21 Jul 98 SPSS for Unix, Release 6.1 (AIX 3.2) Page 1 17:57:38 U of T Library IBM RS6000 AIX 3.2.5/4. For AIX 3.2.5/4. U of T Library SPSS ID 1294 1 0 title Political support in Canada 1983-1988 2 0 subtitle 1988 pre-election survey - frequencies 3 0 set length=none width=80 4 import file='test.yr88' Portable file: sp9874ex.yr88z File format: Communications Date and time: 1992/07/20 16:29:38 Originating software: SPSS RELEASE 4.1 FOR IBM OS/MVS Originating installation: University of North Texas Precision: 5 base-30 digits - roughly 7 base-10 digits Variables: 160 Weighting variable: -NONE- Number of cases read: 2,168 Input file size: 10,164 records (813,120 bytes) Preceding task required 1.88 seconds CPU time; 2.51 seconds elapsed. 5 frequencies variables=alang84 to acommsiz alangi to aq82 6 aw1date / format=onepage >Warning # 704 on line 5 in column 53. Text: AQ28 >This procedure cannot use string variables longer than 8 characters. Only >the first 8 will be used. Memory allows a total of 18,724 values accumulated across all variables. There may be up to 2,340 value labels for each variable. 21 Jul 98 Political support in Canada 1983-1988 Page 2 17:57:43 1988 pre-election survey - frequencies ALANG84 LANGUAGE 1984 QUESTIONNAIRE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1984 ENGLISH 1 660 30.4 30.4 30.4 1984 FRENCH 2 198 9.1 9.1 39.6 NEW RESPONDENT 9 1310 60.4 60.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARESPTYP TYPE OF RESPONDENT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1984 RESPONDENT 1 858 39.6 39.6 39.6 NEW RESPONDENT 2 1248 57.6 57.6 97.1 18-21 SUPPLEMENT 3 62 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APROV 1988 PROVINCE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEWFOUNDLAND 1 96 4.4 4.4 4.4 PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND 2 93 4.3 4.3 8.7 NOVA SCOTIA 3 128 5.9 5.9 14.6 NEW BRUNSWICK 4 98 4.5 4.5 19.1 QUEBEC 5 514 23.7 23.7 42.9 ONTARIO 6 649 29.9 29.9 72.8 MANITOBA 7 90 4.2 4.2 76.9 SASKATCHEWAN 8 91 4.2 4.2 81.1 ALBERTA 9 176 8.1 8.1 89.3 BRITISH COLUMBIA 10 233 10.7 10.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACOMMSIZ COMMUNITY SIZE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 500M+ 1 802 37.0 37.0 37.0 100-500M 2 262 12.1 12.1 49.1 30-100M 3 180 8.3 8.3 57.4 10-30M 4 172 7.9 7.9 65.3 1-10M 5 237 10.9 10.9 76.2 RURAL 6 515 23.8 23.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ALANGI LANGUAGE OF INTERVIEW Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ENGLISH 1 1684 77.7 77.7 77.7 FRENCH 2 483 22.3 22.3 100.0 OTHER 3 1 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AGENDER GENDER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALE 1 1094 50.5 50.5 50.5 FEMALE 2 1074 49.5 49.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ01 POLITICAL INTEREST Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY CLOSELY 1 315 14.5 14.5 14.5 FAIRLY CLOSELY 2 1209 55.8 55.8 70.3 NOT MUCH AT ALL 3 640 29.5 29.5 99.8 DK 8 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ02A1 DISCUSS POLITICS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OFTEN 1 626 28.9 28.9 28.9 SOMETIMES 2 906 41.8 41.8 70.7 SELDOM 3 437 20.2 20.2 90.8 NEVER 4 197 9.1 9.1 99.9 DK 8 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ02A2 CONVINCE FRIENDS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OFTEN 1 136 6.3 6.3 6.3 SOMETIMES 2 255 11.8 11.8 18.0 SELDOM 3 302 13.9 13.9 32.0 NEVER 4 1471 67.9 67.9 99.8 DK 8 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ02A3 ATTEND MEETINGS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OFTEN 1 67 3.1 3.1 3.1 SOMETIMES 2 249 11.5 11.5 14.6 SELDOM 3 326 15.0 15.0 29.6 NEVER 4 1525 70.3 70.3 100.0 DK 8 1 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ02A4 CONTACT OFFICIALS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OFTEN 1 101 4.7 4.7 4.7 SOMETIMES 2 432 19.9 19.9 24.6 SELDOM 3 423 19.5 19.5 44.1 NEVER 4 1208 55.7 55.7 99.8 DK 8 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ02B VOTE FEDERAL ELECTIONS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OFTEN 1 1906 87.9 87.9 87.9 SOMETIMES 2 114 5.3 5.3 93.2 SELDOM 3 60 2.8 2.8 95.9 NEVER 4 59 2.7 2.7 98.7 NOT ELIGIBLE 5 20 .9 .9 99.6 DK 8 9 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ03A PROVINCE THERMOMETER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEGATIVE 1 4 .2 .2 .2 2 1 .0 .0 .2 5 6 .3 .3 .5 7 1 .0 .0 .6 8 4 .2 .2 .7 9 3 .1 .1 .9 10 5 .2 .2 1.1 11 1 .0 .0 1.2 20 6 .3 .3 1.4 23 1 .0 .0 1.5 24 1 .0 .0 1.5 25 11 .5 .5 2.0 30 16 .7 .7 2.8 32 1 .0 .0 2.8 35 2 .1 .1 2.9 40 33 1.5 1.5 4.4 45 11 .5 .5 4.9 48 1 .0 .0 5.0 NEUTRAL 50 186 8.6 8.6 13.6 51 1 .0 .0 13.6 52 1 .0 .0 13.7 55 8 .4 .4 14.0 57 1 .0 .0 14.1 60 120 5.5 5.5 19.6 65 32 1.5 1.5 21.1 67 1 .0 .0 21.1 68 2 .1 .1 21.2 70 199 9.2 9.2 30.4 75 300 13.8 13.8 44.2 78 1 .0 .0 44.3 80 323 14.9 14.9 59.2 82 2 .1 .1 59.3 83 1 .0 .0 59.3 85 84 3.9 3.9 63.2 87 1 .0 .0 63.2 89 2 .1 .1 63.3 90 319 14.7 14.7 78.0 92 1 .0 .0 78.1 95 80 3.7 3.7 81.8 98 12 .6 .6 82.3 99 22 1.0 1.0 83.3 POSTIVE 100 338 15.6 15.6 98.9 DK, REFUSED 888 23 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ03B GOVERNMENT OF PROVINCE THERMOMETER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEGATIVE 1 53 2.4 2.4 2.4 2 4 .2 .2 2.6 3 2 .1 .1 2.7 4 2 .1 .1 2.8 5 6 .3 .3 3.1 6 3 .1 .1 3.2 7 3 .1 .1 3.4 8 2 .1 .1 3.5 9 1 .0 .0 3.5 10 30 1.4 1.4 4.9 15 5 .2 .2 5.1 17 1 .0 .0 5.2 20 48 2.2 2.2 7.4 25 52 2.4 2.4 9.8 28 1 .0 .0 9.8 30 86 4.0 4.0 13.8 35 22 1.0 1.0 14.8 40 119 5.5 5.5 20.3 42 1 .0 .0 20.3 44 1 .0 .0 20.4 45 37 1.7 1.7 22.1 46 1 .0 .0 22.1 47 1 .0 .0 22.2 48 4 .2 .2 22.4 49 5 .2 .2 22.6 NEUTRAL 50 425 19.6 19.6 42.2 51 5 .2 .2 42.4 52 1 .0 .0 42.5 55 36 1.7 1.7 44.1 60 276 12.7 12.7 56.9 62 1 .0 .0 56.9 64 1 .0 .0 57.0 65 67 3.1 3.1 60.1 68 1 .0 .0 60.1 70 198 9.1 9.1 69.2 71 1 .0 .0 69.3 72 1 .0 .0 69.3 74 1 .0 .0 69.4 75 256 11.8 11.8 81.2 80 172 7.9 7.9 89.1 85 43 2.0 2.0 91.1 90 93 4.3 4.3 95.4 95 13 .6 .6 96.0 98 2 .1 .1 96.1 99 4 .2 .2 96.3 POSTIVE 100 35 1.6 1.6 97.9 DK, REFUSED 888 46 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ031 CANADA THERMOMETER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEGATIVE 1 7 .3 .3 .3 2 2 .1 .1 .4 5 2 .1 .1 .5 6 1 .0 .0 .6 8 2 .1 .1 .6 9 2 .1 .1 .7 10 5 .2 .2 1.0 15 1 .0 .0 1.0 20 8 .4 .4 1.4 25 8 .4 .4 1.8 30 13 .6 .6 2.4 33 1 .0 .0 2.4 35 1 .0 .0 2.4 40 26 1.2 1.2 3.6 45 7 .3 .3 4.0 49 1 .0 .0 4.0 NEUTRAL 50 159 7.3 7.3 11.3 51 3 .1 .1 11.5 53 1 .0 .0 11.5 55 12 .6 .6 12.1 60 159 7.3 7.3 19.4 65 29 1.3 1.3 20.8 70 164 7.6 7.6 28.3 75 221 10.2 10.2 38.5 76 1 .0 .0 38.6 77 1 .0 .0 38.6 78 3 .1 .1 38.7 80 290 13.4 13.4 52.1 85 88 4.1 4.1 56.2 86 1 .0 .0 56.2 88 3 .1 .1 56.4 90 310 14.3 14.3 70.7 92 1 .0 .0 70.7 95 98 4.5 4.5 75.2 98 16 .7 .7 76.0 99 23 1.1 1.1 77.0 POSTIVE 100 466 21.5 21.5 98.5 DK, REFUSED 888 32 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ032 GOVERNMENT OF CANADA THERMOMETER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEGATIVE 1 49 2.3 2.3 2.3 2 5 .2 .2 2.5 3 6 .3 .3 2.8 5 14 .6 .6 3.4 6 1 .0 .0 3.5 7 1 .0 .0 3.5 9 1 .0 .0 3.6 10 46 2.1 2.1 5.7 15 8 .4 .4 6.0 20 67 3.1 3.1 9.1 22 1 .0 .0 9.2 25 63 2.9 2.9 12.1 28 1 .0 .0 12.1 30 121 5.6 5.6 17.7 32 2 .1 .1 17.8 33 1 .0 .0 17.9 35 29 1.3 1.3 19.2 37 1 .0 .0 19.2 38 2 .1 .1 19.3 40 178 8.2 8.2 27.5 41 2 .1 .1 27.6 45 55 2.5 2.5 30.2 48 1 .0 .0 30.2 49 2 .1 .1 30.3 NEUTRAL 50 430 19.8 19.8 50.1 51 2 .1 .1 50.2 52 1 .0 .0 50.3 54 1 .0 .0 50.3 55 36 1.7 1.7 52.0 56 1 .0 .0 52.0 58 1 .0 .0 52.1 59 1 .0 .0 52.1 60 284 13.1 13.1 65.2 62 2 .1 .1 65.3 65 75 3.5 3.5 68.8 68 2 .1 .1 68.9 70 148 6.8 6.8 75.7 71 1 .0 .0 75.7 72 2 .1 .1 75.8 75 185 8.5 8.5 84.4 77 2 .1 .1 84.5 78 1 .0 .0 84.5 80 144 6.6 6.6 91.1 83 1 .0 .0 91.2 85 34 1.6 1.6 92.8 87 1 .0 .0 92.8 88 1 .0 .0 92.9 90 56 2.6 2.6 95.4 93 1 .0 .0 95.5 95 19 .9 .9 96.4 98 1 .0 .0 96.4 99 1 .0 .0 96.4 POSTIVE 100 25 1.2 1.2 97.6 DK, REFUSED 888 52 2.4 2.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ033 FEDERAL CIVIL SERVICE THERMOMETER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEGATIVE 1 30 1.4 1.4 1.4 2 1 .0 .0 1.4 3 6 .3 .3 1.7 5 7 .3 .3 2.0 9 1 .0 .0 2.1 10 18 .8 .8 2.9 14 1 .0 .0 3.0 15 3 .1 .1 3.1 20 51 2.4 2.4 5.4 24 1 .0 .0 5.5 25 49 2.3 2.3 7.7 30 103 4.8 4.8 12.5 31 1 .0 .0 12.5 33 1 .0 .0 12.6 35 20 .9 .9 13.5 40 174 8.0 8.0 21.5 41 1 .0 .0 21.6 43 1 .0 .0 21.6 45 35 1.6 1.6 23.2 46 1 .0 .0 23.3 48 1 .0 .0 23.3 49 4 .2 .2 23.5 NEUTRAL 50 579 26.7 26.7 50.2 51 3 .1 .1 50.4 52 1 .0 .0 50.4 55 37 1.7 1.7 52.1 60 257 11.9 11.9 64.0 63 1 .0 .0 64.0 65 60 2.8 2.8 66.8 68 1 .0 .0 66.8 69 1 .0 .0 66.9 70 112 5.2 5.2 72.0 71 1 .0 .0 72.1 72 2 .1 .1 72.2 75 98 4.5 4.5 76.7 77 1 .0 .0 76.8 78 1 .0 .0 76.8 80 53 2.4 2.4 79.2 85 8 .4 .4 79.6 87 1 .0 .0 79.7 90 10 .5 .5 80.1 93 1 .0 .0 80.2 95 2 .1 .1 80.3 POSTIVE 100 10 .5 .5 80.7 DK, REFUSED 888 418 19.3 19.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ034 FEDERAL PARLIAMENT THERMOMETER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEGATIVE 1 29 1.3 1.3 1.3 2 1 .0 .0 1.4 3 3 .1 .1 1.5 5 18 .8 .8 2.4 6 3 .1 .1 2.5 8 1 .0 .0 2.5 10 29 1.3 1.3 3.9 15 6 .3 .3 4.2 20 49 2.3 2.3 6.4 25 51 2.4 2.4 8.8 28 1 .0 .0 8.8 30 89 4.1 4.1 12.9 32 2 .1 .1 13.0 35 23 1.1 1.1 14.1 36 3 .1 .1 14.2 40 194 8.9 8.9 23.2 41 1 .0 .0 23.2 45 44 2.0 2.0 25.2 48 3 .1 .1 25.4 49 3 .1 .1 25.5 NEUTRAL 50 580 26.8 26.8 52.3 55 48 2.2 2.2 54.5 56 1 .0 .0 54.5 58 2 .1 .1 54.6 59 1 .0 .0 54.7 60 278 12.8 12.8 67.5 63 2 .1 .1 67.6 64 1 .0 .0 67.6 65 76 3.5 3.5 71.1 68 2 .1 .1 71.2 70 150 6.9 6.9 78.1 72 1 .0 .0 78.2 73 2 .1 .1 78.3 75 146 6.7 6.7 85.0 78 1 .0 .0 85.1 80 83 3.8 3.8 88.9 85 22 1.0 1.0 89.9 89 1 .0 .0 89.9 90 24 1.1 1.1 91.1 95 1 .0 .0 91.1 96 1 .0 .0 91.1 97 1 .0 .0 91.2 POSTIVE 100 19 .9 .9 92.1 DK, REFUSED 888 172 7.9 7.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ035 FEDERAL MPS THERMOMETER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEGATIVE 1 26 1.2 1.2 1.2 2 1 .0 .0 1.2 3 3 .1 .1 1.4 5 8 .4 .4 1.8 6 1 .0 .0 1.8 10 30 1.4 1.4 3.2 15 4 .2 .2 3.4 20 56 2.6 2.6 6.0 22 2 .1 .1 6.0 25 53 2.4 2.4 8.5 30 105 4.8 4.8 13.3 33 1 .0 .0 13.4 35 33 1.5 1.5 14.9 40 200 9.2 9.2 24.1 42 1 .0 .0 24.2 45 48 2.2 2.2 26.4 48 1 .0 .0 26.4 49 1 .0 .0 26.5 NEUTRAL 50 566 26.1 26.1 52.6 51 1 .0 .0 52.6 52 2 .1 .1 52.7 53 1 .0 .0 52.8 55 54 2.5 2.5 55.3 57 1 .0 .0 55.3 58 1 .0 .0 55.4 59 1 .0 .0 55.4 60 324 14.9 14.9 70.3 62 1 .0 .0 70.4 65 105 4.8 4.8 75.2 70 156 7.2 7.2 82.4 72 1 .0 .0 82.5 74 1 .0 .0 82.5 75 123 5.7 5.7 88.2 76 1 .0 .0 88.2 78 3 .1 .1 88.4 80 65 3.0 3.0 91.4 85 13 .6 .6 92.0 87 1 .0 .0 92.0 90 19 .9 .9 92.9 93 1 .0 .0 92.9 95 2 .1 .1 93.0 POSTIVE 100 10 .5 .5 93.5 DK, REFUSED 888 141 6.5 6.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ036 FEDERAL JUDICIARY THERMOMETER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEGATIVE 1 23 1.1 1.1 1.1 2 3 .1 .1 1.2 3 3 .1 .1 1.3 4 1 .0 .0 1.4 5 7 .3 .3 1.7 6 1 .0 .0 1.8 7 1 .0 .0 1.8 8 3 .1 .1 1.9 10 55 2.5 2.5 4.5 15 5 .2 .2 4.7 19 1 .0 .0 4.8 20 56 2.6 2.6 7.3 25 51 2.4 2.4 9.7 30 97 4.5 4.5 14.2 33 1 .0 .0 14.2 35 25 1.2 1.2 15.4 40 167 7.7 7.7 23.1 41 1 .0 .0 23.1 44 1 .0 .0 23.2 45 45 2.1 2.1 25.2 47 1 .0 .0 25.3 48 1 .0 .0 25.3 49 3 .1 .1 25.5 NEUTRAL 50 395 18.2 18.2 43.7 51 4 .2 .2 43.9 52 1 .0 .0 43.9 55 37 1.7 1.7 45.6 60 243 11.2 11.2 56.8 65 77 3.6 3.6 60.4 70 224 10.3 10.3 70.7 71 1 .0 .0 70.8 72 1 .0 .0 70.8 75 210 9.7 9.7 80.5 77 1 .0 .0 80.5 80 161 7.4 7.4 88.0 85 34 1.6 1.6 89.5 87 1 .0 .0 89.6 88 2 .1 .1 89.7 90 62 2.9 2.9 92.5 93 1 .0 .0 92.6 95 7 .3 .3 92.9 POSTIVE 100 23 1.1 1.1 94.0 DK, REFUSED 888 131 6.0 6.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ037 USA THERMOMETER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEGATIVE 1 41 1.9 1.9 1.9 2 3 .1 .1 2.0 3 3 .1 .1 2.2 4 3 .1 .1 2.3 5 7 .3 .3 2.6 6 2 .1 .1 2.7 8 1 .0 .0 2.8 9 2 .1 .1 2.9 10 34 1.6 1.6 4.4 15 9 .4 .4 4.8 20 53 2.4 2.4 7.3 25 39 1.8 1.8 9.1 30 90 4.2 4.2 13.2 33 1 .0 .0 13.3 35 24 1.1 1.1 14.4 40 132 6.1 6.1 20.5 45 36 1.7 1.7 22.1 47 1 .0 .0 22.2 48 2 .1 .1 22.3 49 3 .1 .1 22.4 NEUTRAL 50 527 24.3 24.3 46.7 51 1 .0 .0 46.8 52 3 .1 .1 46.9 55 26 1.2 1.2 48.1 60 297 13.7 13.7 61.8 63 1 .0 .0 61.9 65 77 3.6 3.6 65.4 68 2 .1 .1 65.5 70 199 9.2 9.2 74.7 75 197 9.1 9.1 83.8 77 2 .1 .1 83.9 79 1 .0 .0 83.9 80 135 6.2 6.2 90.1 85 28 1.3 1.3 91.4 89 1 .0 .0 91.5 90 43 2.0 2.0 93.5 92 1 .0 .0 93.5 95 3 .1 .1 93.6 99 3 .1 .1 93.8 POSTIVE 100 40 1.8 1.8 95.6 DK, REFUSED 888 95 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ038 LOCAL COMMUNITY THERMOMETER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEGATIVE 1 5 .2 .2 .2 3 1 .0 .0 .3 4 1 .0 .0 .3 5 1 .0 .0 .4 6 1 .0 .0 .4 7 1 .0 .0 .5 8 2 .1 .1 .6 9 4 .2 .2 .7 10 6 .3 .3 1.0 15 1 .0 .0 1.1 20 19 .9 .9 1.9 25 6 .3 .3 2.2 30 17 .8 .8 3.0 35 3 .1 .1 3.1 38 1 .0 .0 3.2 40 19 .9 .9 4.1 42 1 .0 .0 4.1 45 6 .3 .3 4.4 49 1 .0 .0 4.4 NEUTRAL 50 107 4.9 4.9 9.4 51 1 .0 .0 9.4 55 9 .4 .4 9.8 60 127 5.9 5.9 15.7 65 51 2.4 2.4 18.0 68 1 .0 .0 18.1 69 1 .0 .0 18.1 70 212 9.8 9.8 27.9 72 2 .1 .1 28.0 75 244 11.3 11.3 39.3 79 1 .0 .0 39.3 80 412 19.0 19.0 58.3 85 93 4.3 4.3 62.6 88 1 .0 .0 62.6 89 3 .1 .1 62.8 90 368 17.0 17.0 79.8 95 102 4.7 4.7 84.5 96 1 .0 .0 84.5 98 7 .3 .3 84.8 99 18 .8 .8 85.7 POSTIVE 100 296 13.7 13.7 99.3 DK, REFUSED 888 15 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ041 FREE TRADE-PROSPERITY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 774 35.7 35.7 35.7 DISAGREE 2 1041 48.0 48.0 83.7 DK 8 353 16.3 16.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ042 FREE TRADE-POLITICAL INDEPENDENCE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 970 44.7 44.7 44.7 DISAGREE 2 941 43.4 43.4 88.1 DK 8 257 11.9 11.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ043 FREE TRADE-ECONOMIC SECTORS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1872 86.3 86.3 86.3 DISAGREE 2 138 6.4 6.4 92.7 DK 8 158 7.3 7.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ044 FREE TRADE-CULTURE & ARTS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 822 37.9 37.9 37.9 DISAGREE 2 1007 46.4 46.4 84.4 DK 8 339 15.6 15.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ045 FREE TRADE-REGIONS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 673 31.0 31.0 31.0 DISAGREE 2 1235 57.0 57.0 88.0 DK 8 260 12.0 12.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ05 FREE TRADE-FAVOR OR OPPOSE? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FAVOR 1 829 38.2 38.2 38.2 OPPOSED 2 985 45.4 45.4 83.7 DK' 8 354 16.3 16.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ061 TAXES UNFAIR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1923 88.7 88.7 88.7 DISAGREE 2 178 8.2 8.2 96.9 NO OPINION, DK 8 67 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ062 ACHIEVEMENT V. ASCRIPTION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1240 57.2 57.2 57.2 DISAGREE 2 758 35.0 35.0 92.2 NO OPINION, DK 8 170 7.8 7.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ063 SOME GROUPS TREATED BETTER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1657 76.4 76.4 76.4 DISAGREE 2 361 16.7 16.7 93.1 NO OPINION, DK 8 150 6.9 6.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ064 CIVIL SERVICE EQUAL TREATMENT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 543 25.0 25.0 25.0 DISAGREE 2 1342 61.9 61.9 86.9 NO OPINION, DK 8 283 13.1 13.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ065 PARTIES-TREAT ALL GROUPS FAIRLY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 983 45.3 45.3 45.3 DISAGREE 2 1050 48.4 48.4 93.8 NO OPINION, DK 8 135 6.2 6.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ066 GROUPS DISTRIBUTION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1811 83.5 83.5 83.5 DISAGREE 2 264 12.2 12.2 95.7 NO OPINION, DK 8 93 4.3 4.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ067 COURTS SPEEDY FAIR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 980 45.2 45.2 45.2 DISAGREE 2 926 42.7 42.7 87.9 NO OPINION, DK 8 262 12.1 12.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ068 PARLIAMENT REPRESENTATION FAIR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1276 58.9 58.9 58.9 DISAGREE 2 731 33.7 33.7 92.6 NO OPINION, DK 8 161 7.4 7.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ069 LAW APPLY EQUALLY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 974 44.9 44.9 44.9 DISAGREE 2 1056 48.7 48.7 93.6 NO OPINION, DK 8 138 6.4 6.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ07 COSTS FEDERALISM UNFAIR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1245 57.4 57.4 57.4 NO 2 536 24.7 24.7 82.1 DK 8 387 17.9 17.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ08 BENEFITS FEDERALISM UNFAIR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1341 61.9 61.9 61.9 NO 2 480 22.1 22.1 84.0 DK 8 347 16.0 16.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ09 IMPORTANCE FEDERAL & PROVINCIAL GOVS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 1 639 29.5 29.5 29.5 PROVINCIAL GOVERNMEN 2 944 43.5 43.5 73.0 LOCAL GOVERNMENT 3 263 12.1 12.1 85.1 ALL EQUALLY 4 148 6.8 6.8 92.0 FED & PROV GOVS EQ 5 54 2.5 2.5 94.5 FED & LOCAL GOVS EQ 6 4 .2 .2 94.6 PROV & LOCAL GOVS EQ 7 14 .6 .6 95.3 DK 8 102 4.7 4.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ10A HEARD OF MEECH LAKE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1350 62.3 62.3 62.3 NO 2 761 35.1 35.1 97.4 DK 8 57 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ10B1 MEECH-QUEBEC FULL PARTNER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 714 32.9 32.9 32.9 DISAGREE 2 484 22.3 22.3 55.3 DK 8 152 7.0 7.0 62.3 NOT APPLICABLE 9 818 37.7 37.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ10B2 MEECH-QUEBEC DISTINCT SOCIETY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 631 29.1 29.1 29.1 DISAGREE 2 612 28.2 28.2 57.3 DK 8 107 4.9 4.9 62.3 NOT APPLICABLE 9 818 37.7 37.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ11 MEECH LAKE-FAVOR OR OPPOSE? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FAVOR 1 584 26.9 26.9 26.9 OPPOSED 2 509 23.5 23.5 50.4 DK 8 257 11.9 11.9 62.3 NOT APPLICABLE 9 818 37.7 37.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ12 PRESENT MATERIAL SATISFACTION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY SATISFIED 1 531 24.5 24.5 24.5 FAIRLY SATISFIED 2 1269 58.5 58.5 83.0 LITTLE DISSATISFIED 3 302 13.9 13.9 97.0 VERY DISSATISFIED 4 63 2.9 2.9 99.9 DK 8 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ13 PRESENT MATERIAL SATISFACTION-GOV IMPACT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GREAT DEAL 1 547 25.2 25.2 25.2 SOMETHING 2 765 35.3 35.3 60.5 NOT MUCH 3 815 37.6 37.6 98.1 DK 8 38 1.8 1.8 99.9 NOT APPLICABLE 9 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ14 FUTURE MATERIAL SATISFACTION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BETTER OFF 1 689 31.8 31.8 31.8 WORSE OFF 2 238 11.0 11.0 42.8 SAME 3 1083 50.0 50.0 92.7 BETTER, WORSE 4 37 1.7 1.7 94.4 DK 8 121 5.6 5.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ15 FUTURE MATERIAL SATISFACTION-GOV IMPACT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GREAT DEAL 1 577 26.6 26.6 26.6 SOMETHING 2 679 31.3 31.3 57.9 NOT MUCH 3 754 34.8 34.8 92.7 DK 8 37 1.7 1.7 94.4 NOT APPLICABLE 9 121 5.6 5.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ16 PRESENT STATE OF ECONOMY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY WELL 1 282 13.0 13.0 13.0 FAIRLY WELL 2 1471 67.9 67.9 80.9 NOT VERY WELL 3 337 15.5 15.5 96.4 DEPENDS 4 52 2.4 2.4 98.8 DK 8 26 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ17 ECONOMY TRENDS -PAST THREE OR FOUR YEARS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BETTER 1 1032 47.6 47.6 47.6 WORSE 2 267 12.3 12.3 59.9 SAME 3 777 35.8 35.8 95.8 BETTER, WORSE 4 59 2.7 2.7 98.5 DK 8 33 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ18 ECONOMY PAST - FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PERFOR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY GOOD JOB 1 164 7.6 7.6 7.6 GOOD JOB 2 1335 61.6 61.6 69.1 POOR JOB 3 402 18.5 18.5 87.7 VERY POOR JOB 4 72 3.3 3.3 91.0 DEPENDS 5 138 6.4 6.4 97.4 DK 8 57 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ19 ECONOMY FUTURE PROJECTION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BETTER 1 451 20.8 20.8 20.8 WORSE 2 251 11.6 11.6 32.4 SAME 3 1118 51.6 51.6 83.9 BETTER, WORSE 4 88 4.1 4.1 88.0 DK 8 260 12.0 12.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ20 ECONOMY FUTURE - GOVERNMENT IMPACT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GREAT DEAL 1 830 38.3 38.3 38.3 SOMETHING 2 767 35.4 35.4 73.7 NOT MUCH 3 283 13.1 13.1 86.7 DK 8 28 1.3 1.3 88.0 NOT APPLICABLE 9 260 12.0 12.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ211 PROVDE WELFARE SERVICES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY WELL 1 521 24.0 24.0 24.0 FAIRLY WELL 2 1134 52.3 52.3 76.3 NOT VERY WELL 3 361 16.7 16.7 93.0 DK 8 152 7.0 7.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ212 PROVIDE EMPLOYMENT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY WELL 1 249 11.5 11.5 11.5 FAIRLY WELL 2 1063 49.0 49.0 60.5 NOT VERY WELL 3 775 35.7 35.7 96.3 DK 8 81 3.7 3.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ213 PROTECT LIVES & PROPERTY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY WELL 1 339 15.6 15.6 15.6 FAIRLY WELL 2 1346 62.1 62.1 77.7 NOT VERY WELL 3 327 15.1 15.1 92.8 DK 8 156 7.2 7.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ214 PROTECT PERSONAL LIBERTIES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY WELL 1 371 17.1 17.1 17.1 FAIRLY WELL 2 1249 57.6 57.6 74.7 NOT VERY WELL 3 384 17.7 17.7 92.4 DK 8 164 7.6 7.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ215 CONTROL INFLATION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY WELL 1 229 10.6 10.6 10.6 FAIRLY WELL 2 1240 57.2 57.2 67.8 NOT VERY WELL 3 576 26.6 26.6 94.3 DK 8 123 5.7 5.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ216 PROVIDE HEALTH CARE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY WELL 1 806 37.2 37.2 37.2 FAIRLY WELL 2 1012 46.7 46.7 83.9 NOT VERY WELL 3 278 12.8 12.8 96.7 DK 8 72 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ217 PROTECT ENVIRONMENT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY WELL 1 127 5.9 5.9 5.9 FAIRLY WELL 2 704 32.5 32.5 38.3 NOT VERY WELL 3 1275 58.8 58.8 97.1 DK 8 62 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ218 PROVIDE EDUCATION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY WELL 1 422 19.5 19.5 19.5 FAIRLY WELL 2 1105 51.0 51.0 70.4 NOT VERY WELL 3 534 24.6 24.6 95.1 DK 8 107 4.9 4.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ221 MPS LOSE TOUCH Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1469 67.8 67.8 67.8 DISAGREE 2 597 27.5 27.5 95.3 NO OPINION, DK 8 102 4.7 4.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ222 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CARE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1156 53.3 53.3 53.3 DISAGREE 2 916 42.3 42.3 95.6 NO OPINION, DK 8 96 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ223 POLITICS COMPLICATED Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1440 66.4 66.4 66.4 DISAGREE 2 700 32.3 32.3 98.7 NO OPINION, DK 8 28 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ224 NO SAY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1067 49.2 49.2 49.2 DISAGREE 2 1051 48.5 48.5 97.7 NO OPINION, DK 8 50 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ225 PARTIES CARE ONLY VOTES NOT OPINIONS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1180 54.4 54.4 54.4 DISAGREE 2 898 41.4 41.4 95.8 NO OPINION, DK 8 90 4.2 4.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ226 PEOPLE IN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT DISHONEST Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 827 38.1 38.1 38.1 DISAGREE 2 1151 53.1 53.1 91.2 NO OPINION, DK 8 190 8.8 8.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ227 PEOPLE IN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WASTE MONEY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1745 80.5 80.5 80.5 DISAGREE 2 333 15.4 15.4 95.8 NO OPINION, DK 8 90 4.2 4.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ228 TRUST PEOPLE IN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1300 60.0 60.0 60.0 DISAGREE 2 738 34.0 34.0 94.0 NO OPINION, DK 8 130 6.0 6.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ229 PEOPLE IN FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SMART Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1367 63.1 63.1 63.1 DISAGREE 2 674 31.1 31.1 94.1 NO OPINION, DK 8 127 5.9 5.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ2210 SHOULD PAY TAXES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1638 75.6 75.6 75.6 DISAGREE 2 439 20.2 20.2 95.8 NO OPINION, DK 8 91 4.2 4.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ2211 SHOULD OBEY PARLIAMENT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 2058 94.9 94.9 94.9 DISAGREE 2 76 3.5 3.5 98.4 NO OPINION, DK 8 34 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ2212 SHOULD SERVE ARMED FORCES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 936 43.2 43.2 43.2 DISAGREE 2 1129 52.1 52.1 95.2 NO OPINION, DK 8 103 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ2213 SHOULD OBEY POLICE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1046 48.2 48.2 48.2 DISAGREE 2 950 43.8 43.8 92.1 NO OPINION, DK 8 172 7.9 7.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ2214 SHOULD GO ALONG WITH FEDERAL GOVERNMENT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1140 52.6 52.6 52.6 DISAGREE 2 907 41.8 41.8 94.4 NO OPINION, DK 8 121 5.6 5.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ231 TURNER THERMOMETER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEGATIVE 1 96 4.4 4.4 4.4 2 12 .6 .6 5.0 3 9 .4 .4 5.4 5 31 1.4 1.4 6.8 6 4 .2 .2 7.0 7 2 .1 .1 7.1 8 3 .1 .1 7.2 9 1 .0 .0 7.3 10 80 3.7 3.7 11.0 15 12 .6 .6 11.5 19 1 .0 .0 11.6 20 95 4.4 4.4 16.0 23 2 .1 .1 16.1 25 71 3.3 3.3 19.3 30 157 7.2 7.2 26.6 31 1 .0 .0 26.6 33 1 .0 .0 26.7 35 30 1.4 1.4 28.0 38 1 .0 .0 28.1 40 237 10.9 10.9 39.0 42 1 .0 .0 39.1 43 2 .1 .1 39.2 44 2 .1 .1 39.3 45 62 2.9 2.9 42.1 47 1 .0 .0 42.2 49 5 .2 .2 42.4 NEUTRAL 50 427 19.7 19.7 62.1 51 9 .4 .4 62.5 52 2 .1 .1 62.6 53 1 .0 .0 62.6 55 40 1.8 1.8 64.5 58 2 .1 .1 64.6 60 263 12.1 12.1 76.7 62 1 .0 .0 76.8 64 1 .0 .0 76.8 65 83 3.8 3.8 80.6 67 1 .0 .0 80.7 68 2 .1 .1 80.8 70 124 5.7 5.7 86.5 71 1 .0 .0 86.5 75 104 4.8 4.8 91.3 78 2 .1 .1 91.4 80 72 3.3 3.3 94.7 81 1 .0 .0 94.8 85 14 .6 .6 95.4 90 21 1.0 1.0 96.4 91 1 .0 .0 96.4 95 3 .1 .1 96.6 99 3 .1 .1 96.7 POSITIVE 100 21 1.0 1.0 97.7 DK, REFUSED 888 50 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ232 LIBERAL PARTY THERMOMETER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEGATIVE 1 41 1.9 1.9 1.9 2 5 .2 .2 2.1 3 3 .1 .1 2.3 4 4 .2 .2 2.4 5 19 .9 .9 3.3 6 2 .1 .1 3.4 7 1 .0 .0 3.5 8 4 .2 .2 3.6 10 48 2.2 2.2 5.9 11 1 .0 .0 5.9 15 13 .6 .6 6.5 20 65 3.0 3.0 9.5 22 1 .0 .0 9.5 23 1 .0 .0 9.6 25 52 2.4 2.4 12.0 29 1 .0 .0 12.0 30 130 6.0 6.0 18.0 32 1 .0 .0 18.1 35 28 1.3 1.3 19.4 36 1 .0 .0 19.4 40 208 9.6 9.6 29.0 42 1 .0 .0 29.1 43 1 .0 .0 29.1 45 55 2.5 2.5 31.6 47 1 .0 .0 31.7 49 1 .0 .0 31.7 NEUTRAL 50 454 20.9 20.9 52.7 51 2 .1 .1 52.8 52 2 .1 .1 52.9 55 57 2.6 2.6 55.5 58 1 .0 .0 55.5 60 288 13.3 13.3 68.8 62 1 .0 .0 68.9 63 1 .0 .0 68.9 65 90 4.2 4.2 73.1 66 1 .0 .0 73.1 68 1 .0 .0 73.2 70 172 7.9 7.9 81.1 72 2 .1 .1 81.2 73 1 .0 .0 81.2 75 137 6.3 6.3 87.5 78 1 .0 .0 87.6 79 1 .0 .0 87.6 80 105 4.8 4.8 92.5 82 1 .0 .0 92.5 85 25 1.2 1.2 93.7 90 38 1.8 1.8 95.4 95 5 .2 .2 95.7 98 1 .0 .0 95.7 99 1 .0 .0 95.8 POSITIVE 100 24 1.1 1.1 96.9 DK, REFUSED 888 68 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ233 MULRONEY THERMOMETER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEGATIVE 1 114 5.3 5.3 5.3 2 14 .6 .6 5.9 3 3 .1 .1 6.0 4 5 .2 .2 6.3 5 36 1.7 1.7 7.9 6 2 .1 .1 8.0 7 3 .1 .1 8.2 8 2 .1 .1 8.3 9 1 .0 .0 8.3 10 93 4.3 4.3 12.6 12 2 .1 .1 12.7 15 12 .6 .6 13.2 18 1 .0 .0 13.3 20 101 4.7 4.7 17.9 23 1 .0 .0 18.0 24 1 .0 .0 18.0 25 59 2.7 2.7 20.8 26 2 .1 .1 20.8 27 1 .0 .0 20.9 30 117 5.4 5.4 26.3 32 3 .1 .1 26.4 33 2 .1 .1 26.5 35 30 1.4 1.4 27.9 40 196 9.0 9.0 36.9 42 1 .0 .0 37.0 44 1 .0 .0 37.0 45 49 2.3 2.3 39.3 46 1 .0 .0 39.3 47 1 .0 .0 39.4 48 4 .2 .2 39.6 49 4 .2 .2 39.8 NEUTRAL 50 350 16.1 16.1 55.9 51 4 .2 .2 56.1 52 1 .0 .0 56.1 53 1 .0 .0 56.2 55 41 1.9 1.9 58.1 56 1 .0 .0 58.1 57 1 .0 .0 58.2 59 1 .0 .0 58.2 60 245 11.3 11.3 69.5 61 1 .0 .0 69.6 63 1 .0 .0 69.6 64 1 .0 .0 69.6 65 55 2.5 2.5 72.2 66 1 .0 .0 72.2 68 2 .1 .1 72.3 70 176 8.1 8.1 80.4 72 2 .1 .1 80.5 73 1 .0 .0 80.6 74 1 .0 .0 80.6 75 137 6.3 6.3 86.9 76 1 .0 .0 87.0 77 1 .0 .0 87.0 78 3 .1 .1 87.2 80 113 5.2 5.2 92.4 82 2 .1 .1 92.5 85 26 1.2 1.2 93.7 90 54 2.5 2.5 96.2 95 11 .5 .5 96.7 99 5 .2 .2 96.9 POSITIVE 100 28 1.3 1.3 98.2 DK, REFUSED 888 39 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ234 PC PARTY THERMOMETER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEGATIVE 1 57 2.6 2.6 2.6 2 8 .4 .4 3.0 3 1 .0 .0 3.0 4 1 .0 .0 3.1 5 17 .8 .8 3.9 6 3 .1 .1 4.0 7 6 .3 .3 4.3 8 1 .0 .0 4.3 9 1 .0 .0 4.4 10 59 2.7 2.7 7.1 12 2 .1 .1 7.2 15 9 .4 .4 7.6 18 1 .0 .0 7.7 20 63 2.9 2.9 10.6 23 1 .0 .0 10.6 25 51 2.4 2.4 13.0 27 1 .0 .0 13.0 30 92 4.2 4.2 17.3 33 1 .0 .0 17.3 35 33 1.5 1.5 18.8 38 1 .0 .0 18.9 40 197 9.1 9.1 28.0 41 1 .0 .0 28.0 42 2 .1 .1 28.1 45 48 2.2 2.2 30.3 47 2 .1 .1 30.4 48 2 .1 .1 30.5 49 5 .2 .2 30.7 NEUTRAL 50 404 18.6 18.6 49.4 51 4 .2 .2 49.5 52 1 .0 .0 49.6 54 1 .0 .0 49.6 55 59 2.7 2.7 52.4 60 279 12.9 12.9 65.2 62 1 .0 .0 65.3 65 70 3.2 3.2 68.5 66 2 .1 .1 68.6 68 2 .1 .1 68.7 70 205 9.5 9.5 78.1 72 1 .0 .0 78.2 73 2 .1 .1 78.3 74 1 .0 .0 78.3 75 164 7.6 7.6 85.9 76 1 .0 .0 85.9 78 2 .1 .1 86.0 80 137 6.3 6.3 92.3 84 1 .0 .0 92.4 85 31 1.4 1.4 93.8 87 1 .0 .0 93.9 90 46 2.1 2.1 96.0 95 7 .3 .3 96.3 99 4 .2 .2 96.5 POSITIVE 100 21 1.0 1.0 97.5 DK, REFUSED 888 55 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ235 BROADBENT THERMOMETER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEGATIVE 1 67 3.1 3.1 3.1 2 4 .2 .2 3.3 3 3 .1 .1 3.4 4 2 .1 .1 3.5 5 16 .7 .7 4.2 6 3 .1 .1 4.4 9 1 .0 .0 4.4 10 52 2.4 2.4 6.8 13 1 .0 .0 6.9 15 5 .2 .2 7.1 20 80 3.7 3.7 10.8 22 1 .0 .0 10.8 23 2 .1 .1 10.9 25 59 2.7 2.7 13.7 30 94 4.3 4.3 18.0 31 1 .0 .0 18.0 32 1 .0 .0 18.1 33 1 .0 .0 18.1 34 1 .0 .0 18.2 35 26 1.2 1.2 19.4 36 1 .0 .0 19.4 40 155 7.1 7.1 26.6 45 40 1.8 1.8 28.4 48 1 .0 .0 28.5 49 2 .1 .1 28.6 NEUTRAL 50 394 18.2 18.2 46.7 51 3 .1 .1 46.9 54 1 .0 .0 46.9 55 49 2.3 2.3 49.2 57 3 .1 .1 49.3 60 285 13.1 13.1 62.5 63 1 .0 .0 62.5 65 73 3.4 3.4 65.9 68 1 .0 .0 65.9 69 1 .0 .0 66.0 70 200 9.2 9.2 75.2 72 2 .1 .1 75.3 73 1 .0 .0 75.3 75 169 7.8 7.8 83.1 78 1 .0 .0 83.2 80 159 7.3 7.3 90.5 82 1 .0 .0 90.5 85 39 1.8 1.8 92.3 87 1 .0 .0 92.4 88 1 .0 .0 92.4 89 1 .0 .0 92.5 90 53 2.4 2.4 94.9 92 1 .0 .0 95.0 95 13 .6 .6 95.6 98 1 .0 .0 95.6 99 2 .1 .1 95.7 POSITIVE 100 34 1.6 1.6 97.3 DK, REFUSED 888 59 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ236 NDP THERMOMETER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEGATIVE 1 88 4.1 4.1 4.1 2 5 .2 .2 4.3 3 4 .2 .2 4.5 4 1 .0 .0 4.5 5 23 1.1 1.1 5.6 6 2 .1 .1 5.7 7 2 .1 .1 5.8 9 1 .0 .0 5.8 10 88 4.1 4.1 9.9 11 1 .0 .0 9.9 13 1 .0 .0 10.0 14 3 .1 .1 10.1 15 12 .6 .6 10.7 20 109 5.0 5.0 15.7 22 1 .0 .0 15.7 23 1 .0 .0 15.8 25 87 4.0 4.0 19.8 26 2 .1 .1 19.9 28 1 .0 .0 19.9 30 144 6.6 6.6 26.6 33 2 .1 .1 26.7 35 35 1.6 1.6 28.3 36 1 .0 .0 28.3 40 235 10.8 10.8 39.2 42 1 .0 .0 39.2 43 1 .0 .0 39.3 45 59 2.7 2.7 42.0 49 3 .1 .1 42.1 NEUTRAL 50 435 20.1 20.1 62.2 51 5 .2 .2 62.4 52 2 .1 .1 62.5 55 42 1.9 1.9 64.4 60 235 10.8 10.8 75.3 62 1 .0 .0 75.3 65 57 2.6 2.6 78.0 68 1 .0 .0 78.0 70 126 5.8 5.8 83.8 71 1 .0 .0 83.9 73 2 .1 .1 83.9 75 104 4.8 4.8 88.7 76 1 .0 .0 88.8 80 82 3.8 3.8 92.6 85 20 .9 .9 93.5 90 34 1.6 1.6 95.1 95 6 .3 .3 95.3 99 2 .1 .1 95.4 POSITIVE 100 17 .8 .8 96.2 DK, REFUSED 888 82 3.8 3.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ241 MP LISTEN TO YOUR OPINIONS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY LIKELY 1 308 14.2 14.2 14.2 SOMEWHAT LIKELEY 2 923 42.6 42.6 56.8 NOT VERY LIKELY 3 867 40.0 40.0 96.8 DK 8 70 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ242 MP HELP RIDING Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY LIKELY 1 524 24.2 24.2 24.2 SOMEWHAT LIKELEY 2 1100 50.7 50.7 74.9 NOT VERY LIKELY 3 461 21.3 21.3 96.2 DK 8 83 3.8 3.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ243 MP HELP WITH PERSONAL PROBLEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY LIKELY 1 324 14.9 14.9 14.9 SOMEWHAT LIKELEY 2 734 33.9 33.9 48.8 NOT VERY LIKELY 3 986 45.5 45.5 94.3 DK 8 124 5.7 5.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ244 MP AVAILABLE TO YOU Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY LIKELY 1 524 24.2 24.2 24.2 SOMEWHAT LIKELEY 2 970 44.7 44.7 68.9 NOT VERY LIKELY 3 552 25.5 25.5 94.4 DK 8 122 5.6 5.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ25 KNOW LOCAL MP PARTY? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1706 78.7 78.7 78.7 NO 2 395 18.2 18.2 96.9 DK 8 67 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ26 WHICH PARTY LOCAL MP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIBERAL 1 288 13.3 13.3 13.3 PC 2 1250 57.7 57.7 70.9 NDP 3 145 6.7 6.7 77.6 SOCIAL CREDIT 4 2 .1 .1 77.7 OTHER 5 12 .6 .6 78.3 DK 8 9 .4 .4 78.7 NOT APPLICABLE 9 462 21.3 21.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ27 KNOW LOCAL MP NAME? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1533 70.7 70.7 70.7 NO 2 528 24.4 24.4 95.1 DK 8 107 4.9 4.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ28 NAME OF LOCAL MP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 635 29.3 29.3 29.3 MCDONAL 1 .0 .0 29.3 lawrenc 1 .0 .0 29.4 .mIFFLIN 1 .0 .0 29.4 1 1 .0 .0 29.5 ? McKi 1 .0 .0 29.5 AL GERAL 4 .2 .2 29.7 AL GERAR 3 .1 .1 29.8 AL GIRAR 1 .0 .0 29.9 ALAIN TA 3 .1 .1 30.0 ALAN RED 2 .1 .1 30.1 ALBERT G 4 .2 .2 30.3 ALEX KIN 1 .0 .0 30.4 ALLAN LA 1 .0 .0 30.4 ALLE RED 1 .0 .0 30.4 ALLEN MA 1 .0 .0 30.5 ALMER MA 1 .0 .0 30.5 ANDERSON 1 .0 .0 30.6 ANDRE TA 1 .0 .0 30.6 ANDREE C 2 .1 .1 30.7 ANNE BLO 2 .1 .1 30.8 ARNOLD J 1 .0 .0 30.9 AXWORTHY 1 .0 .0 30.9 Alain Ta 1 .0 .0 31.0 Alain ta 1 .0 .0 31.0 Alex Kin 1 .0 .0 31.0 Allan Re 1 .0 .0 31.1 Allen Re 1 .0 .0 31.1 B. MacDo 1 .0 .0 31.2 BARBARA 1 .0 .0 31.2 BARBRA M 1 .0 .0 31.3 BARRY TU 2 .1 .1 31.4 BEATTY 1 .0 .0 31.4 BENAJMAN 1 .0 .0 31.5 BENJAMIN 2 .1 .1 31.5 BENNO FR 2 .1 .1 31.6 BENOIT B 3 .1 .1 31.8 BERNARD 2 .1 .1 31.9 BILL ATW 1 .0 .0 31.9 BILL BLA 2 .1 .1 32.0 BILL GOT 1 .0 .0 32.1 BILL KEM 1 .0 .0 32.1 BILL KIM 1 .0 .0 32.1 BILL MC 2 .1 .1 32.2 BILL MCK 5 .2 .2 32.5 BILL McK 1 .0 .0 32.5 BILL VAN 8 .4 .4 32.9 BILL WIN 2 .1 .1 33.0 BISSONET 1 .0 .0 33.0 BIll HOD 1 .0 .0 33.1 BLAIS GR 1 .0 .0 33.1 BLANCHAR 1 .0 .0 33.2 BOB BOGE 1 .0 .0 33.2 BOB BRIS 5 .2 .2 33.4 BOB COAT 1 .0 .0 33.5 BOB HAWK 1 .0 .0 33.5 BOB HORN 2 .1 .1 33.6 BOB HOWE 1 .0 .0 33.7 BOB HOWI 1 .0 .0 33.7 BOB PORT 1 .0 .0 33.8 BOB QUAR 1 .0 .0 33.8 BOB VOGA 1 .0 .0 33.9 BOBBIE S 2 .1 .1 33.9 BOBBY SP 2 .1 .1 34.0 BOSLEY 2 .1 .1 34.1 BOUCHARD 1 .0 .0 34.2 BRAD WOO 1 .0 .0 34.2 BRIAN PE 1 .0 .0 34.3 BRIAN TO 11 .5 .5 34.8 BRISCKEL 1 .0 .0 34.8 BRUCE OW 1 .0 .0 34.9 BRYAN RA 1 .0 .0 34.9 BURNARD 1 .0 .0 35.0 Barbara 3 .1 .1 35.1 Benno Fr 1 .0 .0 35.1 Bill Les 2 .1 .1 35.2 Bill McN 1 .0 .0 35.3 Bill Mck 1 .0 .0 35.3 Bill Tup 1 .0 .0 35.4 Bill Win 5 .2 .2 35.6 Blackbur 1 .0 .0 35.7 Bob Bris 3 .1 .1 35.8 Bob Layt 1 .0 .0 35.8 Bob Lley 1 .0 .0 35.9 Bob Penn 1 .0 .0 35.9 Bob Port 1 .0 .0 36.0 Bob Wema 1 .0 .0 36.0 Bob Wenm 2 .1 .1 36.1 Bosley 1 .0 .0 36.2 Brian To 4 .2 .2 36.3 Briscoe 1 .0 .0 36.4 CADIEUX 2 .1 .1 36.5 CARLO RO 1 .0 .0 36.5 CAROLE J 1 .0 .0 36.6 CFFMAN 1 .0 .0 36.6 CHARLES 6 .3 .3 36.9 CHARLES- 2 .1 .1 37.0 CHARLI M 1 .0 .0 37.0 CHARLIE 3 .1 .1 37.2 CHRIS SP 2 .1 .1 37.3 CHUCK CO 1 .0 .0 37.3 CLAIRE E 1 .0 .0 37.4 CLARKE 1 .0 .0 37.4 CLAUDIE 1 .0 .0 37.5 CLAYTON 1 .0 .0 37.5 COCKERAN 1 .0 .0 37.5 COLLEEN 1 .0 .0 37.6 CORBETT 3 .1 .1 37.7 CROMBIE 1 .0 .0 37.8 CROSBY 1 .0 .0 37.8 Can't re 1 .0 .0 37.9 Charles 1 .0 .0 37.9 Chivia H 1 .0 .0 38.0 Chuck Co 2 .1 .1 38.1 Clement 1 .0 .0 38.1 Clifford 1 .0 .0 38.1 DAN GRAH 1 .0 .0 38.2 DARRYL G 5 .2 .2 38.4 DARYL GR 1 .0 .0 38.5 DAUBNEY 1 .0 .0 38.5 DAVE FIS 1 .0 .0 38.6 DAVE HEA 1 .0 .0 38.6 DAVE SPU 1 .0 .0 38.7 DAVID DA 2 .1 .1 38.7 DAVID DO 1 .0 .0 38.8 DAVID DU 1 .0 .0 38.8 DAVID OR 5 .2 .2 39.1 DEJONG 1 .0 .0 39.1 DENISE C 1 .0 .0 39.2 DENNIE C 1 .0 .0 39.2 DENNIS C 2 .1 .1 39.3 DENNIS H 1 .0 .0 39.3 DEREK BL 1 .0 .0 39.4 DERREK B 1 .0 .0 39.4 DERREN G 1 .0 .0 39.5 DERRIN B 1 .0 .0 39.5 DES COTR 1 .0 .0 39.6 DEWAR 1 .0 .0 39.6 DOBNIE 1 .0 .0 39.7 DOCTOR B 1 .0 .0 39.7 DOCTOR H 1 .0 .0 39.8 DON BLEN 3 .1 .1 39.9 DON MAGI 1 .0 .0 39.9 DON MCIN 1 .0 .0 40.0 DON RAVI 5 .2 .2 40.2 DON'T RE 1 .0 .0 40.3 DONALD C 1 .0 .0 40.3 DONALD M 1 .0 .0 40.4 DONNY MC 1 .0 .0 40.4 DONT KNO 1 .0 .0 40.5 DOUG FEE 1 .0 .0 40.5 DOUG LEW 3 .1 .1 40.6 DOUG LOU 3 .1 .1 40.8 DOUG REY 1 .0 .0 40.8 DR. TUMY 1 .0 .0 40.9 DR.C.EUG 1 .0 .0 40.9 DUGUAY 1 .0 .0 41.0 Dan Heap 2 .1 .1 41.1 Dave Coo 1 .0 .0 41.1 Dave Wor 1 .0 .0 41.1 David Co 1 .0 .0 41.2 David Cr 1 .0 .0 41.2 David Ki 1 .0 .0 41.3 David Pe 1 .0 .0 41.3 Dennis C 1 .0 .0 41.4 Deputy M 1 .0 .0 41.4 Don Mazi 1 .0 .0 41.5 Dr. Morr 1 .0 .0 41.5 EDDIE CL 1 .0 .0 41.6 ELLIOT H 2 .1 .1 41.7 ELLIOTT 1 .0 .0 41.7 ELMER MA 12 .6 .6 42.3 ELMER MC 4 .2 .2 42.4 ELSTON C 1 .0 .0 42.5 EVA COTE 2 .1 .1 42.6 Engus Ia 1 .0 .0 42.6 FERDINAN 1 .0 .0 42.7 FERGUSON 1 .0 .0 42.7 FERN ROB 1 .0 .0 42.8 FERNAND 1 .0 .0 42.8 FLORA MA 3 .1 .1 42.9 FLORA MC 2 .1 .1 43.0 FORESTAL 1 .0 .0 43.1 FORSTOR 1 .0 .0 43.1 FRANCES 1 .0 .0 43.2 FRANCOIS 3 .1 .1 43.3 FRED KIN 2 .1 .1 43.4 FRED MUR 1 .0 .0 43.5 Fernand 1 .0 .0 43.5 Flora Ma 1 .0 .0 43.5 Flora Mc 1 .0 .0 43.6 Francois 1 .0 .0 43.6 Frank Ob 2 .1 .1 43.7 Fred Kin 2 .1 .1 43.8 GABRIEL 4 .2 .2 44.0 GAGNON 1 .0 .0 44.0 GARNEAU 1 .0 .0 44.1 GARTH TU 1 .0 .0 44.1 GARY FIL 1 .0 .0 44.2 GASS 1 .0 .0 44.2 GAUDRY 1 .0 .0 44.3 GAUTHIER 1 .0 .0 44.3 GEORGE B 6 .3 .3 44.6 GEORGE H 1 .0 .0 44.6 GEORGE M 1 .0 .0 44.7 GEORGE P 1 .0 .0 44.7 GERALD M 2 .1 .1 44.8 GERIN 1 .0 .0 44.9 GERRY ME 3 .1 .1 45.0 GILLES G 1 .0 .0 45.1 GIRARD 1 .0 .0 45.1 GORDAN T 2 .1 .1 45.2 GORDEN P 1 .0 .0 45.2 GORDON L 1 .0 .0 45.3 GORDON T 5 .2 .2 45.5 GOTLIEG 1 .0 .0 45.6 GOTSLIEK 1 .0 .0 45.6 GOTTSLEG 1 .0 .0 45.7 GOTTSLEI 1 .0 .0 45.7 GREG O'D 3 .1 .1 45.8 GRIER 1 .0 .0 45.9 Gabriell 1 .0 .0 45.9 George A 1 .0 .0 46.0 Gerry Sa 1 .0 .0 46.0 Gerry St 2 .1 .1 46.1 Gerry st 1 .0 .0 46.2 Gordon L 1 .0 .0 46.2 Gordon T 3 .1 .1 46.4 HARRIS 1 .0 .0 46.4 HARRY BA 1 .0 .0 46.4 HARVEY A 5 .2 .2 46.7 HARVIE A 1 .0 .0 46.7 HAWKS 1 .0 .0 46.8 HAWKSWOR 1 .0 .0 46.8 HENRI GE 1 .0 .0 46.9 HERB GRA 2 .1 .1 47.0 HICKS 1 .0 .0 47.0 HOCKIN 1 .0 .0 47.0 HORNER, 1 .0 .0 47.1 HOWARD C 5 .2 .2 47.3 HWARD CR 1 .0 .0 47.4 Hector J 1 .0 .0 47.4 Herb Epp 1 .0 .0 47.5 Herb Gre 2 .1 .1 47.6 Hockin 1 .0 .0 47.6 Howard M 3 .1 .1 47.7 IAN ANGU 1 .0 .0 47.8 IDEENE N 1 .0 .0 47.8 ISABELLE 1 .0 .0 47.9 IT WAS W 1 .0 .0 47.9 IUIANO E 1 .0 .0 48.0 Ian Angu 1 .0 .0 48.0 JACK ART 1 .0 .0 48.1 JACK BUR 1 .0 .0 48.1 JACK HAR 6 .3 .3 48.4 JACQUE A 1 .0 .0 48.4 JEAN CHA 1 .0 .0 48.5 JEAN GUY 1 .0 .0 48.5 JEAN LE 1 .0 .0 48.6 JEAN ROB 1 .0 .0 48.6 JEAN-GUY 2 .1 .1 48.7 JEAN-LUC 2 .1 .1 48.8 JEAN-PIE 2 .1 .1 48.9 JEAN-ROB 1 .0 .0 48.9 JEFF SCO 2 .1 .1 49.0 JELLINIC 1 .0 .0 49.1 JERRY ME 1 .0 .0 49.1 JESSE FL 1 .0 .0 49.2 JESSY FL 1 .0 .0 49.2 JHN CROS 1 .0 .0 49.3 JIM CALD 1 .0 .0 49.3 JIM DOWN 1 .0 .0 49.4 JIM HAWK 1 .0 .0 49.4 JIM JEPS 1 .0 .0 49.4 JO RIED 1 .0 .0 49.5 JOE GHIZ 1 .0 .0 49.5 JOHN (DO 1 .0 .0 49.6 JOHN BOS 1 .0 .0 49.6 JOHN CRO 6 .3 .3 49.9 JOHN EDW 1 .0 .0 50.0 JOHN GIZ 1 .0 .0 50.0 JOHN GOR 1 .0 .0 50.0 JOHN GRE 1 .0 .0 50.1 JOHN GRO 1 .0 .0 50.1 JOHN MCD 6 .3 .3 50.4 JOHN MON 1 .0 .0 50.5 JOHN NUN 1 .0 .0 50.5 JOHN ROB 2 .1 .1 50.6 JOHN TUR 3 .1 .1 50.7 JOHN WIS 7 .3 .3 51.1 JOHNSON 1 .0 .0 51.1 JONH REI 1 .0 .0 51.2 JR ST GE 1 .0 .0 51.2 Jack Ell 1 .0 .0 51.2 Jack Mur 1 .0 .0 51.3 Jack har 1 .0 .0 51.3 Jean Chg 1 .0 .0 51.4 Jean Rib 1 .0 .0 51.4 Jepson 1 .0 .0 51.5 Jerry Me 1 .0 .0 51.5 Jerry Wa 1 .0 .0 51.6 Jim Elli 1 .0 .0 51.6 Jim Pete 1 .0 .0 51.7 Jim Rabb 1 .0 .0 51.7 John Tu 1 .0 .0 51.8 John Bos 2 .1 .1 51.8 John McD 1 .0 .0 51.9 John Ols 1 .0 .0 51.9 John Rei 1 .0 .0 52.0 John Rim 2 .1 .1 52.1 John Tur 1 .0 .0 52.1 John Wie 2 .1 .1 52.2 John Wis 4 .2 .2 52.4 Jourdena 1 .0 .0 52.4 KEN JAME 1 .0 .0 52.5 KENNETH 1 .0 .0 52.5 KENNY MA 1 .0 .0 52.6 KIMP LIN 1 .0 .0 52.6 KINDLEY 1 .0 .0 52.7 KIlgour 1 .0 .0 52.7 Ken Jame 1 .0 .0 52.8 Kilgour 1 .0 .0 52.8 LANDRY 1 .0 .0 52.9 LARENCE 1 .0 .0 52.9 LAURANCE 2 .1 .1 53.0 LAWERENC 1 .0 .0 53.0 LAWRENCE 6 .3 .3 53.3 LE MIRE 1 .0 .0 53.4 LEA CLAR 1 .0 .0 53.4 LEE CLAR 9 .4 .4 53.8 LEO DUGA 1 .0 .0 53.9 LES BENJ 3 .1 .1 54.0 LEWIS 1 .0 .0 54.1 LINN MAC 1 .0 .0 54.1 LINSDEY 1 .0 .0 54.2 LLOYD AX 1 .0 .0 54.2 LLOYD CR 3 .1 .1 54.3 LLYOD CR 1 .0 .0 54.4 LORNE MC 1 .0 .0 54.4 LOYD AXW 2 .1 .1 54.5 LUCIE PE 1 .0 .0 54.6 LUCIEN B 8 .4 .4 54.9 LYN MACD 1 .0 .0 55.0 LYNN MAC 2 .1 .1 55.1 Lloyd Ax 1 .0 .0 55.1 Lloyd Cr 1 .0 .0 55.2 Louisell 1 .0 .0 55.2 Luc Lebl 1 .0 .0 55.3 Lucien B 1 .0 .0 55.3 Lynne Mc 1 .0 .0 55.4 M Paquet 1 .0 .0 55.4 M coutur 1 .0 .0 55.4 M icar 1 .0 .0 55.5 M,EL GAS 1 .0 .0 55.5 M. BOUCH 1 .0 .0 55.6 M. DUPLE 1 .0 .0 55.6 M. GERIN 1 .0 .0 55.7 M. GRISE 1 .0 .0 55.7 M. GUILB 1 .0 .0 55.8 M. Grave 1 .0 .0 55.8 M. Grise 3 .1 .1 56.0 M. HARVE 1 .0 .0 56.0 M. JOURB 1 .0 .0 56.0 M. Jored 1 .0 .0 56.1 M. LAPIE 1 .0 .0 56.1 M. Lapie 1 .0 .0 56.2 M. MARRI 1 .0 .0 56.2 M. Middl 1 .0 .0 56.3 M. TOUPI 1 .0 .0 56.3 M.ALAIN 1 .0 .0 56.4 M.BLACKB 1 .0 .0 56.4 M.BOUCHA 1 .0 .0 56.5 M.BOUFFA 1 .0 .0 56.5 M.CAMPAG 1 .0 .0 56.5 M.DARRYL 1 .0 .0 56.6 M.FONTAI 1 .0 .0 56.6 M.GUILBA 1 .0 .0 56.7 M.HARVEY 1 .0 .0 56.7 M.LUCIEN 2 .1 .1 56.8 M.MARIN 1 .0 .0 56.9 M.MAURIC 1 .0 .0 56.9 M.TREMBL 1 .0 .0 57.0 M.VINCEN 1 .0 .0 57.0 MACKAY 1 .0 .0 57.1 MACKENZI 1 .0 .0 57.1 MACMILLI 1 .0 .0 57.1 MAL GASS 1 .0 .0 57.2 MALEPARD 1 .0 .0 57.2 MALEPARS 1 .0 .0 57.3 MANTHA 1 .0 .0 57.3 MARCEL M 2 .1 .1 57.4 MARCEL R 1 .0 .0 57.5 MARCHI 1 .0 .0 57.5 MARGRET 1 .0 .0 57.6 MARIAN D 1 .0 .0 57.6 MARIETTA 1 .0 .0 57.7 MARIO SE 1 .0 .0 57.7 MARITTA 1 .0 .0 57.7 MARY COL 1 .0 .0 57.8 MAYER 1 .0 .0 57.8 MC LEAN 1 .0 .0 57.9 MCDURMAN 1 .0 .0 57.9 MCINNIS 1 .0 .0 58.0 MCLELLAN 1 .0 .0 58.0 MEL GASS 10 .5 .5 58.5 MEL GATT 2 .1 .1 58.6 MELGASS 1 .0 .0 58.6 MELLGASS 1 .0 .0 58.7 MICHAEL 2 .1 .1 58.8 MICHEAL 1 .0 .0 58.8 MICHEKL 1 .0 .0 58.9 MICHEL C 1 .0 .0 58.9 MICHEL D 1 .0 .0 58.9 MICHEL G 1 .0 .0 59.0 MICHIAL 1 .0 .0 59.0 MICK DEL 1 .0 .0 59.1 MIKE CAS 1 .0 .0 59.1 MIKE FOR 4 .2 .2 59.3 MINAKER 1 .0 .0 59.4 MME MONI 1 .0 .0 59.4 MME VEZI 1 .0 .0 59.5 MONIQUE 5 .2 .2 59.7 MONIQWUE 1 .0 .0 59.7 MOORE 1 .0 .0 59.8 MORIS FO 1 .0 .0 59.8 MORLEY J 1 .0 .0 59.9 MR BOB B 1 .0 .0 59.9 MR BOB C 1 .0 .0 60.0 MR CHUCK 1 .0 .0 60.0 MR CLIFF 1 .0 .0 60.1 MR COOK 1 .0 .0 60.1 MR EDWAR 1 .0 .0 60.1 MR FAIRW 1 .0 .0 60.2 MR FRANK 1 .0 .0 60.2 MR GUILL 1 .0 .0 60.3 MR JEPSO 1 .0 .0 60.3 MR JOHN 1 .0 .0 60.4 MR MACKI 1 .0 .0 60.4 MR MCKIN 1 .0 .0 60.5 MR MCKNI 1 .0 .0 60.5 MR MERRI 1 .0 .0 60.6 MR NEIL 1 .0 .0 60.6 MR NELSO 1 .0 .0 60.7 MR OSTRI 1 .0 .0 60.7 MR PAUL 1 .0 .0 60.7 MR ST GE 1 .0 .0 60.8 MR STAN 1 .0 .0 60.8 MR TOM S 1 .0 .0 60.9 MR. ALTH 1 .0 .0 60.9 MR. BAKE 1 .0 .0 61.0 MR. BEER 1 .0 .0 61.0 MR. BENJ 1 .0 .0 61.1 MR. COOK 1 .0 .0 61.1 MR. DAVI 1 .0 .0 61.2 MR. ELLI 1 .0 .0 61.2 MR. GAUT 1 .0 .0 61.3 MR. HICK 1 .0 .0 61.3 MR. JELI 1 .0 .0 61.3 MR. MACL 1 .0 .0 61.4 MR. MARA 1 .0 .0 61.4 MR. MCCU 1 .0 .0 61.5 MR. REIM 1 .0 .0 61.5 MR. TALB 1 .0 .0 61.6 MR. Vali 1 .0 .0 61.6 MR.FORLA 1 .0 .0 61.7 MR.REIME 1 .0 .0 61.7 MRS BETT 1 .0 .0 61.8 MS PAT C 1 .0 .0 61.8 MURRAY C 2 .1 .1 61.9 MY.REYCR 1 .0 .0 61.9 Maclean 1 .0 .0 62.0 Manthad 1 .0 .0 62.0 Marc Fer 1 .0 .0 62.1 Marchi 1 .0 .0 62.1 Mary ??? 1 .0 .0 62.2 Mary Col 2 .1 .1 62.3 Mary eda 1 .0 .0 62.3 Mel Gass 1 .0 .0 62.4 Michael 4 .2 .2 62.5 Michel L 1 .0 .0 62.6 Mike Far 2 .1 .1 62.7 Mike For 1 .0 .0 62.7 Mme Jaco 1 .0 .0 62.8 Mme Land 1 .0 .0 62.8 Moe Mant 1 .0 .0 62.9 Monique 1 .0 .0 62.9 Monsieur 3 .1 .1 63.1 Mr. (ted 1 .0 .0 63.1 Mr. Alan 1 .0 .0 63.1 Mr. Bob 1 .0 .0 63.2 Mr. Cros 1 .0 .0 63.2 Mr. Daub 1 .0 .0 63.3 Mr. Gray 1 .0 .0 63.3 Mr. King 1 .0 .0 63.4 Mr. Macl 1 .0 .0 63.4 Mr. Maza 1 .0 .0 63.5 Mr. McCu 1 .0 .0 63.5 Mr. Reim 1 .0 .0 63.6 Mr. Sper 1 .0 .0 63.6 Mr. Tayl 1 .0 .0 63.7 Mr. Wine 1 .0 .0 63.7 Mr. chuc 1 .0 .0 63.7 Mr. robe 1 .0 .0 63.8 Murray C 1 .0 .0 63.8 NE ME SO 1 .0 .0 63.9 NEIL YOU 1 .0 .0 63.9 NELSON R 4 .2 .2 64.1 NEWMAN O 1 .0 .0 64.2 NICK LEB 3 .1 .1 64.3 NICK TAY 1 .0 .0 64.3 NORA STO 1 .0 .0 64.4 NORM STE 1 .0 .0 64.4 NOT STAT 17 .8 .8 65.2 Nelson R 3 .1 .1 65.4 Nick Low 1 .0 .0 65.4 Nick Tay 1 .0 .0 65.5 Niel Yon 1 .0 .0 65.5 OOSTERMA 1 .0 .0 65.5 ORLICOW 1 .0 .0 65.6 ORLIKOW 1 .0 .0 65.6 On tip o 1 .0 .0 65.7 P. H. VI 1 .0 .0 65.7 P.BROUSE 1 .0 .0 65.8 P.H VINC 1 .0 .0 65.8 P.H. VIN 2 .1 .1 65.9 PAT BENS 1 .0 .0 66.0 PAT BINN 7 .3 .3 66.3 PAT KNOW 1 .0 .0 66.3 PATRICK 3 .1 .1 66.5 PAUL CRO 1 .0 .0 66.5 PAUL DIC 1 .0 .0 66.6 PAUL GAG 2 .1 .1 66.7 PAUL MCC 1 .0 .0 66.7 PAUL MCR 1 .0 .0 66.7 PERIN BE 1 .0 .0 66.8 PERRIN B 3 .1 .1 66.9 PETE PET 1 .0 .0 67.0 PETER PE 1 .0 .0 67.0 PETERSON 3 .1 .1 67.2 PIERRE H 2 .1 .1 67.3 PIRRE CA 1 .0 .0 67.3 POLIEEN 1 .0 .0 67.3 Parren B 1 .0 .0 67.4 Pat Carn 2 .1 .1 67.5 Pat Crof 3 .1 .1 67.6 Paul Dic 1 .0 .0 67.7 Paul Gag 2 .1 .1 67.8 Pearrin 1 .0 .0 67.8 Perrin B 1 .0 .0 67.9 RAY DUNS 1 .0 .0 67.9 RAY HAHN 1 .0 .0 67.9 RAY HNAT 2 .1 .1 68.0 REDWAY, 1 .0 .0 68.1 REED, 1 .0 .0 68.1 REIMER 2 .1 .1 68.2 REIS 1 .0 .0 68.3 REMO MAN 1 .0 .0 68.3 RICARDO 1 .0 .0 68.4 RICHARD 1 .0 .0 68.4 RICK WOO 1 .0 .0 68.5 ROB CORB 1 .0 .0 68.5 ROB NICH 2 .1 .1 68.6 ROB NICK 1 .0 .0 68.6 ROBERT C 4 .2 .2 68.8 ROBERT M 1 .0 .0 68.9 ROBERT N 1 .0 .0 68.9 ROBERT T 1 .0 .0 69.0 ROBICHEA 1 .0 .0 69.0 ROCH LAS 1 .0 .0 69.0 ROCHELEA 1 .0 .0 69.1 ROSIE GR 1 .0 .0 69.1 ROSS 1 .0 .0 69.2 ROSS BEL 6 .3 .3 69.5 ROSS STE 2 .1 .1 69.6 RUSSELL 1 .0 .0 69.6 Richard 1 .0 .0 69.6 Rick Fer 1 .0 .0 69.7 Rita Wit 1 .0 .0 69.7 Robert W 1 .0 .0 69.8 Robert d 1 .0 .0 69.8 Roch Las 2 .1 .1 69.9 Ross Dav 1 .0 .0 70.0 Ross Ste 1 .0 .0 70.0 Roy Knig 1 .0 .0 70.1 SAINT JE 1 .0 .0 70.1 SERGIO M 1 .0 .0 70.2 SERNAND 1 .0 .0 70.2 SHEILA F 1 .0 .0 70.2 SHIRLEY 1 .0 .0 70.3 SID FRA 1 .0 .0 70.3 SID FRAG 1 .0 .0 70.4 SID FRAL 4 .2 .2 70.6 SIDDON , 1 .0 .0 70.6 SIDFRALE 1 .0 .0 70.7 SINCLAIR 1 .0 .0 70.7 SMITH 1 .0 .0 70.8 SOMNAL R 1 .0 .0 70.8 SORRY, I 1 .0 .0 70.8 STAN DAR 1 .0 .0 70.9 STAN NAP 1 .0 .0 70.9 STEVE PO 1 .0 .0 71.0 STEVEN L 3 .1 .1 71.1 STEVENSO 1 .0 .0 71.2 STEWART 2 .1 .1 71.3 STUART M 2 .1 .1 71.4 SUZANNE 2 .1 .1 71.4 SVEND RO 1 .0 .0 71.5 SWEENEY 1 .0 .0 71.5 SWEND RO 1 .0 .0 71.6 Schellen 1 .0 .0 71.6 Sergo Ma 1 .0 .0 71.7 Shellenb 1 .0 .0 71.7 Sid Fral 6 .3 .3 72.0 Steve L. 1 .0 .0 72.0 Steve Pa 1 .0 .0 72.1 Suzanne 2 .1 .1 72.2 Svend Ro 1 .0 .0 72.2 Svene Ro 1 .0 .0 72.3 TERRY CL 2 .1 .1 72.4 TOBIN, B 1 .0 .0 72.4 TOM HOCK 3 .1 .1 72.6 TOM MACM 14 .6 .6 73.2 TOM MANM 1 .0 .0 73.2 TOM MCMI 4 .2 .2 73.4 TOM SIDD 1 .0 .0 73.5 TONY ROM 1 .0 .0 73.5 TREMBLAY 2 .1 .1 73.6 TURNER, 1 .0 .0 73.7 Taylor 1 .0 .0 73.7 Ted 1 .0 .0 73.8 Ted Sche 4 .2 .2 73.9 Ted Shel 2 .1 .1 74.0 Tom Gosn 1 .0 .0 74.1 Tom Hawk 1 .0 .0 74.1 Tom Hock 3 .1 .1 74.3 Tom Macm 1 .0 .0 74.3 Tom Sidd 1 .0 .0 74.4 Turner 1 .0 .0 74.4 VERNAL ? 1 .0 .0 74.4 VIC 1 .0 .0 74.5 Vincent 2 .1 .1 74.6 WARREN A 1 .0 .0 74.6 WAS JOHN 1 .0 .0 74.7 WINEGUAR 1 .0 .0 74.7 WINNER;; 1 .0 .0 74.8 WITER 3 .1 .1 74.9 Walter M 7 .3 .3 75.2 William 1 .0 .0 75.3 Winegard 1 .0 .0 75.3 Wingard 1 .0 .0 75.4 \GEORGE 1 .0 .0 75.4 al girar 1 .0 .0 75.5 alain ta 1 .0 .0 75.5 alan red 1 .0 .0 75.6 albert 1 .0 .0 75.6 albert g 2 .1 .1 75.7 aldhouse 1 .0 .0 75.7 alex kin 1 .0 .0 75.8 allan ma 1 .0 .0 75.8 allan mc 1 .0 .0 75.9 allen mc 1 .0 .0 75.9 alvin ha 1 .0 .0 76.0 andre b 1 .0 .0 76.0 andre bi 1 .0 .0 76.1 andre ou 1 .0 .0 76.1 andrer c 1 .0 .0 76.2 anne blo 1 .0 .0 76.2 arnold m 4 .2 .2 76.4 arsenaul 1 .0 .0 76.4 arthur l 1 .0 .0 76.5 axworthy 2 .1 .1 76.6 bRIAN TO 1 .0 .0 76.6 barbara 3 .1 .1 76.8 barry mo 5 .2 .2 77.0 bary moo 1 .0 .0 77.0 belnkarn 1 .0 .0 77.1 ben o'fr 2 .1 .1 77.2 benno fr 1 .0 .0 77.2 bernard 1 .0 .0 77.3 bill Bla 1 .0 .0 77.3 bill gas 1 .0 .0 77.4 bill got 2 .1 .1 77.4 bill gra 1 .0 .0 77.5 bill kem 5 .2 .2 77.7 bill les 1 .0 .0 77.8 bill mck 3 .1 .1 77.9 bill mcn 2 .1 .1 78.0 bill van 5 .2 .2 78.2 bill win 1 .0 .0 78.3 bino fri 1 .0 .0 78.3 bissonet 1 .0 .0 78.4 bob bogo 1 .0 .0 78.4 bob bris 7 .3 .3 78.7 bob corb 1 .0 .0 78.8 bob lato 1 .0 .0 78.8 bob layt 1 .0 .0 78.9 bob penn 1 .0 .0 78.9 bob port 1 .0 .0 79.0 bob wenm 2 .1 .1 79.1 bobby sp 1 .0 .0 79.1 bobleyto 1 .0 .0 79.2 brian to 4 .2 .2 79.3 brisco 2 .1 .1 79.4 briscoll 1 .0 .0 79.5 cannot r 1 .0 .0 79.5 captain 2 .1 .1 79.6 carlo r 1 .0 .0 79.7 carole j 1 .0 .0 79.7 chad she 1 .0 .0 79.8 charet 1 .0 .0 79.8 charie m 1 .0 .0 79.8 charley 1 .0 .0 79.9 charlie 6 .3 .3 80.2 charly m 1 .0 .0 80.2 chris sp 2 .1 .1 80.3 chuck co 1 .0 .0 80.4 claire p 1 .0 .0 80.4 clark 1 .0 .0 80.4 claude l 1 .0 .0 80.5 claudia 1 .0 .0 80.5 cochrane 1 .0 .0 80.6 cockeran 1 .0 .0 80.6 corbett 1 .0 .0 80.7 corbut 1 .0 .0 80.7 cyril ke 2 .1 .1 80.8 daiv mc 1 .0 .0 80.9 dan mcke 1 .0 .0 80.9 dave din 1 .0 .0 81.0 david 1 .0 .0 81.0 david b 1 .0 .0 81.0 david bu 1 .0 .0 81.1 david cr 1 .0 .0 81.1 david da 1 .0 .0 81.2 david ki 4 .2 .2 81.4 david or 3 .1 .1 81.5 de coter 1 .0 .0 81.5 de cotra 1 .0 .0 81.6 decotret 1 .0 .0 81.6 derek fo 1 .0 .0 81.7 desrosie 1 .0 .0 81.7 dewey 1 .0 .0 81.8 dk 1 .0 .0 81.8 docteur 1 .0 .0 81.9 dolald m 1 .0 .0 81.9 don blen 2 .1 .1 82.0 don maci 1 .0 .0 82.1 don masy 1 .0 .0 82.1 don maza 5 .2 .2 82.3 don mazi 5 .2 .2 82.6 don ravi 1 .0 .0 82.6 don't kn 1 .0 .0 82.7 donald c 1 .0 .0 82.7 donald m 1 .0 .0 82.7 dont kno 1 .0 .0 82.8 doug eng 1 .0 .0 82.8 doug lew 5 .2 .2 83.1 doug ray 1 .0 .0 83.1 eLMER BU 1 .0 .0 83.2 elmer ma 7 .3 .3 83.5 elmer mc 2 .1 .1 83.6 elnor ma 1 .0 .0 83.6 ferdind 1 .0 .0 83.7 ferland 1 .0 .0 83.7 fermant 1 .0 .0 83.8 fernan r 1 .0 .0 83.8 fernand 3 .1 .1 83.9 flora ma 4 .2 .2 84.1 flora mc 1 .0 .0 84.2 forresta 1 .0 .0 84.2 francois 1 .0 .0 84.3 fraser 1 .0 .0 84.3 fred kin 4 .2 .2 84.5 friesen 1 .0 .0 84.5 gaglano 1 .0 .0 84.6 gary lan 1 .0 .0 84.6 gaston i 1 .0 .0 84.7 gautier 1 .0 .0 84.7 gean guy 1 .0 .0 84.8 gene ? 1 .0 .0 84.8 george b 1 .0 .0 84.9 george h 1 .0 .0 84.9 gerin 1 .0 .0 85.0 gerry w 1 .0 .0 85.0 gerry me 1 .0 .0 85.1 gerry st 1 .0 .0 85.1 girard 1 .0 .0 85.1 gorden t 1 .0 .0 85.2 gordon p 1 .0 .0 85.2 gordon t 8 .4 .4 85.6 guilbeau 1 .0 .0 85.7 guy rica 1 .0 .0 85.7 guy ryca 1 .0 .0 85.7 harris 1 .0 .0 85.8 harvey a 1 .0 .0 85.8 herb gre 1 .0 .0 85.9 hicks 1 .0 .0 85.9 horner 1 .0 .0 86.0 howard c 2 .1 .1 86.1 howard m 1 .0 .0 86.1 ian angu 1 .0 .0 86.2 j-p blac 1 .0 .0 86.2 jack har 4 .2 .2 86.4 jack mur 1 .0 .0 86.4 jack rid 2 .1 .1 86.5 jean gu 1 .0 .0 86.6 jean la 1 .0 .0 86.6 jean Lap 1 .0 .0 86.7 jean cha 2 .1 .1 86.8 jean guy 1 .0 .0 86.8 jean-guy 1 .0 .0 86.9 jeff sco 4 .2 .2 87.0 jerry ge 1 .0 .0 87.1 jerry wi 1 .0 .0 87.1 jesse fl 1 .0 .0 87.2 jessie f 1 .0 .0 87.2 jim Jeps 1 .0 .0 87.3 jim edwa 4 .2 .2 87.5 jim hawk 1 .0 .0 87.5 joe case 1 .0 .0 87.5 joe clar 2 .1 .1 87.6 joe saxi 1 .0 .0 87.7 john cro 3 .1 .1 87.8 john eng 1 .0 .0 87.9 john gor 1 .0 .0 87.9 john tur 2 .1 .1 88.0 john wis 2 .1 .1 88.1 johnson 1 .0 .0 88.1 johnston 1 .0 .0 88.2 johston 1 .0 .0 88.2 keaton ? 1 .0 .0 88.3 ken rost 1 .0 .0 88.3 king 1 .0 .0 88.4 latansey 1 .0 .0 88.4 laury pa 1 .0 .0 88.5 lee clar 1 .0 .0 88.5 len simm 1 .0 .0 88.6 les benj 3 .1 .1 88.7 lloyd ax 2 .1 .1 88.8 lloyd cr 1 .0 .0 88.8 lorne mc 1 .0 .0 88.9 loyd cro 1 .0 .0 88.9 lucie pe 3 .1 .1 89.1 lucien 1 .0 .0 89.1 lucien b 1 .0 .0 89.2 lucy pep 1 .0 .0 89.2 m 1 .0 .0 89.3 m charr 1 .0 .0 89.3 m decot 1 .0 .0 89.3 m delan 1 .0 .0 89.4 m ferla 1 .0 .0 89.4 m gasto 1 .0 .0 89.5 m guilb 1 .0 .0 89.5 m jean 1 .0 .0 89.6 m landr 1 .0 .0 89.6 m st r 1 .0 .0 89.7 m tremb 1 .0 .0 89.7 m champa 1 .0 .0 89.8 m claude 1 .0 .0 89.8 m garnea 1 .0 .0 89.9 m jourde 1 .0 .0 89.9 m marrin 1 .0 .0 89.9 m trambl 1 .0 .0 90.0 m. alain 1 .0 .0 90.0 m. grise 1 .0 .0 90.1 m. lebel 1 .0 .0 90.1 m. tremb 1 .0 .0 90.2 m.lanthi 1 .0 .0 90.2 mac some 1 .0 .0 90.3 maclean 1 .0 .0 90.3 madame b 1 .0 .0 90.4 madame t 1 .0 .0 90.4 malone 1 .0 .0 90.5 marcel d 1 .0 .0 90.5 marcel p 1 .0 .0 90.5 marin 1 .0 .0 90.6 marion d 1 .0 .0 90.6 mary col 2 .1 .1 90.7 maurice 5 .2 .2 91.0 mazankow 3 .1 .1 91.1 mazinkow 1 .0 .0 91.1 mcdermid 1 .0 .0 91.2 mcknight 2 .1 .1 91.3 mel gas 1 .0 .0 91.3 mel gas? 1 .0 .0 91.4 mel gass 3 .1 .1 91.5 michael 2 .1 .1 91.6 michel p 1 .0 .0 91.7 mike for 3 .1 .1 91.8 mme ber 1 .0 .0 91.8 mme blai 1 .0 .0 91.9 mme cote 1 .0 .0 91.9 mme moni 1 .0 .0 92.0 mme scho 1 .0 .0 92.0 monique 6 .3 .3 92.3 monsieur 2 .1 .1 92.4 mr ander 1 .0 .0 92.4 mr chare 1 .0 .0 92.5 mr dupon 1 .0 .0 92.5 mr edwar 1 .0 .0 92.6 mr gass 2 .1 .1 92.7 mr gottf 1 .0 .0 92.7 mr grise 1 .0 .0 92.8 mr gueri 2 .1 .1 92.9 mr lopez 1 .0 .0 92.9 mr orlik 1 .0 .0 92.9 mr weine 1 .0 .0 93.0 mr. blac 1 .0 .0 93.0 mr. blen 1 .0 .0 93.1 mr. dori 1 .0 .0 93.1 mr. edwa 1 .0 .0 93.2 mr. germ 1 .0 .0 93.2 mr. laur 1 .0 .0 93.3 mr. lyle 1 .0 .0 93.3 mr. pat 1 .0 .0 93.4 mr. port 1 .0 .0 93.4 mr. shel 1 .0 .0 93.5 mr. skel 1 .0 .0 93.5 mr. sole 1 .0 .0 93.5 ms. hage 1 .0 .0 93.6 murry ca 1 .0 .0 93.6 ne se so 1 .0 .0 93.7 neil you 1 .0 .0 93.7 nelson r 5 .2 .2 94.0 nick le 2 .1 .1 94.0 nick leb 5 .2 .2 94.3 o neil 1 .0 .0 94.3 oberlei 1 .0 .0 94.4 omar leg 1 .0 .0 94.4 oneial 1 .0 .0 94.5 otto gel 1 .0 .0 94.5 p . h. v 1 .0 .0 94.6 paproski 1 .0 .0 94.6 pat bins 2 .1 .1 94.7 pat crof 2 .1 .1 94.8 pat nowl 1 .0 .0 94.8 patrick 1 .0 .0 94.9 paul gat 1 .0 .0 94.9 paul udo 1 .0 .0 95.0 pauline 3 .1 .1 95.1 peter pe 1 .0 .0 95.2 peterson 1 .0 .0 95.2 pierre 1 .0 .0 95.2 pierre c 2 .1 .1 95.3 pierre g 1 .0 .0 95.4 pierre h 1 .0 .0 95.4 porter 2 .1 .1 95.5 ray hnat 1 .0 .0 95.6 ray maty 1 .0 .0 95.6 raymond 1 .0 .0 95.7 rev. de 1 .0 .0 95.7 ricard g 1 .0 .0 95.8 ricardo 2 .1 .1 95.8 richard 1 .0 .0 95.9 rob nich 1 .0 .0 95.9 robert b 1 .0 .0 96.0 robert d 4 .2 .2 96.2 robert k 1 .0 .0 96.2 robert l 1 .0 .0 96.3 robert m 1 .0 .0 96.3 robert r 2 .1 .1 96.4 robert t 2 .1 .1 96.5 robichau 1 .0 .0 96.5 roch la 1 .0 .0 96.6 roch las 1 .0 .0 96.6 rock la 1 .0 .0 96.7 rock las 1 .0 .0 96.7 romeo MN 1 .0 .0 96.8 rossigno 1 .0 .0 96.8 s.winsto 1 .0 .0 96.9 schumake 1 .0 .0 96.9 sergio m 1 .0 .0 97.0 sheila c 1 .0 .0 97.0 sheila f 1 .0 .0 97.0 shella f 1 .0 .0 97.1 shiela c 1 .0 .0 97.1 shirley 2 .1 .1 97.2 sid frae 1 .0 .0 97.3 sid frai 1 .0 .0 97.3 simon de 2 .1 .1 97.4 sparrow 1 .0 .0 97.5 stan dar 4 .2 .2 97.6 stan she 1 .0 .0 97.7 stephans 1 .0 .0 97.7 stephen 2 .1 .1 97.8 steve la 1 .0 .0 97.9 steve pa 4 .2 .2 98.1 stewart 3 .1 .1 98.2 stewert 1 .0 .0 98.2 suzanne 2 .1 .1 98.3 svend ro 1 .0 .0 98.4 ted sche 3 .1 .1 98.5 ted shel 3 .1 .1 98.7 tetreaul 1 .0 .0 98.7 thorbara 1 .0 .0 98.8 tom macm 2 .1 .1 98.8 tom micm 1 .0 .0 98.9 tom sidd 3 .1 .1 99.0 tony ro 1 .0 .0 99.1 tony rom 1 .0 .0 99.1 tramblay 2 .1 .1 99.2 tremblay 1 .0 .0 99.3 valthous 1 .0 .0 99.3 vanconet 1 .0 .0 99.4 vanderwa 1 .0 .0 99.4 vaudreui 1 .0 .0 99.4 vaughn b 1 .0 .0 99.5 vezina 1 .0 .0 99.5 vic alth 2 .1 .1 99.6 vic elto 1 .0 .0 99.7 vince da 1 .0 .0 99.7 vincent 2 .1 .1 99.8 walter m 2 .1 .1 99.9 wiener j 1 .0 .0 100.0 young /t 1 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ29 FEDERAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION DIRECTION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIBERAL 1 626 28.9 28.9 28.9 PC 2 675 31.1 31.1 60.0 NDP 3 279 12.9 12.9 72.9 SOCIAL CREDIT 4 15 .7 .7 73.6 CHRISTIAN HERITAGE 5 1 .0 .0 73.6 CONFED WEST 7 2 .1 .1 73.7 GREEN 8 1 .0 .0 73.8 LIBERTARIAN 9 1 .0 .0 73.8 REFORM 11 15 .7 .7 74.5 RHINOCEROS 12 7 .3 .3 74.8 PC & LIBERAL 13 3 .1 .1 75.0 LIBERAL & NDP 14 2 .1 .1 75.0 OTHER, VAGUE 25 8 .4 .4 75.4 INDEPENDENT 26 22 1.0 1.0 76.4 NONE 27 240 11.1 11.1 87.5 DK 88 214 9.9 9.9 97.4 REFUSED 98 57 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ30 FEDERAL PARTY IDENTIFICATION INTENSITY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY STRONGLY 1 500 23.1 23.1 23.1 FAIRLY STRONGLY 2 822 37.9 37.9 61.0 NOT VERY STRONGLY 3 295 13.6 13.6 74.6 DK 8 18 .8 .8 75.4 NOT APPLICABLE 9 533 24.6 24.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ31 FEEL CLOSER TO A FEDERAL PARTY? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 200 9.2 9.2 9.2 NO 2 244 11.3 11.3 20.5 REFUSED 3 15 .7 .7 21.2 DK 8 74 3.4 3.4 24.6 NOT APPLICABLE 9 1635 75.4 75.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ32 WHICH FEDERAL PARTY CLOSER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIBERAL 1 52 2.4 2.4 2.4 PC 2 69 3.2 3.2 5.6 NDP 3 44 2.0 2.0 7.6 SOCIAL CREDIT 4 1 .0 .0 7.7 LIBERTARIAN 9 1 .0 .0 7.7 DK 88 10 .5 .5 8.2 REFUSED 98 23 1.1 1.1 9.2 NOT APPLICABLE 99 1968 90.8 90.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ33 EVER CLOSER TO ANOTHER FEDERAL PARTY? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 887 40.9 40.9 40.9 NO 2 894 41.2 41.2 82.1 DK 8 19 .9 .9 83.0 NOT APPLICABLE 9 368 17.0 17.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ34 EVER CLOSE TO A FEDERAL PARTY? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 105 4.8 4.8 4.8 NO 2 191 8.8 8.8 13.7 DK 8 25 1.2 1.2 14.8 NOT APPLICABLE 9 1847 85.2 85.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ35 WHICH PREVIOUS FEDERAL PARTY CLOSE(R) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIBERAL 1 48 2.2 2.2 2.2 PC 2 28 1.3 1.3 3.5 NDP 3 15 .7 .7 4.2 SOCIAL CREDIT 4 3 .1 .1 4.3 RHINOCEROS 12 1 .0 .0 4.4 DK 88 895 41.3 41.3 45.7 REFUSED 98 2 .1 .1 45.8 NOT APPLICABLE 99 1176 54.2 54.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ361 ELECTIONS - POLITICIANS HONEST Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1205 55.6 55.6 55.6 DISAGREE 2 878 40.5 40.5 96.1 DK 8 85 3.9 3.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ362 ELECTIONS - PARTIES SAY V. DO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1948 89.9 89.9 89.9 DISAGREE 2 184 8.5 8.5 98.3 DK 8 36 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ363 ELECTIONS - RAISE REALLY IMPT PROBLEMS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1416 65.3 65.3 65.3 DISAGREE 2 696 32.1 32.1 97.4 DK 8 56 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ364 ELECTIONS - MONEY UNFAIR Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 589 27.2 27.2 27.2 DISAGREE 2 1445 66.7 66.7 93.8 DK 8 134 6.2 6.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ365 ELECTIONS - REAL CHOICES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1044 48.2 48.2 48.2 DISAGREE 2 1006 46.4 46.4 94.6 DK 8 118 5.4 5.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ366 ELECTIONS - REWARD, PUNISH GOV PARTY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 789 36.4 36.4 36.4 DISAGREE 2 1240 57.2 57.2 93.6 DK 8 139 6.4 6.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ367 ELECTIONS - PARTY ELECTED KNOWS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 807 37.2 37.2 37.2 DISAGREE 2 1279 59.0 59.0 96.2 DK 8 82 3.8 3.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ368 ELECTIONS - DIVIDE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 645 29.8 29.8 29.8 DISAGREE 2 1380 63.7 63.7 93.4 DK 8 143 6.6 6.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ369 ELECTIONS - BENEFITS OUTWEIGH COSTS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AGREE 1 1236 57.0 57.0 57.0 DISAGREE 2 745 34.4 34.4 91.4 DK 8 187 8.6 8.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ37 1988 FEDERAL ELECTION VOTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIBERAL 1 551 25.4 25.4 25.4 PC 2 709 32.7 32.7 58.1 NDP 3 380 17.5 17.5 75.6 SOCIAL CREDIT 4 3 .1 .1 75.8 CHRISTIAN 5 6 .3 .3 76.1 GREEN 8 3 .1 .1 76.2 LIBERTARIAN 9 1 .0 .0 76.2 REFORM 11 24 1.1 1.1 77.4 RHINOCEROS 12 8 .4 .4 77.7 LIBERAL & NDP 14 3 .1 .1 77.9 OTHER, VAGUE 28 8 .4 .4 78.2 UNDECIDED, UNSURE 30 366 16.9 16.9 95.1 WOULD NOT VOTE 31 42 1.9 1.9 97.0 REFUSED 98 64 3.0 3.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ38 1988 FEDERAL ELECTION LEAN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIBERAL 1 56 2.6 2.6 2.6 PC 2 57 2.6 2.6 5.2 NDP 3 30 1.4 1.4 6.6 REFORM 11 2 .1 .1 6.7 LIBERAL & NDP 14 3 .1 .1 6.8 PC & NDP 15 1 .0 .0 6.9 UNDECIDED, UNSURE 30 216 10.0 10.0 16.8 WOULD NOT VOTE 31 2 .1 .1 16.9 REFUSED 98 63 2.9 2.9 19.8 NOT APPLICABLE 99 1738 80.2 80.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ39 VOTE IN 1984 FEDERAL ELECTION? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VOTED 1 1860 85.8 85.8 85.8 DID NOT VOTE 2 203 9.4 9.4 95.2 NOT ELIGIBLE 3 73 3.4 3.4 98.5 DONT REMEMBER 4 28 1.3 1.3 99.8 REFUSED 9 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ40 1984 FEDERAL ELECTION VOTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIBERAL 1 455 21.0 21.0 21.0 PC 2 947 43.7 43.7 64.7 NDP 3 301 13.9 13.9 78.6 SOCIAL CREDIT 4 3 .1 .1 78.7 CONFEDERATION OF REG 7 4 .2 .2 78.9 GREEN 8 4 .2 .2 79.1 LIBERTARIAN 9 1 .0 .0 79.1 RHINOCEROS 12 6 .3 .3 79.4 OTHER, VAGUE 29 1 .0 .0 79.4 DK, DONT REMEMBER 88 79 3.6 3.6 83.1 REFUSED 98 59 2.7 2.7 85.8 NOT APPLICABLE 99 308 14.2 14.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ411 SIGN PETITION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1436 66.2 66.2 66.2 NO 2 714 32.9 32.9 99.2 DK 8 18 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ412 MARCH, RALLY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 513 23.7 23.7 23.7 NO 2 1647 76.0 76.0 99.6 DK 8 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ413 BOYCOTT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 689 31.8 31.8 31.8 NO 2 1466 67.6 67.6 99.4 DK 8 13 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ414 SIT-IN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 158 7.3 7.3 7.3 NO 2 1996 92.1 92.1 99.4 DK 8 14 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ415 VIOLENT DEMONSTATION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 162 7.5 7.5 7.5 NO 2 1993 91.9 91.9 99.4 DK 8 13 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ42 MULRONEY PERFORMANCE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY BAD 1 144 6.6 6.6 6.6 2 113 5.2 5.2 11.9 3 152 7.0 7.0 18.9 4 209 9.6 9.6 28.5 5 389 17.9 17.9 46.4 6 338 15.6 15.6 62.0 7 380 17.5 17.5 79.6 8 261 12.0 12.0 91.6 9 67 3.1 3.1 94.7 VERY GOOD 10 67 3.1 3.1 97.8 DK 88 35 1.6 1.6 99.4 NO ANSWER 99 13 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ43 MULRONEY HONESTY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY BAD 1 201 9.3 9.3 9.3 2 148 6.8 6.8 16.1 3 148 6.8 6.8 22.9 4 226 10.4 10.4 33.3 5 363 16.7 16.7 50.1 6 262 12.1 12.1 62.2 7 298 13.7 13.7 75.9 8 272 12.5 12.5 88.5 9 81 3.7 3.7 92.2 VERY GOOD 10 80 3.7 3.7 95.9 DK 88 71 3.3 3.3 99.2 NO ANSWER 99 18 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ44 TURNER PERFORMANCE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY BAD 1 140 6.5 6.5 6.5 2 144 6.6 6.6 13.1 3 201 9.3 9.3 22.4 4 345 15.9 15.9 38.3 5 545 25.1 25.1 63.4 6 322 14.9 14.9 78.3 7 201 9.3 9.3 87.5 8 116 5.4 5.4 92.9 9 27 1.2 1.2 94.1 VERY GOOD 10 32 1.5 1.5 95.6 DK 88 78 3.6 3.6 99.2 NO ANSWER 99 17 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ45 TURNER HONESTY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY BAD 1 116 5.4 5.4 5.4 2 106 4.9 4.9 10.2 3 132 6.1 6.1 16.3 4 232 10.7 10.7 27.0 5 449 20.7 20.7 47.7 6 356 16.4 16.4 64.2 7 318 14.7 14.7 78.8 8 187 8.6 8.6 87.5 9 65 3.0 3.0 90.5 VERY GOOD 10 65 3.0 3.0 93.5 DK 88 119 5.5 5.5 98.9 NO ANSWER 99 23 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ46 BROADBENT PERFORMANCE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY BAD 1 52 2.4 2.4 2.4 2 66 3.0 3.0 5.4 3 105 4.8 4.8 10.3 4 185 8.5 8.5 18.8 5 467 21.5 21.5 40.4 6 405 18.7 18.7 59.0 7 384 17.7 17.7 76.8 8 282 13.0 13.0 89.8 9 81 3.7 3.7 93.5 VERY GOOD 10 49 2.3 2.3 95.8 DK 88 75 3.5 3.5 99.2 NO ANSWER 99 17 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ47 BROADBENT HONESTY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY BAD 1 47 2.2 2.2 2.2 2 63 2.9 2.9 5.1 3 75 3.5 3.5 8.5 4 135 6.2 6.2 14.8 5 344 15.9 15.9 30.6 6 337 15.5 15.5 46.2 7 402 18.5 18.5 64.7 8 357 16.5 16.5 81.2 9 167 7.7 7.7 88.9 VERY GOOD 10 111 5.1 5.1 94.0 DK 88 107 4.9 4.9 98.9 NO ANSWER 99 23 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ48 PROVINCIAL PARTY ID DIRECTION - QUEBEC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIBERAL 1 237 10.9 10.9 10.9 PC 2 8 .4 .4 11.3 NDP 3 4 .2 .2 11.5 SOCIAL CREDIT 4 7 .3 .3 11.8 PARTI QUEBECOIS 5 141 6.5 6.5 18.3 UNION NATIONALE 6 13 .6 .6 18.9 OTHER, VAGUE 27 5 .2 .2 19.1 INDEPENDENT 28 5 .2 .2 19.4 NONE 29 47 2.2 2.2 21.5 DK 88 40 1.8 1.8 23.4 REFUSED 98 7 .3 .3 23.7 NOT APPLICABLE 99 1654 76.3 76.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ49 PROVINCIAL PARTY ID DIRECTION-NON-QUE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIBERAL 1 507 23.4 23.4 23.4 PC 2 531 24.5 24.5 47.9 NDP 3 268 12.4 12.4 60.2 SOCIAL CREDIT 4 97 4.5 4.5 64.7 PARTI QUEBECOIS 5 1 .0 .0 64.8 UNION NATIONALE 6 4 .2 .2 64.9 PC & LIBERAL 7 2 .1 .1 65.0 LIBERAL & NDP 8 1 .0 .0 65.1 OTHER, VAGUE 27 6 .3 .3 65.4 INDEPENDENT 28 7 .3 .3 65.7 NONE 29 120 5.5 5.5 71.2 DK 88 77 3.6 3.6 74.8 REFUSED 98 33 1.5 1.5 76.3 NOT APPLICABLE 99 514 23.7 23.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ50 PROVINCIAL PARTY ID INTENSITY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY STRONGLY 1 559 25.8 25.8 25.8 FAIRLY STRONGLY 2 879 40.5 40.5 66.3 NOT VERY STRONGLY 3 356 16.4 16.4 82.7 DK 8 38 1.8 1.8 84.5 NOT APPLICABLE 9 336 15.5 15.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ51 FEEL CLOSER TO A PROVINCIAL PARTY? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 82 3.8 3.8 3.8 NO 2 203 9.4 9.4 13.1 DK 8 51 2.4 2.4 15.5 NOT APPLICABLE 9 1832 84.5 84.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ52 WHICH PROVINCIAL PARTY CLOSER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIBERAL 1 15 .7 .7 .7 PC 2 20 .9 .9 1.6 NDP 3 14 .6 .6 2.3 SOCIAL CREDIT 4 4 .2 .2 2.4 PARTI QUEBECOIS 5 12 .6 .6 3.0 PC & NDP 9 1 .0 .0 3.0 DK 88 2 .1 .1 3.1 REFUSED 98 14 .6 .6 3.8 NOT APPLICABLE 99 2086 96.2 96.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ53 FINANCIALLY BETTER OFF OVER PAST 4 YRS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BETTER 1 861 39.7 39.7 39.7 WORSE 2 293 13.5 13.5 53.2 SAME 3 990 45.7 45.7 98.9 DK 8 24 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ54 FINANCIAL CONDITION PAST 4 YEARS - GOVER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GREAT DEAL 1 383 17.7 17.7 17.7 SOMETHING 2 644 29.7 29.7 47.4 NOT MUCH 3 1103 50.9 50.9 98.2 DK 8 14 .6 .6 98.9 NOT APPLICABLE 9 24 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ55 LIFE BETTER OFF OVER PAST 4 YEARS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BETTER 1 862 39.8 39.8 39.8 WORSE 2 156 7.2 7.2 47.0 SAME 3 1128 52.0 52.0 99.0 DK 8 22 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ56 LIFE PAST 4 YEARS-GOVERNMENT IMPACT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GREAT DEAL 1 285 13.1 13.1 13.1 SOMETHING 2 618 28.5 28.5 41.7 NOT MUCH 3 1227 56.6 56.6 98.2 DK 8 16 .7 .7 99.0 NOT APPLICABLE 9 22 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ57 WATCH POLITICS ON TV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OFTEN 1 522 24.1 24.1 24.1 SOMETIMES 2 890 41.1 41.1 65.1 SELDOM 3 534 24.6 24.6 89.8 NEVER 4 217 10.0 10.0 99.8 DK 8 5 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ58 LISTEN TO POLITICS ON RADIO Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OFTEN 1 301 13.9 13.9 13.9 SOMETIMES 2 616 28.4 28.4 42.3 SELDOM 3 653 30.1 30.1 72.4 NEVER 4 592 27.3 27.3 99.7 DK 8 6 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ59 READ ABOUT POLITICS IN NEWSPAPERS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OFTEN 1 980 45.2 45.2 45.2 SOMETIMES 2 634 29.2 29.2 74.4 SELDOM 3 366 16.9 16.9 91.3 NEVER 4 183 8.4 8.4 99.8 DK 8 5 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ60 PEOPLE ARE TRUSTWORTHY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CAN BE TRUSTED 1 1262 58.2 58.2 58.2 CANT BE TOO CAREFUL 2 848 39.1 39.1 97.3 DK 8 58 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ61 PEOPLE ARE HELPFUL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BE HELPFUL 1 1313 60.6 60.6 60.6 LOOK FOR SELVES 2 745 34.4 34.4 94.9 DK 8 110 5.1 5.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ62 PEOPLE TRY TAKE ADVANTAGE OF YOU Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TAKE ADVANTAGE 1 576 26.6 26.6 26.6 BE FAIR 2 1463 67.5 67.5 94.0 DK 8 129 6.0 6.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ63 BETTER TO PLAN AHEAD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PLAN AHEAD 1 1379 63.6 63.6 63.6 MATTER OF LUCK 2 691 31.9 31.9 95.5 DK 8 98 4.5 4.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ64 PLANS WORK OUT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent AS EXPECTED 1 1092 50.4 50.4 50.4 CHANGE PLANS 2 966 44.6 44.6 94.9 DK 8 110 5.1 5.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ65 LIFE WORK OUT AS EXPECTED Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WOULD WORK OUT 1 873 40.3 40.3 40.3 HAVENT BEEN SURE 2 1223 56.4 56.4 96.7 DK 8 72 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ66 RUN OWN LIFE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent RUN OWN LIFE 1 1765 81.4 81.4 81.4 PROBLEMS TOO BIG 2 309 14.3 14.3 95.7 DK 8 94 4.3 4.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ67 OCCUPATION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROFESSIONAL 1 241 11.1 11.1 11.1 OWNER, MANAGER 2 187 8.6 8.6 19.7 SALES 3 61 2.8 2.8 22.6 CLERICAL 4 304 14.0 14.0 36.6 SKILLED LABOR 5 287 13.2 13.2 49.8 UNSKILLED LABOR 6 142 6.5 6.5 56.4 FARMER 7 69 3.2 3.2 59.5 HOMEMAKER ONLY 27 248 11.4 11.4 71.0 STUDENT 28 138 6.4 6.4 77.4 RETIRED 29 327 15.1 15.1 92.4 UNEMPLOYED 30 53 2.4 2.4 94.9 DK 88 111 5.1 5.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ68 EMPLOYMENT STATUS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1214 56.0 56.0 56.0 NO 2 74 3.4 3.4 59.4 NOT APPLICABLE 9 880 40.6 40.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ69 IF UNEMPLOYED - USUAL OCCUPATION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROFESSIONAL 1 1 .0 .0 .0 OWNER, MANAGER 2 2 .1 .1 .1 CLERICAL 4 13 .6 .6 .7 SKILLED LABOR 5 6 .3 .3 1.0 UNSKILLED LABOR 6 16 .7 .7 1.8 HOMEMAKER ONLY 27 4 .2 .2 1.9 STUDENT 28 1 .0 .0 2.0 RETIRED 29 1 .0 .0 2.0 UNEMPLOYED 30 4 .2 .2 2.2 DK, REFUSED 88 5 .2 .2 2.4 NOT APPLICABLE 99 2115 97.6 97.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ70 IF RETIRED - FORMER OCCUPATION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROFESSIONAL 1 38 1.8 1.8 1.8 OWNER, MANAGER 2 35 1.6 1.6 3.4 SALES 3 5 .2 .2 3.6 CLERICAL 4 60 2.8 2.8 6.4 SKILLED LABOR 5 59 2.7 2.7 9.1 UNSKILLED LABOR 6 32 1.5 1.5 10.6 FARMER 7 19 .9 .9 11.4 HOMEMAKER ONLY 27 37 1.7 1.7 13.1 STUDENT 28 1 .0 .0 13.2 RETIRED 29 6 .3 .3 13.5 UNEMPLOYED 30 2 .1 .1 13.6 DK, REFUSED 88 33 1.5 1.5 15.1 NOT APPLICABLE 99 1841 84.9 84.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ71 EDUCATION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SOME ELEMENTARY 1 44 2.0 2.0 2.0 COMPLETED ELEMENTARY 2 116 5.4 5.4 7.4 SOME SECONDARY 3 413 19.0 19.0 26.4 COMPLETED SECONDARY 4 527 24.3 24.3 50.7 SOME TECHNICAL 5 178 8.2 8.2 58.9 COMPLETED TECHNICAL 6 257 11.9 11.9 70.8 SOME UNIVERSITY 7 222 10.2 10.2 81.0 COMPLETED UNIVERSITY 8 381 17.6 17.6 98.6 NO FORMAL SCHOOLING 9 2 .1 .1 98.7 REFUSED 98 28 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ72 HIGHEST DEGREE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BA, BSC 1 253 11.7 11.7 11.7 MA, MSC 2 62 2.9 2.9 14.5 LLB 3 11 .5 .5 15.0 MD 4 10 .5 .5 15.5 PHD 5 21 1.0 1.0 16.5 OTHER, VAGUE 20 11 .5 .5 17.0 DK, REFUSED 88 13 .6 .6 17.6 NOT APPLICABLE 99 1787 82.4 82.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ73 RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ROMAN CATHOLIC 1 872 40.2 40.2 40.2 UNITED CHURCH 2 336 15.5 15.5 55.7 ANGLICAN 3 214 9.9 9.9 65.6 PRESBYTERIAN 4 106 4.9 4.9 70.5 BAPTIST 5 63 2.9 2.9 73.4 LUTHERAN 6 36 1.7 1.7 75.0 UKRAINIAN (GREEK) CA 7 7 .3 .3 75.4 GREEK ORTHODOX 8 16 .7 .7 76.1 JEWISH 9 21 1.0 1.0 77.1 PENTECOSTAL 10 27 1.2 1.2 78.3 SALVATION ARMY 11 8 .4 .4 78.7 JEHOVAH WITNESS 12 5 .2 .2 78.9 MENNONITE 13 18 .8 .8 79.8 BRETHREN 14 6 .3 .3 80.0 EVANGELICAL 16 7 .3 .3 80.4 CHRISTIAN REFORMED 17 12 .6 .6 80.9 CHRISTIAN 18 10 .5 .5 81.4 LATTER-DAY SAINTS 19 2 .1 .1 81.5 CHURCH OF CHRIST, GO 20 4 .2 .2 81.6 PROTESTANT (UNSPECIF 21 49 2.3 2.3 83.9 SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIS 23 2 .1 .1 84.0 CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE 24 3 .1 .1 84.1 BUDDHIST 26 3 .1 .1 84.3 SIKH, HINDU 27 4 .2 .2 84.5 MOSLEM 28 1 .0 .0 84.5 OTHER VAGUE 29 22 1.0 1.0 85.5 NONE 40 248 11.4 11.4 97.0 REFUSED 98 66 3.0 3.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ74 FIRST LANGUAGE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ENGLISH 1 1411 65.1 65.1 65.1 FRENCH 2 522 24.1 24.1 89.2 ENGLISH & FRENCH 3 7 .3 .3 89.5 ENGLISH & OTHER 4 5 .2 .2 89.7 ONE OTHER 6 187 8.6 8.6 98.3 TWO+ OTHER 7 5 .2 .2 98.6 DK, REFUSED 88 31 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ75 ETHNICITY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CZECH, SLOVAK 1 10 .5 .5 .5 CHINESE, JAPANESE 2 27 1.2 1.2 1.7 ENGLISH 3 305 14.1 14.1 15.8 FRENCH 5 322 14.9 14.9 30.6 GERMAN, AUSTRIAN 6 88 4.1 4.1 34.7 GREEK, MALTESE 7 4 .2 .2 34.9 HUNGARIAN 8 6 .3 .3 35.1 IRISH 9 120 5.5 5.5 40.7 ITALIAN 10 23 1.1 1.1 41.7 JEWISH 11 10 .5 .5 42.2 LATVIAN, LITHUANIAN 12 4 .2 .2 42.4 DUTCH, BELGIAN 13 29 1.3 1.3 43.7 POLISH 14 15 .7 .7 44.4 SCANDINAVIAN 15 27 1.2 1.2 45.7 SCOTTISH 16 104 4.8 4.8 50.5 RUSSIAN 17 6 .3 .3 50.7 UKRAINIAN 18 21 1.0 1.0 51.7 YUGOSLOVIAN 19 4 .2 .2 51.9 WELSH 20 12 .6 .6 52.4 NATIVE INDIAN OR ESK 21 4 .2 .2 52.6 SPANISH, PORTUGUESE 22 8 .4 .4 53.0 WEST INDIAN 23 6 .3 .3 53.3 OTHER EUROPEAN 25 3 .1 .1 53.4 OTHER ASIAN 26 13 .6 .6 54.0 ENGLISH & FRENCH 27 1 .0 .0 54.1 BRITISH ISLES 28 10 .5 .5 54.5 ENGLISH & OTHER-NFR 29 1 .0 .0 54.6 ALL OTHER COMBINATIO 31 10 .5 .5 55.0 DK, REFUSED 88 117 5.4 5.4 60.4 1984 RESPONDENT 99 858 39.6 39.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ76 LIVED IN OTHER PROVINCES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 721 33.3 33.3 33.3 NO 2 1433 66.1 66.1 99.4 DK 8 14 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ77 VISITED OTHER PROVINCES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1962 90.5 90.5 90.5 NO 2 195 9.0 9.0 99.5 DK 8 11 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ78 RELATIVES LIVE IN OTHER PROVS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1731 79.8 79.8 79.8 NO 2 422 19.5 19.5 99.3 DK 8 15 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ79A AGE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18 50 2.3 2.3 2.3 19 28 1.3 1.3 3.6 20 28 1.3 1.3 4.9 21 38 1.8 1.8 6.6 22 41 1.9 1.9 8.5 23 41 1.9 1.9 10.4 24 42 1.9 1.9 12.4 25 40 1.8 1.8 14.2 26 39 1.8 1.8 16.0 27 35 1.6 1.6 17.6 28 39 1.8 1.8 19.4 29 46 2.1 2.1 21.5 30 42 1.9 1.9 23.5 31 40 1.8 1.8 25.3 32 53 2.4 2.4 27.8 33 51 2.4 2.4 30.1 34 43 2.0 2.0 32.1 35 53 2.4 2.4 34.5 36 58 2.7 2.7 37.2 37 61 2.8 2.8 40.0 38 43 2.0 2.0 42.0 39 60 2.8 2.8 44.8 40 62 2.9 2.9 47.6 41 49 2.3 2.3 49.9 42 52 2.4 2.4 52.3 43 51 2.4 2.4 54.7 44 53 2.4 2.4 57.1 45 45 2.1 2.1 59.2 46 31 1.4 1.4 60.6 47 31 1.4 1.4 62.0 48 39 1.8 1.8 63.8 49 28 1.3 1.3 65.1 50 32 1.5 1.5 66.6 51 29 1.3 1.3 67.9 52 32 1.5 1.5 69.4 53 33 1.5 1.5 70.9 54 35 1.6 1.6 72.6 55 23 1.1 1.1 73.6 56 19 .9 .9 74.5 57 29 1.3 1.3 75.8 58 26 1.2 1.2 77.0 59 29 1.3 1.3 78.4 60 26 1.2 1.2 79.6 61 24 1.1 1.1 80.7 62 29 1.3 1.3 82.0 63 31 1.4 1.4 83.4 64 29 1.3 1.3 84.8 65 27 1.2 1.2 86.0 66 25 1.2 1.2 87.2 67 24 1.1 1.1 88.3 68 17 .8 .8 89.1 69 21 1.0 1.0 90.0 70 19 .9 .9 90.9 71 11 .5 .5 91.4 72 28 1.3 1.3 92.7 73 18 .8 .8 93.5 74 17 .8 .8 94.3 75 18 .8 .8 95.2 76 17 .8 .8 95.9 77 14 .6 .6 96.6 78 8 .4 .4 97.0 79 11 .5 .5 97.5 80 9 .4 .4 97.9 81 4 .2 .2 98.1 82 6 .3 .3 98.3 83 5 .2 .2 98.6 84 4 .2 .2 98.8 87 2 .1 .1 98.8 90 2 .1 .1 98.9 91 1 .0 .0 99.0 NOT ASCERTAINABLE 999 22 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ79 AGE GIVEN OR ESTIMATED Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent RESP OFFERED AGE 1 2064 95.2 95.2 95.2 INTER ESTIMATED AGE 2 82 3.8 3.8 99.0 NOT ASCERTAINABLE 9 22 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ80 PRESENT LIFE SATISFACTION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY SATISFIED 1 739 34.1 34.1 34.1 FAIRLY SATISFIED 2 1216 56.1 56.1 90.2 LITTLE DISSATISFIED 3 165 7.6 7.6 97.8 VERY DISSATISFIED 4 28 1.3 1.3 99.1 DK 8 20 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ81 PRESENT LIFE SATISFACTION - GOV IMPACT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GREAT DEAL 1 208 9.6 9.6 9.6 SOMETHING 2 713 32.9 32.9 42.5 NOT MUCH 3 1208 55.7 55.7 98.2 DK 8 19 .9 .9 99.1 NOT APPLICABLE 9 20 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AQ82 ANNUAL FAMILY INCOME Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNDER $10,000 1 120 5.5 5.5 5.5 $10,000-$19,999 2 296 13.7 13.7 19.2 $20,000-$29,999 3 358 16.5 16.5 35.7 $30,000-$39,999 4 353 16.3 16.3 52.0 $40,000-$49,999 5 265 12.2 12.2 64.2 $50,000-$59,999 6 201 9.3 9.3 73.5 $60,000-$69,999 7 112 5.2 5.2 78.6 $70,000 OR MORE 8 214 9.9 9.9 88.5 DK 88 103 4.8 4.8 93.3 REFUSED 98 146 6.7 6.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AW1DATE WAVE 1 INTERVIEW DATE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YEAR-MONTH-DAY 881020 60 2.8 2.8 2.8 881021 116 5.4 5.4 8.1 881022 74 3.4 3.4 11.5 881024 118 5.4 5.4 17.0 881025 118 5.4 5.4 22.4 881026 89 4.1 4.1 26.5 881027 77 3.6 3.6 30.1 881028 31 1.4 1.4 31.5 881029 30 1.4 1.4 32.9 881031 96 4.4 4.4 37.3 881101 87 4.0 4.0 41.3 881102 89 4.1 4.1 45.4 881103 96 4.4 4.4 49.9 881104 74 3.4 3.4 53.3 881105 21 1.0 1.0 54.2 881106 119 5.5 5.5 59.7 881107 67 3.1 3.1 62.8 881108 80 3.7 3.7 66.5 881109 55 2.5 2.5 69.0 881110 92 4.2 4.2 73.3 881111 85 3.9 3.9 77.2 881112 53 2.4 2.4 79.7 881113 35 1.6 1.6 81.3 881114 53 2.4 2.4 83.7 881115 60 2.8 2.8 86.5 881116 33 1.5 1.5 88.0 881117 48 2.2 2.2 90.2 881118 79 3.6 3.6 93.9 881119 80 3.7 3.7 97.6 881120 52 2.4 2.4 100.0 DK 999999 1 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2168 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2168 Missing cases 0 21 Jul 98 Political support in Canada 1983-1988 Page 3 17:57:43 1988 pre-election survey - frequencies Preceding task required 1.53 seconds CPU time; 2.62 seconds elapsed. 7 descriptives variables=awgt88w1 76 bytes of memory required for the DESCRIPTIVES procedure. 4 bytes have already been acquired. 72 bytes remain to be acquired. 21 Jul 98 Political support in Canada 1983-1988 Page 4 17:57:44 1988 pre-election survey - frequencies Number of valid observations (listwise) = 2168.00 Valid Variable Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum N Label AWGT88W1 1.02 .30 .12 1.59 2168 NATIONAL SAMPLE WEIGH 21 Jul 98 Political support in Canada 1983-1988 Page 5 17:57:44 1988 pre-election survey - frequencies Preceding task required .33 seconds CPU time; .65 seconds elapsed. 8 finish 8 command lines read. 0 errors detected. 1 warnings issued. 4 seconds CPU time. 7 seconds elapsed time. End of job.