DISLIKE BC LIB PTY MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0141 LOC 243 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 53-54 0 NOW THINK ABOUT THE THINGS YOU DISLIKE ABOUT THE PROVINCIAL PARTIES--AGAIN ZERO MEANS "NOT AT ALL" WHILE TEN INDICATES YOU DISLIKE THEM "A LOT". Q.XIV.B.8 HOW MUCH DO YOU DISLIKE THE PROVINCIAL LIBERAL PARTY? -------------------------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0142 DISLIKE BC PC PTY MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0142 LOC 245 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 55-56 0 Q.XIV.B.9 HOW ABOUT THE PROVINCIAL PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVES? ---------------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 1 73 - (CONTINUED) - 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0143 DISLIKE BC NDP PTY MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0143 LOC 247 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 57-58 0 Q.XIV.B.10 AND THE NDP? HOW MUCH DO YOU DISLIKE THE NDP? -------------------------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0144 DISLIKE BC SOCRED PTY MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0144 LOC 249 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 59-60 0 Q.XIV.B.11 AND SOCIAL CREDIT? ----------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 1 74 - (CONTINUED) - 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0145 DISLIKE FED LIB PTY MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0145 LOC 251 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 61-62 0 Q.XIV.B.12 NOW THE FEDERAL PARTIES? HOW MUCH DO YOU DISLIKE THE FEDERAL LIBERAL PARTY? --------------------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0146 DISLIKE FED PC PTY MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0146 LOC 253 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 63-64 0 Q.XIV.B.13 AND THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVES? --------------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 1 75 - (CONTINUED) - 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0147 DISLIKE FED NDP PTY MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0147 LOC 255 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 65-66 0 Q.XIV.B.14 AND FINALLY THE NDP? ------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0148 LIKE BC LIB LEADER MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0148 LOC 257 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 67-68 0 C. PARTY LEADERS WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT FAIRLY ABSTRACT THINGS LIKE COUNTRIES AND POLITICAL PARTIES. NOW LET'S FOCUS ON THE HUMAN DIMENSION-THE LEADERS AND CANDIDATES PUT FORWARD BY THE PARTIES. I WILL READ OFF A LIST OF NAMES OF THE PARTY LEADERS NOW, AND I WOULD LIKE YOU TO RATE EACH OF THEM IN TERMS OF THE THINGS YOU LIKE ABOUT THEM AND LATER, IN TERMS OF THE THINGS YOU DISLIKE ABOUT THEM. IF WE COME TO A NAME YOU DO NOT RECOGNIZE OR DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT, JUST SAY SO, AND WE WILL SKIP TO THE NEXT NAME. IF YOU DO KNOW THE PERSON NAMED, BUT DON'T PARTICULARLY LIKE ANYTHING ABOUT HIM, YOU WOULD GIVE A 1 76 - (CONTINUED) - SCORE OF ZERO. A TEN MEANS YOU REALLY LIKE SOME THINGS ABOUT HIM A LOT. Q.XIV.C.1 JEV TOTHILL IS THE LEADER OF THE PROVINCIAL LIBERAL PARTY HERE IN B.C. HOW MUCH DO YOU LIKE HIM? ------------------------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0149 LIKE BC PC LEADER MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0149 LOC 259 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 69-70 0 Q.XIV.C.2 HOW MUCH DO YOU LIKE VIC STEPHENS, THE LEADER OF THE PROVINCIAL PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVES? ------------------------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 77 - 0 VAR 0150 LIKE BC NDP LEADER MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0150 LOC 261 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 71-72 0 Q.XIV.C.3 AND DAVE BARRETT, OF THE NDP? --------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0151 LIKE BC SOCRED LEADER MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0151 LOC 263 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 73-74 0 Q.XIV.C.4 AND NOW BILL BENNETT, THE SOCIAL CREDIT LEADER? ------------------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 78 - 0 VAR 0152 LIKE FED LIB LEADER MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0152 LOC 265 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 75-76 0 Q.XIV.C.5 TURNING NOW TO THE FEDERAL PARTIES, HOW MUCH DO YOU LIKE PIERRE ELLIOTT TRUDEAU, THE LIBERAL LEADER? ------------------------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0153 LIKE FED PC LEADER MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0153 LOC 267 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 77-78 0 Q.XIV.C.6 AND JOE CLARK, THE LEADER OF THE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVES? ------------------------------------------------------ 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 79 - 0 VAR 0154 LIKE FED NDP LEADER MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0154 LOC 269 WIDTH 2 DK 4 COL 79-80 0 Q.XIV.C.7 AND FINALLY, THE FEDERAL LEADER OF THE NDP, ED BROADBENT? -------------------------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 98. DK 99. NA 0 DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '05' DK 5 COL 1- 2 ---------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0813 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0813 LOC 1672 WIDTH 4 DK 5 COL 3- 6 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0814 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0814 LOC 1676 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 7 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0815 ICPSR PART NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0815 LOC 1677 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 8 0 1 80 - 0 VAR 0001 RESPONDENT ID NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 6 DK 5 COL 9-14 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0155 DISLIKE BC LIB LEADER MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0155 LOC 271 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 15-16 0 LET'S GO BACK OVER THESE NAMES AGAIN, AND THINK ABOUT THE THINGS YOU DISLIKE ABOUT EACH. (IF R HAS INDICATED A LACK OF FAMILIARITY WITH A LEADER ABOVE, DO NOT ASK ABOUT PERSON HERE). Q.XIV.C.8 STARTING WITH JEV TOTHILL, HOW MUCH DO YOU DISLIKE HIM? -------------------------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0156 DISLIKE BC PC LEADER MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0156 LOC 273 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 17-18 0 Q.XIV.C.9 AND VIC STEPHENS? --------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 1 81 - (CONTINUED) - 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0157 DISLIKE BC NDP LEADER MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0157 LOC 275 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 19-20 0 Q.XIV.C.10 DAVE BARRETT? ------------------------ 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0158 DISLIKE BC SOCRED LEADER MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0158 LOC 277 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 21-22 0 Q.XIV.C.11 BILL BENNETT? ------------------------ 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 1 82 - (CONTINUED) - 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0159 DISLIKE FED LIB LEADER MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0159 LOC 279 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 23-24 0 Q.XIV.C.12 BACK TO THE FEDERAL LEADERS NOW, HOW MUCH WOULD YOU SAY YOU DISLIKE PIERRE TRUDEAU? ---------------------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0160 DISLIKE FED PC LEADER MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0160 LOC 281 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 25-26 0 Q.XIV.C.13 JOE CLARK? --------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 1 83 - (CONTINUED) - 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0161 DISLIKE FED NDP LEADER MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0161 LOC 283 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 27-28 0 Q.XIV.C.14 AND ED BROADBENT? ---------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0162 LIKE PROV LIB CANDIDATE MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0162 LOC 285 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 29-30 0 D. LOCAL CANDIDATES FOR MANY PEOPLE, THE LOCAL CANDIDATES ARE REALLY WHAT MATTERS IN AN ELECTION. SO WE WANT TO FIND OUR YOUR LIKES AND DISLIKES ABOUT EACH OF THE CANDIDATES THAT YOU HAD TO CHOOSE AMONG HERE IN YOUR CONSTITUENCY. AGAIN I WILL READ OUT THEIR NAMES, AND YOU CAN RATE THEM FROM ZERO TO TEN. IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHO THEY ARE OR DON'T WANT TO RATE THEM, FEEL FREE TO SAY SO, AND WE WILL SKIP THEM. FIRST, WE WILL GO THROUGH THE CANDIDATES IN THE MAY 10 PROVINCIAL ELECTION AND THEN THE FEDERAL CANDIDATES FROM THE MAY 22 NATIONAL ELECTION. -------------------------------------------------------- 1 84 - (CONTINUED) - SEE NOTE(S) 2 0 LIKING SCORE FOR PROVINCIAL LIBERAL CANDIDATE 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 97. NO CANDIDATE FROM LIBERAL PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0163 LIKE PROV 1ST PC CAND MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0163 LOC 287 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 31-32 0 LIKING SCORE FOR FIRST PROVINCIAL PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE --------------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 97. NO FIRST CANDIDATE FROM PC PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 85 - 0 VAR 0164 LIKE 1ST PROV NDP CAND MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0164 LOC 289 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 33-34 0 LIKING SCORE FOR FIRST PROVINCIAL NDP CANDIDATE ----------------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 97. NO FIRST CANDIDATE FROM NDP PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0165 LIKE 1ST PRV SOCRED CAND MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0165 LOC 291 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 35-36 0 LIKING SCORE FOR FIRST SOCIAL CREDIT CANDIDATE ---------------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 97. NO FIRST CANDIDATE FROM SOCRED PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 86 - 0 VAR 0166 LIKE 2ND PRV PC CAND MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0166 LOC 293 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 37-38 0 LIKING SCORE FOR SECOND PROVINCIAL PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE ---------------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 97. NO SECOND CANDIDATE FROM PC PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0167 LIKE 2ND PROV NDP CAND MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0167 LOC 295 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 39-40 0 LIKING SCORE FOR SECOND PROVINCIAL NDP CANDIDATE ------------------------------------------------ 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 97. NO SECOND CANDIDATE FROM NDP PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 87 - 0 VAR 0168 LIKE 2ND PRV SOCRED CAND MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0168 LOC 297 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 41-42 0 LIKING SCORE FOR SECOND PROVINCIAL SOCIAL CREDIT CANDIDATE ------------------------------------------------ 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 97. NO SECOND CANDIDATE FROM SOCRED PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0169 LIKE FED LIB CANDIDATE MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0169 LOC 299 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 43-44 0 LIKING SCORE FOR FEDERAL LIBERAL CANDIDATE ------------------------------------------ 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 97. NO CANDIDATE FROM LIBERAL PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 88 - 0 VAR 0170 LIKE FED PC CANDIDATE MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0170 LOC 301 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 45-46 0 LIKING SCORE FOR FEDERAL PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE ------------------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 97. NO CANDIDATE FROM PC PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0171 LIKE FED NDP CANDIDATE MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0171 LOC 303 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 47-48 0 LIKING SCORE FOR FEDERAL NDP CANDIDATE -------------------------------------- 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 97. NO CANDIDATE FROM NDP PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 89 - 0 VAR 0172 LIKE FED SOCRED CAND MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0172 LOC 305 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 49-50 0 LIKING SCORE FOR FEDERAL SOCIAL CREDIT CANDIDATE ------------------------------------------------ 10. LIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 09. . 08. . 07. . 06. . 05. . 04. . 03. . 02. . 01. . 00. DON'T LIKE ANYTHING AT ALL 97. NO CANDIDATE FROM SOCRED PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0173 DISLIKE PROV LIB CAND MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0173 LOC 307 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 51-52 0 LET'S GO BACK OVER THESE NAMES AGAIN AND THINK ABOUT THE THINGS YOU DISLIKE ABOUR EACH. (IF R HAS INDICATED LACK OF FAMILIARITY WITH A CANDIDATE ABOVE, DO NOT ASK ABOUT THAT PERSON HERE.) DISLIKING SCORE FOR PROVINCIAL LIBERAL CANDIDATE -------------------------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 97. NO CANDIDATE FROM LIBERAL PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 1 90 - 0 VAR 0174 DISLIKE 1ST PROV PC CAND MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0174 LOC 309 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 53-54 0 DISLIKING SCORE FOR FIRST PROVINCIAL PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE ------------------------------------------------ 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 97. NO FIRST CANDIDATE FROM PC PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0175 DISLIKE 1ST PRV NDP CAND MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0175 LOC 311 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 55-56 0 DISLIKING SCORE FOR FIRST PROVINCIAL NDP CANDIDATE -------------------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 97. NO FIRST CANDIDATE FROM NDP PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 91 - 0 VAR 0176 DISLIKE 1ST PROV SC CAND MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0176 LOC 313 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 57-58 0 DISLIKING SCORE FOR FIRST PROVINCIAL SOCIAL CREDIT CANDIDATE -------------------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 97. NO FIRST CANDIDATE FROM SOCRED PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0177 DISLIKE 2ND PRV PC CAND MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0177 LOC 315 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 59-60 0 DISLIKING SCORE FOR SECOND PROVINCIAL PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE ------------------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 97. NO SECOND CANDIDATE FROM PC PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 92 - 0 VAR 0178 DISLIKE 2ND PROV NDP CAN MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0178 LOC 317 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 61-62 0 DISLIKING SCORE FOR SECOND PROVINCIAL NDP CANDIDATE --------------------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 97. NO SECOND CANDIDATE FROM NDP PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0179 DISLIKE 2ND PROV SC CAND MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0179 LOC 319 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 63-64 0 DISLIKING SCORE FOR SECOND PROVINCIAL SOCIAL CREDIT CANDIDATE --------------------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 97. NO SECOND CANDIDATE FROM SOCRED PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 93 - 0 VAR 0180 DISLIKE FED LIB CAND MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0180 LOC 321 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 65-66 0 DISLIKING SCORE FOR FEDERAL LIBERAL CANDIDATE --------------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 97. NO CANDIDATE FROM LIBERAL PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0181 DISLIKE FED PC CAND MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0181 LOC 323 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 67-68 0 DISLIKING SCORE FOR FEDERAL PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE ---------------------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 97. NO CANDIDATE FROM PC PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 1 94 - 0 VAR 0182 DISLIKE FED NDP CAND MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0182 LOC 325 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 69-70 0 DISLIKING SCORE FOR FEDERAL NDP CANDIDATE ----------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 97. NO CANDIDATE FROM NDP PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0183 DISLIKE FED SOCRED CAND MD=97 OR GE 98 REF 0183 LOC 327 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 71-72 0 DISLIKING SCORE FOR FEDERAL SOCIAL CREDIT CANDIDATE --------------------------------------------------- 00. DON'T DISLIKE ANYTHING 01. . 02. . 03. . 04. . 05. . 06. . 07. . 08. . 09. . 10. DISLIKE SOME THINGS A LOT 97. NO CANDIDATE FROM SOCRED PARTY 98. DK 99. NA 0 - 1 95 - (CONTINUED) - SECTION XIII. HYPOTHETICAL VOTING --------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0184 ACTION IF DISLIKE CAND MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0184 LOC 329 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 73 0 Q.XIII.1(A) NOW, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU A FEW QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW YOU WOULD VOTE IN CERTAIN SITUATIONS. SUPPOSE THERE WAS AN ELECTION IN WHICH THE PARTY YOU FAVOUR RAN A CANDIDATE IN YOUR RIDING WHOM YOU DID NOT LIKE OR DID NOT AGREE WITH. WHAT WOULD YOU BE MOST LIKELY TO DO, VOTE FOR THE CANDIDATE ANYWAY, VOTE FOR ANOTHER PARTY, OR WOULD YOU JUST NOT VOTE AT ALL? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. VOTE FOR MY PARTY ANYWAY 2. SWITCH TO ANOTHER PARTY 3. NOT VOTE AT ALL 4. DEPENDS ON WHO WAS RUNNING 5. DEPENDS ON SITUATION 6. EITHER SWITCH OR ABSTAIN 7. OTHER (UNSPECIFIED) 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,NOT ELIGIBLE TO VOTE PROVINCIAL 1979 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0185 EVER DISLIKED CANDIDATE MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0185 LOC 330 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 74 0 Q.XIII.1 (B) HAS THIS EVER HAPPENED - THAT IS, HAS YOUR FAVOURITE PARTY RUN A CANDIDATE IN YOUR RIDING WHOM YOU DID NOT LIKE OR DID NOT AGREE WITH? ------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.1.(A) 0 1 96 - 0 VAR 0186 1ST CAND DISLIKE-LEVEL MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0186 LOC 331 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 75 0 IF THE RESPONSE TO Q.XIII.1(B) WAS YES RESPONDENTS WERE THEN ASKED FOR DETAILS OF EACH OCCURRENCE:THE DATE OF THE ELECTION,WHETHER IT WAS FEDERAL OR PROVINCIAL,AND WHAT ACTION THEY TOOK. UP TO THREE OCCURRENCES WERE CODED. IF MORE THAN THREE WERE MENTIONED THE MOST RECENT FEDERAL ELECTION WAS CODED FOLLOWED BY THE MOST RECENT PROVINCIAL, THEN THE SECOND MOST RECENT FEDERAL AND SO ON UNTIL THREE SITUATIONS WERE CODED. ------------------------------------------------------- ELECTION LEVEL AT WHICH CANDIDATE DISLIKED (FIRST RESPONSE) 1. FEDERAL 2. PROVINCIAL 3. MUNICIPAL 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.1.(A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.1.(B) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0187 1ST CAND DISLIKE-YEAR MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0187 LOC 332 WIDTH 2 DK 5 COL 76-77 0 ELECTION YEAR IN WHICH CANDIDATE DISLIKED (FIRST RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------ 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.1(A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.1.(B) 0 1 97 - 0 VAR 0188 1ST CAND DISLIKE-ACTION MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0188 LOC 334 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 78 0 ACTION TAKEN WHEN CANDIDATE DISLIKED (FIRST RESPONSE) ----------------------------------------------------- 1. SWITCHED 2. VOTED FOR OWN PARTY 3. DID NOT VOTE 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.1.(A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.1.(B) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0189 2ND CAND DISLIKE-LEVEL MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0189 LOC 335 WIDTH 1 DK 5 COL 79 0 ELECTION LEVEL AT WHICH CANDIDATE DISLIKED (SECOND RESPONSE) -------------------------------------------------- 1. FEDERAL 2. PROVINCIAL 3. MUNICIPAL 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.1.(A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.1.(B) OR NO SECOND RESPONSE IN REF.186 0 DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '06' DK 6 COL 1- 2 ---------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0813 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0813 LOC 1672 WIDTH 4 DK 6 COL 3- 6 0 1 98 - 0 VAR 0814 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0814 LOC 1676 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 7 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0815 ICPSR PART NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0815 LOC 1677 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 8 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0001 RESPONDENT ID NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 6 DK 6 COL 9-14 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0190 2ND CAND DISLIKE-YEAR MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0190 LOC 336 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 15-16 0 ELECTION YEAR IN WHICH CANDIDATE DISLIKED (SECOND RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------- 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.1(A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.1.(B) OR NO SECOND RESPONSE IN REF.187 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0191 2ND CAND DISLIKE-ACTION MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0191 LOC 338 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 17 0 ACTION TAKEN WHEN CANDIDATE DISLIKED (SECOND RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------ 1. SWITCHED 2. VOTED FOR OWN PARTY 3. DID NOT VOTE 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.1.(A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 1 99 - (CONTINUED) - IN Q.XIII.1.(B) OR NO SECOND RESPONSE IN REF.188 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0192 3RD CAND DISLIKE-LEVEL MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0192 LOC 339 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 18 0 ELECTION LEVEL AT WHICH CANDIDATE DISLIKED (THIRD RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------- 1. FEDERAL 2. PROVINCIAL 3. MUNICIPAL 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.1.(A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.1.(B) OR NO THIRD RESPONSE IN REF.186 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0193 3RD CAND DISLIKE-YEAR MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0193 LOC 340 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 19-20 0 ELECTION YEAR IN WHICH CANDIDATE DISLIKED (THIRD RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------ 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.1(A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.1.(B) OR NO THIRD RESPONSE IN REF.187 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0194 3RD CAND DISLIKE-ACTION MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0194 LOC 342 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 21 0 ACTION TAKEN WHEN CANDIDATE DISLIKED (THIRD RESPONSE) ----------------------------------------------------- 1 100 - (CONTINUED) - 1. SWITCHED 2. VOTED FOR OWN PARTY 3. DID NOT VOTE 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.1.(A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.1.(B) OR NO THIRD RESPONSE IN REF.188 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0195 CANDIDATE DISLIKE-TOTAL MD=0 REF 0195 LOC 343 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 22-23 0 TOTAL NUMBER OF ELECTIONS IN WHICH CANDIDATE DISLIKED ----------------------------------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0,8 OR 9 ON REF.186 OR DK,NA WHICH ELECTION. 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0196 N OF DISLIKE SWITCHES MD=0 REF 0196 LOC 345 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 24-25 0 TOTAL NUMBER OF TIMES PARTY VOTED FOR A DIFFERENT PARTY GIVEN DISLIKE OF CANDIDATE OF PREFERRED PARTY ------------------------------------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 ON REF.195 OR SPECIFIED ACTION NOT TAKEN 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0197 N OF VOTE PTY-DSL CAND MD=0 REF 0197 LOC 347 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 26-27 0 TOTAL NUMBER OF TIMES RESPONDENT VOTED FOR PARTY DESPITE DISLIKE OF ITS CANDIDATE -------------------------------------------------------- 1 101 - (CONTINUED) - 00. INAP.,CODED 0 ON REF.195 OR SPECIFIED ACTION NOT TAKEN. 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0198 N OF ABSTAIN-DISLK CAND MD=0 REF 0198 LOC 349 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 28-29 0 TOTAL NUMBER OF TIMES RESPONDENT ABSTAINED GIVEN DISLIKE OF CANDIDATE OF PREFERRED PARTY -------------------------------------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 ON REF.195 OR SPECIFIED ACTION NOT TAKEN. 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0199 CAND NO CHANCE-ACTION MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0199 LOC 351 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 30 0 Q.XIII.2 (A) SOMETIMES THE PARTY A PERSON LIKES BEST HAS LITTLE CHANCE OF WINNING. SUPPOSE IN YOUR RIDING THE PARTY YOU LIKED BEST HAD VERY LITTLE CHANCE OF WINNING BUT THE PARTY YOU LIKED LEAST HAD A GOOD CHANCE OF WINNING. IN THIS SITUATION, WOULD YOU CONSIDER VOTING FOR A PARTY OTHER THAN YOUR FAVOURITE IN ORDER TO KEEP THE PARTY YOU DID NOT LIKE FROM WINNING? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. NO, VOTE FOR MY PARTY 2. YES, SWITCH TO ANOTHER PARTY 3. NO, NOT VOTE AT ALL 4. VOTE FOR LEADER OR CANDIDATE 7. OTHER (UNSPECIFIED) 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,INELIGIBLE TO VOTE PROVINCIAL 1979 0 1 102 - 0 VAR 0200 EVER HAPPEN-C NO CHNCE MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0200 LOC 352 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 31 0 Q.XIII.2 (B) HAVE YOU EVER FACED A SITUATION LIKE THIS, THAT IS, WHERE YOUR FAVOURITE PARTY HAD LITTLE CHANCE OF WINNING BUT A PARTY YOU DISLIKED HAD A GOOD CHANCE OF WINNING? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.2 (A) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0201 1ST CAND NO CHNCE-LEVEL MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0201 LOC 353 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 32 0 IF THE RESPONSE TO Q.XIII.1(B) WAS YES RESPONDENTS WERE THEN ASKED FOR DETAILS OF EACH OCCURRENCE:THE DATE OF THE ELECTION,WHETHER IT WAS FEDERAL OR PROVINCIAL,AND WHAT ACTION THEY TOOK. UP TO THREE OCCURRENCES WERE CODED. IF MORE THAN THREE WERE MENTIONED THE MOST RECENT FEDERAL ELECTION WAS CODED FOLLOWED BY THE MOST RECENT PROVINCIAL,THEN THE SECOND MOST RECENT FEDERAL AND SO ON UNTIL THREE SITUATIONS WERE CODED. ELECTION LEVEL AT WHICH PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO WIN RIDING (FIRST RESPONSE) -------------------------------------------------------- 1. FEDERAL 2. PROVINCIAL 3. MUNICIPAL 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.2 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.2(B) 0 1 103 - 0 VAR 0202 1ST CAND NO CHNCE-YEAR MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0202 LOC 354 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 33-34 0 ELECTION YEAR IN WHICH PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO WIN RIDING (FIRST RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------- 98. DK 99. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.2 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.2(B) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0203 1ST CAND NO CHNCE-ACTION MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0203 LOC 356 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 35 0 ACTION TAKEN WHEN PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO WIN RIDING (FIRST RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------ 1. SWITCHED 2. VOTED FOR OWN PARTY 3. DID NOT VOTE 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.2 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.2(B) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0204 2ND CAND NO CHNCE-LEVEL MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0204 LOC 357 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 36 0 ELECTION LEVEL AT WHICH PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO WIN RIDING (SECOND RESPONSE) -------------------------------------------------------- 1. FEDERAL 2. PROVINCIAL 3. MUNICIPAL 8. DK 1 104 - (CONTINUED) - 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.2 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.2(B) OR NO SECOND RESPONSE IN REF.201 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0205 2ND CAND NO CHNCE-YEAR MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0205 LOC 358 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 37-38 0 ELECTION YEAR IN WHICH PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO WIN RIDING (SECOND RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------- 98. DK 99. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.2 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.2(B) OR NO SECOND RESPONSE IN REF.202 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0206 2ND CAND NO CHNCE-ACTION MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0206 LOC 360 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 39 0 ACTION TAKEN WHEN PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO WIN RIDING (SECOND RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------ 1. SWITCHED 2. VOTED FOR OWN PARTY 3. DID NOT VOTE 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.2 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.2(B) OR NO SECOND RESPONSE IN REF.203 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0207 3RD CAND NO CHNCE-LEVEL MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0207 LOC 361 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 40 0 ELECTION LEVEL AT WHICH PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO 1 105 - (CONTINUED) - WIN RIDING (THIRD RESPONSE) -------------------------------------------------------- 1. FEDERAL 2. PROVINCIAL 3. MUNICIPAL 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.2 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.2(B) OR NO THIRD RESPONSE IN REF.201 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0208 3RD CAND NO CHNCE-YEAR MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0208 LOC 362 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 41-42 0 ELECTION YEAR IN WHICH PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO WIN RIDING (THIRD RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------- 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.2 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.2(B) OR NO THIRD RESPONSE IN REF.202 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0209 3RD CAND NO CHNCE-ACTION MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0209 LOC 364 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 43 0 ACTION TAKEN WHEN PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO WIN RIDING (THIRD RESPONSE) ------------------------------------------------------ 1. SWITCHED 2. VOTED FOR OWN PARTY 3. DID NOT VOTE 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.2 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.2(B) OR NO THIRD RESPONSE IN REF.203 0 1 106 - 0 VAR 0210 TOTAL CAND NO CHANCE MD=0 REF 0210 LOC 365 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 44-45 0 TOTAL NUMBER OF ELECTIONS IN WHICH PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO WIN RIDING ------------------------------------------------------ 00. INAP.,CODED 0,8 OR 9 ON REF.201 OR DK,NA WHICH ELECTION. 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0211 N OF SWITCHES-C NO CHNCE MD=0 REF 0211 LOC 367 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 46-47 0 NUMBER OF TIMES RESPONDENT SWITCHED WHEN PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE AT RIDING LEVEL -------------------------------------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 ON REF.210 OR SPECIFIED ACTION NOT TAKEN. 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0212 N OF VOTE PTY-C NO CHNCE MD=0 REF 0212 LOC 369 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 48-49 0 NUMBER OF TIMES RESPONDENT VOTED FOR PREFERRED PARTY DESPITE NO CHANCE AT RIDING LEVEL ---------------------------------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 ON REF.210 OR SPECIFIED ACTION NOT TAKEN. 0 1 107 - 0 VAR 0213 N OF ABSTAIN-C NO CHNCE MD=0 REF 0213 LOC 371 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 50-51 0 NUMBER OF TIMES RESPONDENT ABSTAINED WHEN PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE AT RIDING LEVEL --------------------------------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 ON REF.210 OR SPECIFIED ACTION NOT TAKEN. 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0214 ACTION-PTY NO CHANCE MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0214 LOC 373 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 52 0 Q.XIII. 3(A) LET'S THINK NOW ABOUT THE PROVINCE AS A WHOLE AND NOT JUST YOUR RIDING. SUPPOSE THERE WAS AN ELECTION IN WHICH THE PARTY YOU MOST PREFERRED HAD LITTLE CHANCE OF FORMING THE GOVERNMENT BUT THE PARTY YOU LIKED LEAST HAD A GOOD CHANCE OF FORMING THE GOVERNMENT. IN THIS SITUATION, WOULD YOU CONSIDER VOTING FOR A PARTY OTHER THAN YOUR FAVOURITE IN ORDER TO KEEP THE PARTY YOU DID NOT LIKE FROM FORMING THE GOVERNMENT? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,INELIGIBLE TO VOTE PROVINCIAL 1979 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0215 PTY NO CHNCE-EVER HAPPEN MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0215 LOC 374 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 53 0 Q.XIII. 3(B) HAVE YOU EVER FACED A SITUATION LIKE THIS, THAT IS, WHERE YOUR FAVOURITE PARTY HAD LITTLE CHANCE OF FORMING THE GOVERNMENT BUT A PARTY YOU DISLIKED HAD A GOOD CHANCE OF FORMING THE GOVERNMENT? -------------------------------------------------------- 1 108 - (CONTINUED) - 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.3 (A) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0216 1ST PTY NO CHANCE-LEVEL MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0216 LOC 375 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 54 0 IF THE RESPONSE TO Q.XIII.1(B) WAS YES RESPONDENTS WERE THEN ASKED FOR DETAILS OF EACH OCCURRENCE:THE DATE OF THE ELECTION, WHETHER IT WAS FEDERAL OR PROVINCIAL, AND WHAT ACTION THEY TOOK. UP TO THREE OCCURRENCES WERE CODED. IF MORE THAN THREE WERE MENTIONED THE MOST RECENT FEDERAL ELECTION WAS CODED FOLLOWED BY THE MOST RECENT PROVINCIAL,THEN THE SECOND MOST RECENT FEDERAL AND SO ON UNTIL THREE SITUATIONS WERE CODED. LEVEL AT WHICH PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO FORM GOVERNMENT - FIRST RESPONSE ------------------------------------------------------- 1. FEDERAL 2. PROVINCIAL 3. MUNICIPAL 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.3 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.3(B) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0217 1ST PTY NO CHANCE-YEAR MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0217 LOC 376 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 55-56 0 YEAR WHEN PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO FORM GOVERNMENT - FIRST RESPONSE ----------------------------------------------- 98. DK 99. NA 1 109 - (CONTINUED) - 00. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.3 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.3(B) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0218 1ST PTY NO CHANCE-ACTION MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0218 LOC 378 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 57 0 ACTION TAKEN WHEN PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO FORM GOVERNMENT - FIRST RESPONSE ------------------------------------------------------- 1. SWITCHED 2. VOTED FOR OWN PARTY 3. DID NOT VOTE 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.3 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.3(B) 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0219 2ND PTY NO CHANCE-LEVEL MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0219 LOC 379 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 58 0 LEVEL AT WHICH PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO FORM GOVERNMENT - SECOND RESPONSE ---------------------------------------------------- 1. FEDERAL 2. PROVINCIAL 3. MUNICIPAL 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.3 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.3(B) OR NO SECOND RESPONSE IN REF.216 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0220 2ND PTY NO CHANCE-YEAR MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0220 LOC 380 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 59-60 0 YEAR WHEN PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO FORM GOVERNMENT - SECOND RESPONSE ----------------------------------------------- 1 110 - (CONTINUED) - 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.3 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.3(B) OR NO SECOND RESPONSE IN REF.217 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0221 2ND PTY NO CHANCE-ACTION MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0221 LOC 382 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 61 0 ACTION TAKEN WHEN PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO FORM GOVERNMENT - SECOND RESPONSE ------------------------------------------------------- 1. SWITCHED 2. VOTED FOR OWN PARTY 3. DID NOT VOTE 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.3 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.3(B) OR NO SECOND RESPONSE IN REF.218 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0222 3RD PTY NO CHANCE-LEVEL MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0222 LOC 383 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 62 0 LEVEL AT WHICH PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO FORM GOVERNMENT - THIRD RESPONSE ---------------------------------------------------- 1. FEDERAL 2. PROVINCIAL 3. MUNICIPAL 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.3 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.3(B) OR NO THIRD RESPONSE IN REF.216 0 1 111 - 0 VAR 0223 3RD PTY NO CHANCE-YEAR MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0223 LOC 384 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 63-64 0 YEAR WHEN PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO FORM GOVERNMENT - THIRD RESPONSE ----------------------------------------------- 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.3 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.3(B) OR NO THIRD RESPONSE IN REF.217 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0224 3RD PTY NO CHANCE-ACTION MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0224 LOC 386 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 65 0 ACTION TAKEN WHEN PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO FORM GOVERNMENT - THIRD RESPONSE ------------------------------------------------------- 1. SWITCHED 2. VOTED FOR OWN PARTY 3. DID NOT VOTE 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 0 ON Q.XIII.3 (A) OR CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN Q.XIII.3(B) OR NO THIRD RESPONSE IN REF.218 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0225 PARTY NO CHANCE-TOTAL MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0225 LOC 387 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 66-67 0 TOTAL NUMBER OF ELECTIONS WHEN PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO FORM GOVERNMENT ----------------------------------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0,8 OR 9 ON REF.216 OR DK, NA WHICH ELECTION. 1 112 - 0 VAR 0226 N OF SWITCHES-P NO CHNCE MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0226 LOC 389 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 68-69 0 NUMBER OF TIMES RESPONDENT SWITCHED WHEN PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO FORM GOVERNMENT -------------------------------------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 ON REF.225 OR SPECIFIED ACTION NOT TAKEN 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0227 N OF VOTE PTY-P NO CHNCE MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0227 LOC 391 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 70-71 0 NUMBER OF TIMES RESPONDENT VOTED FOR PREFERRED PARTY DESPITE NO CHANCE TO FORM GOVERNMENT ---------------------------------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 ON REF.225 OR SPECIFIED ACTION NOT TAKEN 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0228 N OF ABSTAIN-P NO CHNCE MD=0 OR GE 99 REF 0228 LOC 393 WIDTH 2 DK 6 COL 72-73 0 NUMBER OF TIMES RESPONDENT ABSTAINED WHEN PREFERRED PARTY HAD NO CHANCE TO FORM GOVERNMENT --------------------------------------------------- 00. INAP.,CODED 0 ON REF.225 OR SPECIFIED ACTION NOT TAKEN 0 - 0 SECTION XI. CAMPAIGN PARTICIPATION 1 113 - (CONTINUED) - ---------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0229 CAMPAIGN BUTTON,STICKER MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0229 LOC 395 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 74 0 DID RESPONDENT WEAR BUTTON OR DISPLAY BUMPER STICKER DURING FEDERAL OR PROVINCIAL CAMPAIGNS? ---------------------------------------------------- 1. NO 2. YES, FOR PROVINCIAL ONLY 3. YES, FOR FEDERAL ONLY 4. YES, FOR BOTH 7. YES, DK LEVEL 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0230 DISPLAY LAWN SIGN MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0230 LOC 396 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 75 0 DID RESPONDENT DISPLAY A LAWN SIGN FOR A PARTY OR CANDIDATE DURING FEDERAL OR PROVINCIAL CAMPAIGNS? ------------------------------------------------- 1. NO 2. YES, FOR PROVINCIAL ONLY 3. YES, FOR FEDERAL ONLY 4. YES, FOR BOTH 7. YES, DK LEVEL 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0231 ATTEND RALLY MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0231 LOC 397 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 76 0 DID RESPONDENT ATTEND ELECTION RALLY OR ALL CANDIDATES' MEETING DURING FEDERAL OR PROVINCIAL CAMPAIGNS? ------------------------------------------------------- 1 114 - (CONTINUED) - 1. NO 2. YES, FOR PROVINCIAL ONLY 3. YES, FOR FEDERAL ONLY 4. YES, FOR BOTH 7. YES, DK LEVEL 8. DK 9. NA 0 - 0 SECTION I. INTEREST,INVOLVEMENT,STAKE IN OUTCOME ------------------------------------------------ ............................................................... 0 VAR 0232 DID ELECTION MATTER MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0232 LOC 398 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 77 0 Q.I.L. HOW MUCH DID IT MATTER TO YOU WHO WON THIS YEAR'S B.C. PROVINCIAL ELECTION, ON MAY 10? WOULD YOU SAY IT MATTERED . . . (READ LIST) -------------------------------------------------------- 1. A LOT 2. SOME 3. NOT MUCH AT ALL 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0233 MORE AT STAKE-75 OR 79 MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0233 LOC 399 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 78 0 Q.I.2. DO YOU THINK MORE WAS AT STAKE IN THE DECEMBER 1975 PROVINCIAL ELECTION THAN IN THIS YEAR'S ELECTION? ------------------------------------------------------ 1. YES,MORE AT STAKE IN 1975. 2. NO, NO DIFFERENCE 3. NO, NO MORE AT STAKE IN 1979 8. DK 1 115 - (CONTINUED) - 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0234 CAPTALSM/SOCIALSM ACCUR MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0234 LOC 400 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 79 0 Q.I.3. B.C. ELECTIONS ARE OFTEN DESCRIBED AS CONTESTS BETWEEN "FREE ENTERPRISE" AND "SOCIALISM". DO YOU THINK THIS IS AN ACCURATE DESCRIPTION OF THIS YEAR'S B.C. ELECTION? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0235 CAPTALSM/SOCIALSM-DSRBLE MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0235 LOC 401 WIDTH 1 DK 6 COL 80 0 Q.I.4. DO YOU FEEL THAT PARTIES SHOULD DIFFER FROM EACH OTHER IN THIS WAY? (ADD IF NECESSARY: REMEMBER WE ARE TALKING ABOUT FREE ENTERPRISE VERSUS SOCIALISM). ------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0 DECK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER IS '07' DK 7 COL 1- 2 ---------------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0813 ICPSR STUDY NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0813 LOC 1672 WIDTH 4 DK 7 COL 3- 6 0 1 116 - 0 VAR 0814 ICPSR EDITION NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0814 LOC 1676 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 7 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0815 ICPSR PART NUMBER NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0815 LOC 1677 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 8 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0001 RESPONDENT ID NO MISSING DATA CODES REF 0001 LOC 1 WIDTH 6 DK 7 COL 9-14 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0236 PARTY DISTANCE-OK OR NOT MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0236 LOC 402 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 15 0 Q.I.5. THINKING OF ALL THE WAYS PARTIES CAN DIFFER DO YOU FEEL THAT THE PRESENT B.C. PARTIES SHOULD BE MORE DIFFERENT THAN THEY ARE NOW, LESS DIFFERENT OR IS THE PRESENT SITUATION ABOUT RIGHT? ----------------------------------------------------- 1. MORE DIFFERENT 2. LESS DIFFERENT 3. ABOUT RIGHT 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0237 POLICY DIF/MANAGRL SKILL MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0237 LOC 403 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 16 0 Q.I.6. MANY PEOPLE ARE LESS CONCERNED WITH "FREE ENTERPRISE" VERSUS "SOCIALISM" THAN WITH HOW WELL THE PARTIES GO ABOUT THE BUSINESS OF GOVERNMENT. IN JUDGING A PARTY, WHICH IS MORE IMPORTANT TO YOU: HOW DIFFERENT ITS POLICIES ARE FROM ITS OPPONENT'S POLICIES, OR ITS ABILITY TO MANAGE THE GOVERNMENT? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. POLICY DIFFERENCE 1 117 - (CONTINUED) - 2. MANAGERIAL ABILITY 3. BOTH EQUALLY 4. NEITHER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0238 BETTR MANAGER-NDP/SOCRED MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0238 LOC 404 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 17 0 Q.I.7. IN B.C. WHICH PARTY WOULD BE THE BETTER MANAGER OF GOVERNMENT, THE NEW DEMOCRATS OR SOCIAL CREDIT? ------------------------------------------------------ 1. NEW DEMOCRATS 2. SOCIAL CREDIT 3. NO DIFFERENCE, BOTH OKAY 4. NO DIFFERENCE, NEITHER OKAY 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0239 MORE AT STAKE-FED/PROV MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0239 LOC 405 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 18 0 Q.I.8. HERE IN B.C., WE HAD TWO ELECTIONS LAST MAY, A PROVINCIAL ONE AND A FEDERAL ONE. IN WHICH ELECTION DID YOU THINK THE STAKES WERE HIGHER? (PROBE IF NECESSARY: WHICH WAS MORE IMPORTANT TO YOU, THE PROVINCIAL OR THE FEDERAL ELECTION?) -------------------------------------------------------- 1. PROVINCIAL 2. FEDERAL 3. BOTH EQUALLY IMPORTANT 4. NEITHER IMPORTANT 8. DK 9. NA 0 1 118 - 0 VAR 0240 FOLLOW POLITICS MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0240 LOC 406 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 19 0 Q.I.9. ASIDE FROM ELECTION TIME, HOW CLOSELY WOULD YOU SAY YOU FOLLOW POLITICS ON A DAY TO DAY BASIS? WOULD YOU SAY YOU FOLLOW POLITICS VERY CLOSELY, FAIRLY CLOSELY, NOT VERY CLOSELY, OR NOT AT ALL? ------------------------------------------------------ 1. VERY CLOSELY 2. FAIRLY CLOSELY 3. NOT VERY CLOSELY 4. NOT AT ALL 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0241 LEVEL INTERESTED IN MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0241 LOC 407 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 20 0 Q.I.10. ASIDE FROM ELECTION CAMPAIGNS, WHAT SORT OF POLITICS WOULD YOU SAY YOU PAY MOST ATTENTION TO: FEDERAL POLITICS, PROVINCIAL POLITICS, LOCAL POLITICS, OR POLITICS IN OTHER COUNTRIES AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS? ------------------------------------------------------ 1. FEDERAL 2. PROVINCIAL 3. LOCAL 4. INTERNATIONAL,INCLUDING COMBINATIONS 5. FEDERAL,PROVINCIAL AND LOCAL;ALL EQUALLY 6. FEDERAL/PROVINCIAL 7. PROVINCIAL/LOCAL;FEDERAL/LOCAL 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 4,8 OR 9 IN Q.I.9 0 - 0 SECTION VI. PARTY CONTACT DURING CAMPAIGNS ------------------------------------------ 1 119 - 0 VAR 0242 PROV OR FED HARD FOUGHT MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0242 LOC 408 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 21 0 Q.VI.1. AS YOU KNOW, THE FEDERAL AND PROVINCIAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNS IN B.C. OVERLAPPED THIS YEAR. WHICH CAMPAIGN WAS MORE HARD FOUGHT IN YOUR RIDING, THE PROVINCIAL CAMPAIGN OR THE FEDERAL ONE? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. PROVINCIAL 2. FEDERAL 3. BOTH 4. NEITHER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0243 CAMPGN CONTACT-PERSONAL MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0243 LOC 409 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 22 0 Q.VI.2. DURING THE CAMPAIGNS WERE YOU PERSONALLY CONTACTED BY ANY OF THE LOCAL CANDIDATES OR PARTY WORKERS IN YOUR RIDING? ------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0244 CAMPGN CNTCT NON-PERSNL MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0244 LOC 410 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 23 0 Q.VI.3. WERE YOU CONTACTED IN ANY OTHER WAYS DURING THE CAMPAIGNS, FOR EXAMPLE, BY TELEPHONE OR HAVING A PAMPHLET LEFT IN YOUR MAILBOX? ------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 1 120 - (CONTINUED) - - 0 SECTION IV. MASS MEDIA ---------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0245 TV NEWS-CAMPAIGN MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0245 LOC 411 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 24 0 Q.IV.1. DURING THE ELECTION CAMPAIGNS, HOW OFTEN DID YOU WATCH THE NEWS ON TELEVISION? (READ LIST) -------------------------------------------------------- 1. EVERY DAY 2. FEW TIMES A WEEK 3. WEEKLY 4. VERY RARELY 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0246 RADIO NEWS-CAMPAIGN MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0246 LOC 412 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 25 0 Q.IV.2. DURING THE ELECTION CAMPAIGNS, HOW OFTEN DID YOU LISTEN TO THE NEWS ON RADIO? (READ LIST) -------------------------------------------------------- 1. EVERY DAY 2. FEW TIMES A WEEK 3. WEEKLY 4. VERY RARELY 8. DK 9. NA 0 1 121 - 0 VAR 0247 READ PAPER-CAMPAIGN MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0247 LOC 413 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 26 0 Q.IV.3. DURING THE CAMPAIGNS, HOW OFTEN DID YOU READ A NEWSPAPER? (READ LIST) ------------------------------------------------------ 1. EVERY DAY 2. FEW TIMES A WEEK 3. WEEKLY 4. VERY RARELY 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0248 NUMBER PAPERS READ MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0248 LOC 414 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 27 0 NUMBER OF NEWSPAPERS NORMALLY READ BY RESPONDENT ------------------------------------------------ 0. NONE 1. ONE 2. TWO 3. THREE 4. FOUR 5. FIVE 6. SIX 7. SEVEN OR MORE 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0249 NAME PAPER ONE MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0249 LOC 415 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 28-29 0 NAME OF NEWSPAPER NORMALLY READ - FIRST RESPONSE ------------------------------------------------ 00. VANCOUVER SUN 01. VANCOUVER PROVINCE 02. CRANBROOK TOWNSMAN 03. KAMLOOPS SENTINEL 1 122 - (CONTINUED) - 04. KIMBERLEY BULLETIN 05. NANAIMO FREE PRESS 06. NELSON NEWS 07. NEW WESTMINSTER COLUMBIAN 08. PORT ALBERNI VALLEY TIMES 09. PRINCE GEORGE CITIZEN 10. PRINCE RUPERT NEWS 12. VICTORIA COLONIST 13. VICTORIA TIMES 14. CHINESE TIMES (VANCOUVER) 17. VANCOUVER EXPRESS (STRIKE NEWSPAPER) 18. KELOWNA COURIER 19. OTHER B.C. DAILY 20. CALGARY (ANY PAPER) 21. EDMONTON (ANY PAPER) 22. WINNIPEG (ANY PAPER) 23. MONTREAL STAR 24. MONTREAL GAZETTE 25. TORONTO GLOBE AND MAIL 26. TORONTO STAR 27. SASKATCHEWAN (ANY PAPER) 28. FINANCIAL POST/TIMES (TORONTO) 29. OTHER CANADIAN 33. SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER 34. NEW YORK TIMES 39. OTHER FOREIGN 40. CAMPBELL RIVER MIRROR 46. LANGLEY ADVANCE 48. FRASER VALLEY RECORD (MISSION) 49. 100 MILE HOUSE FREE PRESS 52. CARIBOO OBSERVER (QUESNEL) 53. SURREY LEADER 54. DELTA MESSENGER 55. BOUNDARY ROAD (VANCOUVER) 56. COURIER (VANCOUVER) 58. GEORGIA STRAIGHT (VANCOUVER) 59. HIGHLAND ECHO (VANCOUVER) 60. NORTH SHORE CITIZEN (N. VANCOUVER) 61. NORTH SHORE TIMES (N. VANCOUVER) 62. WESTERN NEWS (VANCOUVER) 63. MONDAY MAGAZINE (VICTORIA) 65. WHITE ROCK AND S. SURREY SUN 66. LAKETOWN NEWS (WILLIAMS LAKE) 67. QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS OBSERVER 69. OTHER B.C. WEEKLY 70. COMOX FREE PRESS 71. CRESTON VALLEY ADVANCE 72. KAMLOOPS NEWS 73. NANAIMO TIMES 74. NORTH SHORE SHOPPERS NEWS (N. VANCOUVER) 1 123 - (CONTINUED) - 76. WILLIAMS LAKE TRIBUNE 79. OTHER B.C. TWICE WEEKLY 89. OTHER ETHNIC PAPER 97. OTHER UNSPECIFIED 98. DK 99. NA;NO NEWSPAPERS READ 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0250 NAME PAPER TWO MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0250 LOC 417 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 30-31 0 NAME OF NEWSPAPER NORMALLY READ - SECOND RESPONSE ------------------------------------------------- 99. INAP.,CODED 99 IN REF.249 OR NO SECOND RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0251 NAME PAPER THREE MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0251 LOC 419 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 32-33 0 NAME OF NEWSPAPER NORMALLY READ - THIRD RESPONSE ------------------------------------------------ 99. INAP.,CODED 99 IN REF.251 OR NO THIRD RESPONSE 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0252 PAPER1 MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0252 LOC 421 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 34-35 0 LOCATION OF NEWSPAPER RELATIVE TO RESPONDENT - FIRST NEWSPAPER ---------------------------------------------------- 00. SAME RIDING OR COMMUNITY AS RESPONDENT 01. GREATER VICTORIA 02. VANCOUVER ISLAND 03. CENTRAL NORTH COAST 04. NORTH SHORE 05. VANCOUVER CITY 06. VANCOUVER SUBURBS 07. FRASER VALLEY 1 124 - (CONTINUED) - 08. CENTRAL INTERIOR 09. OKANAGAN 10. KOOTENAYS 11. NORTH 12. PEACE 13. B.C.-UNABLE TO LOCATE 20. ALBERTA 21. SASKATCHEWAN 22. MANITOBA 30. ONTARIO 40. QUEBEC 50. NEW BRUNSWICK 51. NOVA SCOTIA 52. PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND 53. NEWFOUNDLAND 60. TERRITORIES 61. CANADA-UNSPECIFIED 70. UNITED STATES 80. OTHER 98. DK 99. NA,NO FIRST NEWSPAPER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0253 PAPER2 MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0253 LOC 423 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 36-37 0 LOCATION OF NEWSPAPER RELATIVE TO RESPONDENT - SECOND NEWSPAPER ----------------------------------------------------- 99. NA;INAP.,NO SECOND NEWSPAPER 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0254 PAPER3 MD=98 OR GE 99 REF 0254 LOC 425 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 38-39 0 LOCATION OF NEWSPAPER RELATIVE TO RESPONDENT - THIRD NEWSPAPER ---------------------------------------------------- 99. NA;INAP.,NO THIRD NEWSPAPER 0 1 125 - 0 VAR 0255 READ SUN OR PROVINCE MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0255 LOC 427 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 40 0 RESPONDENT READS VANCOUVER SUN OR PROVINCE? Q.IV.5. (IF SUN OR PROVINCE NOT MENTIONED) DO YOU EVER READ THE VANCOUVER SUN OR THE PROVINCE? ------------------------------------------------------- 1. READS SUN OR PROVINCE 2. DOES NOT READ SUN OR PROVINCE 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0256 PAPER STRIKE A PRBLM MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0256 LOC 428 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 41 0 Q.IV.6. AS YOU KNOW, THE VANCOUVER SUN AND PROVINCE WERE NOT PUBLISHING DURING THE PROVINCIAL AND FEDERAL CAMPAIGNS BECAUSE OF A LABOUR-MANAGEMENT DISPUTE. DID THIS CAUSE YOU ANY DIFFICULTY IN FOLLOWING THE CAMPAIGNS? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 2,8 OR 9 IN REF.255 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0257 PAPER ALTERNATIVE MD=0 OR GE 98 REF 0257 LOC 429 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 42-43 0 Q.IV.7. HOW DID YOU DEAL WITH THIS SITUATION? DID YOU READ OTHER DAILIES, WEEKLY NEWSPAPERS, OR RELY MORE ON RADIO, ON T.V., OR WHAT? (ACCEPT MULTIPLE RESPONSES) ------------------------------------------------------ 01. READ OTHER DAILIES 02. WEEKLIES 03. RADIO 04. T.V. 1 126 - (CONTINUED) - 05. NEWSPAPERS AND RADIO 06. NEWSPAPERS AND T.V. 07. NEWSPAPERS, RADIO AND T.V. 08. RADIO AND T.V. 09. MAGAZINES 10. NEWSPAPERS AND MAGAZINES 11. NEWSPAPERS, MAGAZINES AND T.V. 12. NEWSPAPERS, MAGAZINES, RADIO 13. NEWSPAPERS, MAGAZINES, RADIO AND T.V. 14. TALKED TO FRIENDS 15. WENT TO MEETINGS 16. TALKED TO CANDIDATES, OFFICIALS 17. FRIENDS, PLUS MEDIA 18. MEDIA PLUS MEETINGS 19. CANDIDATES, OFFICIALS PLUS MEDIA 20. MAGAZINES AND T.V. 21. MAGAZINES AND RADIO 22. MAGAZINES, RADIO AND T.V. 23. PARTY LITERATURE 24. ANY MEDIA AND PARTY LITERATURE 96. OTHER 97. DID NOTHING 98. DK 99. NA 00. INAP.,CODED 0,8 OR 9 IN Q.IV.6 0 - 0 SECTION V. PERSONAL INFLUENCE ----------------------------- ............................................................... 0 VAR 0258 INFORMTION PEOPLE/MEDIA MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0258 LOC 431 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 44 0 Q.V.1. WE ARE INTERESTED IN WHERE PEOPLE GET THEIR INFORMATION ABOUT CAMPAIGNS AND ELECTIONS. WOULD YOU THAT YOU GET MORE INFORMATION FROM MASS MEDIA, LIKE T.V., NEWSPAPERS, OR RADIO, OR FROM DISCUSSING THE ELECTION WITH OTHER PEOPLE, LIKE FRIENDS, RELATIVES, OR PEOPLE AT WORK? ------------------------------------------------------- 1. MASS MEDIA 1 127 - (CONTINUED) - 2. OTHER PEOPLE 3. BOTH EQUALLY 4. NOT MUCH FROM EITHER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0259 DISCUSS POLITIC-CAMPIAGN MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0259 LOC 432 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 45 0 Q.V.2. DURING THE PROVINCIAL AND FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNS THIS YEAR, HOW OFTEN DID YOU DISCUSS POLITICS WITH FRIENDS? (READ LIST) ------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALMOST EVERY DAY 2. WEEKLY 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0260 INFLUENCE OTHERS VOTE MD=0 OR GE 8 REF 0260 LOC 433 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 46 0 Q.V.3. IN THESE DISCUSSIONS WITH FRIENDS, DID YOU TRY TO PERSUADE EACH OTHER HOW TO VOTE? -------------------------------------------------------- 1. YES 2. NO 3. SOMETIMES 8. DK 9. NA 0. INAP.,CODED 5,8 OR 9 IN Q.V.2 0 1 128 - 0 VAR 0261 FREQUENCY TALK FRIENDS MD=8 OR GE 9 REF 0261 LOC 434 WIDTH 1 DK 7 COL 47 0 Q.V.4. NOW, THINKING ABOUT CONVERSATIONS ON ALL TOPICS, DO YOU TALK WITH FRIENDS, FOR EXAMPLE, ON THE TELEPHONE OR IN PERSON? (READ LIST) (NOTE: NOT JUST DURING ELECTION CAMPAIGN.) ------------------------------------------------------- 1. ALMOST EVERY DAY 2. WEEKLY 3. OCCASIONALLY 4. HARDLY EVER 5. NEVER 8. DK 9. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0262 LOCATION 1ST FRIEND MD=9999 REF 0262 LOC 435 WIDTH 4 DK 7 COL 48-51 0 Q.V.5. WE ARE VERY INTERESTED IN THE PATTERNS OF FRIENDSHIPS PEOPLE HAVE THESE DAYS, WHETHER FRIENDS LIVE NEAR EACH OTHER OR WHETHER PEOPLE HAVE FRIENDS ALL OVER CANADA OR ABROAD. THINKING OF THE THREE BEST FRIENDS YOU HAVE, WOULD YOU MIND TELLING ME WHERE THEY LIVE-- JUST THE TOWN OR CITY THEY LIVE IN, YOU DON'T NEED TO GIVE ME THEIR NAMES OR ADDRESSES. (INTERVIEWER: PLEASE BE SURE TO GET THE PROVINCE AS WELL AS TOWN OR CITY; IF R NAMES A PLACE ABROAD, RECORD THE COUNTRY.) - FIRST RESPONSE -------------------------------------------------------- 0001. ABBOTSFORD 0004. AGASSIZ 0007. ALBERNI 0011. ALDERGROVE 0012. ALERT BAY 0016. ALEZA LAKE 0020. ANAHIM LAKE 0023. ARMSTRONG 0027. ASHCROFT 0030. ATLIN 0036. BALFOUR 0044. BAYHEE 0060. BIRCH ISLAND 1 129 - (CONTINUED) - 0063. BLACK CREEK 0074. BOWEN ISLAND 0076. BOWSER 0087. BRIDGE LAKE 0090. BRITANNIA BEACH 0093. BUCKLEY BAY 0096. BURNABY 0097. BURNS LAKE 0098. BURTON 0099. CACHE CREEK 0100. CAMPBELL RIVER 0111. CASTLEGAR 0126. CHEMAINUS 0129. CHETWYND 0132. CHILLIWACK 0142. CLEARBROOK 0143. CLEARWATER 0147. CLOVERDALE 0156. COLUMBIA VALLEY 0157. COMOX 0159. COQUITLAM 0163. COURTENAY 0164. COWICHAN STATION 0166. CRANBROOK 0168. CRESCENT BEACH 0170. CRESTON 0171. CROFTON 0174. CUMBERLAND 0179. DAWSON CREEK 0184. DELTA 0186. DENMAN ISLAND 0200. DUGAN LAKE 0201. DUNCAN 0210. ELKFORD 0219. ERRINGTON 0223. FANNY BAY 0227. FERNIE 0232. FORT GEORGE 0233. FORT LANGLEY 0235. FORT ST. JAMES 0236. FORT ST. JOHN 0238. FORT STEELE 0241. FRASER LAKE 0242. FRUITVALE 0244. GABRIOLA 0248. GANG RANCH 0249. GANGES 0253. GIBSONS 0265. GOLDEN 0269. GRANISLE 1 130 - (CONTINUED) - 0276. GREENDALE 0277. GREEN LAKE 0278. GREENWOOD 0279. GRINDROD 0289. HANEY 0298. HAZELTON 0300. HEFFLEY CREEK 0301. HENDRIX LAKE 0309. HOPE 0311. HORNBY ISLAND 0321. INVERMERE 0322. IOCO 0323. JAFFRAY 0325. JUSKATLA 0328. KAMLOOPS 0331. KELOWNA 0341. KIMBERLEY 0344. KITIMAT 0354. KYE BAY 0355. LAC LA HACHE 0356. LADNER 0357. LADYSMITH 0359. LAKE COWICHAN 0365. LANGLEY 0366. LANTZVILLE 0376. LITTLE FORT 0384. LUMBY 0387. LYNN VALLEY 0389. MACKENZIE 0398. MAPLE RIDGE 0400. MARGUERIT 0403. MASSET 0404. MATSQUI 0406. MCBRIDE 0409. MCLEESE LAKE 0415. MERRITT 0416. MERVILLE 0419. METCHOSIN 0423. MILL BAY (STEWART) 0429. MISSION 0451. NAKUSP 0452. NANAIMO 0453. NANOOSE BAY 0458. NELSON 0465. NEW WESTMINSTER 0467. NEWTON 0477. NORTH DELTA 0480. NORTH PINE 0482. NORTH VANCOUVER 0491. OLIVER 1 131 - (CONTINUED) - 0492. 100 MILE HOUSE 0497. OSOYOOS 0499. OYSTER RIVER 0501. PARKSVILLE 0507. PEMBERTON 0509. PENDER HARBOUR 0510. PENTICTON 0515. PITT MEADOWS 0517. PORT ALBERNI 0519. PORT ALICE 0520. PORT CLEMENTS 0521. PORT COQUITLAM 0522. PORT EDWARD 0524. PORT HARDY 0526. PORT MCNEILL 0529. POWELL RIVER 0530. POWERS ADDITION 0531. PRINCE GEORGE 0532. PRINCE RUPERT 0539. QUADRA ISLAND 0540. QUALICUM BAY 0541. QUALICUM BEACH 0544. QUEEN CHARLOTTE 0546. QUESNEL 0551. RED ROCK 0553. REVELSTOKE 0554. RICHMOND 0555. RIONDEL 0560. ROCK CREEK 0567. ROSEDALE 0568. ROSSLAND 0576. SAANICH 0578. SALMON ARM 0581. SALTSPRING 0585. SANDSPIT 0586. SARDIS 0588. SATURNA ISLAND 0591. SAYWARD 0594. SECHELT 0598. 70 MILE HOUSE 0599. SHALALTH 0605. SIDNEY 0619. SMITHERS 0623. SOOKE 0636. SPARWOOD 0637. SQUAMISH 0659. SUMMERLAND 0664. SURREY 0669. TABOR CREEK 0671. TAHSIS 1 132 - (CONTINUED) - 0678. TELEGRAPH COVE 0680. TERRACE 0682. TEXADA ISLAND 0691. TRAIL 0700. UCLUELET 0702. UNION BAY 0705. VALEMOUNT 0708. VANCOUVER 0709. VANDERHOOF 0712. VERNON 0714. VICTORIA 0717. WANETA 0718. WARDNER 0724. WESTBANK 0728. WEST VANCOUVER 0734. WHITE ROCK 0736. WHONNOCK 0737. WHALLEY 0739. WILLIAMS LAKE 0743. WILLOW POINT 0757. WYCLIFF 0761. YARROW 0763. YOUBOU 0764. ZEBALLOS 0765. PORT MOODY 0767. GREENVILLE 0998. B.C. UNABLE TO LOCATE 1002. ALBERTA 1004. MANITOBA 1005. NEW BRUNSWICK 1006. NEWFOUNDLAND 1007. NORTHWEST TERRITORIES 1008. NOVA SCOTIA 1009. ONTARIO 1010. PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND 1011. QUEBEC 1012. SASKATCHEWAN 1013. YUKON 1098. CANADA, DK 2015. ALASKA 2017. ARIZONA 2019. CALIFORNIA 2022. COLORADO 2025. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 2026. FLORIDA 2029. HAWAII 2030. IDAHO 2031. ILLINOIS 2041. MASSACHUSETTS 2042. MICHIGAN 1 133 - (CONTINUED) - 2044. MINNESOTA 2047. NEBRASKA 2050. NEW JERSEY 2051. NEW MEXICO 2052. NEW YORK 2057. OREGON 2058. PENNSYLVANIA 2064. TEXAS 2065. UTAH 2069. WASHINGTON 3073. UNITED KINGDOM 3074. FRANCE 3075. GERMANY 3076. ITALY 3077. GREECE 3078. NETHERLANDS 3079. OTHER EUROPE 3080. JAPAN 3081. HONG KONG 3082. CHINA 3083. SOUTH ASIA 3084. SOUTH EAST ASIA 3088. MEXICO 3090. AUSTRALIA 3092. CARIBBEAN 3093. AFRICA 3094. MIDDLE EAST 3095. OTHER UNSPECIFIED 3096. SOUTH AMERICA 9999. NA;NO FIRST FRIEND 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0263 LOCATION 2ND FRIEND MD=9999 REF 0263 LOC 439 WIDTH 4 DK 7 COL 52-55 0 SECOND RESPONSE TO Q.V.5. ------------------------- 9999. NA;INAP.,NO SECOND FRIEND 0 1 134 - 0 VAR 0264 LOCATION 3RD FRIEND MD=9999 REF 0264 LOC 443 WIDTH 4 DK 7 COL 56-59 0 THIRD RESPONSE TO Q.V.5. ------------------------ 9999. NA;INAP.,NO THIRD FRIEND 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0265 LOCATION CONTACT PERSON MD=9999 REF 0265 LOC 447 WIDTH 4 DK 7 COL 60-63 0 LOCATION OF CLOSE RELATIVE OR FRIEND ALWAYS IN CONTACT WITH RESPONDENT AS YOU KNOW, WE HOPE TO BE ABLE TO INTERVIEW YOU AGAIN IN THREE OR FOUR YEARS TO SEE HOW THINGS HAVE CHANGED FOR YOU. IN ORDER TO HELP US KEEP TRACK OF EVERYONE WE INTERVIEW, IN CASE THEY MOVE OR SOMETHING, COULD I ASK YOU TO GIVE ME THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF A CLOSE RELATIVE OR FRIEND WHO WOULD ALWAYS KNOW WHERE YOU COULD BE REACHED. WE WILL NOT BOTHER THIS PERSON OR TRY TO INTERVIEW THEM; WE JUST WANT TO BE ABLE TO CALL ON SOMEONE RELIABLE IF YOU HAPPEN TO MOVE. (INTERVIEWER: GET NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER: AND IF POSSIBLE ASCERTAIN RELATIONSHIP TO RESPONDENT, FOR EXAMPLE, MOTHER, BROTHER, COUSIN) ------------------------------------------------------- 9999. NA 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0266 LOCATION1 MD=99 REF 0266 LOC 451 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 64-65 0 LOCATION OF FRIEND RELATIVE TO RESPONDENT - FIRST FRIEND -------------------------------------------------------- 00. SAME RIDING OR COMMUNITY AS RESPONDENT 01. GREATER VICTORIA 02. VANCOUVER ISLAND 1 135 - (CONTINUED) - 03. CENTRAL NORTH COAST 04. NORTH SHORE 05. VANCOUVER CITY 06. VANCOUVER SUBURBS 07. FRASER VALLEY 08. CENTRAL INTERIOR 09. OKANAGAN 10. KOOTENAYS 11. NORTH 12. PEACE 13. B.C.-UNABLE TO LOCATE 20. ALBERTA 21. SASKATCHEWAN 22. MANITOBA 30. ONTARIO 40. QUEBEC 50. NEW BRUNSWICK 51. NOVA SCOTIA 52. PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND 53. NEWFOUNDLAND 60. TERRITORIES 61. CANADA-UNSPECIFIED 70. UNITED STATES 80. OTHER 99. NA;INAP.,NO FIRST FRIEND 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0267 LOCATION2 MD=99 REF 0267 LOC 453 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 66-67 0 LOCATION OF FRIEND RELATIVE TO RESPONDENT - SECOND FRIEND -------------------------------------------------- 99. NA;INAP.,NO SECOND FRIEND 0 ............................................................... 0 VAR 0268 LOCATION3 MD=99 REF 0268 LOC 455 WIDTH 2 DK 7 COL 68-69 0 LOCATION OF FRIEND RELATIVE TO RESPONDENT - THIRD FRIEND -------------------------------------------------------- 1 136 - (CONTINUED)