15 Jul 02 Ontario provincial election survey, 1999: political ideology Page 3 15:42:56 York/ISR ed 6 0 frequencies variables=nadults to svsyear 7 0 svsrn1 to svsa4 svsh14 svsm3 to svsm15 svsm16a 8 0 postcode picatemp to picyear picrn1 to picd2 9 0 picd5 to picd13 pinporr to survey Memory allows a total of 18,724 values accumulated across all variables. There may be up to 2,340 value labels for each variable. 15 Jul 02 Ontario provincial election survey, 1999: political ideology Page 4 15:42:56 York/ISR ed NADULTS Number Of Adults In Hhld Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 333 28.8 28.8 28.8 2 608 52.5 52.5 81.3 3 151 13.1 13.1 94.4 4 51 4.4 4.4 98.8 5 13 1.1 1.1 99.9 7 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVSMONTH Month Of Interview Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 5 873 75.5 75.5 75.5 6 284 24.5 24.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVSDAY Day Of Interview
Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 143 12.4 12.4 12.4 2 141 12.2 12.2 24.5 27 132 11.4 11.4 36.0 28 87 7.5 7.5 43.5 29 183 15.8 15.8 59.3 30 255 22.0 22.0 81.3 31 216 18.7 18.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVSYEAR Year Of Interview Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 99 1157 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVSRN1 Randomize Party Leaders Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 191 16.5 16.5 16.5 2 191 16.5 16.5 33.0 3 192 16.6 16.6 49.6 4 189 16.3 16.3 65.9 5 216 18.7 18.7 84.6 6 178 15.4 15.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVSRN2 Randomize Provincial Parties Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 182 15.7 15.7 15.7 2 187 16.2 16.2 31.9 3 213 18.4 18.4 50.3 4 201 17.4 17.4 67.7 5 192 16.6 16.6 84.3 6 182 15.7 15.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVSRN3 Route Leader/PartyRandomisation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 568 49.1 49.1 49.1 2 589 50.9 50.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVSRN7 Randomize Local Candidates Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 202 17.5 17.5 17.5 2 168 14.5 14.5 32.0 3 207 17.9 17.9 49.9 4 186 16.1 16.1 65.9 5 209 18.1 18.1 84.0 6 185 16.0 16.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVSA3 On Election Day Certain To Vote Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Certain 1 763 65.9 65.9 65.9 Likely 2 221 19.1 19.1 85.0 Unlikely 3 67 5.8 5.8 90.8 Certain Not Vote 7 66 5.7 5.7 96.5 D.K. 8 36 3.1 3.1 99.7 Refused 9 4 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVSA4 Party Think Will Vote For Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Other 0 7 .6 .6 .6 PC 1 336 29.0 30.9 31.6 Liberal 3 319 27.6 29.3 60.9 N.D.P. 5 115 9.9 10.6 71.5 Will Not Vote 96 4 .3 .4 71.8 None 97 2 .2 .2 72.0 DK/Undecided 98 235 20.3 21.6 93.7 Refused 99 69 6.0 6.3 100.0 . 70 6.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1087 Missing cases 70 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVSH14 Close To Any Particular Provincial Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Yes 1 384 33.2 33.2 33.2 No 5 748 64.6 64.6 97.8 D.K. 8 19 1.6 1.6 99.5 Refused 9 6 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVSM3 Highest Level Of Education Completed Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Some Elementary 2 12 1.0 1.0 1.0 Complete Elem. 3 32 2.8 2.8 3.8 SomeSoc/H.S. 4 159 13.7 13.7 17.5 Complete Sec/HS 5 289 25.0 25.0 42.5 SomeTech/CAAT 6 91 7.9 7.9 50.4 CompleteTechCAAT 7 189 16.3 16.3 66.7 Some University 8 71 6.1 6.1 72.9 B.A. 9 202 17.5 17.5 90.3 M.A. 10 64 5.5 5.5 95.9 Profesnl/PhD 11 21 1.8 1.8 97.7 D.K. 98 10 .9 .9 98.5 Refused 99 17 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVSM4 Present Employment Status Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Other 0 24 2.1 2.1 2.1 Self-Emp FT 1 125 10.8 10.8 12.9 Self-Emp PT 2 25 2.2 2.2 15.0 Working For Pay 3 606 52.4 52.4 67.4 Unemployed 4 37 3.2 3.2 70.6 Retired 5 207 17.9 17.9 88.5 Student 6 36 3.1 3.1 91.6 Homemaker 7 80 6.9 6.9 98.5 Disabled 8 13 1.1 1.1 99.7 D.K. 98 1 .1 .1 99.7 Refused 99 3 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVSM9 Do You/Hhld Member Belong To A Union Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Yes 1 365 31.5 31.5 31.5 No 5 780 67.4 67.4 99.0 D.K. 8 8 .7 .7 99.7 Refused 9 4 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVSM10 Religious Affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent None 0 191 16.5 16.5 16.5 Protestant 1 472 40.8 40.8 57.3 Catholic 2 356 30.8 30.8 88.1 Jewish 3 17 1.5 1.5 89.5 Islam 4 8 .7 .7 90.2 Other 5 70 6.1 6.1 96.3 D.K. 98 9 .8 .8 97.1 Refused 99 34 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVSM10A Church Or Denomination Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Other 0 15 1.3 3.2 3.2 Anglican 1 110 9.5 23.3 26.5 United 2 170 14.7 36.0 62.5 Presbyterian 3 50 4.3 10.6 73.1 Baptist 4 33 2.9 7.0 80.1 Lutheran 5 22 1.9 4.7 84.7 ChristianReformed 6 15 1.3 3.2 87.9 Pentecostal,etc. 7 23 2.0 4.9 92.8 D.K. 98 30 2.6 6.4 99.2 Refused 99 4 .3 .8 100.0 . 685 59.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 472 Missing cases 685 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVSM15 Language First Learned&Still Understand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Other 0 174 15.0 15.0 15.0 French 1 75 6.5 6.5 21.5 English 5 901 77.9 77.9 99.4 D.K. 98 2 .2 .2 99.6 Refused 99 5 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVSM16A Total Household Income Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent <$20,000 1 50 4.3 9.7 9.7 $20,000-$29,999 2 51 4.4 9.9 19.6 $30,000-$39,999 3 33 2.9 6.4 26.0 $40,000-$49,999 4 35 3.0 6.8 32.8 $50,000-$59,999 5 28 2.4 5.4 38.2 $60,000-$69,999 6 20 1.7 3.9 42.1 $70,000-$79,999 7 17 1.5 3.3 45.3 $80,000-$89,999 8 9 .8 1.7 47.1 $90,000-$99,999 9 3 .3 .6 47.7 >100,000 10 30 2.6 5.8 53.5 D.K. 98 55 4.8 10.7 64.1 Refused 99 185 16.0 35.9 100.0 . 641 55.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 516 Missing cases 641 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POSTCODE Postal Code Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent K0A 7 .6 .6 .6 K0B 1 .1 .1 .7 K0C 5 .4 .5 1.2 K0E 3 .3 .3 1.4 K0G 8 .7 .7 2.2 K0H 4 .3 .4 2.5 K0J 5 .4 .5 3.0 K0K 7 .6 .6 3.6 K0L 8 .7 .7 4.3 K0M 6 .5 .5 4.9 K1A 3 .3 .3 5.1 K1B 2 .2 .2 5.3 K1C 7 .6 .6 6.0 K1E 3 .3 .3 6.2 K1G 5 .4 .5 6.7 K1J 3 .3 .3 6.9 K1K 5 .4 .5 7.4 K1L 4 .3 .4 7.8 K1N 2 .2 .2 7.9 K1O 1 .1 .1 8.0 K1R 2 .2 .2 8.2 K1S 5 .4 .5 8.7 K1T 3 .3 .3 8.9 K1V 5 .4 .5 9.4 K1W 1 .1 .1 9.5 K1Y 1 .1 .1 9.6 K1Z 3 .3 .3 9.8 K2A 1 .1 .1 9.9 K2B 2 .2 .2 10.1 K2C 4 .3 .4 10.5 K2E 4 .3 .4 10.8 K2G 4 .3 .4 11.2 K2H 5 .4 .5 11.6 K2J 1 .1 .1 11.7 K2K 1 .1 .1 11.8 K2L 3 .3 .3 12.1 K2M 2 .2 .2 12.3 K2P 4 .3 .4 12.6 K4B 1 .1 .1 12.7 K4C 1 .1 .1 12.8 K4M 1 .1 .1 12.9 K4P 1 .1 .1 13.0 K4R 2 .2 .2 13.2 K6A 1 .1 .1 13.3 K6H 2 .2 .2 13.4 K6J 1 .1 .1 13.5 K6V 3 .3 .3 13.8 K7A 3 .3 .3 14.1 K7H 1 .1 .1 14.2 K7K 5 .4 .5 14.6 K7L 3 .3 .3 14.9 K7M 4 .3 .4 15.2 K7N 1 .1 .1 15.3 K7P 1 .1 .1 15.4 K7R 1 .1 .1 15.5 K7S 1 .1 .1 15.6 K7V 1 .1 .1 15.7 K7Z 1 .1 .1 15.8 K8A 5 .4 .5 16.2 K8H 4 .3 .4 16.6 K8N 2 .2 .2 16.8 K8P 3 .3 .3 17.0 K8R 1 .1 .1 17.1 K8V 2 .2 .2 17.3 K9A 5 .4 .5 17.8 K9H 4 .3 .4 18.1 K9J 6 .5 .5 18.7 K9K 1 .1 .1 18.8 K9L 1 .1 .1 18.8 K9V 5 .4 .5 19.3 L0B 2 .2 .2 19.5 L0C 1 .1 .1 19.6 L0E 2 .2 .2 19.7 L0G 4 .3 .4 20.1 L0K 3 .3 .3 20.4 L0L 8 .7 .7 21.1 L0M 1 .1 .1 21.2 L0N 5 .4 .5 21.6 L0P 1 .1 .1 21.7 L0R 6 .5 .5 22.3 L0S 2 .2 .2 22.5 L1A 1 .1 .1 22.5 L1B 3 .3 .3 22.8 L1C 2 .2 .2 23.0 L1E 2 .2 .2 23.2 L1G 6 .5 .5 23.7 L1H 3 .3 .3 24.0 L1J 6 .5 .5 24.5 L1K 1 .1 .1 24.6 L1N 3 .3 .3 24.9 L1P 2 .2 .2 25.1 L1R 1 .1 .1 25.2 L1S 3 .3 .3 25.4 L1T 2 .2 .2 25.6 L1V 4 .3 .4 26.0 L1W 1 .1 .1 26.1 L1X 2 .2 .2 26.2 L2A 2 .2 .2 26.4 L2E 3 .3 .3 26.7 L2G 4 .3 .4 27.1 L2H 1 .1 .1 27.1 L2J 2 .2 .2 27.3 L2M 3 .3 .3 27.6 L2N 3 .3 .3 27.9 L2P 1 .1 .1 28.0 L2R 5 .4 .5 28.4 L2V 1 .1 .1 28.5 L3B 2 .2 .2 28.7 L3C 4 .3 .4 29.0 L3K 4 .3 .4 29.4 L3M 1 .1 .1 29.5 L3P 3 .3 .3 29.8 L3R 3 .3 .3 30.0 L3S 2 .2 .2 30.2 L3T 5 .4 .5 30.7 L3V 6 .5 .5 31.2 L3X 2 .2 .2 31.4 L3Y 6 .5 .5 31.9 L3Z 2 .2 .2 32.1 L4A 3 .3 .3 32.4 L4C 9 .8 .8 33.2 L4G 2 .2 .2 33.4 L4J 7 .6 .6 34.0 L4K 2 .2 .2 34.2 L4L 4 .3 .4 34.5 L4M 4 .3 .4 34.9 L4N 8 .7 .7 35.6 L4P 1 .1 .1 35.7 L4R 2 .2 .2 35.9 L4S 2 .2 .2 36.1 L4W 2 .2 .2 36.2 L4X 1 .1 .1 36.3 L4Y 1 .1 .1 36.4 L4Z 2 .2 .2 36.6 L5A 1 .1 .1 36.7 L5B 2 .2 .2 36.9 L5C 3 .3 .3 37.2 L5E 1 .1 .1 37.2 L5G 1 .1 .1 37.3 L5H 2 .2 .2 37.5 L5J 2 .2 .2 37.7 L5L 5 .4 .5 38.1 L5M 2 .2 .2 38.3 L5N 5 .4 .5 38.8 L5R 1 .1 .1 38.9 L5V 1 .1 .1 39.0 L6A 4 .3 .4 39.3 L6F 1 .1 .1 39.4 L6H 4 .3 .4 39.8 L6J 1 .1 .1 39.9 L6L 4 .3 .4 40.2 L6M 1 .1 .1 40.3 L6S 1 .1 .1 40.4 L6T 3 .3 .3 40.7 L6V 4 .3 .4 41.0 L6W 2 .2 .2 41.2 L6X 2 .2 .2 41.4 L6Y 4 .3 .4 41.7 L6Z 2 .2 .2 41.9 L7B 2 .2 .2 42.1 L7E 2 .2 .2 42.3 L7G 3 .3 .3 42.6 L7L 4 .3 .4 42.9 L7M 3 .3 .3 43.2 L7N 2 .2 .2 43.4 L7P 2 .2 .2 43.6 L7R 2 .2 .2 43.7 L7S 3 .3 .3 44.0 L7T 2 .2 .2 44.2 L8B 1 .1 .1 44.3 L8D 1 .1 .1 44.4 L8E 2 .2 .2 44.5 L8G 2 .2 .2 44.7 L8H 1 .1 .1 44.8 L8J 2 .2 .2 45.0 L8K 2 .2 .2 45.2 L8L 1 .1 .1 45.3 L8M 1 .1 .1 45.4 L8P 4 .3 .4 45.7 L8S 1 .1 .1 45.8 L8T 2 .2 .2 46.0 L8V 3 .3 .3 46.3 L9B 2 .2 .2 46.4 L9C 2 .2 .2 46.6 L9G 2 .2 .2 46.8 L9H 2 .2 .2 47.0 L9L 2 .2 .2 47.2 L9P 2 .2 .2 47.3 L9R 2 .2 .2 47.5 L9T 2 .2 .2 47.7 L9V 1 .1 .1 47.8 L9W 3 .3 .3 48.1 L9Y 1 .1 .1 48.2 M0E 1 .1 .1 48.2 M1B 2 .2 .2 48.4 M1C 4 .3 .4 48.8 M1E 3 .3 .3 49.1 M1G 3 .3 .3 49.3 M1H 2 .2 .2 49.5 M1J 1 .1 .1 49.6 M1K 4 .3 .4 50.0 M1L 2 .2 .2 50.1 M1M 2 .2 .2 50.3 M1N 1 .1 .1 50.4 M1P 3 .3 .3 50.7 M1R 2 .2 .2 50.9 M1S 3 .3 .3 51.1 M1T 2 .2 .2 51.3 M1V 3 .3 .3 51.6 M1W 1 .1 .1 51.7 M1X 1 .1 .1 51.8 M2H 2 .2 .2 51.9 M2J 3 .3 .3 52.2 M2K 3 .3 .3 52.5 M2L 1 .1 .1 52.6 M2M 4 .3 .4 52.9 M2N 3 .3 .3 53.2 M2P 1 .1 .1 53.3 M2R 3 .3 .3 53.6 M3A 2 .2 .2 53.7 M3B 1 .1 .1 53.8 M3C 3 .3 .3 54.1 M3H 1 .1 .1 54.2 M3J 1 .1 .1 54.3 M3L 2 .2 .2 54.5 M3M 1 .1 .1 54.6 M3N 2 .2 .2 54.7 M3T 1 .1 .1 54.8 M4A 2 .2 .2 55.0 M4B 1 .1 .1 55.1 M4C 5 .4 .5 55.5 M4E 1 .1 .1 55.6 M4G 1 .1 .1 55.7 M4H 2 .2 .2 55.9 M4J 4 .3 .4 56.3 M4K 4 .3 .4 56.6 M4L 3 .3 .3 56.9 M4M 2 .2 .2 57.1 M4N 4 .3 .4 57.4 M4P 2 .2 .2 57.6 M4S 4 .3 .4 58.0 M4V 3 .3 .3 58.3 M4W 3 .3 .3 58.5 M4X 2 .2 .2 58.7 M5A 3 .3 .3 59.0 M5C 1 .1 .1 59.1 M5M 3 .3 .3 59.3 M5N 3 .3 .3 59.6 M5P 3 .3 .3 59.9 M5R 5 .4 .5 60.3 M5T 1 .1 .1 60.4 M5V 1 .1 .1 60.5 M6A 2 .2 .2 60.7 M6B 4 .3 .4 61.0 M6C 4 .3 .4 61.4 M6E 5 .4 .5 61.9 M6G 6 .5 .5 62.4 M6H 2 .2 .2 62.6 M6I 1 .1 .1 62.7 M6J 3 .3 .3 62.9 M6K 4 .3 .4 63.3 M6M 1 .1 .1 63.4 M6N 2 .2 .2 63.6 M6P 7 .6 .6 64.2 M6R 3 .3 .3 64.5 M6S 3 .3 .3 64.7 M7V 1 .1 .1 64.8 M8V 2 .2 .2 65.0 M8W 3 .3 .3 65.3 M8X 1 .1 .1 65.4 M8Y 1 .1 .1 65.5 M8Z 1 .1 .1 65.6 M9A 1 .1 .1 65.6 M9B 3 .3 .3 65.9 M9C 4 .3 .4 66.3 M9M 3 .3 .3 66.5 M9N 3 .3 .3 66.8 M9R 2 .2 .2 67.0 M9V 6 .5 .5 67.5 M9W 3 .3 .3 67.8 N0A 3 .3 .3 68.1 N0B 8 .7 .7 68.8 N0C 2 .2 .2 69.0 N0D 1 .1 .1 69.1 N0E 3 .3 .3 69.3 N0G 12 1.0 1.1 70.4 N0H 4 .3 .4 70.8 N0J 6 .5 .5 71.3 N0K 3 .3 .3 71.6 N0L 5 .4 .5 72.0 N0M 6 .5 .5 72.6 N0N 5 .4 .5 73.0 N0P 6 .5 .5 73.6 N0R 4 .3 .4 73.9 N0V 1 .1 .1 74.0 N0Z 1 .1 .1 74.1 N1A 2 .2 .2 74.3 N1B 1 .1 .1 74.4 N1E 6 .5 .5 74.9 N1F 1 .1 .1 75.0 N1G 2 .2 .2 75.2 N1H 4 .3 .4 75.6 N1M 1 .1 .1 75.7 N1R 1 .1 .1 75.7 N1S 2 .2 .2 75.9 N1T 1 .1 .1 76.0 N2A 3 .3 .3 76.3 N2B 4 .3 .4 76.6 N2C 1 .1 .1 76.7 N2E 3 .3 .3 77.0 N2G 1 .1 .1 77.1 N2H 3 .3 .3 77.4 N2J 1 .1 .1 77.5 N2K 1 .1 .1 77.5 N2L 6 .5 .5 78.1 N2M 6 .5 .5 78.6 N2N 3 .3 .3 78.9 N2P 1 .1 .1 79.0 N2R 1 .1 .1 79.1 N2T 2 .2 .2 79.3 N2V 2 .2 .2 79.4 N2Z 2 .2 .2 79.6 N3C 2 .2 .2 79.8 N3H 3 .3 .3 80.1 N3L 1 .1 .1 80.2 N3P 2 .2 .2 80.3 N3R 5 .4 .5 80.8 N3S 4 .3 .4 81.2 N3T 1 .1 .1 81.2 N3W 2 .2 .2 81.4 N3Y 3 .3 .3 81.7 N4B 1 .1 .1 81.8 N4F 1 .1 .1 81.9 N4G 1 .1 .1 82.0 N4K 2 .2 .2 82.1 N4L 2 .2 .2 82.3 N4N 1 .1 .1 82.4 N4S 6 .5 .5 83.0 N4X 1 .1 .1 83.0 N5A 5 .4 .5 83.5 N5C 1 .1 .1 83.6 N5H 1 .1 .1 83.7 N5L 1 .1 .1 83.8 N5P 1 .1 .1 83.9 N5R 5 .4 .5 84.3 N5V 4 .3 .4 84.7 N5W 4 .3 .4 85.0 N5X 1 .1 .1 85.1 N5Y 3 .3 .3 85.4 N5Z 2 .2 .2 85.6 N6A 6 .5 .5 86.1 N6C 7 .6 .6 86.7 N6E 4 .3 .4 87.1 N6G 5 .4 .5 87.6 N6H 4 .3 .4 87.9 N6J 6 .5 .5 88.5 N6K 4 .3 .4 88.8 N6M 1 .1 .1 88.9 N7A 3 .3 .3 89.2 N7L 1 .1 .1 89.3 N7T 3 .3 .3 89.5 N7V 1 .1 .1 89.6 N8A 1 .1 .1 89.7 N8H 1 .1 .1 89.8 N8M 1 .1 .1 89.9 N8N 4 .3 .4 90.3 N8R 2 .2 .2 90.4 N8S 3 .3 .3 90.7 N8T 3 .3 .3 91.0 N8W 2 .2 .2 91.2 N8X 1 .1 .1 91.3 N8Y 2 .2 .2 91.4 N9A 3 .3 .3 91.7 N9B 1 .1 .1 91.8 N9C 2 .2 .2 92.0 N9H 1 .1 .1 92.1 N9V 1 .1 .1 92.2 N9Y 1 .1 .1 92.2 P0A 1 .1 .1 92.3 P0B 1 .1 .1 92.4 P0C 3 .3 .3 92.7 P0E 1 .1 .1 92.8 P0G 1 .1 .1 92.9 P0H 4 .3 .4 93.2 P0J 3 .3 .3 93.5 P0K 1 .1 .1 93.6 P0L 2 .2 .2 93.8 P0M 10 .9 .9 94.7 P0N 1 .1 .1 94.8 P0P 1 .1 .1 94.9 P0R 2 .2 .2 95.0 P0T 4 .3 .4 95.4 P0X 1 .1 .1 95.5 P1B 7 .6 .6 96.1 P1L 2 .2 .2 96.3 P2N 1 .1 .1 96.4 P3A 4 .3 .4 96.8 P3B 2 .2 .2 96.9 P3C 1 .1 .1 97.0 P3E 3 .3 .3 97.3 P3L 1 .1 .1 97.4 P3P 2 .2 .2 97.6 P4N 4 .3 .4 97.9 P5N 1 .1 .1 98.0 P6A 5 .4 .5 98.5 P6C 3 .3 .3 98.7 P7A 3 .3 .3 99.0 P7B 3 .3 .3 99.3 P7C 2 .2 .2 99.5 P7E 1 .1 .1 99.5 P7K 1 .1 .1 99.6 P8N 2 .2 .2 99.8 P9A 2 .2 .2 100.0 Refused/Unknown ref 48 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1109 Missing cases 48 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICATEMP Total Number Of Call Attempts Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 189 16.3 21.0 21.0 2 125 10.8 13.9 35.0 3 111 9.6 12.4 47.3 4 84 7.3 9.4 56.7 5 57 4.9 6.3 63.0 6 68 5.9 7.6 70.6 7 47 4.1 5.2 75.8 8 30 2.6 3.3 79.2 9 37 3.2 4.1 83.3 10 23 2.0 2.6 85.9 11 21 1.8 2.3 88.2 12 15 1.3 1.7 89.9 13 14 1.2 1.6 91.4 14 12 1.0 1.3 92.8 15 5 .4 .6 93.3 16 13 1.1 1.4 94.8 17 5 .4 .6 95.3 18 8 .7 .9 96.2 19 2 .2 .2 96.4 20 4 .3 .4 96.9 21 4 .3 .4 97.3 22 1 .1 .1 97.4 23 5 .4 .6 98.0 24 2 .2 .2 98.2 25 1 .1 .1 98.3 26 4 .3 .4 98.8 27 1 .1 .1 98.9 28 2 .2 .2 99.1 29 2 .2 .2 99.3 30 1 .1 .1 99.4 31 4 .3 .4 99.9 38 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICCONT Total Times Respondent Contacted Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 723 62.5 80.5 80.5 2 94 8.1 10.5 91.0 3 52 4.5 5.8 96.8 4 15 1.3 1.7 98.4 5 10 .9 1.1 99.6 6 2 .2 .2 99.8 7 1 .1 .1 99.9 9 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICANS Number Of Times Telephone Answered Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 322 27.8 35.9 35.9 2 218 18.8 24.3 60.1 3 126 10.9 14.0 74.2 4 74 6.4 8.2 82.4 5 46 4.0 5.1 87.5 6 40 3.5 4.5 92.0 7 23 2.0 2.6 94.5 8 12 1.0 1.3 95.9 9 13 1.1 1.4 97.3 10 8 .7 .9 98.2 11 5 .4 .6 98.8 12 1 .1 .1 98.9 13 3 .3 .3 99.2 14 1 .1 .1 99.3 15 1 .1 .1 99.4 16 1 .1 .1 99.6 17 2 .2 .2 99.8 19 1 .1 .1 99.9 22 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICREF Number Of Refusals Before Completion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 867 74.9 96.5 96.5 1 31 2.7 3.5 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICMONTH Month Of Interview Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 7 332 28.7 37.0 37.0 8 531 45.9 59.1 96.1 9 35 3.0 3.9 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICDAY Day Of Interview
Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 3 .3 .3 .3 2 4 .3 .4 .8 3 44 3.8 4.9 5.7 4 26 2.2 2.9 8.6 5 43 3.7 4.8 13.4 7 22 1.9 2.4 15.8 8 54 4.7 6.0 21.8 9 46 4.0 5.1 26.9 10 52 4.5 5.8 32.7 11 50 4.3 5.6 38.3 12 22 1.9 2.4 40.8 13 3 .3 .3 41.1 14 25 2.2 2.8 43.9 15 16 1.4 1.8 45.7 16 19 1.6 2.1 47.8 17 23 2.0 2.6 50.3 18 16 1.4 1.8 52.1 19 22 1.9 2.4 54.6 22 30 2.6 3.3 57.9 23 2 .2 .2 58.1 24 41 3.5 4.6 62.7 25 33 2.9 3.7 66.4 26 52 4.5 5.8 72.2 27 59 5.1 6.6 78.7 28 53 4.6 5.9 84.6 29 93 8.0 10.4 95.0 30 15 1.3 1.7 96.7 31 30 2.6 3.3 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICYEAR Year Of Interview Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 99 898 77.6 100.0 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICRN1 Wording Experiment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 454 39.2 50.6 50.6 2 444 38.4 49.4 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICRN2 Wording Experiment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 433 37.4 48.2 48.2 2 465 40.2 51.8 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICRN4 Randomize Item Delivery Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 468 40.4 52.1 52.1 2 430 37.2 47.9 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICRN5 Randomize Corps/Unions/Gov Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 150 13.0 16.7 16.7 2 154 13.3 17.1 33.9 3 157 13.6 17.5 51.3 4 141 12.2 15.7 67.0 5 149 12.9 16.6 83.6 6 147 12.7 16.4 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICRN6 Randomize Federal/Provincial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 439 37.9 48.9 48.9 2 459 39.7 51.1 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICRN7 Randomize Leader/Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 466 40.3 51.9 51.9 2 432 37.3 48.1 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICRN8 Randomize Party Leaders Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 139 12.0 15.5 15.5 2 160 13.8 17.8 33.3 3 149 12.9 16.6 49.9 4 135 11.7 15.0 64.9 5 164 14.2 18.3 83.2 6 151 13.1 16.8 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICRN9 Randomize Provincial Parties Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 82 7.1 9.1 9.1 2 99 8.6 11.0 20.2 3 99 8.6 11.0 31.2 4 95 8.2 10.6 41.8 5 98 8.5 10.9 52.7 6 94 8.1 10.5 63.1 7 90 7.8 10.0 73.2 8 73 6.3 8.1 81.3 9 84 7.3 9.4 90.6 10 84 7.3 9.4 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICRN11 Route Private Enterprise Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 486 42.0 54.1 54.1 2 412 35.6 45.9 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICRGEN Respondent's Gender Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Male 1 387 33.4 43.1 43.1 Female 5 511 44.2 56.9 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICV1 Vote Recent(June4th) Provincial Election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Yes 1 696 60.2 77.5 77.5 No 5 199 17.2 22.2 99.7 D.K. 8 1 .1 .1 99.8 Refused 9 2 .2 .2 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICV2 Which Party Did You Vote For Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PC/Tory/Harris 1 307 26.5 44.1 44.1 Liberal/McGuinty 3 228 19.7 32.8 76.9 NDP/Hampton 5 101 8.7 14.5 91.4 Another Party 7 13 1.1 1.9 93.2 D.K. 8 8 .7 1.1 94.4 Refused 9 39 3.4 5.6 100.0 . 461 39.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 696 Missing cases 461 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICV3 Most Important Reason Why Voted Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Response Given 1 625 54.0 96.3 96.3 D.K. 98 19 1.6 2.9 99.2 Refused 99 5 .4 .8 100.0 . 508 43.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 649 Missing cases 508 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICV4 Was Your First Choice Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Yes 1 549 47.5 84.6 84.6 No 5 83 7.2 12.8 97.4 D.K. 8 17 1.5 2.6 100.0 . 508 43.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 649 Missing cases 508 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICV5 Which Party Was Your First Choice Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PC/Tory/Harris 1 14 1.2 16.9 16.9 Liberal/McGuinty 3 29 2.5 34.9 51.8 NDP/Hampton 5 24 2.1 28.9 80.7 Another Party 7 2 .2 2.4 83.1 D.K. 8 14 1.2 16.9 100.0 . 1074 92.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 83 Missing cases 1074 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICV6 Chances <1st Choice> Winning Your Riding Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VeryGood 1 17 1.5 20.5 20.5 Fairly Good 3 18 1.6 21.7 42.2 Not Very Good 5 28 2.4 33.7 75.9 Almost Zero 7 16 1.4 19.3 95.2 D.K. 8 4 .3 4.8 100.0 . 1074 92.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 83 Missing cases 1074 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICV7 Chances Winning Your Riding Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VeryGood 1 27 2.3 32.5 32.5 Fairly Good 3 33 2.9 39.8 72.3 Not Very Good 5 11 1.0 13.3 85.5 Almost Zero 7 9 .8 10.8 96.4 D.K. 8 3 .3 3.6 100.0 . 1074 92.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 83 Missing cases 1074 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICV10 Interested In Recent Ontario Election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Very Interested 1 316 27.3 35.2 35.2 Fairly 3 375 32.4 41.8 76.9 Not Very 5 141 12.2 15.7 92.7 NotAtAll 7 53 4.6 5.9 98.6 D.K. 8 12 1.0 1.3 99.9 Refused 9 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICV11 Interested In Politics In General Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Very Interested 1 186 16.1 20.7 20.7 Fairly 3 406 35.1 45.2 65.9 Not Very 5 213 18.4 23.7 89.6 NotAtAll 7 80 6.9 8.9 98.6 D.K. 8 13 1.1 1.4 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICV12 Involved In Election Campaign In Any Way Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Yes 1 48 4.1 5.3 5.3 No 5 849 73.4 94.5 99.9 D.K. 8 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICV13 What Did You Do In The Campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Response Given 1 47 4.1 97.9 97.9 D.K. 98 1 .1 2.1 100.0 . 1109 95.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 48 Missing cases 1109 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICV14 Issues Important Ignored In Campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Yes 1 229 19.8 25.5 25.5 No 5 637 55.1 70.9 96.4 D.K. 8 31 2.7 3.5 99.9 Refused 9 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICV15 What Important Issues Were Ignored Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Response Given 1 225 19.4 98.3 98.3 D.K. 98 4 .3 1.7 100.0 . 928 80.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 229 Missing cases 928 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICLD1 Anything Like About: Dalton McGuinty Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Response Given 1 142 12.3 20.1 20.1 Nothing R Likes 95 421 36.4 59.5 79.6 R Knows Nothing 96 101 8.7 14.3 93.9 D.K. Any Leaders 97 25 2.2 3.5 97.5 D.K. 98 11 1.0 1.6 99.0 Refused 99 7 .6 1.0 100.0 . 450 38.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 707 Missing cases 450 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICLD2 Anything Dislike About: Dalton McGuinty Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Response Given 1 260 22.5 44.8 44.8 Nothing R Dislikes 95 307 26.5 52.8 97.6 D.K. Any Leaders 97 3 .3 .5 98.1 D.K. 98 5 .4 .9 99.0 Refused 99 6 .5 1.0 100.0 . 576 49.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 581 Missing cases 576 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICLD3 Anything Like About: Mike Harris Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Response Given 1 365 31.5 52.4 52.4 Nothing R Likes 95 299 25.8 43.0 95.4 R Knows Nothing 96 12 1.0 1.7 97.1 D.K. Any Leaders 97 6 .5 .9 98.0 D.K. 98 8 .7 1.1 99.1 Refused 99 6 .5 .9 100.0 . 461 39.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 696 Missing cases 461 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICLD4 Anything Dislike About: Mike Harris Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Response Given 1 353 30.5 52.1 52.1 Nothing R Dislikes 95 313 27.1 46.2 98.2 D.K. Any Leaders 97 2 .2 .3 98.5 D.K. 98 4 .3 .6 99.1 Refused 99 6 .5 .9 100.0 . 479 41.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 678 Missing cases 479 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICLD5 Anything Like About: Howard Hampton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Response Given 1 178 15.4 25.2 25.2 Nothing R Likes 95 355 30.7 50.2 75.4 R Knows Nothing 96 150 13.0 21.2 96.6 D.K. Any Leaders 97 12 1.0 1.7 98.3 D.K. 98 6 .5 .8 99.2 Refused 99 6 .5 .8 100.0 . 450 38.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 707 Missing cases 450 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICLD6 Anything Dislike About: Howard Hampton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Response Given 1 139 12.0 25.5 25.5 Nothing R Dislikes 95 382 33.0 70.1 95.6 D.K. Any Leaders 97 8 .7 1.5 97.1 D.K. 98 8 .7 1.5 98.5 Refused 99 8 .7 1.5 100.0 . 612 52.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 545 Missing cases 612 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICLD7 Anything Like: Ontario Liberal Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Response Given 1 185 16.0 26.3 26.3 Nothing R Likes 95 437 37.8 62.2 88.5 R Knows Nothing 96 32 2.8 4.6 93.0 D.K. Any Parties 97 19 1.6 2.7 95.7 D.K. 98 22 1.9 3.1 98.9 Refused 99 8 .7 1.1 100.0 . 454 39.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 703 Missing cases 454 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICLD8 Anything Dislike: Ont. Liberal Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Response Given 1 250 21.6 38.3 38.3 Nothing R Dislikes 95 369 31.9 56.6 94.9 D.K. Any Parties 97 6 .5 .9 95.9 D.K. 98 19 1.6 2.9 98.8 Refused 99 8 .7 1.2 100.0 . 505 43.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 652 Missing cases 505 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICLD9 Anything Like About: Ontario PC Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Response Given 1 309 26.7 44.1 44.1 Nothing R Likes 95 334 28.9 47.7 91.9 R Knows Nothing 96 18 1.6 2.6 94.4 D.K. Any Parties 97 12 1.0 1.7 96.1 D.K. 98 22 1.9 3.1 99.3 Refused 99 5 .4 .7 100.0 . 457 39.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 700 Missing cases 457 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICLD10 Anything Dislike About: Ont. PC Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Response Given 1 350 30.3 52.2 52.2 Nothing R Dislikes 95 293 25.3 43.7 96.0 D.K. Any Parties 97 4 .3 .6 96.6 D.K. 98 15 1.3 2.2 98.8 Refused 99 8 .7 1.2 100.0 . 487 42.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 670 Missing cases 487 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICLD11 Anything Like About: Ontario NDP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Response Given 1 174 15.0 24.8 24.8 Nothing R Likes 95 433 37.4 61.8 86.6 R Knows Nothing 96 53 4.6 7.6 94.2 D.K. Any Parties 97 13 1.1 1.9 96.0 D.K. 98 22 1.9 3.1 99.1 Refused 99 6 .5 .9 100.0 . 456 39.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 701 Missing cases 456 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICLD12 Anything Dislike About: Ontario NDP Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Response Given 1 270 23.3 42.5 42.5 Nothing R Dislikes 95 328 28.3 51.7 94.2 D.K. Any Parties 97 8 .7 1.3 95.4 D.K. 98 21 1.8 3.3 98.7 Refused 99 8 .7 1.3 100.0 . 522 45.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 635 Missing cases 522 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICT1 How Feel About Politicans In General Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Really Dislike 0 51 4.4 5.7 5.7 1 1 .1 .1 5.8 2 5 .4 .6 6.3 3 1 .1 .1 6.5 4 1 .1 .1 6.6 5 22 1.9 2.4 9.0 6 5 .4 .6 9.6 7 1 .1 .1 9.7 9 2 .2 .2 9.9 10 24 2.1 2.7 12.6 15 3 .3 .3 12.9 20 34 2.9 3.8 16.7 25 22 1.9 2.4 19.2 30 26 2.2 2.9 22.0 33 2 .2 .2 22.3 35 20 1.7 2.2 24.5 40 59 5.1 6.6 31.1 44 1 .1 .1 31.2 45 16 1.4 1.8 33.0 49 3 .3 .3 33.3 50 231 20.0 25.7 59.0 52 1 .1 .1 59.1 53 1 .1 .1 59.2 55 5 .4 .6 59.8 60 115 9.9 12.8 72.6 62 2 .2 .2 72.8 63 1 .1 .1 72.9 65 26 2.2 2.9 75.8 70 62 5.4 6.9 82.7 75 51 4.4 5.7 88.4 80 25 2.2 2.8 91.2 85 6 .5 .7 91.9 90 6 .5 .7 92.5 98 1 .1 .1 92.7 Really Like 100 9 .8 1.0 93.7 D.K. 998 47 4.1 5.2 98.9 Refused 999 10 .9 1.1 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICT2 Those Elected Parliament Soon Lose Touch Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1 171 14.8 19.0 19.0 Agree 3 443 38.3 49.3 68.4 Disagree 5 215 18.6 23.9 92.3 StronglyDisagree 7 19 1.6 2.1 94.4 Not Sure/D.K. 8 47 4.1 5.2 99.7 Refused/N.A. 9 3 .3 .3 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICT3 People Like Me No Say What Govt Does Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1 163 14.1 18.2 18.2 Agree 3 341 29.5 38.0 56.1 Disagree 5 312 27.0 34.7 90.9 StronglyDisagree 7 38 3.3 4.2 95.1 Not Sure/D.K. 8 41 3.5 4.6 99.7 Refused/N.A. 9 3 .3 .3 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICT4 Not Think Govt Cares Much People Think Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1 158 13.7 17.6 17.6 Agree 3 357 30.9 39.8 57.3 Disagree 5 307 26.5 34.2 91.5 StronglyDisagree 7 31 2.7 3.5 95.0 Not Sure/D.K. 8 39 3.4 4.3 99.3 Refused/N.A. 9 6 .5 .7 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICT5 Not Make Much Diff Which Party Wins Ont. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1 73 6.3 8.1 8.1 Agree 3 239 20.7 26.6 34.7 Disagree 5 400 34.6 44.5 79.3 StronglyDisagree 7 158 13.7 17.6 96.9 Not Sure/D.K. 8 28 2.4 3.1 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICP1 For Good Of Country: Labour Unions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Much Too Much 1 108 9.3 12.0 12.0 Too Much Power 2 376 32.5 41.9 53.9 Too Little Power 3 116 10.0 12.9 66.8 Much Too Little 4 19 1.6 2.1 68.9 About Right Amt 5 198 17.1 22.0 91.0 Not Sure/D.K. 8 72 6.2 8.0 99.0 Refused/N.A. 9 9 .8 1.0 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICP2 For Good Of Country: Large Corporations Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Much Too Much 1 129 11.1 14.4 14.4 Too Much Power 2 476 41.1 53.0 67.4 Too Little Power 3 37 3.2 4.1 71.5 Much Too Little 4 3 .3 .3 71.8 About Right Amt 5 164 14.2 18.3 90.1 Not Sure/D.K. 8 82 7.1 9.1 99.2 Refused/N.A. 9 7 .6 .8 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICP3 For Good Of Country: Prov. Govt Ontario Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Much Too Much 1 52 4.5 5.8 5.8 Too Much Power 2 269 23.2 30.0 35.7 Too Little Power 3 120 10.4 13.4 49.1 Much Too Little 4 7 .6 .8 49.9 About Right Amt 5 386 33.4 43.0 92.9 Not Sure/D.K. 8 58 5.0 6.5 99.3 Refused/N.A. 9 6 .5 .7 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICP4 For Good Of Country: Federal Govt Ottawa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Much Too Much 1 69 6.0 7.7 7.7 Too Much Power 2 306 26.4 34.1 41.8 Too Little Power 3 95 8.2 10.6 52.3 Much Too Little 4 7 .6 .8 53.1 About Right Amt 5 338 29.2 37.6 90.8 Not Sure/D.K. 8 73 6.3 8.1 98.9 Refused/N.A. 9 10 .9 1.1 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICP5 Which Group Is The Most Powerful Now Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Large Corps 1 211 18.2 23.5 23.5 Labour Unions 3 103 8.9 11.5 35.0 Federal Gov 5 325 28.1 36.2 71.2 Prov Gov Ontario 7 153 13.2 17.0 88.2 D.K. 8 102 8.8 11.4 99.6 Refused 9 4 .3 .4 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICP6 Which Group Is Second Most Powerful Now Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Large Corps 1 134 11.6 16.9 16.9 Labour Unions 3 128 11.1 16.2 33.1 Federal Gov 5 246 21.3 31.1 64.1 Prov Gov Ontario 7 256 22.1 32.3 96.5 D.K. 8 27 2.3 3.4 99.9 Refused 9 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 365 31.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 792 Missing cases 365 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICP7 Which Group Is The Least Most Powerful Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Large Corps 1 154 13.3 19.4 19.4 Labour Unions 3 369 31.9 46.6 66.0 Federal Gov 5 56 4.8 7.1 73.1 Prov Gov Ontario 7 148 12.8 18.7 91.8 D.K. 8 62 5.4 7.8 99.6 Refused 9 3 .3 .4 100.0 . 365 31.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 792 Missing cases 365 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPI1 Too Much Difference Between Rich & Poor Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1 276 23.9 30.7 30.7 Agree 2 363 31.4 40.4 71.2 Neither 3 35 3.0 3.9 75.1 Disagree 4 102 8.8 11.4 86.4 StronglyDisagree 5 16 1.4 1.8 88.2 No Opinion/D.K. 8 102 8.8 11.4 99.6 Refused/N.A. 9 4 .3 .4 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPI2 Unemployment High Too Easy Get Welfare Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1 154 13.3 17.1 17.1 Agree 2 286 24.7 31.8 49.0 Neither 3 51 4.4 5.7 54.7 Disagree 4 282 24.4 31.4 86.1 StronglyDisagree 5 46 4.0 5.1 91.2 No Opinion/D.K. 8 76 6.6 8.5 99.7 Refused/N.A. 9 3 .3 .3 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPI3 People High Incomes Pay Greater Share Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1 138 11.9 15.4 15.4 Agree 2 342 29.6 38.1 53.5 Neither 3 37 3.2 4.1 57.6 Disagree 4 246 21.3 27.4 85.0 StronglyDisagree 5 47 4.1 5.2 90.2 No Opinion/D.K. 8 82 7.1 9.1 99.3 Refused/N.A. 9 6 .5 .7 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPI4 Teachers Shld Not Have Right To Strike Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1 138 11.9 15.4 15.4 Agree 2 284 24.5 31.6 47.0 Neither 3 22 1.9 2.4 49.4 Disagree 4 330 28.5 36.7 86.2 StronglyDisagree 5 62 5.4 6.9 93.1 No Opinion/D.K. 8 54 4.7 6.0 99.1 Refused/N.A. 9 8 .7 .9 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPI5 During Strike Mgt Prohibited Hiring Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1 98 8.5 10.9 10.9 Agree 2 312 27.0 34.7 45.7 Neither 3 29 2.5 3.2 48.9 Disagree 4 276 23.9 30.7 79.6 StronglyDisagree 5 72 6.2 8.0 87.6 No Opinion/D.K. 8 100 8.6 11.1 98.8 Refused/N.A. 9 11 1.0 1.2 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPI6 People Come Canada Try Harder Be Cdn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1 157 13.6 17.5 17.5 Agree 2 299 25.8 33.3 50.8 Neither 3 44 3.8 4.9 55.7 Disagree 4 250 21.6 27.8 83.5 StronglyDisagree 5 56 4.8 6.2 89.8 No Opinion/D.K. 8 82 7.1 9.1 98.9 Refused/N.A. 9 10 .9 1.1 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICA1 More Important For A Child To Have: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Independence 1 184 15.9 20.5 20.5 Respect For Elders 5 600 51.9 66.8 87.3 D.K./Both/Neither 8 109 9.4 12.1 99.4 Refused 9 5 .4 .6 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICA2 More Important For A Child To Have: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Obedience 1 350 30.3 39.0 39.0 Self-Reliance 5 418 36.1 46.5 85.5 D.K./Both/Neither 8 123 10.6 13.7 99.2 Refused 9 7 .6 .8 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICA3 More Important For A Child To Have: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Curiousity 1 277 23.9 30.8 30.8 Good Manners 5 458 39.6 51.0 81.8 D.K./Both/Neither 8 158 13.7 17.6 99.4 Refused 9 5 .4 .6 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICA4 Generally Most People Can Be Trusted Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Most Can Be Trusted 1 414 35.8 46.1 46.1 Can't Be Too Careful 5 443 38.3 49.3 95.4 D.K. 8 38 3.3 4.2 99.7 Refused 9 3 .3 .3 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICA5 Against Law Write/Speak Promotes Hatred Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Shld Be Against Law 1 683 59.0 76.1 76.1 Shld Not Be 5 153 13.2 17.0 93.1 Depends/D.K. 8 50 4.3 5.6 98.7 Refused 9 12 1.0 1.3 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICGR1A Cut Taxes=CutSocialPgms/Increase=Improve Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cut Taxes 1 122 10.5 28.2 28.2 Increase Taxes 3 66 5.7 15.2 43.4 Keep As They Are 5 211 18.2 48.7 92.1 D.K. 8 31 2.7 7.2 99.3 Refused 9 3 .3 .7 100.0 . 724 62.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 433 Missing cases 724 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICGR1B Spending On Social Programs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Cut Spending 1 64 5.5 13.8 13.8 IncreaseSpending 3 141 12.2 30.3 44.1 Keep As It Is 5 201 17.4 43.2 87.3 D.K. 8 57 4.9 12.3 99.6 Refused 9 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 692 59.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 465 Missing cases 692 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICGR2 Put Trust In Ordinary Rather Than Expert Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1 101 8.7 11.2 11.2 Agree 3 403 34.8 44.9 56.1 Disagree 5 260 22.5 29.0 85.1 StronglyDisagree 7 31 2.7 3.5 88.5 Not Sure/D.K. 8 87 7.5 9.7 98.2 Refused/N.A. 9 16 1.4 1.8 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICGR3A Gov Leave Provide Electricity To Private Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1 36 3.1 7.4 7.4 Agree 3 205 17.7 42.2 49.6 Disagree 5 169 14.6 34.8 84.4 StronglyDisagree 7 21 1.8 4.3 88.7 Not Sure/D.K. 8 52 4.5 10.7 99.4 Refused/N.A. 9 3 .3 .6 100.0 . 671 58.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 486 Missing cases 671 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICGR3B Gov Leave Running Hospitals To Private Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1 22 1.9 5.3 5.3 Agree 3 98 8.5 23.8 29.1 Disagree 5 185 16.0 44.9 74.0 StronglyDisagree 7 48 4.1 11.7 85.7 Not Sure/D.K. 8 53 4.6 12.9 98.5 Refused/N.A. 9 6 .5 1.5 100.0 . 745 64.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 412 Missing cases 745 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICGR3C Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 1157 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1157 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICGR4 People WhoCan Pay ShldGet Faster MedCare Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1 18 1.6 2.0 2.0 Agree 3 136 11.8 15.1 17.1 Disagree 5 513 44.3 57.1 74.3 StronglyDisagree 7 207 17.9 23.1 97.3 Not Sure/D.K. 8 22 1.9 2.4 99.8 Refused/N.A. 9 2 .2 .2 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICGR5 Govt Put Into Health & Medical Care Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MuchMore Effort 1 216 18.7 24.1 24.1 More Effort 2 476 41.1 53.0 77.1 AboutTheSame 3 190 16.4 21.2 98.2 Less Effort 4 8 .7 .9 99.1 MuchLess Effort 5 1 .1 .1 99.2 Not Sure/D.K. 8 6 .5 .7 99.9 Refused/N.A. 9 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICGR6 Govt Providing Assistance To Unemployed Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MuchMore Effort 1 83 7.2 9.2 9.2 More Effort 2 245 21.2 27.3 36.5 AboutTheSame 3 398 34.4 44.3 80.8 Less Effort 4 124 10.7 13.8 94.7 MuchLess Effort 5 9 .8 1.0 95.7 Not Sure/D.K. 8 36 3.1 4.0 99.7 Refused/N.A. 9 3 .3 .3 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICGR7 Effort Government Put Helping The Poor Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MuchMore Effort 1 163 14.1 18.2 18.2 More Effort 2 411 35.5 45.8 63.9 AboutTheSame 3 247 21.3 27.5 91.4 Less Effort 4 39 3.4 4.3 95.8 MuchLess Effort 5 5 .4 .6 96.3 Not Sure/D.K. 8 30 2.6 3.3 99.7 Refused/N.A. 9 3 .3 .3 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICGR8 Effort Government Put Crime Prevention Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MuchMore Effort 1 201 17.4 22.4 22.4 More Effort 2 361 31.2 40.2 62.6 AboutTheSame 3 290 25.1 32.3 94.9 Less Effort 4 21 1.8 2.3 97.2 MuchLess Effort 5 1 .1 .1 97.3 Not Sure/D.K. 8 24 2.1 2.7 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICGR9 Govt Eliminating Discrimination: Women Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MuchMore Effort 1 162 14.0 18.0 18.0 More Effort 2 293 25.3 32.6 50.7 AboutTheSame 3 332 28.7 37.0 87.6 Less Effort 4 60 5.2 6.7 94.3 MuchLess Effort 5 13 1.1 1.4 95.8 Not Sure/D.K. 8 33 2.9 3.7 99.4 Refused/N.A. 9 5 .4 .6 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICGR10 Government Protecting The Environment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MuchMore Effort 1 232 20.1 25.8 25.8 More Effort 2 430 37.2 47.9 73.7 AboutTheSame 3 196 16.9 21.8 95.5 Less Effort 4 18 1.6 2.0 97.6 MuchLess Effort 5 4 .3 .4 98.0 Not Sure/D.K. 8 18 1.6 2.0 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICGR11 Effort Government Put Education Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MuchMore Effort 1 202 17.5 22.5 22.5 More Effort 2 414 35.8 46.1 68.6 AboutTheSame 3 241 20.8 26.8 95.4 Less Effort 4 18 1.6 2.0 97.4 MuchLess Effort 5 1 .1 .1 97.6 Not Sure/D.K. 8 21 1.8 2.3 99.9 Refused/N.A. 9 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPI7 Phasing Out Rent Controls Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Approve 1 40 3.5 4.5 4.5 Approve 3 238 20.6 26.5 31.0 Disapprove 5 379 32.8 42.2 73.2 StronglyDisapprove 7 120 10.4 13.4 86.5 D.K. 8 115 9.9 12.8 99.3 Refused 9 6 .5 .7 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPI8 Reduction Welfare Payments By About 20% Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Approve 1 101 8.7 11.2 11.2 Approve 3 359 31.0 40.0 51.2 Disapprove 5 285 24.6 31.7 83.0 StronglyDisapprove 7 61 5.3 6.8 89.8 D.K. 8 86 7.4 9.6 99.3 Refused 9 6 .5 .7 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPI9 Workfare Program (Work=Welfare Cheque) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Approve 1 234 20.2 26.1 26.1 Approve 3 421 36.4 46.9 72.9 Disapprove 5 138 11.9 15.4 88.3 StronglyDisapprove 7 52 4.5 5.8 94.1 D.K. 8 50 4.3 5.6 99.7 Refused 9 3 .3 .3 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPI10 Elementary & H.S. Students Wear Uniforms Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Approve 1 110 9.5 12.2 12.2 Approve 3 347 30.0 38.6 50.9 Disapprove 5 285 24.6 31.7 82.6 StronglyDisapprove 7 79 6.8 8.8 91.4 D.K. 8 72 6.2 8.0 99.4 Refused 9 5 .4 .6 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPI11 Recent Court Rulings Rights Of Same-Sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Approve 1 80 6.9 8.9 8.9 Approve 3 312 27.0 34.7 43.7 Disapprove 5 228 19.7 25.4 69.0 StronglyDisapprove 7 173 15.0 19.3 88.3 D.K. 8 92 8.0 10.2 98.6 Refused 9 13 1.1 1.4 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPV1 Vote In 1995 Ontario Provincial Election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Yes 1 700 60.5 78.0 78.0 No 5 145 12.5 16.1 94.1 TooYoung/NotElig 7 30 2.6 3.3 97.4 D.K. 8 22 1.9 2.4 99.9 Refused 9 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPV2 Party Vote For In 1995 Ontario Election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Another Party 0 12 1.0 1.7 1.7 PC/Tory/Harris 1 311 26.9 44.4 46.1 Liberal/McCloud 2 198 17.1 28.3 74.4 NDP/Rae 3 108 9.3 15.4 89.9 D.K. 8 36 3.1 5.1 95.0 Refused 9 35 3.0 5.0 100.0 . 457 39.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 700 Missing cases 457 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPV3 Vote In 1990 Ontario Provincial Election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Yes 1 585 50.6 67.4 67.4 No 5 184 15.9 21.2 88.6 TooYoung/NotElig 7 35 3.0 4.0 92.6 D.K. 8 62 5.4 7.1 99.8 Refused 9 2 .2 .2 100.0 . 289 25.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 868 Missing cases 289 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPV4 Party Vote For In 1990 Ontario Election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Another Party 0 11 1.0 1.9 1.9 PC/Tory/Harris 1 138 11.9 23.6 25.5 Liberal/Peterson 2 173 15.0 29.6 55.0 NDP/Rae 3 178 15.4 30.4 85.5 D.K. 8 57 4.9 9.7 95.2 Refused 9 28 2.4 4.8 100.0 . 572 49.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 585 Missing cases 572 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPV5 Vote In Last (1997) Federal Election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Yes 1 720 62.2 80.2 80.2 No 5 141 12.2 15.7 95.9 TooYoung/NotElig 7 15 1.3 1.7 97.6 D.K. 8 20 1.7 2.2 99.8 Refused 9 2 .2 .2 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPV6 Party Vote For In 1997 Federal Election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Another Party 0 11 1.0 1.5 1.5 PC/Tory/Charest 1 126 10.9 17.5 19.0 Liberal/Chretien 2 396 34.2 55.0 74.0 NDP/McDonough 3 56 4.8 7.8 81.8 Reform/ Manning 4 57 4.9 7.9 89.7 D.K. 8 45 3.9 6.3 96.0 Refused 9 29 2.5 4.0 100.0 . 437 37.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 720 Missing cases 437 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPV7 Politics In Ontario, Think Of Self As: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Other 0 43 3.7 4.8 4.8 Conservative 1 272 23.5 30.3 35.1 Liberal 2 239 20.7 26.6 61.7 NDP 3 93 8.0 10.4 72.0 Independent/None 7 142 12.3 15.8 87.9 D.K. 8 87 7.5 9.7 97.6 Refused 9 22 1.9 2.4 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPV8 Think Of Self As Closer To One Party (P) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Yes 1 87 7.5 38.2 38.2 No 5 135 11.7 59.2 97.4 D.K. 8 5 .4 2.2 99.6 Refused 9 1 .1 .4 100.0 . 929 80.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 228 Missing cases 929 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPV9 What Party(P) Think Of Self As Closer To Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Other 0 2 .2 2.3 2.3 Conservative 1 32 2.8 36.8 39.1 Liberal 2 28 2.4 32.2 71.3 NDP 3 16 1.4 18.4 89.7 D.K. 8 8 .7 9.2 98.9 Refused 9 1 .1 1.1 100.0 . 1070 92.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 87 Missing cases 1070 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPV10 In Federal Politics, Think Of Self As: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Other 0 26 2.2 2.9 2.9 Conservative 1 185 16.0 20.6 23.5 Liberal 2 372 32.2 41.4 64.9 NDP 3 77 6.7 8.6 73.5 Reform 4 41 3.5 4.6 78.1 Independent/None 7 113 9.8 12.6 90.6 D.K. 8 59 5.1 6.6 97.2 Refused 9 25 2.2 2.8 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPV11 Think Of Self As Closer To One Party (F) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Yes 1 36 3.1 21.1 21.1 No 5 130 11.2 76.0 97.1 D.K. 8 5 .4 2.9 100.0 . 986 85.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 171 Missing cases 986 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICPV12 What Party(F) Think Of Self As Closer To Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Conservative 1 10 .9 27.8 27.8 Liberal 2 19 1.6 52.8 80.6 NDP 3 3 .3 8.3 88.9 Reform 4 2 .2 5.6 94.4 D.K. 8 1 .1 2.8 97.2 Refused 9 1 .1 2.8 100.0 . 1121 96.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 36 Missing cases 1121 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICSC1 Think Of Self As Belong To Social Class Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Yes 1 290 25.1 32.3 32.3 No 5 562 48.6 62.6 94.9 D.K. 8 41 3.5 4.6 99.4 Refused 9 5 .4 .6 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICSC2 Which Class Would You Say You Are In Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Upper Class 1 4 .3 1.4 1.4 Upper Middle 2 37 3.2 12.8 14.1 Middle 3 161 13.9 55.5 69.7 Working 4 73 6.3 25.2 94.8 Lower Class 5 13 1.1 4.5 99.3 D.K. 8 1 .1 .3 99.7 Refused 9 1 .1 .3 100.0 . 867 74.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 290 Missing cases 867 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICSC3 If Had To Make A Choice, Which Class In Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Upper Class 1 11 1.0 1.8 1.8 Upper Middle 2 63 5.4 10.4 12.2 Middle 3 260 22.5 42.8 54.9 Working 4 213 18.4 35.0 90.0 Lower Class 5 27 2.3 4.4 94.4 D.K. 8 19 1.6 3.1 97.5 Refused 9 15 1.3 2.5 100.0 . 549 47.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 608 Missing cases 549 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICD1 Present Employment Status Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Other 0 26 2.2 2.9 2.9 Employed 1 520 44.9 57.9 60.8 Unemployed 2 25 2.2 2.8 63.6 Retired 3 158 13.7 17.6 81.2 Student 4 35 3.0 3.9 85.1 Homemaker 5 52 4.5 5.8 90.9 Disabled 6 9 .8 1.0 91.9 Self-Employed 7 71 6.1 7.9 99.8 Refused 9 2 .2 .2 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICD2 Ever Employed Full-Time More Than One Yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Yes 1 17 1.5 68.0 68.0 No 5 8 .7 32.0 100.0 . 1132 97.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 25 Missing cases 1132 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICD5 Work Private Company/Public/Government Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Other/Self Employed 0 15 1.3 2.0 2.0 Private Company 1 440 38.0 57.4 59.4 Self-Employed 2 49 4.2 6.4 65.8 Public Sector 3 144 12.4 18.8 84.6 Government Owned 5 34 2.9 4.4 89.0 Fed/Prov Ministry 7 61 5.3 8.0 97.0 D.K. 8 18 1.6 2.3 99.3 Refused 9 5 .4 .7 100.0 . 391 33.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 766 Missing cases 391 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICD6 Last 12 Months #Weeks Worked At Your Job Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Not Work Last 52 Wks 0 152 13.1 19.8 19.8 2 3 .3 .4 20.2 3 1 .1 .1 20.4 4 3 .3 .4 20.8 6 1 .1 .1 20.9 7 2 .2 .3 21.1 8 8 .7 1.0 22.2 9 1 .1 .1 22.3 10 4 .3 .5 22.8 12 9 .8 1.2 24.0 13 1 .1 .1 24.2 14 2 .2 .3 24.4 16 4 .3 .5 24.9 20 8 .7 1.0 26.0 24 5 .4 .7 26.6 25 4 .3 .5 27.2 26 7 .6 .9 28.1 28 5 .4 .7 28.7 30 9 .8 1.2 29.9 31 1 .1 .1 30.0 32 3 .3 .4 30.4 35 3 .3 .4 30.8 36 10 .9 1.3 32.1 37 1 .1 .1 32.2 38 2 .2 .3 32.5 40 29 2.5 3.8 36.3 41 4 .3 .5 36.8 42 3 .3 .4 37.2 44 6 .5 .8 38.0 45 6 .5 .8 38.8 46 6 .5 .8 39.6 47 7 .6 .9 40.5 48 50 4.3 6.5 47.0 49 27 2.3 3.5 50.5 50 58 5.0 7.6 58.1 51 11 1.0 1.4 59.5 52 269 23.2 35.1 94.6 D.K. 98 36 3.1 4.7 99.3 Refused 99 5 .4 .7 100.0 . 391 33.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 766 Missing cases 391 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICD7 In Last Year Laid Off Or Lose Your Job Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Yes 1 32 2.8 12.5 12.5 No 5 224 19.4 87.5 100.0 . 901 77.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 256 Missing cases 901 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICD8 Respondent's Marital Status Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Married 1 487 42.1 54.2 54.2 Partner 2 57 4.9 6.3 60.6 Widowed 3 50 4.3 5.6 66.1 Separated 4 33 2.9 3.7 69.8 Divorced 5 58 5.0 6.5 76.3 Never Married 6 199 17.2 22.2 98.4 Refused 99 14 1.2 1.6 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICD9 How Many Children Live At Home With You Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent None 0 472 40.8 52.6 52.6 1 157 13.6 17.5 70.0 2 177 15.3 19.7 89.8 3 56 4.8 6.2 96.0 4 20 1.7 2.2 98.2 5 2 .2 .2 98.4 6 1 .1 .1 98.6 7 2 .2 .2 98.8 Refused 9 11 1.0 1.2 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICD10 Children At Home In Elementary Or H.S. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Yes 1 280 24.2 67.5 67.5 No 5 133 11.5 32.0 99.5 D.K. 8 2 .2 .5 100.0 . 742 64.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 415 Missing cases 742 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICD11 Children At Home In University Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Yes 1 26 2.2 7.5 7.5 No 5 320 27.7 92.2 99.7 D.K. 8 1 .1 .3 100.0 . 810 70.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 347 Missing cases 810 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICD12A To What Ethnic/Cultural Group Belong-1st Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Other 0 44 3.8 4.9 4.9 Australian/NZ 1 1 .1 .1 5.0 Black/African 5 7 .6 .8 5.8 British 6 241 20.8 26.8 32.6 Chinese 7 12 1.0 1.3 34.0 Yugoslavian 8 6 .5 .7 34.6 Czech 9 1 .1 .1 34.7 Scandinavian 10 6 .5 .7 35.4 Dutch 11 16 1.4 1.8 37.2 French 14 50 4.3 5.6 42.8 German 15 28 2.4 3.1 45.9 Greek 16 6 .5 .7 46.5 Guyanese 17 1 .1 .1 46.7 Hungarian 19 4 .3 .4 47.1 Irish 20 59 5.1 6.6 53.7 Italian 21 32 2.8 3.6 57.2 Indian 22 7 .6 .8 58.0 Jamaican 24 2 .2 .2 58.2 Jewish 26 9 .8 1.0 59.2 Lebanese 28 2 .2 .2 59.5 Filipino 31 7 .6 .8 60.2 Polish 32 10 .9 1.1 61.4 Portuguese 33 9 .8 1.0 62.4 Somalian 36 1 .1 .1 62.5 Spanish 37 2 .2 .2 62.7 Sri Lankan 38 1 .1 .1 62.8 Trinidadian 39 3 .3 .3 63.1 Ukrainian 40 8 .7 .9 64.0 Native, Inuit 95 6 .5 .7 64.7 Canadian 96 265 22.9 29.5 94.2 D.K. 98 25 2.2 2.8 97.0 Refused 99 27 2.3 3.0 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICD12B To What Ethnic/Cultural Group Belong-2nd Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Other 0 8 .7 .9 .9 British 6 70 6.1 8.3 9.2 Chinese 7 1 .1 .1 9.3 Czech 9 1 .1 .1 9.5 Dutch 11 7 .6 .8 10.3 French 14 20 1.7 2.4 12.6 German 15 8 .7 .9 13.6 Hungarian 19 1 .1 .1 13.7 Irish 20 34 2.9 4.0 17.7 Italian 21 5 .4 .6 18.3 Jewish 26 1 .1 .1 18.4 Polish 32 5 .4 .6 19.0 Russian 34 1 .1 .1 19.1 Spanish 37 2 .2 .2 19.4 Ukrainian 40 5 .4 .6 20.0 Native, Inuit 95 5 .4 .6 20.6 Canadian 96 49 4.2 5.8 26.4 NoSecond Mention 97 620 53.6 73.3 99.6 D.K. 98 2 .2 .2 99.9 Refused 99 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 311 26.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 846 Missing cases 311 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICD12C To What Ethnic/Cultural Group Belong-3rd Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Other 0 2 .2 .9 .9 Black/African 5 1 .1 .5 1.4 British 6 17 1.5 7.7 9.0 Chinese 7 1 .1 .5 9.5 Czech 9 1 .1 .5 9.9 Dutch 11 1 .1 .5 10.4 French 14 2 .2 .9 11.3 German 15 4 .3 1.8 13.1 Irish 20 4 .3 1.8 14.9 Italian 21 1 .1 .5 15.3 Polish 32 2 .2 .9 16.2 Ukrainian 40 1 .1 .5 16.7 Native, Inuit 95 1 .1 .5 17.1 Canadian 96 11 1.0 5.0 22.1 No Third Mention 97 173 15.0 77.9 100.0 . 935 80.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 222 Missing cases 935 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICD12D To What Ethnic/Cultural Group Belong-4th Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Austrian 2 1 .1 2.0 2.0 British 6 4 .3 8.2 10.2 Dutch 11 2 .2 4.1 14.3 French 14 2 .2 4.1 18.4 German 15 2 .2 4.1 22.4 Native, Inuit 95 1 .1 2.0 24.5 Canadian 96 2 .2 4.1 28.6 NoFourth Mention 97 35 3.0 71.4 100.0 . 1108 95.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 49 Missing cases 1108 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PICD13 How Important Is Religion In Your Life Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Very Important 1 301 26.0 33.5 33.5 Quite Important 3 269 23.2 30.0 63.5 Not Important 5 210 18.2 23.4 86.9 NotAtAll Important 7 93 8.0 10.4 97.2 D.K. 8 18 1.6 2.0 99.2 Refused 9 7 .6 .8 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PINPORR Respondent> Pineo-Porter 1981 Category Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Self-Emp Profs 1 7 .6 .9 .9 Employed Profs 2 97 8.4 12.6 13.5 Hi-Level Managers 3 30 2.6 3.9 17.4 Semi-Profs 4 87 7.5 11.3 28.8 Technicians 5 17 1.5 2.2 31.0 Mid-Managers 6 59 5.1 7.7 38.7 Supervisors 7 44 3.8 5.7 44.4 Foremen/women 8 7 .6 .9 45.3 Sk.Clerical+Sales 9 66 5.7 8.6 53.9 Skilled Crafts 10 59 5.1 7.7 61.6 Farmers 11 8 .7 1.0 62.6 Semi-Sk.Cl.+Sales 12 100 8.6 13.0 75.7 Semi-Skilled Manual 13 34 2.9 4.4 80.1 Unsk.Cler.+Sales 14 47 4.1 6.1 86.2 Unskilled Manual 15 67 5.8 8.7 94.9 Farm Labourers 16 7 .6 .9 95.8 Student 17 1 .1 .1 96.0 Homemaker 18 11 1.0 1.4 97.4 D.K. 19 1 .1 .1 97.5 Not Codeable,NA 20 19 1.6 2.5 100.0 . 389 33.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 768 Missing cases 389 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SVS Strategic Voting Survey Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 1157 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PIC Political Ideology And Culture Survey Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 898 77.6 100.0 100.0 . 259 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 898 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SURVEY Strategic Voting or Political Ideology Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SVS Only 1 259 22.4 22.4 22.4 SVS & PIC 2 898 77.6 77.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1157 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 0 15 Jul 02 Ontario provincial election survey, 1999: political ideology Page 5 15:42:56 York/ISR ed Preceding task required 14.00 seconds CPU time; .24 seconds elapsed. 10 0 descriptives variables=idnum areacode svsdate 11 0 svsd1a to svsc3c svsage svsm16 svshhwgt pictime 12 0 picdate to picinum picd3 to picd4 picage blish81r 13 0 * write outfile='oed99outside.dat' table / idnum to survey 1,672 bytes of memory required for the DESCRIPTIVES procedure. 88 bytes have already been acquired. 1,584 bytes remain to be acquired. 15 Jul 02 Ontario provincial election survey, 1999: political ideology Page 6 15:42:56 York/ISR ed Number of valid observations (listwise) = 438.00 Valid Variable Mean Std Dev Minimum Maximum N Label IDNUM 1445.35 833.90 1 2899 1157 Respondent Identification Number AREACODE 641.31 180.15 416 905 1157 Telephone Area Code SVSDATE 54807.56 3107.08 52799 60299 1157 Date Of Interview SVSD1A 97.67 222.26 0 999 1157 Rating> Mike Harris SVSD1B 188.49 343.68 0 999 1157 Rating> Dalton McGuinty SVSD1C 248.54 394.13 0 999 1157 Rating> Howard Hampton SVSD1G 121.20 258.14 0 999 1119 Rating> Conservative Party SVSD1H 127.63 257.25 0 999 1119 Rating> Liberal Party SVSD1I 130.57 284.90 0 999 1119 Rating> New Democratic Party SVSC3A 394.78 458.52 0 999 1014 Rating> Local Conservative Candidate SVSC3B 404.73 456.22 0 999 1007 Rating> Local Liberal Candidate SVSC3C 523.67 477.69 0 999 993 Rating> Local New Democrat Candidate SVSAGE 2107.54 1099.27 1912 9999 1157 Respondent's Year Of Birth SVSM16 481.67 465.31 1 999 1157 Total Household Income SVSHHWGT 1.00 .43 .5079 3.5553 1157 Household Weight - Strategic Voting PICTIME 21.58 7.21 11 89 896 Length Of Interview PICDATE 78556.35 4816.59 72299 91499 898 Date Of Interview PICINUM 414.88 169.08 127 999 898 Interviewer's Number (# Of Interviews) PICD3 43.39 15.41 5 99 591 # Of Hours Usually Work In A Week PICD4 4850.42 2804.84 1113 9999 768 Occupation PICAGE 2035.31 801.88 1912 9999 898 Respondent's Year Of Birth BLISH81R 46.04 13.88 21.24 101.74 713 Occupation:Respondent> Blishen 1981 SES 15 Jul 02 Ontario provincial election survey, 1999: political ideology Page 7 15:42:56 York/ISR ed Preceding task required 6.00 seconds CPU time; .08 seconds elapsed. 14 0 execute Preceding task required .00 seconds CPU time; .00 seconds elapsed. 15 0 finish 15 command lines read. 0 errors detected. 1 warnings issued. 49 seconds CPU time. 1 seconds elapsed time. End of job.